Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Xenophon" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 23
Tytuł:
Ksantypa – dobra żona Sokratesa
Xanthippe – Good Wife of Socrates
Autorzy:
Marchewka, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/648686.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
wife of Socrates
Plato
Xenophon
letter from Pseudo-Xenophon
Opis:
After the death of Socrates, anecdotes and distorted stories about the philosopher’s family life and the unbearable character of his wife, Xanthippe, circulated in the general quasi literary circle. These stories were willingly read in subsequent epochs. Eventually, they preserved the model of the hellcat wife in the shape of Xanthippe, to which we still eagerly refer to. But did Socrates’ wife really deserve such a bad opinion? Is it possible for such a rating to be given by the desultory information we owe to Plato (Phaed. 60a) and Xenophon (Mem. II 2, Conv. II 10)? When attempting to defend the Xanthippe, an important source turned out to be a letter from Pseudo-Xenophon (vel Pseudo-Aeschines), which allowed us to look at the philosopher’s wife as his pupil, leading life according to Socrates’ teachings and surrounded by the care of his friends (Epist. XXI, Hercher 1873: 624).
Źródło:
Collectanea Philologica; 2018, 21; 75-86
1733-0319
2353-0901
Pojawia się w:
Collectanea Philologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Value of Opheleia in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus
Pożytek (opheleia) jako wartość etyczna w Ekonomiku Ksenofonta
Autorzy:
Tymura, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1376018.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
Sokrates, Xenophon
Oikonomikos
Nutzen
Opheleia
Wissen
Akrasia
Socrates
Xenophon
Oeconomicus
benefit
opheleia
knowledge
akrasia
Sokrates
Ksenofont
Ekonomik
pożytek
wiedza
Opis:
This article portrays the unique position occupied by the notion of benefit (opheleia) in the philosophy of Xenophon’s Socrates. Apparently, opheleia was one of Socrates’ most frequently used ethical concepts, and its particular importance was emphasized in Oeconomicus. In Xenophon’s dialogue Socrates treats benefit as a value that forms the basis for true friendship, good family relations and especially so in marriage, proper professional attitudes, and thus for all the most important interpersonal contacts. Benefit is also presented as a true spiritual value that shapes the moral behaviour of the individual toward himself and others. It holds a prime place in Socrates’s ethics. As such a value, it must, however, be based on knowledge and proper moral behavior, especially in line with the demands of enkrateia.  It can therefore be ascertained that opheleia, equated also with the good and the beautiful, is strictly tied up with the most important concepts in Socrates’ philosophy, such as  knowledge, virtue, friendship and moral education and plays a  very essential part in his considerations.
Der Artikel setzt sich zum Ziel, Opheleia von Sokrates als wesentlichen ethischen Wert im Leben des Menschen anhand des Textes Oikonomikos aufzuzeigen. Opheleia könnte als einer der von Sokrates am häufigsten verwendeten ethischen Begriffe angesehen werden, wobei sein besonderer Status im Text Oikonomikos hervorgehoben wurde. Im Dialog von Xenophon behandelt Sokrates den Nutzen als einen Wert, der der wahren Freundschaft, guten familiären Beziehungen, insbesondere den ehelichen, richtigen beruflichen Beziehungen, insgesamt den wichtigsten menschlichen Beziehungen zugrunde liegt. Er wird auch als ein wahrer spiritueller Wert dargestellt, der das moralische Verhalten des Menschen gegenüber sich selbst und gegenüber anderen prägt und damit einen führenden Platz in der sokratischen Ethik einnimmt. Als ein solcher Wert muss er jedoch auf Wissen und angemessenem moralischem Verhalten beruhen, insbesondere in Übereinstimmung mit den Geboten der Encrateia. Deswegen kann behauptet werden, dass die auch mit dem Guten und Schönen gleichgesetzte Opheleia, eng mit den wichtigsten Begriffen der Philosophie von Sokrates verbunden ist, wie Wissen, Tugend, Freundschaft und moralische Erziehung, und eine sehr wichtige Rolle in seinen Überlegungen spielt.
Celem artykułu jest ukazanie Sokratejskiej opheleia jako istotnej wartości etycznej w życiu człowieka - na podstawie tekstu Ekonomika. Można sądzić, że opheleia była jednym z najczęściej przez Sokratesa używanych pojęć etycznych, a jego szczególna pozycja  została uwypuklona w tekście Ekonomika. W dialogu Ksenofonta Sokrates traktuje pożytek jako wartość, która stanowi podstawę prawdziwej przyjaźni, dobrych relacji rodzinnych, w tym szczególnie małżeńskich, właściwych stosunków zawodowych, a więc wszystkich najważniejszych relacji międzyludzkich. Jest on równie ukazany jako prawdziwa wartość duchowa kształtująca zachowanie moralne człowieka zarówno względem samego siebie, jak i innych ludzi, zajmując tym samym czołowe miejsce w etyce Sokratejskiej. Jako taka wartość musi on być jednak oparty na wiedzy i właściwym moralnym postępowaniu, w szczególności w zgodzie z nakazami enkrateia. Dlatego można twierdzić, że opheleia, utożsamiana również z dobrem i pięknem, jest ściśle powiązana z najważniejszymi pojęciami filozofii Sokratesa, takimi jak wiedza, cnota, przyjaźń i moralne wychowanie, i odgrywa  w jego rozważaniach bardzo istotną rolę.
Źródło:
Kultura i Wartości; 2020, 30; 69-84
2299-7806
Pojawia się w:
Kultura i Wartości
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ethnographic Trailblazers: Herodotus, Thucydides and Xenophon
Autorzy:
Prus, Robert
Burk, Matthew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138659.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Ethnography
Classical Greek
Herodotus
Thucydides
Xenophon
Symbolic Interaction
Anthropology
History
Pragmatism
Generic Social Process
Opis:
While ethnographic research is often envisioned as a 19th or 20th century development in the social sciences (Wax 1971; Prus 1996), a closer examination of the classical Greek literature (circa 700-300BCE) reveals at least three authors from this era whose works have explicit and extended ethnographic qualities. Following a consideration of “what constitutes ethnographic research,” specific attention is given to the texts developed by Herodotus (c484-425BCE), Thucydides (c460-400BCE), and Xenophon (c430-340BCE). Classical Greek scholarship pertaining to the study of the human community deteriorated notably following the death of Alexander the Great (c384-323BCE) and has never been fully approximated over the intervening centuries. Thus, it is not until the 20th century that sociologists and anthropologists have more adequately rivaled the ethnographic materials developed by these early Greek scholars. Still, there is much to be learned from these earlier sources and few contemporary social scientists appear cognizant of (a) the groundbreaking nature of the works of Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon and (b) the obstacles that these earlier ethnographers faced in developing their materials. Also, lacking awareness of (c) the specific materials that these scholars developed, there is little appreciation of the particular life-worlds depicted therein or (d) the considerable value of their texts as ethnographic resources for developing more extended substantive and conceptual comparative analysis.  Providing accounts of several different peoples’ life-worlds in the eastern Mediterranean arena amidst an extended account of the development of Persia as a military power and related Persian-Greek conflicts, Herodotus (The Histories) provides Western scholars with the earliest, sustained ethnographic materials of record. Thucydides (History of the Peloponnesian War) generates an extended (20 year) and remarkably detailed account of a series of wars between Athens and Sparta and others in the broader Hellenistic theater. Xenophon’s Anabasis is a participantobserver account of a Greek military expedition into Persia. These three authors do not exhaust the ethnographic dimensions of the classical Greek literature, but they provide some particularly compelling participant observer accounts that are supplemented by observations and open-ended inquiries. Because the three authors considered here also approach the study of human behavior in ways that attest to the problematic, multiperspectival, reflective, negotiated, relational, and processual nature of human interaction, contemporary social scientists are apt to find instructive the rich array of materials and insights that these early ethnographers introduce within their texts. Still, these are substantial texts and readers are cautioned that we can do little more in the present statement than provide an introduction to these three authors and their works.
Źródło:
Qualitative Sociology Review; 2010, 6, 3; 3-28
1733-8077
Pojawia się w:
Qualitative Sociology Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wojna i religia w Anabazie Ksenofonta
War and Religion in Xenophon’s Anabasis
Autorzy:
Trzcionkowski, Lech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1964504.pdf
Data publikacji:
1993
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The paper analyzes the relations which undergo between war and religion in Xenophon’s Anabasis. An attempt has been made at a reconstruction of the peculiar ideological context of war on the basis of the speeches contained in the text. It results from this reconstruction that Xenophon takes up the battle between Greeks and Persians after the category of agon in which gods are judges at the athletic contests. The religious sense of Greek soldiers is based on a conviction that nothing can be done without the aid of gods, since they govern everything and support the pious. Cyrus’ hired troops fulfil traditional customs linked with the conducting of war. Detailed considerations lead one to verify R. Lonis’ and K. W. Pritchett’s opinions concerning this problem.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 1993, 41, 3; 69-81
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pobyt Adama Mickiewicza w Rosji w świetle Zapisków Ksenofonta Polewoja
Adam Mickiewicz’s stay in Russia in light of The Notesby Xenophon Polevoy
Autorzy:
Dąbrowska, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/482416.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
Tematy:
Xenophon Polevoy
Nikolai Polevoy
Adam Mickiewicz
Russia
Moscow
Saint Peters-burg
Konrad Wallenrod
reception
improvisation
Opis:
This paper presents The Notes (published in Saint Petersburg, 1888) by Xenophon Polevoy (1801–1867), Nikolai’s brother, from a perspective of Adam Mickiewicz’s stay in Russia. It concerns Mickiewicz’s meetings with the Russian poets (A. Pushkin, I. Kozlov and others) in 1825 and 1826, his relations with them and the reception of Crimean Sonnets and Konrad Wallenrod in Russia. Polevoy highly values the Polish poet and considers his contacts with Russians to be friendly. An interpretive background is the periodical “Moskovskij tielegraf”.
Źródło:
Acta Polono-Ruthenica; 2019, 4, XXIV; 115-126
1427-549X
Pojawia się w:
Acta Polono-Ruthenica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prodikos z Keos a Cyropedia Ksenofonta
Prodikos of Keos and Cyropedia by Xenophon
Autorzy:
Jędrzejczak, Danuta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1034499.pdf
Data publikacji:
1991
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Opis:
In her study the author tries to show the influence of philosophy of Prodikos ofKeos on the Cyropedia by Xenophon. Prodikos, a sophist, held the opinion that prowess (areté) is some knowledge which can be acquired since it is the knowledge deriving from recognition of one's ovn self, that is the human nature. The knowledge of one's own self, it is of one's nature, gives the possibility of a correct behaviour which leads to success in life and secures prosperity and comfort. Prowess is an advantage for oneself and for the others. It can be gained through hard pains and strains, but prowess once attained is not lost. Cyrus, the king of Persia, the hero of Cyropedia, was provided by Xenophon with that knowledge of oneself and of the human nature. Cyrus attained prowess due to his hard and steady work on himself, and he gained knowledge of himself and of the human nature. That deep knowledge of the human nature allowed him to win success, as a result of knowledge of the motives of human behaviour. The knowledge of human nature allowed him to anticipate human behaviour in certain conditions and in certain mental attitudes, as well as to induce certain behaviour by creating proper conditions, to gain friends and allies, to defeat enemies, to recognise properly the situation and qualities of people useful for him and advantages for him which may be brought by people of proper qualifications. The character of Cyrus is in a way a practical application of Prodikos's doctrine of prowess as a knowledge of human nature, a vivid example of the doctrine.
Źródło:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria; 1991, 31
0208-6085
Pojawia się w:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
THE TREATISE ON THE ATHENIAN CONSTITUTION (Ustrój Atenczyków i jego nieznany autor)
Autorzy:
Rodziewicz, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/702693.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
ATHENIAN CONSTITUTION
GREEK LITERATURE
PSEUDO-XENOPHON
Opis:
A translation of the work attributed to Xenophon, preceded by an introduction concentrating on the question of its authorship and the philosophical value of the work.
Źródło:
Meander; 2006, 61, 3-4; 195-212
0025-6285
Pojawia się w:
Meander
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ctesias and the Importance of His Writings Revisited
Autorzy:
Almagor, Eran
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/637962.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
Ctesias
Persica
Indica
Artaxerxes II
Xenophon
Anabasis
Greek Historiography
Photius
Plutarch
Deinon
Opis:
Following the recent attempts to rehabilitate the reputation of Ctesias and the information given in his works, this paper proposes to understand certain of the seemingly fanciful details that were associated with the physician and his writings. It tries to shed some light on several uncertainties connected with Ctesias (i.e., his sojourn in Persia) and the Persica (i.e., date, original style and sources of imagery). It argues that the pedestrian lists included in the work might have been later interpolations and that the minor works circulating under Ctesias’ name might have been either sections of the Persica that were taken out to be presented as stand-alone volumes or else falsely attributed to him. The paper addresses the Indica and puts forward several possibilities concerning its relation with the Persica. The influence of Ctesias on the author Deinon is examined, and in the appendix the impact of the Persica on Xenophon’s Anabasis is analyzed.
Źródło:
Electrum; 2012, 19; 9-40
2084-3909
Pojawia się w:
Electrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prodico al bivio. Ancora sull’antilogia
Prodicus at the Crossroads. Once Again on the Antilogy
Autorzy:
Giombini, Stefania
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938280.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Prodicus
Antilogy
Xenophon
Heracles
Horai
Sophists
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to analyze the tale of Heracles at the Crossroads, attributed to Prodicus by Socrates in Xenophon’s Memorabilia, through the notion of antilogy. The apologue has got an antilogic structure that is immediately outlined in the description of the situation in which the young Heracles finds himself. But the text, seemingly antilogic, does not develop itself according to one of the most important rules of antilogies, i.e., the epistemic parity of two speeches, since it appears to be completely in favor of just one of the theses. Prodicus would have had no interest in writing a text that did not demonstrate his rhetorical and linguistic abilities. According to this perspective, Xenophon’s version of Heracles at the Crossroads does not seem to be the original version by Prodicus, as can be seen by analyzing its structure and properties.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2017, 8, 1; 187-200
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 23

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies