Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Ustawa o ochronie zabytków" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 21
Tytuł:
Co wnosi nowego ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury i o muzeach?
Autorzy:
Malinowski, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536235.pdf
Data publikacji:
1962
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury o muzeach
radziecka uchwała o ochronie zabytków
czechosłowacka ustawa o zabytkach kultury
ochrona zabytków w Niemieckiej Republice Demokratycznej
użytkownictwo zabytków
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1962, 2; 3-10
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona powietrza ochroną zabytków
LA PROTECTION DE L’AIR CONTRE L’ IMPURIFICATION CONSTITUE L’UNE DES FORMES DE LA PROTECTION DES MONUMENTS HISTORIQUES
Autorzy:
Paździor, Marian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539134.pdf
Data publikacji:
1967
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ustawa o ochronie powietrza
szkodliwe działanie zanieczyszczonego powietrza
opady atmosferyczne zagrożeniem dla zabytków
Opis:
Le projet de la loi soumis aux débats de la Diète le 14 avril 1966 portait entre autres sur les problèmes de la contamination de l’air. Ce projet charge de responsabilité non seulement les établissements industriels mais aussi les utilisateurs des véhicules mécaniques. Parmi les régions les plus menacées, le projet mentionne les departments de Katowice et de Wrocław, ainsi que les villes: Varsovie, Cracovie, Opole, Grudziądz, Łódź. Le problème de la contamination de l’air par les véhicules mécaniques fait en ce moment l’objet d’une étude détaillée. La loi qui concerne la protection de l’air touche de près celle qui s’occupe de la protection des biens culturels et des objets de musée (du 21 février 1962). Les ensembles des monuments historiques ci-contre ont été classés parmi ceux qui présentent les plus hautes valeurs: Chełmno, Gdańsk, Frombork, Kazimierz n/Wisłą, Cracovie, Sandomierz, Toruń, Wrocław, Zamość. Or, l’analyse chimique des éléments qui entrent dans la composition de la fumée et des gaz d’échappement permet de constater leur influence néfaste sur les parements de brique et de pierre des bâtiments historiques. Il faudrait éliminer les causes de leur dégradation permanente, car le résultat des interventions conservatrices „post factum” ne donne que peu d’effet, ne serait-ce que par ex., le lavement des façades monumentales des bâtiments de Paris: le Louvre, le Panthéon, etc. Au point de vue des directives données par le service de conservation, il nous faudrait postuler: 1) des recherches approfondies sur l’influence nocive des fumées et des gaz d’échappement sur le matériel de construction dans les monuments d’architecture et de la sculpture, 2) dans les centres urbains historiques déceler les sources de l’enfumage et exiger l’investissement des dispositifs de filtration de l’air, 3) postuler la planification des objectifs industriels futurs en se concertant avec les services de conservation, 4) postuler que soit pris en considération dans les plans de la déglomération future le déplacement des objectifs industriels qui dénotent un coefficient élevé de pollution de l’air par l’enfumage et les gaz d’échappement. Exiger que leur localisation soit éloignée des ensembles et même des monuments isolée de haute valeur historique, 5) Postuler l’interdiction formelle du trafic des véhicules mécaniques munis de moteurs à combustion interne dans les centres urbains historiques. 6) Postuler l’interdiction d’une localisation des garages e t des parkings à proximité des objectifs historiques. 7) Postuler que seul le trafic des véhicules sur pneus et munis de moteurs électriques soit admis dans les centres urbains historiques.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1967, 1; 52-61
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nowa ustawa o ochronie zabytków w Niemieckiej Republice Demokratycznej
A NEW LAW CONCERNING HISTORICAL MONUMENTS PROTECTION IN GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
Autorzy:
Malinowski, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537565.pdf
Data publikacji:
1976
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
„Prawo o Opiece nad Zabytkami”
ustawa o ochronie zabytków w NRD
polityczna ustawa o ochronie zabytków w NRD
Opis:
The present article deals with the „Law concerning Historical Monuments Protection” enacted in GDR in June, 1975, and replacing the one from 1961. Although the new Law refers in many respects to the old one, it also contains elements completely new and consequently it extends and consolidates the system of historical monuments protection in GDR. It includes, among others, a clause which gives significance to monument connected with German international and workers’ movement. It also says th a t all administration authorities as well as social organizations should be made responsible for historical monuments protection and all historical monuments should be accounted for in the central register. The Law states clearly th a t historical monuments protection should be included in the national plan for economic development; it also promotes the Institute of Historical Monuments Protection which is to initiate various forms of protection and utilization of monuments. A novelty of greatest importance was to appoint the Cabinet a body of control and to make it responsible for monuments protection. Allocation of funds to historical monuments protection is also considered to be of great significance. The new Law will most probably be followed by due executive decisions.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1976, 3; 208-210
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
W sprawie nowelizacji "Ustawy o ochronie dóbr kultury i o muzeach"
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT TO THE LAW ON PROTECTION OF CULTURAL GOODS AND MUSEUM PRACTICE
Autorzy:
Pawłowski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539084.pdf
Data publikacji:
1976
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury i muzeach
nowelizacja ustawy o ochronie dóbr kultury
zabytki w rękach prywatnych
dotacja na roboty konserwatorskie
społeczny opiekun zabytków
Opis:
The author, dealing for several dozen years past with social protection of historical monuments, discusses the legal aspect of monument protection against the background of the relevant Law of 1962. What is tackled in greater detail is the question of the possibilities of saving monuments which are privater or social property. Stress is laid on lack of coordination between the provisinons of the Law and those binding on other ministries and bodies liable to command of historical buildings and monuments (e.g. the Ministry of Agriculture). A postulate is made for incorporating in the Law of a more explicit ban on building work being conducted on the area of, or within, historical monuments without the permission of the Head of the Voivodship Conservator’s Office. The final part of the article is devoted to the importance of, and the part played by, social coustodians of monuments who encounter in their work lack o f understanding on the part of the local authorities and users of historical buildings as well as other monuments. The author concludes in a postulate for amending the Law of 1962 in regard to all the questions raised in his article.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1976, 4; 295-297
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Z problematyki ochrony zabytków architektury i budownictwa w Holandii
SOME PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH PRESERVATION OF MONUMENTS IN THE NETHERLANDS
Autorzy:
Kornecki, Marian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537453.pdf
Data publikacji:
1976
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona zabytków w Holandii
holenderska ustawa o ochronie zabytków
wiatraki holenderskie
zespół staromiejski Amsterdamu
historia rozbudowy Amsterdamu
ochrona holenderskich wiatraków
Opis:
In the Netherlands conservation tendencies include at present: — composite preservation of monumental complexes, — reconstruction of historical forms and detail on the basis of thorough historical records, — preservation of folk architecture and technological monuments (windmills). To the monuments registered in Amsterdam belong 6743 objects (the number of 1969) th a t is to say 17% of monuments all over the country. Nowadays active preservation of monuments is realised and coordinated by the Municipal Bureau for Conservation (Gemeentelijk Bureau Monumentenzorg). Achievements of the Bureau, which has been active for twenty years now, are grand: With the cons tarnt increase of means 1636 objects have been put under protection and the expenses, have exceeded 220 million guldens by now. The most urgent task was to protect rows of houses imperilled by unfavourable local conditions (moisture and small stability of the soil). In these circumstances it was impossible to save all the buildings; some details from the lost objects reinforced lapidarium exposures under creation. This was followed by restoration of historical and artistic values to the transformed buildings. Some attempts of experimental treatments were also made, as during the process of adaptations of the old St. Lucia convent to the Amsterdam City Museum, when the old-town lane was covered with a glazed roofing to form a sort of passage assigned for museum exposition. For many ages water was pumped out of flood-lands with the help of windmills, which have by now become insęperable element of the Dutch landscape. P re viously wind energy was applicable literally in all branches of industry, which led to extra-ordinary development and improvement of windmills. Present system atics establishes the typology of these objects — it is based on the distinction between functions, constructions and architectural forms. Intensive preservation of windmills has resulted from their rapid destruction since the second half of the 19th century. At the beginning of the 19th century there were about 11 thousand windmills, at present the stock- taking list includes only 958 of them (the number of 1971). Apart from the efforts made by many special public societies, the campaign under the slogan „Vochten voor windmolen” has been entered upon by the S tate authorities. It is based on special regulations that stipulate the possibility to subsidize works at windmills. In every case, the State provides owners with subsidies to the amount of 40% of the repa ir expenses, but this aid is given except to those whose windmills ai e designed for other purposes. More complex is the question of polder landscape protection. Here a windmill is only one of the elements of multi-problem engineering assumption. The reservation in Kinderdijk near Rotterdam (19 windmills) and the complex in the Zaandam district have been already organized. We hope that the Unique Dutch landscape will be prese rved not only in the masterpiece pictures of old painting masters, but also in nature. The author feels obliged to thank Prof. dr. C. A. van Swigchem, the director of Rijksdienst voor Monumentenzorg for a very good arrangement of his visit to the Netherlands in 1973. He also expresses his hea rt-felt thanks to Mr. A. P. Srnaal of Afdeling Voorlichting, Rijksdienst voor de Monumentenzorg in Zeisl and Mr. W. Timp, the conservator of the Gemeentelijk Bureau voor Monumentenzorg in Amsterdam.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1976, 1; 43-55
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona środowiska ochroną zabytków?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION — A SYNONYM OF THE PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS?
Autorzy:
Paździor, Marian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535652.pdf
Data publikacji:
1977
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ustawa o ochronie środowiska
ochrona przyrody
środowisko
Opis:
The author deals with the draft law on environmental protection, the problem being approached from the viewpoint o f the Law ou Protection o f Cultural Goods and on Museums, promulgated in 1962. The article begins with the statement that no specialist in the protection of historical monuments was invited to give consultation on the said draft. Neither was the Law o f 1962 duly taken into consideration. The contents of the new bill discussed in greater detail, the author determines his position on various-questions tackled therein and points out to the items which should refer to the historical monuments making the elements o f landscape. This applies i.a. to the definitions o f natural environment and protected landscape areas. The author points out as well to the lack in the draft law of qualifications pertaining to be the parks and cemeteries in the countryside which are protected as historical objects and whose management should meet the requirements of the Law on the Protection o f Cultural Goods. What is extremely essential is proper determination by the draft o f the principles of cooperation between the Head o f the Voivodship Office for the Protection of Natural Environment and the Voivodship Conservator of Historical Monuments. The author concludes his deliberations' in the statement that the draft law discussed is not ripe as yet for being passed and put into effect.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1977, 3-4; 112-117
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ustawa Związku Socjalistycznych Republik Radzieckich o ochronie i wykorzystaniu zabytków historii i kultury
THE RESOLUTION OF THE UNION OF THE SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON THE PROTECTION AND USE OF HISTORIC AND CULTURAL MONUMENTS
Autorzy:
Malinowski, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536062.pdf
Data publikacji:
1978
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Jarosław Wojciechowski
dekret Rady Regencyjnej o opiece nad zabytkami
ochrona zabytków w ZSRR
ustawa o ochronie zabytków kultury w ZSRR
Państwowa ewidencja zabytków historii i kultury ZSRR
wykorzystanie zabytków w ZSRR
Opis:
The autors makes a comparative study of two documents on the protection o f historic monuments, namely the Resolution of the Council o f Ministers o f 1976 and that o f 1948. According to the author, the 1948 Resolution contained the most important postulates on conservation and museums but it involved too many organizations in the protection o f historic monuments. Besides, the 1948 Resolution did not specify the age o f protected monuments and did not contain penalty clauses. A new Resolution o f 29.10.1976, thoroughly discussed by the author, is in principle based on the 1948 Resolution. In his appraisal of the Resolution the author says that it introduces many new postulates and attaches an utmost importance to the question o f the protection o f historic monuments as the supreme body is here the Council of Ministers o f the USSR. The Resolution enlarges a list of monuments under protection (landscape, reservations, etc.). The problem of financing the monuments is solved in such a way that the user of a given historic building pays a rent for it which in turn is used to finance works on other historic objects. A great emphasis is put also on keeping records of historic monuments and on the responsibility o f administrative authorities for their protection. One of the chapters deals with penalties. Summing up, the Soviet Resolution o f 1976 is a legal document based on a traditional system o f the protection of historic monuments, but re-thought and uptodated.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1978, 3; 155-160
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zabytki w kompetencji samorządów?
Historical Monuments in the Competence of Self-governments?
Autorzy:
Makowiecki, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537683.pdf
Data publikacji:
2001
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
dobra kultury
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury
obowiązki i prawa samorządów wobec zabytków
zadania gmin wobec zabytków
samorządy a zabytki
analiza stanu prawnego ochrony zabytków
Opis:
In the face of the progressing transference of rights and duties to self-governments we may expect that soon they latter will be burdened with greater privileges are regards undertakings connected with the protection of historical monuments. The author underlines that this process calls for flexibility: it is impossible to ascribe identical tasks to all self-governments. The range of the rights and duties of particular self-governments should stem from their staff and financial potential as well as the degree of familiarity with cultural property in a given area. With few exceptions (the largest cities) the preparation of self-governments for a proper realisation of tasks must take years, and a one-time introduction of a uniform system of obligations on a national scale would be highly unsuitable. It is important that the right to decide about historical monuments be given to qualified persons and not to offices.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2001, 2; 175-177
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona dziedzictwa przyrody na przykładzie zbiorów paleontologicznych z doliny Świśliny
The Protection of Natural Heritage upon the Example of Palaeonthological Collections from the Świślina Valley
Autorzy:
Rdzanek, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535738.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona dziedzictwa przyrody
zbiory paleontologiczne z doliny Świśliny
dolina Świśliny
„Zbiory z Wiór”
prawne aspekty ochrony zabytków paleontologicznych
ochrona zabytków paleontologicznych
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury
skamieniałości
muzeum paleontologiczne w dolinie Świśliny
Opis:
The palaeonthological collections (220 tons) from the valley of the Świślina, amassed by the author, became a testing field for the state of the protection of natural monuments in Poland at the turn of the century. Legally, such monuments are considered cultural property. Recently, we have witnessed the emergence of new trends in their protection. On the one hand, interest in economic and tourist values has been shown by county self-governments, while on the other hand local communities have disclosed great concern for natural heritage and its exploitation for the promotion of the region. Events on the Świślina have rendered aware the newly established county authorities that their tasks involve care for the cultural and economic development of all communes comprising the county, and that shifting monuments from those communes to the seat of the county authorities results in alienation from the natural environment and the loss of tourist attraction. At the same time, it became apparent that self-government authorities are unprepared to embark upon conservation efforts, and th a t the transference of such tasks to the self-government requires extremely thorough deliberations and supervision, since it could lead to the devastation of the monuments.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 2; 224-237
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zniszczenie stanowiska archeologicznego w świetle obowiązującego prawa oraz działań prokuratury i sądu
The Destruction of an Archaeological Site in the Light of Binding Law and the Activity of the Prosecutors Office and Courts
Autorzy:
Wysocki, Jacek
Górny, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538013.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
zniszczenie stanowiska archeologicznego
w świetle obowiązującego prawa
przestępstwo zniszczenia stanowiska archeologicznego
prawo o ochronie zabytków
przepisy prawa o ochronie dóbr kultury
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury
nawarstwienia kulturowe w świetle prawa
wpisanie nawarstwień kulturowych do rejestru zabytków
podstawa prawna ścigania sprawców zniszczeń stanowisk archeologicznych
Opis:
The destruction of an archaeological site is a crime defined in article 288 § 1 of the penal code in connection with article 294 § 2 of the penal code. Albeit both regulations do not make direct mention of an archaeological site or monument, the formulation about “property of particular significance for culture” is interpreted by the prosecutor’s office and courts as a registered historical monument. Experiences of the conservation services in the voivodeship of Varmia and Mazuria show that despite the conviction universally shared by conservators about the ineffectual persecution of felons guilty of incurring damage to archeological sites, successes in this field are possible. In the mentioned voivodeship eight such cases were tried in the years 2000-2002, and all ended with sentences. Nonetheless, the process of attaining success involves many factors which, as long as they are skillfully exploited, may comprise excellent weapons in the battle waged against dishonest investors or persons digging for the purpose of obtaining metal monuments. One of the fundamental premises is the active p a rticipation of conservation services, the provision of information about the committed felony and witnesses testimony or participation as an auxiliary prosecutor during the court trial; determination and consistency are also of great importance. It is insufficient to merely inform about a crime nor is it possible to resign from the possibility of filing a complaint or an appeal in a situation when the prosecutor’s office or court discontinue legal proceedings or adjudicate the slight social harm of the deed and the perpetrator remains unpunished. As a rule, such situations are linked with a misunderstanding of the specificity of archaeological heritage on the part of the administration of justice. Another prominent factor of decisive importance in cases of this kind involves registering historical monuments. Apparently, only registered archaeological sites can be recognised as property of particular importance for culture. The conclusions stemming from cases concerning the destruction of archaeological sites are as follows: 1. effective activity starts not in court or the prosecutor’s office but already at the stage of ordinary administrative work — decisions to register historical monuments, properly conducted coordination of investments, etc.; 2. the specificity of archaeological heritage is, as a rule, unknown to prosecutors and judges, and thus eventual success depends predominantly upon the active participation of the conservation services at all stages of procedure in the prosecutor’s office and court; 3. the more frequently are such cases reported to the organs of persecution, the more often will they have their finale in court and the easier will it be to penalise the perpetrators.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 2; 217-223
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
PRAWNOKARNE ASPEKTY OCHRONY DÓBR KULTURY REFLEKSJE NA TLE ZMIANY STANU PRAWNEGO
PENAL LAW ASPECTS OF THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY. REFLECTIONS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF AN ALTERED LEGAL STATE
Autorzy:
Chlebowicz, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536091.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona zabytków
pojęcie zabytku
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury
Opis:
Despite the fact that the legal aspects of the protection of historical monuments comprise a separate and interesting domain, they remain on the peripheries of Polish legal sciences. The presented sketch deals with assorted problems of the protection of historical monuments perceived from the perspective of penal law. Apparently, the implementation of the statute of 23 July 2003 on the protection of, and care for historical monuments constitutes a convenient pretext for a survey of penal law institutions. The “new” statute appears to be better than its predecessor, i. e. the statute on the protection of cultural property; the same holds true for its penal elements, and the clarity of legal language deserves particular attention. The copious article 3 of the statute, which contains as many as 15 legal definitions, should considerably facilitate the application of the regulations of this normative act which, after al,l is a basic source of the rights and duties of the owners of historical monuments. An indubitable novelty is article 108 of the statute which re-introduces the misdemeanour of destroying or damaging a historical monument. It should be kept in mind that up to now the conservation services applied a legal foundation composed of article 288 paragraph 1 of the penal code, in connection with article 294 paragraph 3 of the penal code. The mentioned foundation of the charge produced numerous problems associated with its interpretation. After all, not every historical monument constitutes property of particular significance for culture. Moreover, penal cases concerning historical monuments are rather rarely encountered. The described construction was successfully applied in cases of the devastation of archaeological sites in the voivodeship of Warmia- Mazuria. A penal-legal analysis of the protection of cultural property should draw attention to the statutory symptoms of misdemeanours which occur in great numbers in the penal regulations of the statute. Taking into consideration the subjective criteria, the misdeeds are divided into two groups : the first encompasses regulations concerning everyone, and thus each person may become a subject of the misdemeanour, while the second deals only with the owners of historical objects. Essential significance is ascribed to the norms expressed in article 109 of the statute penalising the behaviour of the owner who has ignored securing the object. Finally, it is also worth indicating the executive regulations which define the manner of protecting the historical object. The sociological premise of the effectiveness of the regulations is the legal awareness of the addressees of the norms. Unfortunately, the level of the legal culture of Polish society is far from desired. This question remains particularly topical within the realm of the protection of national heritage.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2003, 3-4; 122-126
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
SYTUACJA PRAWNA WŁAŚCICIELI OBIEKTÓW ZABYTKOWYCH
THE LEGAL SITUATION OF OWNERS OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS
Autorzy:
Chlebowicz, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538366.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ustawa o ochronie zabytków
prawa właścicieli obiektów zabytkowych
obowiązki właścicieli obiektów zabytkowych
sytuacja prawna
nadzór konserwatorski
Opis:
The statute of 23 July 2003 about the protection of, and care for historical monuments essentially modified a number of heretofore legal institutions, thus affecting the legal position held by the owners of historical objects. The prime jurisdictional elements which exert greatest impact on the legal status of the owner include conservation directives and supervision, penal regulations, and the obligation to obtain numerous permissions. A prime feature which to a considerable measure shapes the legal situation of the owners of historical monuments is the asymmetry of legal relations, expressed predominantly in the fact that the state, represented by the conservation services, can intervene into the owners’ legal status. A distinct rise in the control privileges of the conservation offices justifies the thesis that such services are gradually evolving towards becoming a historical monuments police force. The expanded control system is not accompanied by regulations that balance numerous burdens associated with the possession of a historical monument. Attention is due to the construction of real estate tax exemption, a reduction of fees associated with the purchase of registered real estate and, finally, the possibility of obtaining a donation.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2004, 1-2; 124-127
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
REKLAMA NA ZABYTKACH
ADVERTISEMENTS ON HISTORIC SITES
Autorzy:
Sławomirska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535376.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
reklama
reklama za zabytkach
reklama stała
reklama czasowa
ustawa o ochronie zabytków
ustawa o drogach publicznych
Prawo budowlane
Opis:
Advertisements accompany us in everyday life, and interfere in many spheres of our activities. They appear in means of mass communication, the Internet and on all kinds of buildings, including historic ones. The advertisements that are placed on historic buildings may be divided into two groups: permanent and temporary. Permanent advertisements (signs, neon signs, semaphores and so forth), which depict company logos, are currently an inseparable part of most historic Old Towns in Poland. Temporary advertisements, put up on historic sites during renovation periods, appear on tarpaulins that cover scaffolding. In Poland, the affixing of advertisements on registered historic sites is subject to particularly restrictive laws. This issue is regulated by a number of legal statutes, of which the most important is the statute protecting historic sites and regulating the maintenance of historic sites. The remaining statutes regarding this matter are the law from the 21st of March, 1985, regarding public roads and the law from the 7th of July, 1994, regarding building law. In the event an advertisement is hung on a registered historic site without permission, or if it is at odds with the conditions stated by law, the voivodeship’s conservator may issue a decision requiring that the historic site be returned to its previous state or that the site be reorganized within an established period of time. Independent of issuing orders, the voivodeship conservator is obliged to file a lawsuit in order to fine the party which affixed an advertisement to a historic site without permission. In practice, however, many advertisements are put up which are not in conformity with the law. Given this state of events, conservators do not manage to fulfill their duties when the binding regulations prevent quick and effective enforcement of the obligations required of the owners and users of historic sites. There are a few possibilities for fighting against advertising lawlessness. Above all, quick and unavoidable legal action is needed: in order to main consistency in the protection of historic sites, strict discipline should be upheld in ordering the immediate removal of advertisements from historic sites. Legal protection should also be extended to those historic sites which are not registered, and require that those who intend to place advertisements near historic sites receive suitable permission from conservator services. Nowadays, the sight of a historic building hung with advertisements is no surprise, though the legitimacy of this type of marketing arouses controversy, particularly in the context of large-format advertisements. Supporters of advertisements raise the point that money received from sponsors often means salvation for historic sites that are falling into ruin. Opponents are of the opinion that advertisements “disfigure” historic sites and prevent them from being viewed in their entirety. In seeking a solution to this problem, the arguments of both sides should be taken into account.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2005, 2; 75-88
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
WOKÓŁ DEFINICJI ZABYTKU ARCHEOLOGICZNEGO
ON THE DEFINITION OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENT
Autorzy:
Trzciński, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535629.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
zabytek archeologiczny
wykopaliska
ustawa o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami
Opis:
The binding statute of 23 July 2003 on the protection and care of historical monuments was the first Polish legal regulation relating to the protection of the national heritage to introduce the concept of the archaeological monument. Its pre-war predecessors and the statute on the protection of cultural property from 1962 consistently used the terms “excavations” or “findings”. The introduced division of monuments into mobile, immobile and archaeological (the latter are also classified as mobile and immobile) constitutes irrefutable proof that the object under protection has become more extensive and concrete. New systemic, economic and legal conditions have become the reason why the scale of threats to archaeological heritage grew rapidly already at the onset of the 1990s. The solutions introduced into the statute, concerning the protection of archaeological monuments, imposedcivic duties whose neglect is now threatened with penalaccountability. From the viewpoint of the almost five years-long existence of the statute on monuments it has become apparent that the application of its regulations can be problematical. Reservations are formulated not only by bodies using this law in their decision-making process but also those involved in combating and preventing crimes committed against monuments (the police force, border guards, customs services). Fundamental doubts are produced by an interpretation of the definition of the historical monument and its classified form, i.e. the archaeological monument. Attention is also drawn to the fact that the range of the definition of the archaeological object has been delineated much too generally, which makes it possible to classify, for instance, an item originating from the early twentieth century as an archaeological monument. Indubitably, the clarity and acuteness of the definition are closely associated with legal consequences pertaining to, e.g. , awarding a person who had discovered an archaeological monument or punishment for damaging or appropriating it. It is high time, therefore, to answer whether the binding definition should be modified, and if so, then to what extent. It seems that this question should be addressed to archaeologists, since in the course of the past decade the range of the interests of contemporary archaeology has changed due to the development of large municipal agglomerations and the construction of roads and highways, always accompanied by archaeological investigations. A discussion on the definition of the archaeological monument is also directly connected with the increasingly universal search for monuments, conducted across the country.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2007, 4; 111-117
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona zabytków i organizacja urzędów konserwatorskich w Polsce okresu międzywojennego (na przykładzie woj. pomorskiego) a unormowania Ustawy z dn. 23 VII 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami
Monument protection and organisation of conservation offices during the interwar period in Poland (on the example of Pomeranian Voivodeship) and the norms in the Act from 23 July 2003 concerning monument protection and care for monuments
Autorzy:
Zimna-Kawecka, K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/217540.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Konserwatorów Zabytków
Tematy:
ustawa
prawo
ochrona zabytków
opieka nad zabytkami
act
monument protection
care of monument
Opis:
W artykule podjęto próbę przybliżenia problematyki ochrony zabytków w okresie międzywojennym w Polsce, wraz z organizacją i kompetencjami urzędów konserwatorskich i skonfrontowania z obecnie funkcjonującym w Polsce systemem prawnym. Reguluje go ustawa o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami z dn. 23 VII 2003 r. Organizacja urzędów konserwatorskich w obu omówionych okresach i zakres kompetencji poszczególnych organów związanych z ochroną zabytków posiadają wiele analogii, mimo kilkudziesięcioletniego przedziału czasowego, jakie je dzieli. Dekretem Rady Regencyjnej z 1918 r., a następnie Rozporządzeniem Prezydenta RP z dn. 6 III 1928 r. powołano okręgowych konserwatorów zabytków, którzy zostali włączeni w skład wojewódzkich urzędów, jako fachowi funkcjonariusze do spraw opieki nad zabytkami. Specyficzny status obecnych wojewódzkich konserwatorów podlegających organizacyjnie wojewodzie, a zarazem będących organem zespolonej administracji rządowej w województwie, jest rozwinięciem zasady ukształtowania struktury urzędowej w okresie międzywojennym. Oczywiście nie należy sądzić, że obecnie obowiązująca ustawa o ochronie zabytków pomijając doświadczenia kolejnych kilkudziesięciu lat XX w., czerpie wyłącznie bezpośrednio z ustawodawstwa okresu międzywojennego. Uwidacznia się tu zwłaszcza różnica w polityce administracyjnej państwa zmierzającej do decentralizacji, co widać w przekazaniu właściwości wojewódzkiego konserwatora zabytków jednostkom samorządowym. Ale i w tym wypadku takie przekazanie właściwości odnajdujemy już w okólniku wojewody z 1935 r. Warto zatem uzmysłowić sobie, że dokonania polskiej państwowej ochrony zabytków w latach dwudziestych zeszłego stulecia nie straciły na aktualności u progu XXI wieku. Współczesne konserwatorstwo kontynuuje i twórczo wykorzystuje myśl, doktryny i praktyki przedwojenne.
The article attempts to popularise the issue of monument protection during the interwar period in Poland, with the organisation and competence of conservation offices, and to confront it with the legal system currently functioning in Poland which is regulated by the Ancient Monuments Protection and Preservation Act from July 23, 2003. Organisation of conservation offices in both discussed periods and the competence range of particular bodies associated with monument protection display numerous analogies despite the several decades that separate them. By the Decree of the Regency Council in 1918, and then the Regulation of the President of the Republic of Poland issued on March 6, 1928, regional monument conservators were appointed, who became members of voivodeship offices as professional officials to deal with issues concerning monument protection. The specific status of the present voivodeship monument conservators organisationally subordinate to the voivode, and at the same time being a body representing united government administration in the voivodeship, is a continuation of the principle of forming official structures during the interwar period. Naturally it should not be assumed that the currently binding legal Act concerning monument protection draws directly and exclusively from the legislature of the interwar period, ignoring the experience of the following decades of the 20th century. There is a clearly visible difference in the administrative policy of the state directed at decentralisation, which was noticeable when the rights of a Voivodeship Monuments Conservator were ceded onto local authority units. But even in this case such cession of rights can be found in the circular of the voivode from 1935. It is worth realizing that the achievements of Polish state monument protection service from the 1920s lost none of their relevance on the threshold of the 21st century. Present-day conservation services continue and creatively use the thought, doctrines and practices from the pre-war period.
Źródło:
Wiadomości Konserwatorskie; 2010, 27; 123-144
0860-2395
2544-8870
Pojawia się w:
Wiadomości Konserwatorskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 21

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies