Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Simon, Cordula" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
„Österreichische“ und andere Ironie in den Texten von Olga Flor, Teresa Präauer und Cordula Simon
“AUSTRIAN” AND OTHER IRONY IN THE FICTION BY OLGA FLOR, TERESA PRÄAUER AND CORDULA SIMON
Autorzy:
Kupczyńska, Kalina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/910296.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-04-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
contemporary Austrian novel
irony
Opis:
Den Ausgangspunkt für den Artikel bildet die Aussage von Kathrin Röggla, derzufolge „Was in Österreich – nicht nur in der Literatur – Tradition hat, ist Ironie“. Den Gegenstand der Untersuchung bilden Ironie-Konzepte in drei Romanen der österreichischen Autorinnen der Gegenwart Olga Flor, Teresa Präauer, Cordula Simon. Die Fragestellung ist auf die spezifisch „österreichische“ Ironie ausgerichtet, die, so die These, eine besondere Form der Auseinandersetzung mit aktuellen sozialen und politischen Themenkomplexen darstellt.
“There is a tradition of irony in Austria, not only in literature”, said Kathrin Röggla in an interview in 2012; my article considers the assertion as a starting point to an analysis of three novels by contemporary Austrian women authors Flor, Präauer and Simon. The aim is to examine the different patterns of irony by Flor, Präauer and Simon in order to assess what the “Austrian” concept of irony can mean today. Furthermore, I would like to consider the „Austrian“ irony as a specific Austrian cue to express involvement in current political matters.
Źródło:
Studia Germanica Posnaniensia; 2019, 40; 21-36
0137-2467
Pojawia się w:
Studia Germanica Posnaniensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Deconstructionism And Language Shift – The Scientific Troubles Of Political Correctness
Autorzy:
Simon, Cordula
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/526482.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Univerzita sv. Cyrila a Metoda. Fakulta masmediálnej komunikácie
Tematy:
Deconstructionism
Language shift. Overview
Political correctness
Neo-Whorfianism
Euphemism treadmill
Opis:
Deconstructionism teaches us, that power lies within language, or rather that power decides, what language is supposed to mean. The old question asked in Alice in Wonderland: „Who decides, what words mean?“ builds up to the discrepancy in any language between the individual speaker’s intention and his or her position in the political power hierarchy. In recent decades calls for a more humane language have arisen, giving birth to movements of political correctness in the Western hemisphere, making it an issue of globalisation being fairly paired with left-wing ideology, making everyday conversation a subject of critique, calling for normative changes in language and ultimately facing the same question everywhere: Does it in fact help? This paper will shed light on the empirical linguistic knowledge we possess on the connection between form and content, going back to De Saussure and following the discourse of language and power in an historical manner, thus taking a hard look at the theoretical background of the dynamics of power and language, building a chronology of deconstructivist theorists like Derrida, Foucault, Bourdieu, and Barthes. These theories will be paralleled with the so-called linguistic turn from its beginning to the nowadays so popular Neo-Whorfian approach. Finally the deconstructivist method will be put in contrast to what we know about the connection between language on action following John Austin, circling back to the postmodern discursive approach known in everyday life: The language policing of everyday conversations by individual speakers, representing the deconstructivist movement, comparing it to the empirical data about language and culture, the named and the unnamed, empowerment and the mechanics of language shifting that were subject to studies already more than a hundred years ago, focusing on the shift of meaning and tabooing of vocabulary, dissecting what critics of political correctness call the „euphemism treadmill“, building up to the effects of political correctness we have come to experience so far. The goal is to finally answer the question, whether language policing and the growing public attention to the use of language do have an egalitarian effect on reality.
Źródło:
Media Literacy and Academic Research; 2020, 1; 46-56
2585-8726
Pojawia się w:
Media Literacy and Academic Research
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies