Wszystkie pola: Piegdoń, Maciej - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Umbria i jej mieszkańcy wobec ekspansji rzymskiej w IV–II wieku p.n.e.
Autorzy:: Piegdoń, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640547.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:: Umbria, Umbrians, Roman Republic, Roman Expansion, Colonisation, Roman Conquest
Opis:: Umbria and Umbrians’ attitude towards the Roman expansion in 4th–2nd century BCE This article is an attempt to present the role of the Roman Republic’s policies towards Umbrian tribes (in 4th–2nd century BCE) and show the effects of those policies. Umbria was initially an area inhabited by a mosaic of Umbrian’s tribes representing various levels of development. The policy of first conquering and then subordinating this area, as well as the powerful influence of Roman law, ideas, and cultural models, indicates not only the great military might of republican Rome but also the attractiveness of its civilization. Rome’s effectiveness resulted mainly from the fact that its actions complemented each other. After victorious military operations, or sometimes simultaneously with those operations, came settlement campaigns (colonies: Narnia, Interamna Nahars, Spoletium etc.) Rome was also a master of diplomacy. It mollified its recent enemies by concluding alliances (foederae with Camerinum, Ocriculum etc.) that created a system of friendly state and tribal organisms and enabled its citizens to live peaceably on the conquered territories. All these actions made it possible to subordinate the region, make the Roman presence permanent, and effectively repulse the invaders (Hannibal and his brother – Hasdrubal during the Second Punic War). The intensified settlement policy in Umbria and the expansion of its infrastructure (roads), facilitated economic contacts between Roman settlements and the centers of the subjugated, allied native tribes.
Źródło:: Prace Historyczne; 2013, 140, 2
0083-4351
Pojawia się w:: Prace Historyczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Roman Arbitration in the Greek Oikumene in the Third–Second Century BCE: Some Observations
Autorzy:: Piegdoń, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/52229494.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2018
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:: Arbitratio
Roman Republic
Hellenistic world
mediation
Opis:: Rome’s expansion in the Hellenistic world had an impact on the use of various instruments of diplomacy by the Romans, including arbitration, commonly used by and popular among the Greeks. The Romans did not have the desire to become arbitrators of the Greek world, but it was important to them to take advantage of the situation they encountered there and to achieve their goals. The Greeks, who had been used to employing various, more or less sophisticated, diplomatic instruments, saw the Roman Republic, a new player in their world, in the same way as the other large and mighty powers which could be appealed to as arbitrators. Rome did not become an arbitrator in Greek matters of its own will, but due to the fact that the Greek world itself appointed it to this role when it replaced the Hellenistic monarchies. The Romans became involved in solving disputes in the Greek world only when they had to. Despite being offered this role, the Senate had no intention of being an “arbitration court” for the conflicted Greek states. Roman arbitrators acted on the basis of the authority given to them by the Senate (senatus consulta), which fi rst became familiar with the cause of the dispute. Disputes were usually solved by Roman officials (proconsul, governor) or specially delegated legates and decemviri with prepared instructions which gave them the authority to solve the matter on the spot and to enforce the decisions they made. The procedure applied both to the Greek world and to the western part of the Mediterranean Sea, where Rome held power (North Africa, Italy). However, what differentiated the arbitration in Italy and the western part of Rome’s dominion from the one in the Greek world was the Republic appointing other Greek states (poleis or leagues) to arbitrate on its behalf. When deciding to arbitrate, the Romans were usually not interested in the history of the dispute, but solved the disagreement or conflict on the basis of the status quo, without going into the details of who had been right previously. This was different from the rules of arbitration in the Greek world, where earlier mediation was taken into consideration. Perhaps this was a result of the difference between the Roman and the Greek worlds in terms of property right. The Roman law of property had an important distinction between legal ownership of a thing (dominium or proprietas), called property right, and the actual possession of a thing (possessio). For the Republic, this approach made it easier to side with their allies participating in a dispute, even if they were wrong. This attitude mainly protected the interests of the allied state, unless it was beneficial to Rome to act against them.
Źródło:: Electrum; 2018, 25; 27-46
1897-3426
2084-3909
Pojawia się w:: Electrum
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: J. Alison Rosenblitt, Rome after Sulla, Bloomsbury Publishing (Bloomsbury Academic), London–New York–Oxford–New Delhi–Sydney 2019, 220 pp., ISBN 978-1-4725-8057-3
Autorzy:: Piegdoń, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/52229522.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Źródło:: Electrum; 2019, 26; 219-221
1897-3426
2084-3909
Pojawia się w:: Electrum
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Gwynaeth McIntyre, Sarah McCallum (eds.), Uncovering Anna Perenna: A Focused Study of Roman Myth and Culture, (Bloomsbury Classical Studies Monographs), Bloomsbury Academic, London–New York–Oxford–New Delhi–Sydney 2019, 242 pp.; ISBN 978-1-3500-4843-0
Autorzy:: Piegdoń, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/52391973.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Źródło:: Electrum; 2020, 27; 221-224
1897-3426
2084-3909
Pojawia się w:: Electrum
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Coloniam deducere. Colonisation as an Instrument of the Roman Policy of Domination in Italy in the 3rd and 2nd Centuries BC, as Illustrated by Settlements in the Ager Gallicus and Picenum
Autorzy:: Piegdoń, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/637970.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:: Roman colonisation
Roman Republic
Ager Gallicus
Picenum
Roman conquest
Opis:: This article is an attempt to present the role of colonisation in the Roman policy of expansion towards its Italian neighbours in the 3rd–2nd BCE and showing the effects of this phenomenon, as illustrated by settlements in the Ager Gallicus and Picenum. Information on the founded colonies in sources, appearing somewhat on the margins of accounts of military activities and diplomatic missions in Italy (foedera), but also connected with the internal policy conducted by Rome (grants of land), may indicate that colonisation complemented such activities. This complementary character of the process of colonisation in relation to other political, military, diplomatic, and internal activities seems to be an important feature of the Republic’s activities.
Źródło:: Electrum; 2013, 20; 117-141
2084-3909
Pojawia się w:: Electrum
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Karl-Joachim Hölkeskamp, Sema Karataş, Roman Roth (eds.), Empire, Hegemony or Anarchy? Rome and Italy, 201–31 BCE, (Ancient History), Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2019, 259 pp., ISBN 978-3-515-11524-7
Autorzy:: Piegdoń, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/52401909.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2022
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Źródło:: Electrum; 2022, 29; 345-346
1897-3426
2084-3909
Pojawia się w:: Electrum
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Romanizacja, kreolizacja, globalizacja, tożsamość czy też „stawanie się Rzymianinem”? Kolonialne i postkolonialne spojrzenie na problem przemian kulturowych w Imperium Romanum
Romanisation, Creolisation, Globalisation Identity and “Becoming a Roman”? Colonial and Postcolonial Approaches to the Question of Cultural Processes in the Imperium Romanum
Autorzy:: Piegdoń, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2080810.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:: Romanisation
Rome
identity
creolisation
globalisation
romanizacja
Rzym
tożsamość
kreolizacja
globalizacja
Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
Opis:: This short essay presents how complex and difficult it is today to study the ethnic, cultural, and civilisational transformations in the areas subjected to Rome. It seems it is no longer enough to use the term ‘Romanisation’ to describe all the complicated and diverse phenomena of adaptation, acculturation, or assimilation in the Roman world.
Źródło:: Historyka studia metodologiczne; 2020, 50; 397-419
0073-277X
Pojawia się w:: Historyka studia metodologiczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: „Transpadanos et Ambranos” w działaniach politycznych G. Juliusza Cezara w latach 60. I wieku p.n.e.
“Transpadanos et Ambranos” in the Political Operations of G. Julius Caesar in the 60s of 1st BCE
Autorzy:: Piegdoń, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2058114.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2021-08-13
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:: „causa Transpadanorum”
G. Juliusz Cezar
północna Italia
„Gallia Cisalpina”
„Transpadani”
“causa Transpadanorum”
Gaius Iulius Caesar
Northern Italy
“Gallia Cisalpina”
“Transpadani”
Opis:: W latach 60. I wieku p.n.e. ważnym czynnikiem w polityce rzymskiej była sprawa przyznania pełnego obywatelstwa ludności prowincji Galii Przedalpejskiej zamieszkującej tereny za rzeką Pad. W swojej działalności politycznej do tego postulatu odwoływał się G. Juliusz Cezar, który już w 67 roku p.n.e. próbował wykorzystać niezadowolenie tzw. Transpadanów ze swojego statusu prawnego. W kolejnych latach Cezar sięgał po wsparcie ze strony mieszkańców Galii Przedalpejskiej, nie tylko podsycając ich nastroje w 65 roku p.n.e., lecz także prowokując do wystąpień tajemniczych „Ambranos”. Efektem tych działań była budowa relacji klienckich, które przyniosły mu duże korzyści w walce o władzę w latach 50. i 40. I wieku p.n.e.
This article discusses the policy of Gaius Iulius Caesar towards the “Transpadani” — the inhabitants of the province “Gallia Cisalpina”, who had a Latin status in the 60s of 1st BCE. Caesar’s first recorded political actions were carried out in 67 and 65 BCE. In the 60s Caesar may have begun campaigning for changing the Latin status of the “Transpadani” and for making them legally equal to the rest of the province and Italy. The result of his activities was the building of client relationships that benefited him greatly in the power struggles in fifties and forties of Ist BCE.
Źródło:: Wieki Stare i Nowe; 2021, 16, 21; 41-60
1899-1556
2353-9739
Pojawia się w:: Wieki Stare i Nowe
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki