Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Liberty" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Tytuł:
Charles Taylor on Ethics and Liberty
Autorzy:
Barry, Conor
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/451521.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-10-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Tematy:
positive liberty
negative liberty
virtue ethics
political philosophy
history of philosophy
Opis:
My argument in this paper is that Charles Taylor’s view of liberty and ethics unites Isaiah Berlin’s liberal pluralism with Elizabeth Anscombe’s virtue ethics. Berlin identifies, in “Two Concepts of Liberty,” a tradition of negative liberty advocated by figures like Locke and Mill. He maintains that this concept of liberty is unique to modernity, and it is the form of liberty best suited to the political sphere. The much older concept of positive liberty, which is found in ancient philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, as well as modern thinkers like Hegel, Berlin regards as ill-suited to the political sphere. Anscombe, in “Modern Moral Philosophy,” specifically identifies and criticizes the Anglo-Saxon tradition of moral philosophy. Utilitarian thinkers like Mill are, for Anscombe, consequentialists. The virtue ethics of Aristotle gives a basis for the intrinsic goodness and badness of actions not in sentiment but reason. Charles Taylor draws upon the views of both thinkers. He advocates a liberal pluralism in a manner comparable to Berlin. However, Taylor strongly emphasizes, with Anscombe, that the most complete conception of ethical and political life must be rooted in virtue ethics and positive liberty. Thus, Taylor’s views constitute a synthesis of the approaches of his two mentors.
Źródło:
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2019, 3, 3(9); 83-102
2544-302X
Pojawia się w:
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Secularization and Liberty
Autorzy:
Aguilera, Juan Carlos
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/421137.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Tematy:
secularization
liberty
John Paul II
anthropology
Opis:
 REASERCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is showing the idea of liberty as inherent in the process of secularization, from which it results; the author appeals to the anthropological thesis drawing its significance from the relational character of the human being as created by God and shows how the secularization destroys this idea of the human person. THE REASERCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: What happens when the liberty is understood as liberation and autonomy towards to God and finally causes result contradictory to the intended one? The author applies the hermeneutic and critical method, referring to the different authors, for example to Henri de Lubac, Romano Guardini, J. Ratzinger, saint John Paul II. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The article analysis the problem of the contradiction between liberty and liberation in Catholic thought. The main item in this argumentation is that the liberty should not be understood as liberation towards to God because of the destructive effects of the secularization process in the Catholic doctrine and Church.  REASERCH RESULTS: The liberty understood as an absolute and liberation breaking with the Creator degenerates finally into artifice devoid of rational fundament, in short, of real contents; it is like human epiphenomenon. The new humanism brings the negation and destruction of the human being recognizing his humanity and maturity by breaking with God. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Modernity is the source and the root of the secularization. The idea of liberty devoid of fundament in the human being and the person of God complicates seriously the human coexistence and social life, as admitted once Habermas.
Źródło:
Horyzonty Polityki; 2018, 9, 27; 91-99
2082-5897
Pojawia się w:
Horyzonty Polityki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Legal Scopes of Liberty and the State in Light of the Utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill
Zakresy prawne wolności i państwa w świetle utylitaryzmu Johna Stuarta Milla
Autorzy:
Baramidze, Luka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21375415.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-12-01
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego
Tematy:
liberty
freedom
negative liberty
individual liberty
liberty of expression
the harm principle
wolność
swoboda
wolność negatywna
wolność indywidualna
wolność słowa
zasada krzywdy
Opis:
In modern democracies the liberty of the individual is ensured and protected by the state or the government. But it is well-known that restrictions on liberty are institutionalized and the individual is responsible for obeying them. The liberty of the individual and its protection is provided through restrictions. On the other hand, the legal system and the government are the institutions that threaten the liberty of the individual. Mill’s thesis on individual liberty implies the primacy of it and sets out the social conditions in which it will be possible to realize and protect individual liberty. The main theme of his treatise On Liberty is the nature and boundaries of individual liberty, the scope of legitimate interference with individual liberty. In other words, the principle establishes a sufficient basis for the legitimate protection of the individual liberty, i.e. what is a restriction of a right, on the one hand, is at the same time a protection of it. An individual must be free from all forms of violence, if his/her actions do not harm others [Riley 2001, 46]. The purpose of the paper On Liberty is to provide one very simple principle. Main point of it is that the method of societies’ relations with the individual should not be coercion and control. No matter is it a case of physical violence as a form of punishment or as a form of moral coercion by society. Power over a member of a civilized community can only be exercised for the sole purpose of preventing harm to others. Thus, the liberty principle establishes a necessary condition for legitimate violence against any individual: his/her liberty of action must be restricted by law or opinion if there is a reasonable expectation that it will harm others.
We współczesnych demokracjach wolność jednostki jest zapewniana i chroniona przez państwo lub rząd. Jednak powszechnie wiadomo, że ograniczenia wolności są zinstytucjonalizowane i jednostka jest odpowiedzialna za ich przestrzeganie. Wolność jednostki i jej ochrona jest zapewniona poprzez ograniczenia. Z drugiej strony system prawny i rząd to instytucje zagrażające wolności jednostki. Teza Milla o wolności indywidualnej implikuje jej prymat i określa warunki społeczne, w których możliwa będzie realizacja i ochrona wolności indywidualnej. Głównym tematem jego traktatu O wolności jest natura i granice wolności jednostki oraz zakres uzasadnionej ingerencji w wolność jednostki. Innymi słowy, zasada ta stwarza wystarczającą podstawę dla uzasadnionej ochrony wolności jednostki, czyli to, co jest ograniczeniem prawa, jest jednocześnie jego ochroną. Jednostka musi być wolna od wszelkich form przemocy, jeśli jej działania nie szkodzą innym. Celem dzieła O wolności jest przedstawienie jednej bardzo prostej zasady. Najważniejsze jest to, że metodą relacji społeczeństw z jednostką nie powinien być przymus i kontrola. Nie ma znaczenia, czy jest to przemoc fizyczna jako forma kary czy forma przymusu moralnego ze strony społeczeństwa. Władza nad członkiem cywilizowanej społeczności może być sprawowana wyłącznie w celu zapobiegania krzywdzie innych. Zatem zasada wolności ustanawia warunek konieczny uzasadnionej przemocy wobec jakiejkolwiek osoby: jej wolność działania musi być ograniczona przez prawo lub opinię, jeśli istnieje uzasadnione oczekiwanie, że zaszkodzi to innym.
Źródło:
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego; 2023, 18, 20 (2); 9-21
2719-3128
2719-7336
Pojawia się w:
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Dignity of Children Deprived of Liberty and Suspected of Committing Crimes
Autorzy:
Nordlöf, Kerstin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1196769.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-07-21
Wydawca:
Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Tematy:
Dignity
Children
Liberty
Crime
Opis:
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: In this article the research objectives are the rights of children deprived of liberty and suspected of having committed crimes in international and regional agreements as well as in Swedish legislations and intended to preserve the child’s dignity. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The method applied to study their dignity is, on one hand, in the context of international and regional agreements; on the other hand, in the context of Swedish legislations, which are relevant to these children. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The argument is whether in Sweden children under the age of 15 years deprived of liberty and suspected of having committed crimes are treated in a manner consistent with promoting the child’s sense of dignity during the investigation of the crime. These children are of particular interest as they are more vulnerable than adults in the same situation; the spirit of dignity should therefore be more explicitly expressed for them. RESEARCH RESULTS: The research result confirms that dignity is fundamental for the rights of children as expressed in the studied international and regional agreements and, more specifically, in the CRC Articles 37 and 40. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Swedish legislations still need improvements to preserve the dignity of children, particularly regarding the rights of children under the age of 15 deprived of liberty and suspected of having committed crimes.
Źródło:
Horyzonty Wychowania; 2020, 19, 50; 59-75
1643-9171
2391-9485
Pojawia się w:
Horyzonty Wychowania
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Etyka – zagrożenie wolności nauki?
Ethics – Impendence of Science’s Liberty?
Autorzy:
Kowalczyk, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/964294.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-05-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
liberty
science
ethics
human person
common good
Opis:
Paper has three parts. Te first part gives the reasons for need of liberty external-social of science guaranteed by law. Speaks about it Declaration of human rights in 1948 and social teaching of Church – including documents of Vaticanum II and Jean Paul II, which indicate of subjectivity and dignity of man as person. The second part of this paper based on personalism demonstrates that science can harmoniously develop only in the climate of internal-moral freedom of scientist. The purpose of science is revelation of truth, but effects of scientific investigations – in particular of biological-medical sciences – influence on the life of human individuals and societies. Conscious and free activity of man has ethical character, therefore liberty of science ought to be responsible liberty and then to be subordinated the ethical criterions. Science cannot ignore values and rules moral. The third part of paper stated that good of human person and common good of society demand juridical limitations of scientific inquiries’ liberty. Liberty is man’s right but also its obligation to respect of human person’s fundamental rights – including right to life, integrality and dignity. Therefore internal-ethical and external-juridical limitations are necessary of scientist’s liberty.
Źródło:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym; 2010, 13, 2
1899-2226
2353-4869
Pojawia się w:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Liberty in liberal thought – past and present
Autorzy:
Sochoń, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1070189.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
liberty
liberalism
Christian thought
freedom
truth
John Locke
John S. Mill
Opis:
The article presents history of liberty in the past and contemporary liberal thought. This article grounds that creators of liberalism passed by a long way to define precisely the phenomenon of liberty. When creators were closer to the present day, they tried to separate liberty from metaphysics and morality with reference to the ideals of democracy. However, they confused the cult of equality with the liberty to show that the truth always must be at liberty’s service. But the liberty should be understood like a competence to realize person’s rights. Not till then, liberalism will conceal the historic and present–time demons.
Źródło:
Studia Philosophiae Christianae; 2020, 56, S2; 259-275
0585-5470
Pojawia się w:
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Shaping the Modern Discourse on Liberty: French Intellectual Debates from Revolution to Dreyfus
Autorzy:
Budzanowska, Anna
Pietrzykowski, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2200443.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Projekt Avant
Tematy:
liberty
freedom
revolution
republicanism
conservatism
society
Opis:
The age of intellectual debates in France between the Revolution in 1789 and the Dreyfus Affair at the turn of the centuries is one of the key sources that enable the understanding of the modern political culture. It concerns, in particular, the modern concept of liberty that became one of the defining values shaping the European political discourse. Thus, the post-revolutionary France remains an extremely valuable source of inspiration when revisiting the essence of many contemporary debates in political philosophy and public discourse. Most of the ideas and arguments in circulation today echo the debates over the liberty, reason, and society that dominated the intellectual climate of that period in the French political history or, at least, heavily depend on the foundational ideas formulated then and there. Thus, they are worth reconsidering.
Źródło:
Avant; 2019, 10, 1; 43-57
2082-6710
Pojawia się w:
Avant
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Idea of Liberty: John Rawls and Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart
Autorzy:
Dyszy, Marzena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/3200745.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomiczno-Humanistyczna w Bielsku-Białej
Tematy:
liberty
justice
John Rawls
H.A.L Hart
original position
Opis:
The above article illustrates the argument between Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart and the issue of liberty as it was depicted by John Rawls. Rawls in his Theory of Justice claims that justice requires that every person enjoys the greatest possible liberty which is possible to reconcile with the liberty of other people. Following such a principle it may be assumed that liberty can only be limited in the name of the liberty of others. H.L.A. Hart does not share such a standpoint. He points out that liberty can be limited not only because of itself, but also due to some social and economic progress. Moreover Hart claims that the idea of liberty presented by Rawls differs from his point of view concerning the possible limitation of the law of property. In fact Rawls admitted that his deliberations in his subsequent work, namely The Political Liberalism, arise from the critical view of Hart presented in his work Rawls on Liberty and its Priority.
Źródło:
Polonia Journal; 2021, 14; 55-66
2083-3121
Pojawia się w:
Polonia Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
WOLNOŚĆ POZYTYWNA I NEGATYWNA W MYŚLI KS. JÓZEFA TISCHNERA JAKO KRYTYCZNE UJĘCIE STANOWISKA ISAIAHA BERLINA
POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE LIBERTY IN THE THOUGHTS OF JÓZEF TISCHNER AS A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ISAIAH BERLIN’S NOTION
Autorzy:
PRZYBYŁO, SŁAWOMIR
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/513597.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Tischner
Berlin
negative liberty
positive liberty
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present Józef Tischner’s notion about negative and positive liberty. He does not oppose the first but, in his opinion, positive liberty is complementary to negative liberty (as freedom from restraint and interference by other persons and/or the state) and it has greater importance. However, Tischner defines positive liberty differently than Berlin. Primarily, for him, it is the possibility of doing Good.
Źródło:
Polityka i Społeczeństwo; 2013, 11, 4; 117-128 (12)
1732-9639
Pojawia się w:
Polityka i Społeczeństwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies