Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Jr 16" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Prorok jako świadek (Jr 23,16-22)
Prophet as a Witness (Jer 23:16-22)
Autorzy:
Jaworski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1621768.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-10-25
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
prorok
świadek
rada Jahwe
Jr 23
16-22
prophet
witness
council of Yahweh
Jer 23
Opis:
This article deals with the subject: “prophet as a witness”. The Bible portrays a prophet as a messenger speaking in God’s name and announcing His word. However, he is not merely a neutral reporter, but the witness of received revelation. A witness is a person who has participated in some event personally and therefore can confirm what he or she saw and heard. These two elements of witness in the prophet’s mission are pointed out by Jeremiah. His oracle in Jer 23:16-22 deals with false prophets, whose own visions proclaim themselves as coming from God. Meanwhile, the true prophet is following quite a different path. He participates in “the council of Yahweh”, experiencing divine revelation (conf. v. 18), and then testifies to what he has seen and heard (conf. v. 22). Therefore, such a prophet is truly the witness of God and His word.
Źródło:
Verbum Vitae; 2015, 27; 77-94
1644-8561
2451-280X
Pojawia się w:
Verbum Vitae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niektóre aspekty polemiki Septuaginty z kultami misteryjnymi
Some Aspects of the Septuagint’s Polemic Against Mystic Cults
Autorzy:
Laskowski, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1051486.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-11-14
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Septuaginta
kulty misteryjne
Dionizos
Demeter
Izyda
Mitra
Baal‑Peor
Belfegor
bałwochwalstwo
Lb 25
Pwt 23
18
1 Krl 15
12
Am 7
5
Oz 4
14
Jr 16
Septuagint
mysteric cults
Dionysios
Isis
Baal-Peor
Belphegor
idolatry
Num 25
Deut 23
1 Kgs 15
Hos 4
Jer 16
Opis:
This article provides an analysis of the occurrence of basic terms related to the Greek mystery cults in the Septuagint. Such terms as τελεταί, μύσται and θίασοι appeared to be so significant and wide that could be employed in expressing theological views on current reality while translating. Considerably general criticism of initiations seems to reflect the translator’s polemics against traditions which he considered unacceptable in the light of the Yahwist. The Baal-Peor cult (Numbers 25:3,5 and Psalms 105:28 LXX) was perceived by the translator as one of the initiations. The translation of the Book of Amos 7:9 defines the idolatrous temples of Israel as initiations, thus being living institutions and not specific locations. A similar approach can be observed in the translation of the terms qedesha and qadesh. in Deut 23:18, 1 Kgs 15:12 and Hos 4:14, whereas the term θίασοι in translation of Jeremiah 16:5 refers to feasts in the honour of deities. It should be noted, however, that the Septuagint translators’ reference to mystery cults was not their main focus of attention. Translation phenomena observed herein remain rather marginal even in comparison with the writings of Philo or Flavius Josephus. Therefore it can be inferred that the problem in question was a peripheral part of a larger phenomenon, i.e. condemnation of idolatry.
Źródło:
The Biblical Annals; 2014, 4, 2; 334-354
2083-2222
2451-2168
Pojawia się w:
The Biblical Annals
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Chimera w sporach o Trójcę Świętą w latach 60. XVI wieku (na przykładzie sylwy IV Andrzeja Trzecieskiego)
Chimera in disputes over the Holy Trinity in the sixties of the 16th century (exemplified by "Silva Rerum" IV by Andrzej Trzecieski)
Autorzy:
Wojtkowska-Maksymik, Marta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012715.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-06-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Andrzej Trzecieski Młodszy
Chimera
antytrynitarze
Stanisław Orzechowski
Andrzej Trzecieski Jr
antitrinitarians
Opis:
The article discusses the way in which the symbolism of chimera, a mythic monster from Lycia (with lion’s mouth, goat’s torso and serpent’s tail) slayed by Bellerophon, was used in Silva Rerum IV (In sophistats Serveticos et novorum arianorum faecem censurae catholicae, around 1565) by Andrzej Trzecieski junior. This work is also a testimony to the stormy disputes with Arianism followers which engaged Stanisław Orzechowski through, inter alia, a treatise known to Trzecieski, namely Chimaera sive de Stancari Fvnesta Regno Poloniae Secta (1562). The author of Sylvarum libri II undoubtedly based his work on Orzechowski’s piece, but referred to chimera in a different way. Chimera in Trzecieski’s view was used not as a direct attack against particular persons, to defend the papacy, the ecclesiastical power and king’s majesty, but above all to exemplify the heretics’ beliefs upon the Holy Trinity or the everlasting divinity of Christ, and to show the reasons for the heretics’ mistakes.
Źródło:
Prace Filologiczne. Literaturoznawstwo; 2017, 7(10); 347-362
2084-6045
2658-2503
Pojawia się w:
Prace Filologiczne. Literaturoznawstwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies