Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Józef M. Bocheński" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 20
Tytuł:
Józef M. Bocheński jako tomista
Autorzy:
Zembrzuski, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966205.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
J.M. Bocheński
filozofia tomistyczna w Polsce
Opis:
The aim of the paper is to present the following, how Thomism was understood by Bocheński, next, path of Thomistic inspirations he had followed, and finally we show Thomism Bocheński had explored when teaching his own philosophical abbreviation (ABC tomizmu). Analysis based on these issues would allow to identify the specific features of Thomism studied and explored by Bocheński. Hence, the question we might pose does not to regard the fact whether Bocheński was a Thomist or not but, what sort of Thomism he represented. Bocheński should rather be considered to be a traditional Thomist than existential one because in his philosophical work he barely treated the problem of act of existence and importance of this particular problem. However, he refrained from adopting the method fundamental for traditional Thomism, which is strict adherence (fidelity) to source texts of Aquinas. Bocheński, in being open to achievements of contemporary philosophy, especially logic, was closer to Louvain Thomism. But, he never decided to implement modern scientific trends to philosophy of Aquinas, the tendency which was foreign to the very essence of philosophy, at least in its shape understood by Bocheński. In his philosophical views Bocheński was closer to Aristotle and the Aristotelian tradition. And because he preferred to follow Aristotelian realism he consequently kept that stance. His interest in analysis the utterances of Thomism from a perspective of logic allow to classify Bocheński to analytical Thomism, but we should remember that in times contemporary to Bocheński, the very notion of analytical Thomism had not been coined. The aforementioned conclusions allow to recognize originality of Thomistic thought represented by Bocheński and also, to admit that Bocheński’s thought cannot be classified univocally to a particular school of Thomism.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 265-289
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Józef M. Bocheński’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy
Autorzy:
Mordarski, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1052483.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-15
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki w Bydgoszczy. Wydawnictwo Uczelniane
Tematy:
J.M. Bocheński
analytic philosophy
history of analysis
rules of analysis
analysis
vs. synthesis
social role of analytic philosophy
Opis:
The article characterizes the main features Bocheński’s conception of Analytic Philosophy. In the first part, we present the difference between Analytic Philosophy and different world-views. Then we discuss the forth rules of analysis, and finally we refer to the practical and social role of Analytic Philosophy pointed out by Bocheński.
Źródło:
Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne; 2019, 9; 245-256
2084-1302
Pojawia się w:
Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przedmiot logiki formalnej w ujęciu Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
The Subject Matter of Formal Logic according to Józef M. Bocheński
Autorzy:
Kiczuk, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2106964.pdf
Data publikacji:
1999
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
Aristotle, the founder of formal logic, did not describe the subject matter of that discipline. During twenty or so centuries the subject matter has been defined in many ways. The paper depicts J. M. Bochenski’s standpoints, as they are included in one of his works, dealing with the subject matter of formal logic. Furthermore, aside to ordering Bochenski’s theses as regards the problems in question, the paper seeks to supplement, modify and make more profound the formulations in the analyzed text. In conclusion, the paper claims that classical (standard) logic is not a theory of any objects, as Bocheński put it, but a theory of some relationships that obtain between any objects (entities) which may be designates of the names or denotations of the positive propositions. That type of relationships are formulated in the laws of logic.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1999, 46-47, 1; 69-87
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozoficzna biografia Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966203.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef M. Bocheński
tomizm
logika
sowietologia
filozofia analityczna
Opis:
Józef Bocheński was born on 30th August 1902. He graduated from the Secondary School in 1920 and immediately after the final exam (matura) he joined the 8th Ulhan (light cavalry) Regiment and took part in a final part of a Polish-Bolshevik war. After the war, in 1922, he joined studies in law at the University of Lwów and after two years he attended the University in Poznań in order to study political economy. These studies were interrupted in 1926 when Bocheński joined the Seminary in Poznań which he left when moving to the Dominican novitiate in Cracow. There he adopted names Innocenty Maria. After one year of a novitiate he was sent to philosophical studies at the University in Fribourg in Swizerland, he graduated in 1934 . Two years earlier however, he was ordained a priest and in 1936, along with Jan Salamucha, Franciszek Drewnowski and Bolesław Sobociński, he organised the so called Cracow Circle. After receiving a doctorate in theology he was appointed a professor of logic at Angelicum, and he officially remained there until 1940. In 1938 he got habilitation in philosophy at the Faculty of Theology at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow. Along with the Polish Corpus of Gen. Władysław Anders he took part in the Italian campaigne. He fought in the battle at Monte Cassino (May 1944). After the end of the Second World War he became a professor of philosophy at Fribourg University and remained at that position until the retirement (1945-1972). He occupied a position of a Dean of Faculty of Philosophy (1950-1952) and a Rector. There he initiated soviet studies which brought him recognition and political significance. He visited Poland in 1987 for the first time since he left in 1939. In the next year he was awarded doctorates honoris causa at the Jagiellonian University and at the Academy of Catholic Theology (ATK) in Warsaw. Moreover, during his emigration he co-operated regularly with the Polish University Abroad established in Londyn. He died in Fribourg on 8th February 1995. During his lifetime Józef Bocheński was changing philosopical schools and views. In his youth he was a Kantian, next, he „converted” to neo-Thomism in its most traditional (handbook and essential) version, which actually was more Aristotelian than Thomistic. The next step was an attempt to „modernise” this sort of Thomism by tools of mathematical logic in order to make Thomas - as Bocheński said himself - no longer his „guru”. In the result, Bocheński ceased to explore the problems and style of classical philosophy in favour of analytical mode of philosophying. He himself divided his scientific work into four periods distinguished as follows, according to interest and passions (and views as well) dominated in particular time: 1) neo-Thomistic (1934–1940), 2) historical- logical (1945–1955) 3) sovietological (1955–1970) 4) systematical- logical (1970–1995).
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 245-264
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metafizyka w marksizmie? – Materializm dialektyczny i jego konsekwencje w ujęciu o. Józefa Marii Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Pawlikowski, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966262.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
marksizm
metafizyka
sowietologia
Józef M. Bocheński
Marxism
Metaphysics
Sovietology
Joseph M. Bocheński
Opis:
Father Józef Maria Bocheński OP (1902– 1995) was considered a leading sovietologist. At the University of Fribourg, he founded in 1957 the Institute of Eastern Europe, in which the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism was studied scientifically. The results were published in the journal „Studies in Soviet Thought”. He initiated the uprising in Cologne Ost-Kolleg, where knowledge about Soviet philosophy and communism was disseminated. In the years 1961–1962 he was also its director. In his publications he undertook, among others the question of the metaphysics of Marxism, seeing it generally in dialectical materialism and, in specific applications, also in historical materialism. Criticizing this trend of thought, he focused on its latest findings, developed in the Soviet philosophy in the fifties of the twentieth century. Approaching the criticism from an external point of view, he pointed out some significant inconsistencies of Marxist materialism. According to the first law of dialectics, it proclaims a universal cause-effect determinism, and at the same time allows for the occurrence of random events. Explaining the existence of consciousness in matter with the adopted concept of cognition, Marxism mixes the epistemological and ontological order. Moreover, this trend uses the unscientific understanding of matter. On the basis of the considerations of Father Bocheński, it can also be concluded that the fundamental inconsistency of Marxist materialism is the acceptance of the existence of a spiritual element (consciousness) different in quality from mat-ter, while maintaining the thesis that there is only matter and what comes from it.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 301-316
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozofia ekonomii Józefa Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Łazarski, Adrian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966189.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
filozofia ekonomii
teoria firmy
teoria przedsiębiorczości
o. Józef M. Bocheński
Philosophy Of Economics
Theory Of Firm
Entrepreneurship Theory
Fr. Joseph M. Bocheński
Opis:
Fr. Józef Maria Bocheński, known for his many contributions, is not usually associated with the philosophy of economics, even though he had some achivements in this field. The classical analysis of the enterprise, limited to the division into capital, land, and labor, as a sociological-historical rather than an economic concept, does not contribute much to the study of economics, so Bocheń-ski’s analysis using ontological and logical tools is an attempt to remedy this. The analysis of the enterprise shows that it is a system which purpose is production. This system consists of internal and external elements and a synthesis factor in the form of the entrepreneur, who may be identical with with one or more of these elements or with none of them. As the dynamic analysis shows, the various subsystems of the enterprise may have divergent objectives, but they must be subordinated to the main objective, which is production, otherwise no objective will be fulfilled. From the work as a whole, the ideal of the entrepreneur emerges, reconciling the conflicting aspirations of the individual components of the system. These considerations provide an ontological ground for deliberation of the theory of the firm and the theory of entrepreneurship, showing the connection between these two issues. Bochenski’s work generates numerous problems of a detailed nature, mainly in the selection and number of elements, and needs to be supplemented with a theory of the boundaries of the firm.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 371-383
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Józefa M. Bocheńskiego koncepcja historii filozofii
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966109.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef M. Bocheński
historia filozofii
filozofia starożytna
filozofia średniowieczna
filozofia nowożytna
filozofia współczesna
History of philosophy
classic philosophy
medieval philosophy
modern philosophy
contemporary philosophy
Opis:
The notion of history of philosophy is initiated by Bocheński by presentation of the notion of history itself which, according to him for the fact of treating the past („that what happened”), has two meanings: subject meaning (past events) and object meaning (historiosophy). Both of them can be further divided into two parts: history of facts and history of doctrines. History of philosophy is a typical history of doctrines. The second element of the name „history of philosophy”- which is philosophy-is etymologically linked to wisdom, present in numerous meanings: in antiquity its was simply a synonim of science. In the Middle Ages we observe division of human knowledge to revealed knowledge and natural knowledge, the latter one, in its aspect of exploring the ultimate principles and causes is called philosophy. In modern times philosophy was questioned at all or the entire science was included in its scope. For that reason Bocheński establishes the set of topics which are constantly present in the history of philosophy and which can be classified as strictly philosophical issues. They are: 1) the question of cognition (can we cognize truth?); 2) the question of science; 3) ontological issues (universalities, existence or non-existence of plurality); 4) questions of relation of science and psychic; 5) axiological issues (ethics, esthetics, philosophy of religion); 6) the question of absolute (God, eternal matter). Bocheński stresses that questions proper to philosophy can not be classified as one of the science and, what is more, contemporary methodology of science will rather not change this situation. Striking in that presentation is the lack of issues regarding philosophy of being (existence, essence, substance, accidental properties, relations, causes) with little exemption of philosophy of being inc-luded in the question of absolute. When it comes to division of history of philosophy, we may say that according to Bocheński it should follow analogically the traditional division of the European history such as classic, medieval, modern and contemporary times
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 433-451
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Philosophy of Industrial Enterprise from a Praxeological and Personalistic Perspective
Filozofia przedsiębiorstwa przemysłowego z perspektywy prakseologicznej i personalistycznej
Autorzy:
Gniadek, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2130820.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
Tematy:
Józef M. Bocheński
Ludwig von Mises
John Paul II
enterprise
entrepreneur
private property
subjective theory of value
free market
Jan Paweł II
przedsiębiorstwo
przedsiębiorca
własność prywatna
subiektywistyczna
teoria wartości
wolny rynek
Opis:
In the text entitled Zur Philosophie der industriellen Unternehmung / Uwagi filozoficzne o przedsiębiorstwie przemysłowym („Towards the Philosophy of Industrial Enterprise”), Józef I. M. Bocheński OP (†1995) attempts at discovering the function of the entrepreneur as a factor connecting capital and labor. The Dominican philosopher fails to notice, however, that there is no artificial division of consumer goods and capital goods. This is determined by the calculating mind of the acting man, whose point of reference is private property. It is a necessary element of economic calculation, without which there is no economic rationality. In his analysis, Bocheński does not take into account private property, and therefore he does not distinguish between the functions of a manager and an entrepreneur. The Dominican thinker’s attempt to defi ne philosophically an enterprise is innovative, based on anthropological principles consistent with Christian personalism, but incomplete. Ludwig von Mises and the Austrian School of Economics advocate a subjectivist theory of value that explains the essence of economic exchange based on private property. The author of this article, as a theologian, also reaches for economic personalism and John Paul II who taught that without private property man is not able to understand his dignity fully.
Filozofia przedsiębiorstwa przemysłowego z perspektywy prakseologicznej i personalistycznej Józef I. M. Bocheński OP (†1995) w tekście pt. Zur Philosophie der industriellen Unternehmung / Uwagi filozoficzne o przedsiębiorstwie przemysłowym dochodzi do odkrycia funkcji przedsiębiorcy, jako czynnika łączącego kapitał i siłę roboczą. Dominikański filozof nie zauważa jednak, że nie istnieje sztuczny podział na dobra konsumpcyjne i kapitałowe. O tym decyduje kalkulujący umysł działającego człowieka, którego punktem odniesienia jest własność prywatna. Jest ona koniecznym elementem kalkulacji ekonomicznej, bez której nie istnieje ekonomiczna racjonalność. Bocheński nie uwzględnia w swojej analizie własności prywatnej i dlatego nie odróżnia funkcji menadżera od funkcji przedsiębiorcy. Próba zdefiniowania przez dominikańskiego myśliciela przedsiębiorstwa na gruncie filozofii jest innowacyjna, oparta na antropologicznych zasadach zgodnych z chrześcijańskim personalizmem, ale niepełna. Z pomocą przychodzi tutaj Ludwig von Mises i szkoła austriacka ekonomii z subiektywistyczną teorię wartości, która tłumaczy istotę ekonomicznej wymiany w oparciu o własność prywatną. Autor niniejszego artykułu, jako teolog, sięga także do ekonomicznego personalizmu i Jana Pawła II, który nauczał, że bez własności prywatnej człowiek nie jest w stanie do końca zrozumieć swojej godności.
Źródło:
Prakseologia; 2020, 162; 83-101
0079-4872
Pojawia się w:
Prakseologia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Business Enterprise in the Logic and Ontological Analysis of Józef I. M. Bocheński
Przedsiębiorstwo sfery gospodarczej w logicznej i ontologicznej analizie Józefa I. M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Bukała, Marcin W.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2130818.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
Tematy:
Józef M. Bocheński
business enterprise
industrial enterprise
philosophy of business enterprise
logic of business enterprise
ontology of business enterprise
Aristotle
entrepreneurship and ownership
entrepreneur’s ethics
common good
przedsiębiorstwo przemysłowe
przedsiębiorstwo sfery gospodarczej
filozofia przedsiębiorstwa
logika przedsiębiorstwa
ontologia przedsiębiorstwa
Arystoteles
przedsiębiorczość i własność
etyka przedsiębiorcy
dobro wspólne
Opis:
The article proposes a new look at J. M. Bocheński’s OP classical philosophical concept of the business enterprise as a “system” (presented in the text Zur Philosophie der industriellen Unternehmung). The referred author analyzed the industrial enterprise – or business enterprise – from the logic and ontological perspective. The discourses conducted in the article focus mainly on: the significance of Bocheński’s model (1), the ontological perspective and the author’s references to Aristotelian terms (2), the reservations and objections to the concept (especially regarding the role of ownership) (3), the possibilities of extending the analysis and new interpretations of the concept, with regard to the idea of entrepreneur’s contribution to the common good (4).
W artykule proponuje się nowe spojrzenie na klasyczną filozoficzną koncepcję przedsiębiorstwa, pochodzącą od J. I M. Bocheńskiego OP. Autor ten analizował “przedsiębiorstwo przemysłowe” – lub szerzej, przedsiębiorstwo sfery gospodarczej – jako “system”, w perspektywie logicznej i ontologicznej. Rozważania prezentowane w artykule dotyczą głównie: znaczenia modelu Bocheńskiego (1); jego ukierunkowania na perspektywę ontologiczną i nawiązań do Arystotelesa (1), zastrzeżeń, które mogą być formułowane (dotyczących zwłaszcza roli własności) (2), możliwości jego nowej interpretacji w kontekście wkładu przedsiębiorcy do dobra wspólnego (4).
Źródło:
Prakseologia; 2020, 162; 103-114
0079-4872
Pojawia się w:
Prakseologia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O uniwersytecie
Autorzy:
Bocheński, Józef M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966200.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Opis:
Odczyt wygłoszony na XVII Weekendzie Dyskusyjnym P.K.S.U. Veritas w Londynie w dniu 19 kwietnia 1952 roku, opublikowany w wydawanym przez Veritas Katolickim Tygodniku Religijno-Kulturalnym „Życie” 6 (1952) 35(27) z 31 sierpnia 1952 roku. Dziękujemy władzom Fundacji i Katolickiego Ośrodka Wydawniczego Veritas z Londynu za zgodę na przedruk odczytu.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 225-238
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Św. Tomasz z Akwinu, O bycie i istocie
Autorzy:
Bocheński, Józef M.
Płotka, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966127.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Opis:
Przekład o. Innocentego Marii Bocheńskiego OP wczesnego dziełka św. Tomasza z Akwinu pt. De ente et essentia został wydany jesienią 1955 roku w numerze 5 czasopisma „Filozofia”. Przekład ten jest prawie niedostępny dla polskiego czytelnika. Przekład zawiera wstęp Bocheńskiego, sam przekład oraz przypisy tłumacza.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 485-499
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
J. M. Bocheńskiego nowa wersja teorii hipotezy religijnej
J.M. Bocheński’s New Version of the Theory of a Religious Hypothesis
Autorzy:
Herbut, Józef
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013209.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
wiara podstawowa
doświadczenie religijne
hipoteza religijna
J.M. Bocheński
basic faith
religious experience
religious hypothesis
Opis:
In his Logic of Religion (1965) Bocheński presumed that: (1) ‘religion’ denotes a system of propositions of religious contents, (2) man becomes an advocate of a certain religion through an acceptance of its meta-dogma, i.e. a statement that the creed of this religion is true. In his article Religious Hypothesis Revised [in: P. Weingartner (ed.), Scientific and Religious Belief, Dordrecht 1994, 142-160] Bocheński writes that the concept of religion assumed in the Logic is wrong. Our experience shows that the conversion of a man who previously was an unbeliever may occur in two steps: first, he accepts several elementary propositions about God. They constitute ‘basic faith’ (that God exists that He governs the events in the world, etc.). Then we have a collection of propositions that compose “the confession of faith” of a given religion. The religious hypothesis is applied, above all, when we accept a system. It is doubtful whether it can be used in the basic faith. In this paper, the author discusses first various forms of religious experience that inspires the basic faith: (1) a religious interpretation of secular phenomena; (2) an experience of sacrum in the world; (3) an ‘encounter’ of Transcendence. Then he presents a new version of this hypothesis: what kind of experience that some persons have accounts for religion and whether it permits to predict their new experiences or even new events.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2008, 56, 1; 85-99
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozoficzne aspekty człowieczeństwa w ujęciu J.M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Izabella
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966206.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
antropologia filozoficzna
człowieczeństwo
humanizm
Józef Bocheński
antropological philosophy
humanity
humanism
Opis:
The content of the article concerns the philosophical views of the famous Dominican J. Bocheński on the structure of human existence. Bocheński himself divided his work into the neo-romantic and analytical periods. The article uses this division and focuses more on Bocheński’s later philosophical views. One of the reasons was that his neotomistic anthropological views had already been discussed in the book K. Policki, entitled: The philosophy of man in the early work of J.I.M. Bocheński. The presented article presents the structural elements of man, along with his powers. Then it deals with topics related to humanity. That is why the following parts of the paper are devoted to various areas of human activity and humanism. It seems that despite the changes in his philosophical views declared by Bocheński, he still remained an Aristotelian. It is manifested in the way of perceiving man from the perspective of his essence and accepting the spiritual and body unity. Moreover, Bocheński adopts the hegemony of the intellect in human activities (despite the declaration that, according to him, man does not differ from an animal). Since Bocheński readily expressed mutually exclusive views, it should be emphasized that establishing his position on the metaphysical structure of man is not an easy task.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 291-300
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Etyka w ujęciu Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966034.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef Bocheński
etyka
moralność
tomizm
filozofia analityczna
Ethics
morality
Thomism
analytic philosophy
Opis:
The notion of ethics has been developed by Bocheński in four areas: 1. Ethics is a normative science regarding human behaviour. Its scientific character means a „systematic research on a particular part of reality”. In the result of its normativity it „not only describes object but also indicates what this object should be like”. When speaks of human behaviour it „makes research on this set of acts who derive consciously (voluntarily) from human free will”. 2. Ethics as a normative science makes research and establishes general goal of human activity and then it considers, from the psychological point of view, a nature of human act which should be an act of realisation of a goal. In this way ethics works out the problem of ethical norm, a principle which should be followed to fulfill human act in order to achieve a goal proper to human being. Additionally, when ethics is grounded in Christian Revelation we may apply the matter of grace as supernatural support from God in fulfilling ethically good human act. 3. „There are two areas of each properly constructed ethics”. The first, in a theoretical way considers five sets of problems: the general goal of human act, the structure of human act, the problem of moral norms, the theory of character and the subject of God’s grace. The aim of the second area is practical analysis of particular features of human character, we understand them as „steady dispo-sition toward proceeding human act easily and energetic” according to a moral norm. 4. Ethics understood in that way can be atrributed to each human being. Hence, each men should adopt and cultivate in himself all properties and ethical norms. „Each human being should posses entirely human and Christian character”. 5. Individual human life shows that a teacher suppose to be equippped in some properties more than a merchant. For that reason, even there exists unity in ethics in general, we may speak of particular ethics. They consists of general ethics and on that ground they develop further principles in particular domains. In the result there may exist business ethics, academic ethics, ethics of prie-sthood, political ethics and military one.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 385-391
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 20

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies