Wszystkie pola: Eisenhower, Dwight D. - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Wyścig do Berlina
Autorzy:: Bączyk, Norbert.
Powiązania:: Polska Zbrojna 2005, nr 13, s. [34-35]
Data publikacji:: 2005
Tematy:: Stalin, Józef (1878-1953)
Eisenhower, Dwight D.
Polityka międzynarodowa 1945 r.
Bitwy
II wojna światowa (1939-1945)
Operacja berlińska (1945)
Projekty
Opis:: Fot.
Dostawca treści:: Bibliografia CBW

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: The Adam Mickiewicz controversy, 1948: Eisenhower and Columbia
Autorzy:: Jacobs, Travis Beal
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/650315.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:: Thomas Anessi, Stanislaus Blejwas, Arthur Coleman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Frank Fackenthal, Robert C. Harron, Albert C. Jacobs, Roman Jakobson, Manfred Kridl, katedra im. Adama Mickiewicza, Czesław Miłosz, Kongres Polonii Amerykańskiej, Arthur Hays Sulzbe
Opis:: Columbia University announced the Adam Mickiewicz Chair in Philology, Language and Literature in May, 1948, during the Cold War. The Chair’s incumbent would be Manfred Kridl, an émigré who had left Poland 1940, and the communist Warsaw government would contribute $10,000 annually. Polish Ambassador Josep Winiewicz, with the assistance of Czeslaw Milosz, had suggested Kridl. Arthur Coleman, an Assistant Professor of Slavic Languages, and the Polish-American Congress loudly protested the appointment, “This infiltration of the Communist voice.” The Polish-American press agreed. The controversy received nationwide attention when Coleman resigned and asserted that Poland, controlled by Moscow and the Comintern, would wage a campaign of “academic infiltration” with the Mickiewicz Chair. Sigmund Sluszka, a former Coleman student, called Kridl “a noted Marxist.” The New York Timesgave the resignation front-page coverage, and the media emphasized that Columbia was “a Hot-Bed of Communism.” The fact that World War II hero, Dwight D. Eisenhower, had just become the university’s president increased public interest in the controversy, even though the decision on the Chair had been made before his arrival. Columbia’s Provost launched an extensive investigation into the accusations against Kridl and two professors, and Eisenhower presented the confidential report to the University’s Trustees. Columbia stood by hersupport of the Chair and Kridl.The protest lasted throughout the summer, and several university officials had questioned accepting the funding from Warsaw. While the controversy had undermined the Polish Studies program for the Polish-American and émigré communities, the Provost believed that the Adam Mickiewicz Chair and Professor Kridl contributed to the furthering of Polish-American Studies in America.
Źródło:: Konteksty Kultury; 2015, 12, 4
2353-1991
Pojawia się w:: Konteksty Kultury
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki