Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Chinese social sciences" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
Tytuł:
Social science education offered by Chinese Departments in Korean universities
Autorzy:
Nam, Jong-ho
Kim, Insik
Kim, Yongdeog
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2004959.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-06-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Chinese studies in Korea
Chinese social sciences
Chinese language and literature
two-track curricula
Opis:
The current curricula of the departments of Chinese in Korea emphasize language and literature, although most students in these departments would prefer an emphasis on curricula in the Chinese social sciences, with less emphasis on language and literature. The research reported here include surveys that identified needs as perceived by students, and contrasted these with studies of existing Korean departments of Chinese. This research indicates that Korean universities currently lack the ability to meet students’ needs. For more effective education, Chinese departments should offer two-track curricula, consisting of a language track and a social science track.
Źródło:
The New Educational Review; 2016, 44; 17-29
1732-6729
Pojawia się w:
The New Educational Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
GON, WOO, SEONDO GODDESS, AND CHINESE LEGENDS ABOUT PEOPLE IN KOREAN MYTHOLOGY
곤, 우, 선도여신, 그리고 한국신화 속의 인물들에 관한 중국 전설들
Gon, Woo, bogini Seondo i chińskie legendy o ludziach w mitologii koreańskiej
Autorzy:
PARK, Jong-seong
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040337.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-11-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Gon
Woo
Dangun
kingdom Goguryeo
the holy mother
Chinese heroes
nation
Opis:
Gon and Woo are mythological persons who were born in China and who performed all their tasks there. That is why they are present in Korean myths from time to time, for instance in the myth about Dangun or the kingdom Goguryeo, and finally they achieve universality and credibility. On the other hand the holy mother Seondo was the daughter of the Chinese emperor who acquired supernatural powers and went to Korea where she stayed. Consequently Koreans did not know much about what she did in China. As a result she became accepted by Koreans as the common goddess of mountains called differently in different regions. From the point of view of the Korean nation Ju Wonjang and Seol Ingwi are heroes from China but at the same time despite being persons of low birth as commonalty they managed to become heroes. It is an extremely important aspect for Koreans. Although they actually attacked Goguryeo and forced Korea to obey China, for the Korean commonalty such historical experiences could be of different significance. As far as myths about Chinese heroes are concerned, the Korean commonalty seemed to be interested first and foremost in their skills and strength, which were so great that there was no authority in Korea powerful enough to withstand it. In my opinion for the Korean commonalty the concept of nation was something in the form of an imaginary community, which should arise at any moment by chance and should unify people strongly. The Korean commonality expressed in legends and folktales its strong will to identify themselves with people beyond national divisions in order to save themselves from their hard everyday life. Folktales usually do not present any issue fully. They only present a specific situation or a particular day or something typical of China, etc. By treating Chinese heroes as if they were their own, the Korean commonalty took advantage of them in some sense. I think it was their strategy enabling them to fulfil their dreams by living the life of others.
곤과 우는 중국에서 자신의 출생과 소임을 다한 존재들이다. 그런 까닭에 고유명사로서 우리 신화의 이곳저곳에 사후적으로 연계되면서 단군 신화나 고구려 신화와 보편적 성격을 다져나가는 데에 활용된다. 반면, 성모는 중국 제실의 딸이었다가 신선술을 익혀 우리 땅에 들어와 좌정한 성모여서 중국에서의 특별한 행적을 부각시키지 못했다. 우리 땅에 좌정한 이후 제실의 딸이면서 도래 여신적 존재인 성모로서의 성격은 보통명사화해서 여느 우리 땅의 여산신과도 습융할 수 있는 방식으로 호명되는 운명을 받아들여야 했다고 본다. 이 점이 둘 사이의 차이이고 곤·우와 성모를 달리 수용하는 방식의 차이라고 생각한다. 주원장이나 설인귀나 우리네 민중들의 시선에서는 중국의 영웅이면서 동시에 자신들과 같은 미천한 처지에서 영웅이 된 존재라는공통점을 갖는다. 그들이 조선에 사대의 예를 강요하거나 고구려를 침탈한 주역이지만 오히려 침탈의 역사적 경험이 민중들에게는 다층적인 함의를 갖게 하는 요인으로 작동했다고 볼 개연성이 있다. 역사적 인물을 매개로 한 중국에 대한 인물전설의 인식은 침탈의 주역으로서 지닌 영웅적 능력, 곧 우리 내부의 어떤 권력도 함부로 제어하지 못하는 그 능력에 초점을 두고 있다. 우리네 민중들에게 민족이라는 인식은 임의적이고 일시적인 상황에서 등장해서 굳건하게 공동체를 결집시키는 상상적 공동체의 성격을 갖는다고 생각한다. 고단한 현실의 문제를 해결하는 방식이 있다면 국적이나 민족을 넘어서서 동일화하려는 몸짓을 설화의 전승을 통해 구현한다. 설화는 일상의 전 영역을 전시간적으로 감당하지 못한다. 특별한 날에 특별한 상황에 특별한 중국의 그 무엇을 사후적으로 되새김질할 뿐이다.
Źródło:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences; 2015, 1; 39-54
2449-7444
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
HISTORY OF THE DATIVE MARKERS IN KOREAN LANGUAGE: FROM OLD KOREAN TO CONTEMPORARY KOREAN
한국어 여격조사의 역사: 고대한국어에서부터 현대한국어까지
Historia sposobu wyrażania celownika w języku koreańskim: od starokoreańskiego do współczesnego koreańskiego
Autorzy:
BAILBLÉ, Olivier
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040346.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-11-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Datives Markers
Early Middle Korean
Chinese Characters
Idu Writing System
Opis:
The focus of this paper and the intention of the author are to show in a diachronic perspective how the dative markers in Korean Language have changed and evolved during two thousand years of history. The rise of new writing systems during 8th century such as Idu and also the difference of the structure of the language between Chinese and Korean bring different conclusions. In particular, this paper will focus on the different grammatical origins of dative markers and additionally the morphological changes will be shown in those structures, especially with the rise of the Korean Alphabet in 15th century.
이 연구는 한국어 여격의 변화를 통시적 관점에서 다루고 있다. 이천 년 전 한국인들은 외국에서 온, 다시 말해 한자를 사용하기 시작하였다. 풍부하지 않은 자료로 첫 번째 여격의 초기형태를 엿보기 위해서는 5 세기 광개토대왕의 비문을 참고해야만 한다. 하지만 광개토왕의 비문의 글은중국어 문법에 따라 한자어로 쓰여 있어 문장에 대한 판독은 쉽지 않다. 바로 이러한 이유로 그 시대부터 한국사람들은 전통적인 한자어 구조를 한국어의 구조에 맞게 변경하기 시작하였다. 이러한 변화는 이두 표기법 (관료들의 문자) 의 출현에서 엿볼 수 있다. 이두 표기법은 고대의 텍스트에 존재하지 않은 한국어의 문법적인 형태를 재현해주고 있다. 게다가 12 세기경에는 우리는 이두 표기법의 여격에서 분명하게 이 변화를 알아볼 수 있다. 한편 이두 표기법은 훈민정음 창제로 또 다른 중요한 발전을 맞이하게 된다. 이두 표기법으로 표현된, 중국어의 차용으로 표기된 조사는 대다수 한글로 대체되어 사라지게 된 것이다. 여격 또한 이 변화에 예의 없이 원래의 기원과는 많이 달라진 형태를 보여준다. 유교사상의 결합으로 생긴 사회계층에 의한 높임말에 변화에 따라 여격의 변화가 생기는 것이다. 이러한 기원은 우리가 누구와 대화하느냐에 따라 다르게 표현되는 현대 한국어에서 쉽게 찾아볼 수 있다.
Źródło:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences; 2015, 1; 119-136
2449-7444
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
DIALECTS AT THE BORDER BETWEEN KOREA AND CHINA
북-중 국경지역 한국어 방언 실태
DIALEKTY NA GRANICY KOREAŃSKO-CHIŃSKIEJ
Autorzy:
LEE, Choonkyu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040290.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-11-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Korea Północna (KRLD)
mniejszość koreańska
dialekt koreański
azyl
analiza językowa służąca ustaleniu kraju pochodzenia (LADO)
North Korea
Korean-Chinese
Korean dialects
asylum
LADO
Opis:
In this paper, we seek a closer comparative dialectological study of the dialects of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Korean dialects of the ethnically Korean Chinese near the Korea-China border. Accessible resources published in English and other languages besides Korean are particularly necessary in these times of increasing instability in the North Korean regime and foreseeable cases of asylum seekers. Speech samples are discussed to illustrate the relative difficulty of distinguishing between North Korean and Korean-Chinese speakers, compared to distinguishing between North Korean and South Korean speakers. Based on an over-view of previous literature, some guidelines are developed for identifying some distinguishing characteristics of these speech communities. Continuing dialectological research with refugees and field research making direct comparisons between these communities are necessary for further and up-to-date insight.
이 연구는 북한과, 북한-중국 국경 부근에 거주하는 한국계 중국인들의 방언 비교 분석을 다룬다. 북한 정권의 불안정과 난민의 증가가 예견되는 지금, 한국어 외에도 영어 및 다른 언어로도 볼 수 있는 자료물이 시급히 필요하다. 본고는 남-북한 방언 구분보다 북한-조선족 방언 구분이 더 힘든 점을 음성 샘플 분석을 통해 보이고, 문헌 분석을 바탕으로 이 방언들의 구분되는 특징을 찾는 데 유용한 지침을 제시한다. 지속적인 새터민들과의 협력과 비교방언학 현지조사를 통해 최신 정보를 더 구축해야 할 것이다.
W niniejszym artykule przedstawione zostanie badanie dialektologiczne dialektów, jakimi posługują się użytkownicy języka Demokratycznej Republiki Ludowej Korei oraz koreańskich dialektów etnicznych u Koreańczyków pochodzenia koreańsko-chińskiego na granicy koreańsko-chińskiej. Badanie tych dialektów jest obecnie niezmiernie istotne zwłaszcza w kontekście politycznym i społecznym (w zakresie osób mogących ubiegać się o azyl). Przytoczone i omówione zostają przykłady próbek mowy by zilustrować trudności w odróżnianiu osób z Korei Północnej od osób posługujących się dialektami etnicznymi koreańsko-chińskimi. Punktem wyjścia dla zobrazowania tych trudności jest uprzednie zestawienie próbek mówców północnokoreańskich i południowokoreańskich. W oparciu o dotychczasową literaturę przedmiotu, sformułowane zostają wskazówki dotyczące sposobów identyfikacji mówców należących do tych wspólnot komunikatywnych. Wskazana jest także konieczność kontynuacji badań w tym zakresie.
Źródło:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences; 2016, 2; 157-178
2449-7444
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
DISPUTE BETWEEN CHINESE AND KOREAN RESEARCHERS CONCERNING TERRITORIAL AFFILIATION OF THE KOGURYO KINGDOM IN THE LIGHT OF ARCHEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION
고고학적 발굴을 통한 고구려 왕국의 영토적 소속에 대한 한국과 중국학자들 간의 논쟁
SPÓR POMIĘDZY BADACZAMI CHIŃSKIMI I KOREAŃSKIMI DOTYCZĄCY TERYTORIALNEJ PRZYNALEŻNOŚCI KRÓLESTWA KOGURYO W ŚWIETLE ZNALEZISK ARCHEOLOGICZNYCH
Autorzy:
AŁTYN, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040266.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-03-03
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Koguryo
Northeast Project
Koguryo tombs
Chinese historiography
Koguryo Research Foundation
Kitora Ancient Tomb
Chiny
grobowce Koguryo
historiografia chińska
grobowiec Kitora
Opis:
The aim of this article is to summarize knowledge regarding dispute about Koguryo territorial and historical affiliation, which occurred on the political and academic level. Between 37 BC and AD 668 ancient Kingdom of Koguryo embraced large area from central Manchuria to south of Seoul. After year 1945, when Korea regained independence Korean researchers were able to begin their studies on the foundation of the national identity. According to the “Serial Research Project on the History and Current status of the Northeast Border Region” started in China in 2002, Koguryo was an ethnic system in one of the provinces in ancient China. Through this project Chinese historians and archaeologists wanted to incorporate history of Koguryo into the Chinese history, which was not acceptable to Korean researchers. Because of such approach from both sides to this issue, both countries were forced to use archeological excavations and obtained relics in order to show the connection between past and present in both, Koguryo-China and Koguryo- Korea history.
Celem tego artykułu jest streszczenie wiedzy o debacie dotyczącej przynależności terytorialnej i historycznej Koguryo, która wykształciła się na poziomie politycznym i akademickim. Pomiędzy 37 rokiem p.n.e. a 668 rokiem n.e. starożytne Królestwo Koguryo zajmowało ogromny obszar od środkowej Mandżurii do terenów na południe od Seulu. Po 1945 roku, kiedy Korea odzyskała niepodległość koreańscy badacze byli w stanie rozpocząć studia dotyczące ich tożsamości narodowej. Według “ Serial Research Project on the History and Current status of the Northeast Border Region” rozpoczętego w Chinach w 2002 roku, Koguryo było jedynie systemem etnicznym wchodzącym w skład jednej z prowincji w starożytnych Chinach. Poprzez ten rozpoczęty projekt historycy oraz archeolodzy Chińscy chcieli włączyć historię Koguryo do historii Chin, co oczywiście był nie do zaakceptowania przez naukowców koreańskich. Z powodu takiego podejścia obu stron do zaistniałego problemu, oba kraje zostały zmuszone do wykorzystania wykopaliskami archeologicznych oraz uzyskanych zabytków, w celu pokazania związków między przeszłością i teraźniejszością w przypadku historii na linii Koguryo-Chiny, jak i na linii Koguryo-Korea.
기원전 37년부터기원 668년까지 고대고구려왕국은중앙만주에서서울의남쪽에 이르는광대한지역을차지하였다. 1945년 해방 이후에 한국의 학자들은 민족의 정체성에 근거하여 그들의 연구를 시작하였다. 2002년 중국에서 시작된 “동북쪽 변경지대의 역사와 현상에 관한 연구 프로젝트”에 따르면, 고구려는 고대 중국의 동북지역들 가운데 하나였다. 이 프로젝트를통해중국의역사가들과고고학자들은중국의 역사에 고구려의역사를편입시키려 하였지만, 그것은 한국의 학자들에게는 용납될 수 없는 것이었다. 이 문제에 대한 양국의 그러한 접근방법에 따라 두 나라는 얻어진 고고학적 발굴물들과 고대 유적들을 고구려-중국 혹은 고구려-한국의 과거와 현재를 잇는 연결고리라는 것을 증명하려 했다. 
Źródło:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences; 2016, 2; 35-48
2449-7444
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Investigating the history of folk Taoism: the concept of magic in the study of zhuyou rituals
Z badań nad historią ludowego taoizmu: koncepcja magii w studiach nad rytuałami zhuyou
Autorzy:
Muchowska, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31340860.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
historia ludowego taoizmu
taoistyczne rytuały pseudomedyczne
magia w literaturze chińskiej
definicja magii w badaniach taoistycznych
History of folk Taoism
Taoist pseudo-medical rituals
magic in Chinese literature
definition of magic in sinological studies
Opis:
This article is devoted to the problem of applying the concept of magic in the study of Chinese Taoist pseudo-medical practices, particularly the therapeutic and apotropaic rituals of zhuyou 祝由, using incantations and talismans (fu 符). It addresses the question of whether, in the current state of sinological research, the use of the term "magic," which originated in Western culture, is still legitimate, and whether the phenomena in question meet the criteria for magicalness. This is an important issue because of the dissonance between the trends in contemporary theoretical research on magic, showing a tendency to interpret it as a parareligious phenomenon in which the concepts of religion and magic intermingle, and the practical approach of sinologists, who still clearly distinguish magical phenomena from religious phenomena and consistently use the term 'magic'. The article also attempts to answer the question of how classical definitions of magic should be modified to be consistent with the concept of magic actually used in sinological research.
Artykuł poświęcony jest problemowi stosowania pojęcia magii w badaniach chińskich taoistycznych praktyk pseudomedycznych, w szczególności terapeutycznych i apotropaicznych rytuałów zhuyou 祝由, wykorzystujących zaklęcia i talizmany (fu 符). Autor wypowiada się w kwestii, czy stosowanie w badaniach sinologicznych terminu 'magia', pochodzącego z kultury zachodniej, jest w obecnym stanie badań ciągle zasadne i czy odnośne zjawiska spełniają kryteria magiczności. Jest to problem istotny ze względu na dysonans pomiędzy trendami we współczesnych badaniach teoretycznych nad magią, wykazującymi tendencję do intepretowania jej jako zjawiska parareligijnego, w którym pojęcia religii i magii przenikają się, a praktycznym podejściem sinologów, którzy ciągle wyraźnie odróżniają zjawiska magiczne od zjawisk religijnych i konsekwentnie posługują się terminem 'magia'. W artykuł podjęto też próbę odpowiedzi na pytanie, jak powinno się zmodyfikować klasyczne definicje magii, by były spójne z pojęciem magii faktycznie stosowanym w badaniach sinologicznych.
Źródło:
UR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; 2023, 28, 3; 98-110
2543-8379
Pojawia się w:
UR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
ON SHADOW AND FORM: KOREAN NATIONALISM’S DIGRAPHIC CONFLICT
영(影) 및 형(形)에 관하여: 한국(조선)민족주의의 이중(二重)문자 갈등
W CIENIU I FORMIE: KONFLIKT DWUZNAKÓW W KOREAŃSKIM NACJONALIZMIE
Autorzy:
Strnad, William
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040283.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-11-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Koreański nacjonalizm etniczny
konstruktywizm
instrumentalizm
znaki chińskie (Hanja)
pismo koreańskie Han’gŭl (Chosŏn’gŭl)
Korean ethnic nationalism
constructivism
instrumentalism
Chinese characters (Hanja)
Han’gŭl (Chosŏn’gŭl) exclusivity
Opis:
This paper is an examination of the many points of intersection between Korean nationalism in both Koreas, and Chinese characters (Hanja), as well as a contextualization of the historical and, at times, antithetical relationship or binary consisting of Hanja and Han’gŭl (Chosŏn’gŭl). Emerging from liberation the two Korean states over the next several decades would “engage” Hanja with diverse and fluctuating positions and approaches at different times. These responses have ranged from the abolition of Hanja or the enforcement of Han’gŭl (Chosŏn’gŭl) exclusivity, to the re-establishment and strengthening of Hanja education. Koreans for over a century have responded to “issues of script” based on socially-created narratives. This phenomenon can be viewed through constructivist paradigms, or can be interpreted as implemented pragmatic policies exemplifying instrumentalist nationalism. This paper’s assertion is that Korea’s vacillating response regarding Korean nationalism’s digraphic conflict is eloquent of the complex confluences that formed Korean ethnic nationalism, and therefore, Korean national identity.
Niniejszy artykuł stanowi wieloaspektowy przegląd „punktów stycznych” między koreańskim nacjonalizmem w obu Koreach a chińskimi znakami (Hanja). W tym aspekcie ukazuje również kontekstualizację historyczną, występujący niekiedy przeciwstawny związek czy istniejącą „podwójność”, która składa się z Hanja i Han’gŭl (Chosŏn’gŭl). W powstałych po wyzwoleniu dwóch państwach koreańskich w ciągu kolejnych kilku dekad znaki chińskie były nadal stosowane różnorodnie w różnym czasie. Zastanawiano się nad zniesieniem (likwidacją) Hanja i wprowadzeniem wyłącznie pisma koreańskiego, jak i nad przywróceniem i umocnieniem edukacji Hanja. Koreańczycy od ponad wieku odnoszą się do „kwestii pisma” w oparciu o społecznie tworzone narracje. Zjawisko to może być rozważane (analizowane) przez paradygmaty konstruktywistyczne lub może być postrzegane (tłumaczone) jako wprowadzenie pragmatycznych zasad ukazujących instrumentalny nacjonalizm. W kontekście koreańskiego nacjonalizmu pokazano konflikt dotyczący stosowania w Koreach dwuznaku (podwójności pisma: Hanja i Han’gŭl (Chosŏn’gŭl), co powiązane jest z kształtowaniem się koreańskiego nacjonalizmu etnicznego, a zatem i koreańskiej tożsamości narodowej.
본 논문은 남북한의 민족주의와 한자 사이의 많은 교차점을 분석하는 것뿐만 아니라, 한자와 한글(조선글) 간의 역사적 때때로는 상반되는 관계 및 이중성을 맥락화하는 것이다. 해방 후 수십 년 동안 남북한의 한자에 대한 입장과 정책은 다양하게 변화해 왔고, 그것은 한자폐지 혹은 한글(조선글)전용의 강제로 시작하여 한자교육의 재건이나 강화 등으로 나타났다. 한 세기 이상에 걸쳐 한국(조선)인들은 “문자의 문제”에 대해 사회적으로 이루어진 내러티브에 입각하여 반응했다. 이 현상은 구성주의 패러다임을 통해 볼 수 있으며, 또는 도구적 민족주의를 증명하는 실용 정책의 구현이라 해석될 수도 있다. 본 논문은 한국(조선) 민족주의의 이중(二重)문자 갈등에 관한 변동적 반응이 한국(조선)의 민족주의 즉, 한국(조선)의 정체성을 형성해 가는 복잡한 합류점임을 밝힌다.
Źródło:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences; 2016, 2; 87-122
2449-7444
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies