- Tytuł:
- Jan Białostocki (1921–1988)
- Autorzy:
- Ziemba, Antoni
- Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/707061.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2011
- Wydawca:
- Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
- Tematy:
-
POLAND
ART HISTORY
BIALOSTOCKI - Opis:
- This article introduces Jan Białostocki (1921-1988), who is considered the most outstanding Polish art historian, and who belonged to the world’s elite humanist scholars of the twentieth century. Throughout his life, Bialostocki was associated with two institutions: the Institute of Art History at the Warsaw University and the National Museum in Warsaw. He lectured at numerous European and American universities. He was a member of several European Academies of Sciences, and Vice-President of the Comité International d'Histoire de l'Art, Conseil International de la Philosophie et des Sciences Humaines. He also received the Warburg-Preis award. Białostocki was the author of over 500 major scholarly publications, including such fundamental works as: Les Primitifs Flamands: Les Musées de Pologne (1966), Spätmittelalter und beginnende Neuzeit (Propylaen Kunstgeschichte VII, 1972), The Art of the Renaissance in Eastern Europe: Hungary, Bohemia, Poland (1976), and Il Quattrocento nell' Europa Settentrionale (1989). His main focus was on iconology, which he developed, often arguing with its founder, E. Panofsky. He proposed the modus theory in art history, which made an important impact on Western art literature, as well as the category of “framework theme” (Rahmenthema). Białostocki also put forward a comprehensive vision of the methods of art history comprising the study of a work of art as a physical object, of its genesis as well as the analysis of the reception. Very important to Białostocki’s interestswas the problem of the relationship between the center/periphery, metropolitanism/ provincialism – he fought with the stereotyped geohistory of European art caught in the paradigm of centralism, Eurocentrism, Italocentrism or Francocentrism.
- Źródło:
-
Rocznik Historii Sztuki; 2011, 36; 157-171
0080-3472 - Pojawia się w:
- Rocznik Historii Sztuki
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł