Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Aristotle’s rhetoric" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10
    Tytuł:
    Aristotle’s "Rhetoric": A Pragmatist Analysis of Persuasive Interchange
    Autorzy:
    Prus, Robert
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138564.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2008-08-31
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Aristotle
    Rhetoric
    Influence
    Activity
    Agency
    Identity
    Emotions
    Justice
    Culpability
    Symbolic interaction
    Pragmatism
    Opis:
    Approaching rhetoric as the study of persuasive interchange, this paper considers the relevance of Aristotle's Rhetoric for the study of human group life. Although virtually unknown to modern day social scientists, this text has great relevance for contemporary scholarship. Not only does Aristotle's text centrally address influence work (and resistance), identities and reputations, deviance and culpability, emotionality and deliberation, and the broader process of human knowing and acting in political, character shaping, and courtroom contexts, but Aristotle also deals with these matters in remarkably comprehensive, systematic, and precise terms. Attending to the human capacity for agency, Aristotle also works with a sustained appreciation of purposive, reflective, adjustive interchange. Hence, whereas this text is invaluable of as a resource for the comparative transhistorical analysis of human interchange, it also suggests a great many ways that contemporary scholarship could be extended in the quest for a more adequate, more authentic social science.
    Źródło:
    Qualitative Sociology Review; 2008, 4, 2; 24-62
    1733-8077
    Pojawia się w:
    Qualitative Sociology Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Generating, Intensifying, and Redirecting Emotionality: Conceptual and Ethnographic Implications of Aristotle’s Rhetoric
    Autorzy:
    Prus, Robert
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373617.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Emotionality
    Theory
    Ethnography
    Aristotle
    Rhetoric
    Pragmatism
    Interactionism
    Persuasion
    Negotiated Reality
    Opis:
    In contrast to those who more characteristically approach emotion as an individual realm of experience of more distinctive physiological and/or psychological sorts, this paper addresses emotionality as a socially experienced, linguistically enabled, activity-based process. While conceptually and methodologically situated within contemporary symbolic interactionist thought (Mead 1934; Blumer 1969; Strauss 1993; Prus 1996; 1997; 1999; Prus and Grills 2003), this statement is centrally informed by the pragmatist considerations of emotionality that Aristotle (circa 384-322 BCE) develops in Rhetoric. Although barely known to those in the human sciences, Aristotle’s Rhetoric provides a great deal of insight into people’s definitions of, and experiences with, a wide array of emotions. Addressing matters of persuasive interchange in political, judicial, and evaluative contexts, Aristotle gives particular attention to the intensification and neutralization of people’s emotional states. This includes (1) anger and calm, (2) friendship and enmity, (3) fear and confidence, (4) shame and shamelessness, (5) kindness and inconsideration, (6) pity and indignation, and (7) envy and emulation. Following an introduction to “rhetoric” (as the study of persuasive interchange) and “emotionality,” this paper briefly (1) outlines a pragmatist/interactionist approach to the study of emotionality, (2) considers Aristotle as a sociological pragmatist, (3) locates Aristotle’s work within the context of classical Greek thought, (4) acknowledges the relationship of emotionality and morality, and (5) addresses emotionality as a generic social process. Following (6) a more sustained consideration of emotionality within the context of Aristotle’s Rhetoric, the paper concludes with (7) a short discussion of the importance of Aristotle’s work for studying emotionality as a realm of human lived experience on a contemporary plane.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej; 2013, 9, 2; 10-45
    1733-8069
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Generating, Intensifying, and Redirecting Emotionality: Conceptual and Ethnographic Implications of Aristotle’s Rhetoric
    Autorzy:
    Prus, Robert
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108131.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013-10-31
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Emotionality
    Theory
    Ethnography
    Aristotle
    Rhetoric
    Pragmatism
    Interactionism
    Persuasion
    Negotiated Reality
    Opis:
    In contrast to those who more characteristically approach emotion as an individual realm of experience of more distinctive physiological and/or psychological sorts, this paper addresses emotionality as a socially experienced, linguistically enabled, activity-based process. While conceptually and methodologically situated within contemporary symbolic interactionist thought (Mead 1934; Blumer 1969; Strauss 1993; Prus 1996; 1997; 1999; Prus and Grills 2003), this statement is centrally informed by the pragmatist considerations of emotionality that Aristotle (circa 384-322 BCE) develops in Rhetoric. Although barely known to those in the human sciences, Aristotle’s Rhetoric provides a great deal of insight into people’s definitions of, and experiences with, a wide array of emotions. Addressing matters of persuasive interchange in political, judicial, and evaluative contexts, Aristotle gives particular attention to the intensification and neutralization of people’s emotional states. This includes (1) anger and calm, (2) friendship and enmity, (3) fear and confidence, (4) shame and shamelessness, (5) kindness and inconsideration, (6) pity and indignation, and (7) envy and emulation. Following an introduction to “rhetoric” (as the study of persuasive interchange) and “emotionality,” this paper briefly (1) outlines a pragmatist/interactionist approach to the study of emotionality, (2) considers Aristotle as a sociological pragmatist, (3) locates Aristotle’s work within the context of classical Greek thought, (4) acknowledges the relationship of emotionality and morality, and (5) addresses emotionality as a generic social process. Following (6) a more sustained consideration of emotionality within the context of Aristotle’s Rhetoric, the paper concludes with (7) a short discussion of the importance of Aristotle’s work for studying emotionality as a realm of human lived experience on a contemporary plane.
    Źródło:
    Qualitative Sociology Review; 2013, 9, 4; 6-42
    1733-8077
    Pojawia się w:
    Qualitative Sociology Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Z recepcji Retoryki Arystotelesa w Bizancjum
    On the Reception of Aristotle’s Rhetoric in Byzantium
    Autorzy:
    Cichocka, Helena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938397.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Aristotle
    rhetoric
    Troilus
    Athanasius
    Sopatros
    Doxapatres
    Maximus
    Planudes
    Opis:
    The paper deals with the reception of Aristotle’s definition of rhetoric(Rhet. I 1355b26–27) in several Byzantine commentators of Hermogenes’and Aphthonius’ treatises. A justification of critical interpretationof this definition is to be found in the commentaries of Troilus and Athanasius(4th/5th century) as well as Sopatros (6th century) and Doxapatres(11th century), Maximus Planudes (13th/14th century) and several anonymouscommentators. The Byzantine tradition has found Aristotle’s definitionof rhetoric to be all too theoretical and insufficiently connected topractical activity, which Byzantium identified with political life.
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2012, 3, 1; 231-238
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Strategie argumentacji w teorii retoryki Arystotelesa: entymematy pozorne i obalające
    Autorzy:
    Lechniak, Marek
    Stefańczyk, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/561254.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne
    Tematy:
    argumentacja
    entymemat
    sylogizm
    retoryka Arystotelesa
    entymemat pozorny
    entymemat obalający
    logiki niemonotoniczne
    argumentation
    enthymeme
    syllogism
    Aristotle’s rhetoric
    apparent enthymeme
    refutative enthymeme
    nonmonotonic logics
    Opis:
    Arystoteles wyodrębnił w Organonie dwa rodzaje rozumowań: analityczne i dialektyczne. Badaniami rozumowań analitycznych, które podjął w Analitykach I i II, zasłużył sobie na miano ojca logiki formalnej. Według Chaima Perelmana, współczesnym logikom umknął z pola widzenia fakt, że rozważania Arystotelesa na temat rozumowań dialektycznych – podjęte w Topikach, Retoryce i O dowodach sofistycznych – czynią zeń także ojca teorii argumentacji. Niniejszy artykuł jest próbą odpowiedzi na tę diagnozę. Jego celem jest potwierdzenie tezy Perelmana o jednorodności Arystotelesowskiej koncepcji sylogizmu teoretycznego i praktycznego. W tym potwierdzeniu kluczową rolę odgrywa pojęcie entymematu. W artykule odpowiadamy na pytanie, jakie miejsce zajmuje ono w teorii retoryki Arystotelesa i porównujemy je z ogólnym pojęciem sylogizmu. Szkicujemy też strukturę argumentacji przez entymemat oraz przedstawiamy dwa typy entymematów omawiane przez Arystotelesa: pozorne i obalające.
    The aim of the article is to confirm the thesis of Chaim Perelman on the homogeneity of Aristotle’s results regarding the theoretical and practical syllogism by presenting the concept of enthymeme; the article presents a description of what the enthymeme is and what place it occupies in the theory of Aristotle’s rhetoric; the concept of enthymeme is confronted with the concept of syllogism, the structure of the argumentation through the enthymeme is outlined and the particular types of the enthymeme distinguished by Aristotle, namely the apparent enthymeme and the refutational enthymeme, are also discussed. An attempt to look at the analyzed types of enthymemes from the point of view of contemporary logic (especially nonmonotonic logic) is also undertaken.
    Źródło:
    Studia Semiotyczne; 2018, 32, 1; 77-112
    0137-6608
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Semiotyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kompozycja wypowiedzi w ujęciu greckiej szkoły retorycznej
    Komposition der Rede in Anlehnung an die Griechische Schule der Rhetorik
    Autorzy:
    Nowaszczuk, Jarosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2127739.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2007
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    grecka szkoła retoryczna
    budowa wypowiedzi
    kompozycja mowy
    Koraks i Tejzjasz
    Retoryka Arystotelesa
    części mowy
    argumentacja retoryczna
    schemat wypowiedzi
    naturalny porządek wypowiedzi
    artystyczny porządek wypowiedzi
    Greek rhetorical school
    construction of speech
    speech composition
    Corax and Teisias
    Aristotle’s Rhetoric
    parts of speech
    rhetorical argumentation
    rhetorical speech model
    ordo naturalis – natural order of things
    ordo artificialis – artificial word-order
    Opis:
    Die Frage nach, was sich in einer Rede befinden soll und wie die einzelnen Teile des Inhalts geordnet werden müssen, war präsent schon in der frühen Rhetorik und galt immer als der Interessengegenstand in diesem Bereich des Wissens. Seit den legendären Korax und Teisias, über die Lehren der ersten Sophisten, Isokrates und Platon, Vertreter der zweiten Sophistik, Aristoteles, bis zu Hermagoras und Hermogenes, war die Redestruktur der Gegenstand von rhetorischen Untersuchungen und Besprechungen. Zuerst bediente man sich der sogenannten „natürlichen Ordnung der Dinge“ (ordo naturalis), also der angeborenen und oft unaufgeklärten Art und Weise von Schilderung eines Sachverhalts. Später teilte man die Rede in einzelne Teile, unter denen als fundamental Darlegung des Sachverhalts und Beweisführung gelten, was bei Aristoteles πρόϑεσις und πίστις genannt wird. Diesen zwei Grundelementen wurden noch andere zugegeben und das waren die Einleitung (προ- οίμιον), Erzählung (διήγησις), Vorwürfe (διαβολῆ), Das Entkräften von Argumenten des Gegners (λύσις), die Fragenstellung (ἐρώτησις) und der Redeschluss (ἐπίλογος). Die Zahl dieser Elemente ist jedoch bei verschiedenen Autoren unterschiedlich. Was noch betont werden soll, ist, dass die Redestrukturen nicht im Widerspruch zueinander stehen. Sie entwickeln die von den Vorgängern ausgearbeiteten Konzepte.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2007, 54-55, 3; 241-262
    0035-7707
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kenneth Burke’s Dramatistic Pragmatism: A Missing Link between Classical Greek Scholarship and the Interactionist Study of Human Knowing and Acting
    Autorzy:
    Prus, Robert
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108125.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017-04-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Kenneth Burke
    Dramatistic Pragmatism
    Classical Greek Scholarship
    Symbolic Interaction
    Rhetoric
    Dramatistic Sociology
    Knowing and Acting
    Aristotle
    Cicero
    Erving Goffman
    Opis:
    The term “rhetoric” often has been maligned by those lacking familiarity with classical Greek and Latin scholarship. However, a more sustained, historically-informed examination of persuasive interchange is of fundamental importance for the study of human knowing and acting across the humanities and social sciences, as well as all other realms of community life. While acknowledging several contemporary scholars who have reengaged aspects of classical Greek and Latin rhetoric, this statement gives particular attention to the works of Kenneth Burke and the linkages of Burke’s writings with Aristotle’s Rhetoric, as well as American pragmatist thought and the ethnographically, conceptually-oriented sociology known as symbolic interactionism (Blumer 1969; Strauss 1993; Prus 1996; 1997; 1999; 2015; Prus and Grills 2003). Because scholarship does not exist as isolated instances of genius, even the productions of highly accomplished individuals such as Kenneth Burke are best understood within the context of a horizontal- temporal, as well as a vertical-historical intellectual community. Accordingly, Burke’s contributions to the human sciences more generally and pragmatist social theory (along with its sociological extension, symbolic interaction) more specifically are best comprehended within this broader, historically-enabled scholarly context. Kenneth Burke’s dramatistic pragmatism is not the only missing link between classical Greek thought and symbolic interactionism, but Burke’s work on rhetoric represents a particularly important medium for extending the conceptual and analytic parameters of contemporary symbolic interaction. Indeed, Kenneth Burke’s scholarship has important implications for the fuller study of community life as implied in the most fundamental and enabling terms of human knowing and acting.
    Źródło:
    Qualitative Sociology Review; 2017, 13, 2; 6-58
    1733-8077
    Pojawia się w:
    Qualitative Sociology Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Why Is Poetry More Philosophical Than History? Some Remarks On Aristotle’s Poetics
    Autorzy:
    Domański, Iulius
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633557.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Aristotle
    poetry
    rhetoric
    history
    philosophy
    Opis:
    Aristotle’s statement that - in terms of philosophy - poetry is superior to history can be understood better, when analysed in the context of the Stagirite’s epistemology, ontology, and eudaimonic ethics. Both poetry and history deal with numerous contingent and chaotic events, but while history is only reconstructive, poetry reworks its matter more thoroughly. History attempts to recount all events and does it in accord with their contingent and chaotic nature, whereas poetry implies certain choices. By doing so, it introduces uniformity and coherence thus providing a different ontic status than the one that reigned originally. Consequently, the cognitive result of poetry can be compared to the beatific value of conceptual knowledge in philosophy.
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2010, 1, 1; 75-82
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    HONOR, ANGER, AND BELITTLEMENT IN ARISTOTLE’S ETHICS
    Autorzy:
    Sokolowski, Robert
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507292.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Aristotle
    honor
    ethics
    politics
    anger
    belittlement
    contempt
    friendship
    virtue
    vice
    incontinence
    flattery
    wealth
    pleasure
    rhetoric
    Opis:
    The author considers the phenomenon of honor by examining Aristotle’s description of it and its role in ethical and political life. His study of honor leads him to two related phenomena, anger and belittlement or contempt; examining them helps him define honor more precisely. With his examination of honor the author shows how densely interwoven Aristotle’s ethical theory is; he illuminates such diverse things as the human good, political life and friendship, virtue, vice, incontinence, flattery, wealth and pleasure; he shows how the metaphysical principles of dunamis and energeia are at work in human affairs; he treats the passion of anger as well as the moral attitude of contempt that provokes it, and he situates both within the study of rhetoric.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2014, 3; 221-240
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Influence Work, Resistance, and Educational Life-Worlds: Quintilian’s [Marcus Fabius Quintilianus] (35-95 CE) Analysis of Roman Oratory as an Instructive Ethnohistorical Resource and Conceptual Precursor of Symbolic Interactionist Scholarship
    Autorzy:
    Prus, Robert
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2106788.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-07-31
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Quintilian
    Rhetoric
    Aristotle
    Cicero
    Roman Oratory
    Education
    Symbolic Interactionism
    Ethnohistory
    Persuasive Interchange
    American Pragmatism
    Impression Management
    Courtroom Exchanges
    Opis:
    Despite the striking affinities of classical Greek and Latin rhetoric with the pragmatist/interactionist analysis of the situated negotiation of reality and its profound relevance for the analysis of human group life more generally, few contemporary social scientists are aware of the exceptionally astute analyses of persuasive interchange developed by Aristotle, Cicero, and Quintilian. Having considered the analyses of rhetoric developed by Aristotle (384-322 BCE) and Cicero (106-43 BCE) in interactionist terms (Prus 2007a; 2010), the present paper examines Quintilian’s (35-95 CE) contributions to the study of persuasive interchange more specifically and the nature of human knowing and acting more generally. Focusing on the education and practices of orators (rhetoricians), Quintilian (a practitioner as well as a distinctively thorough instructor of the craft) provides one of the most sustained, most systematic analyses of influence work and resistance to be found in the literature. Following an overview of Quintilian’s “ethnohistorical” account of Roman oratory, this paper concludes by drawing conceptual parallels between Quintilian’s analysis of influence work and the broader, transcontextual features of symbolic interactionist scholarship (Mead 1934; Blumer 1969; Prus 1996; 1997; 1999; Prus and Grills 2003). This includes “generic social processes” such as: acquiring perspectives, attending to identity, being involved, doing activity, engaging in persuasive interchange, developing relationships, experiencing emotionality, attaining linguistic fluency, and participating in collective events. Offering a great many departure points for comparative analysis, as well as ethnographic examinations of the influence process, Quintilian’s analysis is particularly instructive as he addresses these and related aspects of human knowing, acting, and interchange in highly direct, articulate, and detailed ways. Acknowledging the conceptual, methodological, and analytic affinities of The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian with symbolic interactionism, an epilogue, Quintilian as an Intellectual Precursor to American Pragmatist Thought and the Interactionist Study of Human Group Life, addresses the relative lack of attention given to classical Greek and Latin scholarship by the American pragmatists and their intellectual progeny, as well as the importance of maintaining a more sustained transcontextual and transhistorical focus on the study of human knowing, acting, and interchange.
    Źródło:
    Qualitative Sociology Review; 2022, 18, 3; 6-52
    1733-8077
    Pojawia się w:
    Qualitative Sociology Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies