Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 26
Tytuł:
Археологічні пам’ятки Любеча
Archaeological monuments of Liubech
Autorzy:
Веремейчик, Олена
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28407599.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Zarubinetskya Archaeological culture
Romny Archaeological culture
Middle Age
fortified settlement
cemeteries
Opis:
The archaeological heritage of Liubech (Lyubech, Chernihiv region, Ukraine) includes various monuments and objects from the Bronze Age to early Modernity (2000 BC – 17th century) with small time gaps. Archaeological surveys in Liubech began in the late 19th century and have continued until today with certain interruptions. Despite the close attention paid by scholars to the archaeological monuments of Liubech, it should be noted that the area of the city within its administrative boundaries (both the floodplain part of the Dnieper River and the densely developed part of the town) has not been sufficiently studied.
Źródło:
Slavia Antiqua: rocznik poświęcony starożytnościom słowiańskim; 2023, 64; 21-57
0080-9993
Pojawia się w:
Slavia Antiqua: rocznik poświęcony starożytnościom słowiańskim
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona zabytków archeologicznych?
The Protection of Archaeological Monuments?
Autorzy:
Szpanowski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536808.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona zabytków archeologicznych
Ośrodek Ochrony Dziedzictwa Archeologicznego (OODA)
konserwatorstwo archeologiczne
prace archeologiczne i wykopaliskowe w Polsce
zabytki archeologiczne w Polsce
Opis:
Once again archaeological conservation is in the throes of institutional transformations, which in 2002 involved offices and institutions associated with the protection of cultural heritage. The protection of archaeological monuments has been, for all practical purposes, excluded from the tasks of government administration, which included the Office of the General Conservator of H istorical Monuments, liquidated on 31 March 2002. Its fate was shared by the Centre for Salvage Archaeological Research and the Department of Archaeology at the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments. Today, the protection of archaeological monuments is the domain of the newly established Centre for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage which, in its capacity as a cultural institution outside the structure of government administration, has been entrusted with extremely responsible tasks stemming from the regulations of the binding statute about the protection of cultural property and acts of international law, supervision over the Service of the Protection of Historical Monuments entailing the p ro tection of archeological monuments, current inventories, the documentation and assessment of the state of the preservation of monuments and tackling the challenges of an epoch of the domination of digital techniques, in which the usefulness of archaeological archives will be decided by the degree of their accessibility with the help of modern information instruments.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 2; 214-216
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zabytki archeologiczne w środowisku naturalnym
ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS IN THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Autorzy:
Jaskanis, Danuta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535610.pdf
Data publikacji:
1978
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
krajobraz
środowisko naturalne
plany zagospodarowania przestrzennego
las formą ochrony krajobrazu
Opis:
One of the major tasks of archaeological conservation is the protection o f archaeological sites as elements of cultural and spatial complexes. In view o f an intensified rate o f socio-economic growth and a process o f landscape deformation related to it, it is necessary to work out an adequate way to secure sites by means o f rescue actions other than excavation methods. Because o f the fact that the function o f a ground archaeological monument as an element o f cultural landscape and as a spatial element has not as yet been always properly comprehended, this problem needs interdisciplinary measures to be taken in programming the protection o f this category o f monuments. The problem should also be included in regional plans o f spatial development o f towns, settlements, villages as well as in investment plans of economically developed historic areas. It is not enough today to care only for the inviolability o f monumental substance; protection o f archaeological sites should consist in proper exposing, i.e. preserving their old specific nature and atmosphere. Until now, spatial development of historic towns has had a wrong approach to the relics o f strongholds, incorrectly excluding them from a generally applied terminology in the field o f historic monuments. Forestry department has issued a number of normative acts on the principles o f protecting monuments of material culture on wooded lands. The problem to be still solved is a proper tourist development o f wooded lands with monuments o f material culture on them. It is planned to create soon an archaeological and natural reserve on the territory o f the Białowieża Forest, that would secure and make open for visiting grave mounds dating back to the early Middle Ages, old charcoal piles and field patches o f a former village. As regards problems involved in the protection o f objects situated in open landscape, it is necessary to be able to recognize, still at the stage o f designing, planned economic investments and to assess the projects involving areas o f cultural and landscape values. An early orientation o f archaeological conservation services allows them to interfere into projects or to take up measures protecting the site prior to investment works. This may be exemplified by the object at Haćki, Bielsk Podlaski commune, where the intervention o f conservation authorities resulted in abandoning a melioration project that constituted a threat to natural environment. It is also necessary for conservators to interfere into a plan o f making an artifical lake at Drohiczyn, as it might destroy and deform a unique spatial complex. Problems o f proper protection o f spatial archaeological monuments were raised at a symposium held at Białystok in October 1977, entitled: „Problems o f developing archaeological posts in town agglomerations and wood complexes”.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1978, 4; 256-261
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena wartości – niezbędny etap ochrony zabytków archeologicznych
Value assessment - a necessary stage for the protection of archaeological monuments
Autorzy:
Konopka, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113974.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
Tematy:
valuing
archaeological sites
record of historic monuments and sites
wycena
stanowiska archeologiczne
zapis zabytków i miejsc
Opis:
In 2012 and 2015, Zbigniew Kobyliński’s articles on valuing archaeological monuments and sites (the article of 2012 was co-authored by Jacek Wysocki) were printed in post-conference publications. Z. Kobyliński assumed that historic preservation officers can assess values of archaeological sites by basing on non-scientific criteria and the level of preservation of artifacts only. The author is also of the opinion that the criteria used for classifying and categorising both properties of special architectural and historic interest and works of arts cannot be applied to archaeological sites. This stems from the knowledge on full potential of archaeological monuments and sites being limited prior to conducting thorough analyses. According to Kobyliński, any value assessment results in negative selection of archaeological sites and therefore, it is of utmost importance to provide all resources with appropriate protection. The author of this article takes a different point of view. Assuming that there is 0.5 million sites entered into the Polish record of archaeological monuments and sites, Konopka is of the opinion that it is and will be impossible to provide all resources even with basic monitoring, not mentioning active care. He reckons that basing on the information collected by archaeologists, it is possible to nominate sites of outstanding potential. Analysing the records by applying the most innovative non-invasive methods may allow for selecting sites which should be provided with particular care in a certain region. Konopka calls for implementing a form in which past relics of outstanding historical value and features characteristic of archaeological sites would be listed. These would be useful in identifying the potential of the place to be protected. He suggests creating a card being of higher rank than the record. The information provided therein would be helpful in nominating properties and sites to be entered into the register of historic monuments and sites.
Źródło:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 57-66
2543-6422
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Z zagadnień ekspozycji zabytków archeologicznych in situ : problemy ekspozycji na grodzisku
ON PROBLEMS OF THE IN SITU DISPLAY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS
Autorzy:
Augustyniak, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539689.pdf
Data publikacji:
1973
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
zabytek archeologiczny
muzealnictwo archeologiczne
eksponowanie zabytków archeologicznych
rezerwat archeologiczny
grodzisko kasztelańskie w Gieczu
rezerwat archeologiczny w Kaliszu-Zawodziu
grodzisko w Brudnie Starym w Warszawie
Sieradzki Park Etnograficzny
Opis:
Within the complex structure of a „bridge” linking the past with our days in the field of evolution and development of both artistic culture and historical conscience of a society the historic monuments, the relics of the past, no doubt, have their important place. In fact entirely particular position is being kept among them by those of archaeological character since they relate to times from which no written records or sources have survived, or are available in quite negligible numbers. The advances of archaeological excavations conducted in the period of the Polish People’s Republic resulted in a considerable extension of the so-called source material base, i.e. in enrichment of supply of materials enabling the insight into the story of formation of the Polish State. An immense supply of source materials has led to changes in activities of such important institutions where they can be popularized as are the museums. However, this fundamental change that occured with regard to the basic form of the museum’s activities, i.e. display is by far inadequate nowadays. Those serious objectives that are being set by contemporaneity before museums are in a considerable measure concerning the display itself. Today it can by no means be based on scientific information alone that has been furnished by archaeology, history of art or by ethnography. There exists a need to find a creative agent in its system as it should contain a number of experiences of emotional nature that are required by young people, it must emphasize the importance of direct contact with original objects and more still — it should prevent the loss of historical and social receptiveness. A properly thought modern display method should avoid any forms of stereotyped presentation whatsoever that obscures its sense and makes its language more or less conventionalized. The display space should be handled as a place of action or even to some extent as a theatrical stage on which with the aid of exhibits a sui generis performance can be played. The displayed exhibits do not in themselves constitute any information — they only form an informative situation that controls the flow of information in a strictly predetermined manner. As one of possible answers to objectives that are set before archaeological museums by contemporaneity is to be considered the display of archaeological objects in situ. The first attempts to cristallize an idea of archaeological reservation were made in Poland as early as in 1934 at Biskupin. At present the number of reservations whose forms comply to definition by Professor K. Piwocki is ranging as high as to ten. The author distinguishes two types of archaeological reservations: I — a simple reservation, and II — a composed reservation. As the background for such distinction was adopted the form of relics discovered. As the most essential element of the in situ display is to be considered that of proportion between the historical substance and installations and equipment that are necessary to secure the appropriate functioning of reservation and are decisive for the effects and impressions that can be received by visitors. With concern to the in situ display of archaeological relics within the space of an ancient castle the author suggests that (1) the castle site needs to be immediately and inseparably linked with its natural environment which the links should in no way be disturbed by any modern buildings or other kind of installations, (2) regardless of the state of preservation of a castle its shape that survived to our days forms a part of its historical substance and should therefore be protected. The architectural design of display must take into account the following: (a) the necessary climatic conditions (i.e. temperature, humidity) under which can be kept the relics exposed to their action, (b) an appropriate from the historical and aesthetic viewpoint display of relics themselves. In his further considerations the author discussed some examples of archaeological sites within the ancient castles that have already been realized as, for instance, that of Giecz or are now at the stage of designing as those at Kalisz or Bródno Stare. Unfortunately, all the three archaeological sites mentioned above in their architectural designs are far enough from the required respect for the castle solids as the latter have seriously been disturbed by service installations and equipment. The author of the present publication is responsible for general design of archaeological site at Sieradz being discussed here and forming an integral part of the Sieradz Ethnographic Park. The ethnographic part will, however, not disturb the natural environment of the Sieradz castle site as a wide green belt and plantings accentuating the site occuppied by ancient castle will ensure the appropriate proportion between the both parts. As a result of archaeological investigations the following elements have been planned as those designed for permanent exhibition: (1) the 13th-century timber-constructed fortifications, (2) the relics of brickwork rotunda of the 13th century, (3) the negative pattern of circumpherential castle wall built during the 14th century. To prevent the damage to the castle solid preserved to our times it was decided that the in situ display of the discovered relics will be placed at the underground level. None of installations that are inevitable for preservation and display of historic substance will be visible at the ground level. Both system and rôle of the separate components forming the whole display on the Sieradz archaeological site have been devised as follows: Part I — „Prologue”; (1) Projection of a film devoted to „History of Sieradz covering the period of the 6th to 15th century A.D.”; (2) a printed „Guide to Archaeological Site, Sieradz” having special version for young readers with a plastic reconstruction of the castle site; Part II — „Culmination”; Pavilion No 1 housing the relics of the timber constructed fortifications and those of rotunda; Pavilion No 2 housing the negative castle wall pattern; Part III — „Epilogue”; a display of the movable historical monuments coming from excavations conducted on the castle site. It may be said that Parts I and III perform a subordinated, servicing function thus supporting the main part of the in situ display and their location (Part I forming a projection room is housed in an especially adapted to purpose historic building located within the „ethnographic” area whereas Part III in the Sieradz Museum some 500 m from the castle site) creates conditions favouring the exclusive display of relics excavated within the castle site. At any rate, however, the proportion of historic substance to the necessary safeguarding and servicing installations remains an open problem in the in situ display. Nevertheless, it is a duty of every conservator and designing architect to keep this problem before his eyes and to make every possible effort to arrive at its optimum solution.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1973, 4; 270-283
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kilka uwag o problemach ochrony zabytków archeologicznych w Polsce
SOME NOTES ON PROBLEMS INVOLVED IN THE PROTECTION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS IN POLAND
Autorzy:
Jaskanis, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537168.pdf
Data publikacji:
1978
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
badania wykopaliskowe
konserwator zabytków archeologicznych
konserwatorstwo archeologiczne
ochrona zabytków archeologicznych
Opis:
Pointing out some characteristics typical o f archaeological monuments, the article deals only with some of the problems involved in their protection. In the author’s view, these problems have lost none o f their immediate interest, as they have been discussed by professional circles in Poland for quite a long time, especially at scientific and specialistic conferences, meetings and symposia and not only at those concerning conservation and museums. One o f the reasons is undoubtedly the fact that under the Polish conditions o f intensive economic growth archaeological monuments show a growing susceptibility to devastation and the problem o f providing their effective protection becomes an everyday complaint. In order to ensure this effectiveness, the author finds it indispensable to have the following factors available: 1) adequate regulations that would precisely determine purposes, measures and principles o f the work, 2) highly qualified and well equipped personnel, able to carry out tasks entrusted, 3) a conducive climate in both a professional circle o f archaeologists who would recognize the priority of interests in the field o f the protection o f archaeological monuments and also in the whole Polish society, 4) creation and development o f scientific, theoretical and methodical foundations for works on conservation and museums in Poland, and consequently a need to train conservators and to use them in a proper way. In view o f the above, the author points out the need o f amending or correcting some o f the wordings o f the present law on the pro tection of cultural values, attaching thus more importance to it as to the act duly sorting out both general and singular matters pertaining to all kinds o f monuments including archaeological ones. Quite a few comments concern organization and capacity needs o f the executive organ, i.e. the so-called conservation section (conservators o f archaeological monuments). The author thinks that one of the best forms o f work at a voivodship level is —■ under the absence o f a single modus operandi — a junction o f archaeological conservation work with that of museums. This creates a possibility of specialistic operation based on the numerous personnel and with technical and storehouse resources. A rational use o f powers and measures can also be obtained in the case o f recording and popularization works. Listing positive examples o f the operation o f such a solution (e.g. in Białystok voivodship), the author does not mean to suggest a universality o f that model, emphasizing the need o f choosing a model that would best suit the conditions prevailing in a given region. Further on, the author presents his comments on the necessity o f professional training of archaeologists in the field o f conservation; this should be included into the programme o f both university studies as well as make the subject o f doctor’s and other kinds of specialistic dissertations. The final comment concluding the article concerns the need to consolidate works o f the central archaeological conservation centre.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1978, 4; 246-249
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
SKARBY ZIEMI WYDARTE. GÓRNY ŚLĄSK I POGRANICZE Red. Eugeniusz Tomczak, Wyd. Śląskie Centrum Dziedzictwa Kulturowego w Katowicach, Katowice 2005
TREASURES EXTRACTED FROM THE EARTH. UPPER SILESIA AND THE BORDERLAND. Ed. by Eugeniusz Tomczak, Wyd. Slaskie
Autorzy:
Krajewska, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538242.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS
TOMCZAK EUGENIUSZ
UPPER SILESIA
Opis:
The album 'Skarby ziemi wydarte. Gorny Slask i pogranicze' (Treasures Extracted from the Earth. Upper Silesia and the Borderland), was published in 2005 by the Silesian Centre of Cultural Heritage in Katowice. It is the outcome of editorial cooperation supervised by Eugeniusz Tomczak and involving scientific institutes, museums, cultural institutions, and the collector Roman Czarnecki. A presentation of archaeological monuments and objects discovered in the present-day voivodeships of Silesia and Opole. The well-devised and logical arrangement. of the book starts with an Introduction by Jerzy Piekalski, in four versions: Polish, English, German and Czech, with the author discussing the fundamental concepts and most essential issues of archaeology. He also outlined the history of Silesia, emphasising the fact that this is a region of the permeation and stratification of assorted cultures. Finally, the reader is informed that the content of the album was based on the scientific accomplishments of Silesian archaeologists. The basic part of the album is composed of photographs of archaeological objects and monuments, accompanied by a scientific commentary which contains: a name, a description, dates, cultural affiliation and, in justified cases - the objective, remarks about the technology of execution, the history of extraction, together with the name of the researcher, and a brief depiction of the archaeological site, analogies, and place of storage. The photographs, together with a commentary and the name of the locality from which the monuments and object originate, have been arranged chronologically from the Palaeolithic Age to the Renaissance (sixteenth century). The lavish and high-quality illustrations has been selected extremely carefully, and the publishing house has guaranteed a superior poligraphic standard. The only shortcoming appears to be the absence of a scale in the presentation of the monuments, which makes it impossible to visually determine their size (the actual dimensions are listed in the commentaries). The publication has been outfitted with a selective bibliography. It also contains a map with marked localities in which the monuments presented in the album had been discovered, as well as their index with complete administrative data.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2006, 2; 115-119
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wybrane motywy archeologiczne z zakresu archeologii śródziemnomorskiej na monetach europejskich z lat 1990–2005
Selected archaeological motifs from the scope of Mediterranean archaeology on European coins from 1990–2005
Autorzy:
Lajsner, Włodzimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27313984.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
coins
numismatics
archaeological motifs
Mediterranean archaeology
archaeological monuments
Opis:
The role of coins is not limited only to a means of payment, but through the various iconographic and epigraphic contents they contain, coins are also a means of cultural communication. The obverse and reverse of coins are a specific form of image, which includes motifs understood as a repeating decorative element that is also a pattern or an iconographic element expressing specific symbolism and themes. Archaeological motifs reflect archaeological monuments or their elements, and their themes commemorate not only the monument itself, but also related aspects studied by archaeologists, e.g. the broadly understood context. The aim of the considerations was to examine the numismatic form of commemorating and popularizing archaeological heritage on the example of selected motifs referring to monuments of Mediterranean archeology appearing on European coins in the years 1990–2005. First, the motifs were analyzed in terms of the form of their depiction on coins, then the archaeological theme with which themotifs were connected was determined and, on its basis, axiological considerations were carried out, the aim of which was to learn a potential answer to the question – why a given motif was placed on a coin.
Źródło:
Folia Praehistorica Posnaniensia; 2023, 28; 131-152
0239-8524
2450-5846
Pojawia się w:
Folia Praehistorica Posnaniensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rescue archaeology in Russia at the turn of the 20th and 21st century
Autorzy:
Krenke, Nikolay
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/896971.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
rescue archaeology
Old Russian cities
archaeological monuments protection laws
Opis:
Rescue archaeology in Russia is full of contradictions. The apologetic approach to archaeology focuses solely on vast areas covered by excavations, discoveries and investments of millions. But the reality is more complex than that. This article addresses the transformations that took place in rescue archaeology in the 1980s, during “Perestroika”, and in particular in Moscow. Not everyone can withstand the temptation of money. Commercial interests have supplanted the Science in many cases, including that of Moscow. In the meantime, in many Old Russian cities (Pskov, Tver, Vladimir, etc.), the works were conducted in an exemplary manner, thanks to pre-existing traditions of research. Authorities’ demands to free land from the burden of archaeological heritage have led to shifting the focus of archaeological exploration now, identifying the boundaries of archaeological monuments became the key objective, a task that remains basically impossible, as said boundaries are of a purely formal nature. Excavations of empty spaces within archaeological sites have become typical for rescue archaeology and form modern “informational noise”. At the same time, archaeological research carried out on an unprecedented scale, even including the “empty” trenches, provide unique data on spatial and temporal structure of human activity, as exemplified by exploration of the Angara river banks during the construction of the Boguchany Dam.
Źródło:
Raport; 2017, 12; 213-220
2300-0511
Pojawia się w:
Raport
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Magazyny archeologiczne w Polsce – kwestia przechowywania zabytków archeologicznych, czyli rzecz o stajniach Augiasza i kilka przykładów dobrych praktyk
Archaeological warehouses in Poland – the issue of storing archaeological monuments, that is about the Augeas’ stables, and some examples of good practices
Autorzy:
Bugaj, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/896949.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
archaeological warehouses
storage of archaeological monuments
protection of archaeological heritage
Opis:
In Poland, there is a problem with the proper storage of portable archaeological monuments. This is one of the most important, if not the most important issue of archaeological heritage management. Archaeological monuments are owned by the State that does not properly fulfil its obligations. The lack of a good system and organization, effective law, and above all, proper storage space for archaeological monuments is a fact and this is a nationwide issue. This article deals with the legal and practical issues related to the subject matter. Several storage and study facilities, which were created in Poland by local archaeological milieus, are also presented. These are examples of good practices and responsible attitudes, which can serve as models to be followed. However, at the country level, the problem of storing archaeological monuments remains unresolved and requires a systemic approach, not the bottom-up initiatives and solutions.
Źródło:
Raport; 2018, 13; 155-169
2300-0511
Pojawia się w:
Raport
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 26

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies