Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Przywara, Paweł" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Problem mentalese
    The Problem of mentalese
    Autorzy:
    Przywara, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012899.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    Fodor
    język myśli
    intencjonalność
    language of thought
    intentionality
    Opis:
    In the present article I critically analyze the conception of the “language of thought” formulated by J. Fodor, and I suggest a solution of the question of the relation between the language and thought that refers to the studies of intentionality conducted by E. Husserl. I argue that our (mono-subjective) thinking is not reducible to the language (especially understood in the cybernetic way), and mental processes that we usually recognize as verbalized ones, are in fact operations on specific intentional forms that are not language units at all, but are our formulation of phrases (spoken, written, and so on). I question both the physicalist view of the issue of internalization of the language and the use of it in mental processes, and the position that perceives these processes as exclusively (or first of all) linguistic ones. According to the conception I suggest the natural language is intentionally transformed, de-verbalized, by the subject, and the intentional forms, by means of which the subject of cognition performs acts of “linguistic” thinking, have a subjective character, analogous to the intentional forms that take part in processes of recognizing external objects. The subject does not assume a metalinguistic attitude in the acts of thinking, but an attitude directed to the objects it thinks about. This objective character is also revealed in communicating with other subjects, and it does not have (as is usually assumed) the character of coding/decoding the message, but is an interpretation of defined objective domains, that is objects, that are the theme of the subjects’ communication.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2010, 58, 2; 97-124
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Husserla konstytucja przestrzeni naocznej
    Husserl’s Constitution of Visual Space
    Autorzy:
    Przywara, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2016242.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2000
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Opis:
    Husserl’s phenomenology of space issues from the so-called static transcendental phenomenology and its foundations were created in the years 1907-1910. However, one can talk about Husserl’s two approaches to the problem of the constitution of space: 1) from the period before Ideas, and 2) the one initiated with considerations in Ideas II (this latter approach is a modified continuation of the former one). For Husserl the problem of visual space is connected with his studies of the inner consciousness of time, his philosophy of geometry and the specific conception of experience (understood as experiencing the world). According to the phenomenological methodology - in Husserl’s opinion - a certain reduced sphere that cannot undergo further reduction should be the point of departure for studies of the visual space. Hence he conducts a visual reduction of the outer observation (understood as pre-experience), as it is there that spatiality of every perceived thing is constituted. Husserl understands reduced outer observation as one that is isolated temporally and causally both from other observations and from observed objects. At the same time reduction includes the object of perception (here it assumes the shape of so-called phantom, or pure sensual scheme, ressensibilis) and the perceiving subject (here it assumes the shape of intentional approach of res sensibilis. With such reduction of the subject and object of perception, for Husserl the layers of pure, transcendental subjectivity are revealed only in correlation with the constituted layers of what is perceived, that are revealed in phenomenological analysis. Revelation of ever higher layers o f the constitution of visual space and layers of the subject (that in various ways - kinetically, kinaesthetically etc. - is correlated with that space) is directed by the principle of horizontality discovered by Husserl. Intentional horizontality is revealed on the level of pure impression contents and their formulations and it penetrates all levels of constitution. Besides it (or more precisely: within it) Husserl finds the existence of the so-called in ten tio n a l implication that, as further analyses show, motivates the intentional teleology of perception, that is aspiration for achieving a certain (aspectual) optimum of giving. This is so due to the fact that within perceptive correlation a constant dependence is revealed between grasping and intentional presumption. Interperceptive horizontality, in turn, refers one to the (phenomenologically reduced) sphere o f touching, experiencing, feeling, moving, that is, to the sphere of the subject’s corporeality. As long as the latter is not constituted the constitution of a spatial thing or of visual space proves to be - according to Husserl - impossible. This is because this space is only constituted against the background of the constituted so-called impression areas (intentional correlates of corporeal spheres of experiencing-feeling-moving) on the basis of the two constitutive movements of the perceiving subject’s whole body (approaching / moving away from the perceived thing and moving around it). On the other hand, studies undertaken in Ideas II (and expanded in the later writings) on the constitution of visual space are subjected to the findings of phenomenology of inter-subjectivity. Husserl, although he refers to his earlier theory of space analyses, starts with the phenomenon of my body and supports his considerations with the conception of the so-called inter-subject understanding (based on empathy) and on the inter-systemic agreement of systems of appearances and systems of formulations. The visual space here is a certain objectivised (intersubjectively) system of places that is the ultimate form enabling appearance of identical things for all transcendental subjects. Husserl’s theory of constitution of space shows an aporethic character in such points as: the problem of the Other’s constitution, the problem of the so-called sphere of primordiality. the conception of experience (interpreted solipsistically), the problem of the body’s constitution and the conception of movement used in the course of perceiving. Translated by Tadeusz Karłowicz
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2000, 48, 1; 147-168
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    KONWERSACJA JAKO FENOMEN SPOŁECZNY I JAKO PRZEDMIOT BADAŃ
    CONVERSATION AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON AND AREA OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
    Autorzy:
    Przywara, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/513439.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
    Tematy:
    conversation
    theory of conversation
    contextuality
    pragmatics
    Opis:
    The paper deals with the relationship between conversation and different contexts as well as constraints of research which appear within scientific disciplines analysing interpersonal communication, especially within pragmatics. It is pointed that the studies on conversation ought to be reinforced with an epistemological approach.
    Źródło:
    Polityka i Społeczeństwo; 2013, 11, 1; 7-25 (19)
    1732-9639
    Pojawia się w:
    Polityka i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies