Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "ranking," wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Examples of Objectified Multiple Criteria Ranking in the Selection of Infrastructural Projects
Autorzy:
Klimasara, E.
Wierzbicki, A. P.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/308171.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
Tematy:
multiple criteria ranking
objectified multiple criteria ranking
objectified ranking method
subjective ranking
Opis:
The paper addresses the issue of multiple criteria rankings of infrastructural projects (buildings, roads, etc.). Although the amount of literature devoted to this subject is considerable, all methods proposed produce subjective rankings, dependent on a direct or indirect definition of weighting coefficients applicable to subsequent evaluation criteria. Infrastructural projects are usually selected and approved collegially, however, by a group of decision makers with preferences that may potentially differ significantly. Therefore, an objectified ranking, independent from subjectively defined weighting coefficients, is needed for infrastructural projects. Such a ranking is proposed, analyzed and applied by the authors of this paper. This ranking depends originally only on the multiple objective evaluation data, i.e. the values of evaluation criteria related to decision scenarios or alternatives. Such an approach does not render a fully objective ranking, since one of this kind does not exist at all. Even the choice of the ranking method is a subjective decision, but it is objectified to the extent possible. The paper presents several examples of multiple criteria evaluation of infrastructural projects, derived from literature, and compares subjective rankings published in literature with objectified rankings that are independent of weighting coefficients.
Źródło:
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology; 2018, 4; 18-25
1509-4553
1899-8852
Pojawia się w:
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Multiple Criteria Evaluation and Ranking of Social Penetration of Information Society Technologies
Autorzy:
Grzegorek, J.
Wierzbicki, A. P.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/307608.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
Tematy:
dynamic ranking
ICT social penetration
multiple criteria ranking
objective ranking
Opis:
The paper presents a comparison of two ways of multiple criteria ranking of social penetration of information society technologies (ICT): the traditional one and the socalled objective ranking, illustrated on the example of Network Readiness Index. It is shown that objective ranking stresses a balanced development more than the traditional one. Another issue presented in this paper is the concept of dynamic ranking, a systematic presentation and prediction of the change of ranking in time. This is illustrated on the example of regions of three European countries: Finland, Italy and Poland.
Źródło:
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology; 2012, 4; 3-13
1509-4553
1899-8852
Pojawia się w:
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The problem of objective ranking: foundations, approaches and applications
Autorzy:
Wierzbicki, A. P.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/308101.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
Tematy:
subjective ranking
objective ranking
reference point approaches
objectivity
Opis:
The paper starts with the discussion of the issue of objectivity versus subjectivity, stressing that while an absolute objectivity is not attainable, nevertheless trying to be as objective as possible constitutes a higher value, necessary for hard science and technology. Dangers and errors of the subjectivist reduction of objectivity to power and money attempted by the postmodern sociology of science are discussed. Then we turn to the problem of subjective versus objective decision analysis and ranking. It is shown that while all classical decision theory aims at a rational analysis and support of subjective decisions, there are important application cases, particularly in managerial problems, when the decision maker prefers to avoid specifying her/his preferences and needs decision analysis - e.g., ranking of decision options - that is as objective as possible. An approach to decision support that might be easily adapted for such objective ranking is the reference point methodology; its application is shown on examples. One of these examples is actually not an application of the methodology, but a real life problem that motivated the development of objective ranking. The examples illustrate that objective ranking might be important for management, including also management of telecommunication networks.
Źródło:
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology; 2008, 3; 15-23
1509-4553
1899-8852
Pojawia się w:
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Examples of multiple criteria ranking in the design of cellular networks of mobile telecommunication
Autorzy:
Klimasara, E.
Wierzbicki, A. P.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/305642.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie. Wydawnictwo AGH
Tematy:
design of cellular networks
network evolution
variants of network designs
multiple criteria ranking of network designs
objectified ranking
Opis:
The paper addresses planning and design of contemporary networks of mobile telecommunication, where an existing network is subject to far reaching development and modication, thus evolution with diverse requirements of users and diverse density of network cells. This leads to considering diverse variants of network designs. When several variants of network designs are available, an investor might ask for a ranking of these variants. The investor is obviously not bounded by the results of such a ranking and might select a variant not highest in the ranking, but an objectied ranking might help in the selection. Therefore, the paper presents the way of computing and examples of objectied multiple criteria ranking, possibly not requiring the determination of weighting coecients.
Źródło:
Computer Science; 2018, 19 (1); 99-112
1508-2806
2300-7036
Pojawia się w:
Computer Science
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies