Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Kowalczyk, Stanisław." wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Postmodernistyczna koncepcja życia społecznego
Postmodernist Conception of Social Life
Autorzy:
Kowalczyk, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1856474.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
postmodernizm
społeczność
naród
państwo
antytotalitaryzm
solidarność
postmodernism
community
nation
state
anti-totalitarianism
solidarity
Opis:
Postmodernists’ opinions on social life are fragmentary, diverse and ambivalent and they are mainly concerned with three categories: community, nation and state. J. F. Lyotard and R. Rorty treat the origin of community as the result of a temporary social contract, whereas Z. Bauman considers freedom, differentiation and solidarity as the foundation of the political community. All postmodernists call in question ontological foundations of social life and this is why they express their criticism of the categories of nation and national state. Bauman accepts the ideas of cosmopolitism, and M. Foucault suggests the political conception instead of the ethnic-cultural conception of the nature. Postmodernists’ common position is a decided anti-totalitarianism, but they differ in their appraisal of state models; Rorty accepts the liberal model of parliamentary democracy, Lyotard considers it as out of date, and Foucault favors the ideas of anarchism, and that is why he considers any kind of political power connected with state structures to be a form of violence against man. Some postmodernists accept the idea of solidarity, but they call in question its foundations: the ontological one – the existence of the human nature, and the religious one – the idea of love of the neighbor. Rorty bases the postulate of solidarity on the belief that the differences that divide people are less important than their common characteristics. Bauman sees the basis of solidarity in the accidental character of man and in community of all people’s fate.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2005, 33, 1; 25-36
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Arystoteles a idea demokracji
Aristotle and the Idea of Democracy
Autorzy:
Kowalczyk, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1857537.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
państwo
demokracja
dobro wspólne
system polityczny
rząd
state
democracy
common good
political system
goverment
Opis:
Aristotle regarded the state as a natural and self-sufficient society, its aim being common good of all citizens (except slaves and foreigners). This kind of good contains non only economic good, but also moral good including a group of virtues: equality, justice, obedience, and prudence. The work entitled Politics distinguishes three positive political systems: monarchy (the reign of one), aristocracy (the reigns of elites), and politeia (the reigns of many or all). Once these systems aiming at common good are deformed, they become systems carrying out particular interests: tyranny cares about the good of one, oligarchy about the good of elites, and democracy about the good of a people exclusively. An ideal system is politeia characterized by the government of all citizens for the good of the whole population of the country. Aristotle separated many forms of democracy, bering in mind a twofold criterion: juridic-procedural (the number of the roles and a technique of holding the power) and axiological (whether the aim of the state is the good of all, or only the good of some, e.g. the poor). The ancient-Greek thinker valued moderate direct democracy which he understood of the rule of all for the good of all. He was critical, however, about the radical form of democracy, such that assumed the primary role of law before ethics, and considering only the good of the people, that is a part of the citizens of the state.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2002, 30, 1; 13-23
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Idea wolności w filozofii grecko-rzymskiej
Ideas of Freedom in Greco-Roman Philosophy
Autorzy:
Kowalczyk, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1858031.pdf
Data publikacji:
1999
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
anarchia
człowiek
demokracja
dyktatura
wolność
wolność woli
wolność społeczno-polityczna
państwo
państwo totalitarne
anarchy
man
democracy
dictatorship
freedom
freedom of will
socio--political freedom
State
totalitarian State
Opis:
Ancient philosophy distinguished three meanings of the notion of freedom: an individual man's freedom of choice and decision, freedom of social-political life and freedom (sovereignty) of the state. This latter meaning was considered the most important form of freedom. In his conception of an “ideal state” Plato advised abolition of private property and monogamy for the political élite (the so called “guards”), which is a feature of a totalitarian state. He distinguished three models of state: monarchic, aristocratic and democratic. He accepted the latter model, but he warned against maximising individual freedom, as it leads to anarchy in social life, which in turn is a source of tyranny. Aristotle appreciated democracy more, as it best puts into effect the postulates of freedom, equality and justice. The other form of freedom, according to his approach, is freedom understood as enabling a man to choose rationally, which should be preceded by reflection. His conception of man's existential freedom (proaíresis) is close to the theory of free will (liberum arbitrium) in the Christian thought. The Stoics concentrated their attention on inner-moral freedom that they identified with the attitude of keeping a distance to man's existential vicissitudes. Some of them (Marcus Aurelius) joined the idea of inner freedom with philosophy of naturalistic pantheism, others (Epictetus) considered God as the source of moral freedom. Plotinus was also mainly interested in man's inner freedom, which he explained in the context of the pantheistic conception of the absolute.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1999, 27, 1; 17-31
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies