Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "tomizm" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Poznanie i byt. Z epistemologii Wilfrida Sellarsa
Knowledge and being in the epistemology of Wilfrid Sellars
Autorzy:
Szubka, Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015962.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
epistemologia
poznanie
tomizm
W. Sellars
epistemology
cognition
Thomism
Opis:
Wilfrid Sellars very often expounds his philosophical views in an historical context. In his paper „Being and Being Known” Sellars gives a succinct account of his epistemology while at the same time discussing the Thomistic conception of sensory and intellectual knowledge. His aim in that paper is to provide a plausible interpretation of the doctrine that both the senses and the intellect are informed by the nature of external objects, and thus our cognitive acts are isomorphic with their objects. Sellars claims that there are two dimensions to that isomorphism, and that those separate dimensions are conflated by the Thomists, as well as by other philosophers. That is to say, there is isomorphism in the real or the natural order, and there is isomorphism in the intentional or the logical order. Sellars insists that in sensory cognition isomorphism holds merely in the real order. By contrast, intellectual knowledge is based upon the isomorphism of the intentional order. However, that isomorphism obtains in virtue of specific relations holding in the real order. Thus those two orders are intimately connected. Unfortunately, Sellars does not fully elaborate the nature of the connections between those two orders. I argue that in light of his commitment to ontological naturalism, Sellars should claim that ultimately there is only one isomorphism, namely the isomorphism in the real order. I suggest that his insistence that there are no genuine semantical relations holding between the elements of the intentional and the real supports such an interpretation.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2002, 50, 1; 439-457
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Obecność filozofii tomistycznej w polemice Piotra Semenenki z Andrzejem Towiańskim
The presence of Thomistic philosophy in the polemic of Piotr Semenenko with Andrzej Towiański
Autorzy:
Mikucki, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/5956790.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-31
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Piotr Semenenko
Andrzej Towiański
filozofia
tomizm
philosophy
Thomism
Opis:
The presenting article presents the main themes of Piotr Semenenko polemics with Andrzej Towiański, which took place in the environment of the Great Emigration. It concerned many matters, including some philosophical ideas related to the Catholic faith. They belonged mainly to fhe field of interest in the philosophy of cognition, general theory of being, philosophy of God and religion, angelology, philosophy of man and philosophy of history. Semenenko’s polemic with Towiański resulted from their representing different philosophical traditions. The first referred essentially to Thomistic philosophy, while the second drew from ideas to Neoplatonic philosophy and the currents of thought that were close to it, which cannot be reconciled with the Thomistic and Christian vision of the world, especially in the matter of understanding its most important elements, which are God and the human person. The use of Thomism in the fight against Towianism has shown that it is the form of Christian philosophy that best serves the Catholic faith as its intellectual foundation, which seems important in the context of current discussions about the doctrinal shape of this faith and its threats from religious syncretism.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2022, 11; 227-243
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór Józefa Tischnera z tomizmem - między konfrontacją a dialogiem
Józef Tischners Debate with Thomism - Between Confrontation and Dialogue
Autorzy:
Jawor, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1048492.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
tomizm
Józef Tischner
filozofia
antropologia
metafizyka
Thomism
philosophy
anthropology
metaphysics
Opis:
The article presents an analysis of Józef Tischner’s debate with Thomism. Leaving aside the historical and personal influences which shaped the debate, the author is trying to assess the presented polemics on two fundamental planes: metatheoretical and anthropological. The text constitutes an attempt to answer the question: are the two disparate approaches bound to remain seen as ever confronting, or is there a possibility of them entering a constructive dialogue?
Źródło:
Filozofia Chrześcijańska; 2013, 10; 211-227
1734-4530
2450-0399
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia Chrześcijańska
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Etyka w ujęciu Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966034.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef Bocheński
etyka
moralność
tomizm
filozofia analityczna
Ethics
morality
Thomism
analytic philosophy
Opis:
The notion of ethics has been developed by Bocheński in four areas: 1. Ethics is a normative science regarding human behaviour. Its scientific character means a „systematic research on a particular part of reality”. In the result of its normativity it „not only describes object but also indicates what this object should be like”. When speaks of human behaviour it „makes research on this set of acts who derive consciously (voluntarily) from human free will”. 2. Ethics as a normative science makes research and establishes general goal of human activity and then it considers, from the psychological point of view, a nature of human act which should be an act of realisation of a goal. In this way ethics works out the problem of ethical norm, a principle which should be followed to fulfill human act in order to achieve a goal proper to human being. Additionally, when ethics is grounded in Christian Revelation we may apply the matter of grace as supernatural support from God in fulfilling ethically good human act. 3. „There are two areas of each properly constructed ethics”. The first, in a theoretical way considers five sets of problems: the general goal of human act, the structure of human act, the problem of moral norms, the theory of character and the subject of God’s grace. The aim of the second area is practical analysis of particular features of human character, we understand them as „steady dispo-sition toward proceeding human act easily and energetic” according to a moral norm. 4. Ethics understood in that way can be atrributed to each human being. Hence, each men should adopt and cultivate in himself all properties and ethical norms. „Each human being should posses entirely human and Christian character”. 5. Individual human life shows that a teacher suppose to be equippped in some properties more than a merchant. For that reason, even there exists unity in ethics in general, we may speak of particular ethics. They consists of general ethics and on that ground they develop further principles in particular domains. In the result there may exist business ethics, academic ethics, ethics of prie-sthood, political ethics and military one.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 385-391
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aleksandra Usowicza wkład do badań nad dziejami filozofii krakowskiej
Autorzy:
Trombik, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/669247.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
Usowicz
Konstanty Michalski
Polish philosophy
neo-scholasticism
Thomism
filozofia polska
neoscholastyka
tomizm
Opis:
The article attempts to justify the thesis that Aleksander Usowicz has made contribution to the research on Cracow philosophy, which was developed in two periods: a) between the 15th and 17th centuries, b) at the end of the 19th and the first half of the 20th century. Usowicz was one of the pioneers in post-war history of Polish philosophy, publishing between 1946 and 1949 several important articles, concerning Cracow philosophy (from 15th to 19th centuries). In addition, Usowicz was the leading commentator and interpreter of the philosophical thought of Konstanty Michalski – undoubtedly one of the most important catholic philosophers in the first half of the 20th century.
W artykule podjęto próbę uzasadnienia tezy o wkładzie ks. Aleksandra Usowicza CM w badania nad krakowską filozofią, rozwijaną w dwóch okresach: a) między XV a XVII wiekiem, b) u schyłku XIX i w pierwszej połowie XX wieku. W świetle przeprowadzonych analiz ks. Usowicz jawi się jako jeden z pionierów powojennej historii filozofii polskiej, publikując w latach 1946–1949 kilka znaczących artykułów dotyczących myśli filozoficznej środowiska krakowskiego z wieków XV–XVII i XIX–XX. Ponadto ks. Usowicz zasługuje na miano czołowego komentatora myśli Konstantego Michalskiego, niewątpliwie jednego z najważniejszych krakowskich myślicieli katolickich pierwszej połowy XX wieku.
Źródło:
Tarnowskie Studia Teologiczne; 2017, 36, 2
2391-6826
0239-4472
Pojawia się w:
Tarnowskie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Skąd pochodzą nowe formy substancjalne? – Polemika z teistycznym ewolucjonizmem w ujęciu Mariusza Tabaczka
Where do the Substantial Forms Come From?—A Polemic with the Theistic Evolutionism of Mariusz Tabaczek
Autorzy:
Chaberek, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1790998.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-01-04
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
tomizm
ewolucja teistyczna
forma substancjalna
makroewolucja
Thomism
theistic evolution
substantial form
macroevolution
Opis:
Współcześni tomiści usiłują wykazać zgodność metafizyki arystotelesowsko-tomistycznej z teorią makroewolucji biologicznej. W ostatnim czasie stanowisko takie poparł Dr Mariusz Tabaczek. Jednak przyznaje on, że naukę Tomasza należy zmodyfikować w istotny sposób, aby można ją było pogodzić z teistycznym ewolucjonizmem. W jego ujęciu główny punkt takiej modyfikacji stanowi kwestia tego, czy stworzenie się zakończyło, czy nadal powstają nowe gatunki. W istocie ewolucyjny postulat powstawania nowych gatunków uderza nie tylko w naukę Tomasza, ale klasyczne chrześcijańskie rozumienie stworzenia. Tomistyczni ewolucjoniści nie potrafią wyjaśnić pochodzenia nowych form substancjalnych. Odwołują się do zmian przypadłościowych, takich jak przypadkowe mutacje genetyczne, których kumulacja miałaby prowadzić do powstania nowych gatunków. To jednak nie jest możliwe w świetle metafizyki tomistycznej, ponieważ zmiana przypadłościowa nie tworzy nowej substancji. Dodatkowo koncepcja tomistycznych ewolucjonistów nie harmonizuje z wieloma faktami odkrywanymi przez współczesną biologię. Tomistyczni ewolucjoniści muszą porzucić fundamentalne pojęcia filozofii św. Tomasza, takie jak złożenie bytowe substancja-przypadłości czy umiarkowany realizm. Nie da się więc pogodzić makroewolucji biologicznej z nauką Akwinaty.
Contemporary Thomists strive to demonstrate a compatibility between Aristotelian-Thomistic metaphysics and the theory of biological macroevolution. Recently such positions have been promoted by Dr Mariusz Tabaczek. However, he admits that Aquinas’s teachings need to be substantially modified to make them compatible with theistic evolution. On his view, the main point of controversy is whether the creation of the world has been completed (as Aquinas maintains) or it continues (as it is required by theistic evolution). But the evolutionary postulate of continual creation understood as emergence of totally new substantial forms contradicts not only Aquinas’s doctrine but the classic Christian understanding of creation. Thomistic evolutionists cannot explain the origin of new substantial forms; they refer to accidental changes, such as random genetic mutations, whose accumulation over time would produce new species. This, however, is not possible in the light of Thomistic metaphysics because an accidental change does not produce a substantial change. Additionally, the Thomistic evolutionist concept does not tally with many facts discovered by contemporary science. Thomistic evolutionists abandon the fundamental concepts of Aquinas’s philosophy such as the substance-accidents fold and moderate realism as a cognitive attitude. Hence the conclusion that it is not possible to reconcile biological macroevolution with Aquinas’s teachings.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2020, 68, 4; 199-215
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Karol Wojtyła – teatr osoby
Karol Wojtyła – the Theatre of the Person
Autorzy:
Kaczmarek, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1731879.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-28
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
osoba; personalizm
tomizm
fenomenologia
theatrum Dei
person
personalism
Thomism
phenomenology
Theatrum Dei
Opis:
W koncepcji personalizmu Karola Wojtyły osoba rozumiana jest jako podmiot i relacja. Człowiek jest więc istotą relacyjną, jego ciało jest predysponowane, by angażował się w dialog z drugą osobą. Spotkanie osób i ich wzajemne relacje tworzą w efekcie podstawę teatru i na tej przesłance Wojtyła stworzył swój teatr personalistyczny, w którym połączył mostem tomizm i fenomenologię przedstawiając człowieka jako aktora na scenie w relacji do drugiego. W Bracie naszego Boga Wojtyła próbował „przeniknąć” człowieka, by dotrzeć do źródeł jego człowieczeństwa. Kluczem była relacja „ja”, rozumianego jako podmiot poznający, do „ja” drugiego człowieka. Oryginalność dramatów Wojtyły polega na tym, że autor odwołując się do natury osoby, ukazuje jej pełnię w perspektywie theatrum Dei. Najmocniej jest ona wyrażona w trylogii: Brat naszego Boga, Przed sklepem jubilera i Promieniowanie ojcostwa. Analiza wnętrza osoby, jaka jest tam przeprowadzona, pozwala określić te dramaty jako teatr osoby.
According to Karol Wojtyła’s personalism, a person is both a subject and a relationship. A person is a relational being whose body predisposes him or her to engage in dialogue. The meeting of people, and their relationships as a result of this event, lie at the core of theatre. In his personalistic theatre, Wojtyła created a bridge between Thomism and Phenomenology, exploring the human person as an actor. In Our God’s Brother (Brat naszego Boga, 1945–1950), Wojtyła attempts to “penetrate man,” so as to be able to arrive at the sources of his humanity. What allows one to penetrate man’s nature is the revelation of the relationship between his “I,” understood as the subject which comes to know, and the “you” of the other, recognised in personal experience as a second “I.” The originality of Wojtyła’s drama is contained in its literary and theatrical nature, but its full sense is only revealed in the perspective of Theatrum Dei (especially in Wojtyła’s dramatic trilogy: Our God’s Brother – Brat naszego Boga; In front of the Jeweller’s Shop – Przed sklepem jubilera, 1960; The Radiance of Fatherhood – Promieniowanie ojcostwa, 1967). We could call Wojtyła’s drama of the inner Self the Theatre of the Person.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2020, 68, 1 Special Issue; 123-136
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Józefa M. Bocheńskiego elementarz etyki wojskowej
Autorzy:
Niepsuj, Jerzy
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966053.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef Bocheński
etyka
etyka wojskowa
tomizm
męstwo
Ethics
military ethics
Thomism
bravery
Opis:
Military ethics as one of a „special ethics” is built, according to Bocheński, on morally obvious right to self-defense and obligation to defend the closest people. It is related to patriotism understood as love of the country, love is a prominent value in defense of which man is willing to sacrifice his life. With regard to characteristics of a soldier Bocheński suggests the following shape of skills and virtues proper for a military job: of prime importance is bravery, connected rather with heroism and honour than with patience and persistence. Also, virtues demanded for the process of taking decision are, as Bocheński claims, key for all militaries regardless their rank, because even the lowest, a private soldier has to decide. When it comes to taking decision, the most essential is a set of skills and values which enable its accurate conduct. Apart from suitable knowledge and skills there are wisdom and prudence as the most important virtues in taking decision. The most significant virtues of superiors, according to Bocheński, are integrity and justice, generosity and humility. Integrity means respect for law. Justice regulates all human relations. Generosity is related to a task of being a superior, and always to some socially important good, furthermore, it is a task of a superior to guide toward that important good. Humility, hence, is a condition to judge themselves and the others properly, what is indispensable for managing people. Taking decisions and superiority are related to a question of military obedience. Ethical fundament of that obedience is common good, to which army is subordinated. That common good is a principle which joins efforts of both, superiors and subordinates. The first condition of obedience is conviction that all members of community serve the same common goal. Order received from a su-perior can be a decision held at one of its stage. There are situations when an order speaks only about the task of planned activity, or it can indicate a set of means available or it may just order so-me action. The virtue of obedience means that we do not question and ponder on particular stages of a process of decision performed by superior but proceed as effectively as possible until the task is fulfilled. In his military ethics Józef Bocheński promotes the ethos of Polish soldier as a knight, hence the spiritual culture is a matter of prime importance in the army. It is crucial to develop this culture within a proper, which is humanist, frame. Advanced development of military technology must be accompanied by a care for advanced moral development.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 393-404
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Klasyczne ujęcia problemu prawdy w „post-świecie”
The Classic Approaches to the Problem of Truth in the “Post-World”
Autorzy:
Pawlikowski, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075958.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
prawda
filozofia współczesna
tomizm
arystotelizm
platonizm
Truth
Contemporary Philosophy
Thomism
Aristotelianism
Platonism
Opis:
1. For many people, the contemporary culture seems to be something different from modernity, it is something resembling a special period of “post-”. At the same time, different trends are present in current culture. Some reach the genesis of nearly two and a half thousand years back, others have about half a century. Perhaps also breaks some modern belief that in every culture, “newer” means “better”. 2. Representatives of the philosophical and theological trend of “Radical Orthodoxy” noticed in this the approach of postmodernism to the pre-modern tradition. Therefore, we can say that we live and operate in a “post-world”, without leading currents of thought. On the other hand, is the current culture very different from the others when you look at it from the perspective of centuries? 3. For many philosophers, it is still important to reach to the great traditional approaches to the problem of truth. These are above all three concepts related to three great philosophical syntheses created by Plato, Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas. This is also evident among the basic contemporary trends critical of the classics and philosophical tradition. 4. M. Heidegger created a certain idea of being reduced to the time determinant. For the supporters of his views, it became the overcoming of Aquinas’s theory. The German thinker also formulated a specific interpretation of Plato's views on truth. He contrasted it with Thomas's concept, especially with the definition of truth as the adequacy of thing to intellect. 5. T. Bartoś – Polish author of the new attempt to read the essence of the concept – believes, in turn, that the statements of the Angelic Doctor can be found close to the characteristics of post-modernity. He points to a certain incoherence and fragmentary nature of the problem, anthropocentrism and pragmatism of the approach, and a rejection of the unity of truth. It seems, however, that there is a lot of exaggeration in this interpretation. De facto, we are dealing here with radical criticism of Thomism as a trend that develops the views of Saint Thomas Aquinas, because none of the known Thomists do not even come close in their deliberations to the view that T. Bartoś formulated. 6. Finally, a group of philosophers using in the method of reflection the achievements of contemporary logic, representatives of analytic philosophy, generally seems to be aimed at getting rid of the term “truth” from his vocabulary. The idea of reaching their assumptions of logical positivism is difficult to discuss with his followers because of the difference in approach to the practice of philosophy itself between the “analysts” and “non-analysts”. The classic concept of philosophy, under which situates itself Platonism, Aristotelianism and Thomism, is different from the concept of linguistic or neo-positivist, which locates to analytic philosophy. 7. The classical approach to truth, especially the definition developed in the final shape in the Middle Ages, indicating the adequacy of things and the intellect as the essence of truth, therefore meets with criticism from various directions. This does not mean that they should go into oblivion, that they have been replaced by newer and better concepts, or simply refuted. The proclamation of the slogans such as “The End of the Era ...”, “The End of Truth ...” sounds propaganda. 8. The classical approach to the problem of truth has lost nothing in its argumentation. In fact, the current forms of criticism do not rely on any discussion, but on the rejection of the principles on which it is based. Heidegger proclaimed his vision of being and truth, supporting it with a hermeneutic analysis of ancient works. He claimed that this vision is contained in the properly read outlooks of ancient Greek thinkers. The current of philosophy practiced with the use of modern logic tools considers reality only in so far as it can be translated into a “language fact”. This is the analysis of language and not reality. The proposal to read the theory of truth contained in the works of Aquinas, submitted by T. Bartoś to be a projection of some interpretative grid on the expression Thomas's interpretation, wherein the radically differs from the recognized positions. 9. It seems that in the whirlwind of ideologies present in philosophy, science and culture in general, it remains to preserve the classical approach to the problem of truth and develop them according to their essential elements. Compilation with principles that are not appropriate to them will not result in the presentation of their authentic content. They are permanent achievements of culture, philosophically justified. Recourse to reality, confrontation with it, makes the classic approaches open in terms of development. None of them provides a closed system also adopted a priori or received by the conversion performed according to a specified number of regulations. The development of the classical approaches to the problem of truth is theoretically interesting for the whole field of philosophy and as such should be supported.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 313-344
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy relacja – najsłabszy rodzaj bytowości w metafizyce św. Tomasza – może stanowić fundament realnego bytu narodu?
Can relation that has the weakest kind of being in St. Thomas’ metaphysics constitute a foundation for the real being of a nation?.
Autorzy:
Grzybowski, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452607.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
relation
substance
Thomism
nation
society
metaphysics
relacja
substancja
tomizm
naród
społeczeństwo
metafizyka
Opis:
Relation is defined by St. Thomas as ordo unius ad aliud, in which three elements – the subject (the thing that is referred), object (the thing to which the subject is referred) and finally the cause of this referring (ground or fundament) – can be distinguished. Though relations are real, they are dependent in the order of existence upon their elements and, in a similar way as accidental properties, are forms of being secondarily added to a substance. Being of a relation is added to that of a substance and connected with it. Relation existing by virtue of its subject is the most imperfect being (imperfectissimum esse). It is the weakest form of beingness (esse) because it requires not only previous existence of a substance but also existence of other accidents that are causing relations. However, relations are the least perfect beings because a proper principle of relation presupposes its referring to something else (since its existence implies the reference to its opposed terms). Relation is an accident, because it inheres in the being of its subject. Furthermore, it depends for its being on the existence (esse) of something else besides this subject. A nation thus is a relation- based community that has an accidental character. It means that it does not exist in its own right, but always has existence due to individuals creating a community as a collective. The very idea of nation is based on social dimension of an individual, as well as on pursuit of the common good. A nation is a specific organism composed of individuals united by blood ties, common ancestry, territory, history, and broadly understood culture intricately connected through various relations.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 247-262
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metodologia historii filozofii w ujęciu wybranych tomistów
Thomistic account of methodology of history of philosophy
Autorzy:
Nowik, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452671.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
metodologia historii filozofii
tomizm
Etienne Gilson
methodology of history of philosophy
Thomism
Opis:
Etienne Gilson relied his concept of doing history of philosophy on Thomistic metaphysics, so it enable him to distinguish between the proper history of philosophy and history of philosophical texts or history of philosophical doctrine; the former concerns philosophical problems disregarding their historical contexts. He referred to the way of studying history of philosophy, which was worked out by St. Thomas Aquinas as well as Aristotle and Alexandrian scholars before him, who were distinguishing between publication, understanding, interpretation and valuation of the text in text studying. Such history of philosophy allows not only to make synthesis within its framework, but also to pose a question on the adequacy of historical solutions of philosophical problems to real being; in that way history of philosophy becomes auxiliary and supporting science.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2012, 1; 173-181
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wprowadzenie do arysto-tomizmu
An Introduction to Aristo-Thomism
Autorzy:
Piotrowski, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/553233.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Zielonogórski. Instytut Filozofii
Tematy:
arystotelizm
tomizm
metafizyka
filozofia przyrody
dynamizm
Aristotelism
Thomism
metaphysics
philosophy of nature
dynamism
Opis:
Recenzja książki: Piotr LENARTOWICZ i Jolanta KOSZTEYN, Wprowadzenie do filozofii, wyd. 4., Petrus, Kraków 2012, s. 184.
Review of: Piotr LENARTOWICZ i Jolanta KOSZTEYN, Wprowadzenie do filozofii, wyd. 4., Petrus, Kraków 2012, s. 184.
Źródło:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy; 2013, 10; 267-269
2299-0356
Pojawia się w:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tomizm analityczny
Analytical Thomism
Autorzy:
Japola, Justyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015833.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
tomizm
filozofia analityczna
tomistyczna teoria poznania
Thomism
analytical philosophy
Thomistic theory of knowledge
Opis:
The term „analytical Thomism” was coined by John Haldane of the University of St. Andrews (Scotland). Haldane characterizes analytical Thomism as „a broad philosophical approach that brings into mutual relationship the styles and preoccupations of recent English-speaking philosophy and the concepts and concerns shared by Aquinas and his followers.” In addition to Haldane, the most prominent philosophers, whose philosophical training and general philosophical perspective are rooted in English-speaking analytical philosophy but who are very much interested in the thought of Thomas Aquinas include: Peter Geach, Elisabeth Anscombe, Anthony Kenny, Norman Kretzmann, Brian Davies, Scott MacDonald, Eleonore Stump, and Christopher Martin. In the first part of the paper I consider the question whether it is possible to be both a Thomist and an analytic philosopher. I set forth reasons why the alliance between the two views does not seem to be possible and I try to make clear that such impressions are often based on misconceptions. In fact, I try to show in the paper that the alliance between Thomism and analytic philosophy may prove beneficial for both sides. The goal of the second part of the paper is to present some specific problems characteristic of contemporary analytic philosophy and to show how they are approached from a Thomistic perspective. First of all, I present Robert Pasnau's analysis of Aquinas' position on the nature of human thinking. I also argue that Aquinas' account of our knowledge of our own mental states can be an attractive alternative to currently still popular models of self-knowledge as a type of perception. On the latter accounts, introspection, which is a very special type of causal mechanism, reliably produces corresponding second-level beliefs or judgments about our first-level mental states. In this special type of observation no intermediate and fallible organ of perception is involved, and this is what guarantees the truth of second-level statements. The principal problem facing such inner sense accounts of self-knowledge is that they do not provide us with a satisfactory explanation of why a causal mechanism should always produce true statements in the case of knowledge of mental states where similar mechanisms sometimes fail in the case of external perception. It is exactly at this point, as we shall see, that Aquinas' reflective model of self-knowledge turns out to be attractive.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2003, 51, 1; 321-347
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Author’s Response To Contributors
Odpowiedzi autora
Autorzy:
Kerr, Gaven
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/488177.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
God
essence
esse
metaphysics
causality
philosophy
Thomism
Bóg
istota
metafizyka
przyczynowość
filozofia
tomizm
Opis:
The text represents the author’s responses to the contributors who have addressed issues in my 2015 book, Aquinas’s Way to God: The Proof in De Ente et Essentia, published by Oxford University Press.
Tekst zawiera odpowiedzi na kwestie poruszane przez autorów, którzy podjęli się dyskusji na temat problemów zawartych w mojej książce Aquinas’s Way to God: The Proof in De Ente et Essentia, wydanej w 2015 r. przez Oxford University Press.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2019, 67, 4; 147-169
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływ Étienne’a Gilsona na filozofię w Polsce
The Influence of Étienne Gilson on Philosophy in Poland
Autorzy:
Gogacz, Mieczysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075829.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Étienne Gilson
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
Stefan Swieżawski
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Thomas Aquinas
Thomism
Opis:
After the Second World War, Stefan Swieżawski gave his lectures on the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics at the Catholic University of Lublin. The lectures were based on the approaches and methodologies of Etienne Gilson. In this way, Gilson’s thought came in Polish culture. The influence of Gilson’s thought on Polish philosophers had three tangible effects. First of all, positive knowledge about the Middle Ages as such and in particular the medieval philosophy was more able to penetrate the insightful minds. Secondly, a completely new, different from Aristotelian definition of metaphysics was adopted. The definition was developed by Gilson who based on the texts of Thomas Aquinas. Finally, thirdly, Gilson’s theory of history was creatively developed in Poland philosophy, as a study of the philosophical problems that ancients authors took and which have been elaborated in ancient texts. Pedagogical activity of Swieżawski and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, who in the creative way took over Gilson’s thought, caused that existential Thomism has become one of the most known philosophical trends in Poland. At the end of the Stalinist night in Poland, Swieżawski manager to send to Gilson a series of philosophical works done at the Catholic University in Lublin; the texts concerned the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics. In a response, Gilson encouraged him to step up his efforts to initiate research on the history of Polish medieval philosophy and philosophy of the fifteenth century in Europe. With time, a number of translations of Gilson’s books appeared in Poland. Until today they influence their readers. Today, in 21st century, Gilsonian works are used by the next - after the Swieżawski’s and Krąpiec’s students - Polish generation of Thomists.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 119-128
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies