Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "ochrona dziedzictwa" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Światowe dziedzictwo UNESCO z perspektywy 40 lat
Autorzy:
Szmygin, Bogusław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538592.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Lista światowego dziedzictwa UNESCO
ochrona dziedzictwa materialnego
Opis:
Konwencja o ochronie światowego dziedzictwa kultury i natury została uchwalona przez Konferencję Generalną UNESCO podczas 17. sesji w Paryżu w październiku 1972 r. Obchodzona w 2012 r. 40. rocznica uchwalenia Konwencji była podstawą do podsumowania jej dorobku, dokonania analizy sytuacji oraz dyskusji o przyszłości ruchu światowego dziedzictwa. Polska od początku aktywnie uczestniczy w tym ruchu, będąc w grupie krajów, które jako pierwsze ratyfikowały Konwencję i które jako pierwsze nominowały obiekty na Listę UNESCO. Wyrazem uznania dla tej aktywności było wybranie w listopadzie 2013 r. Polski do grona 21 krajów, które tworzą Komitet Światowego Dziedzictwa. Znaczenie światowego dziedzictwa jako najbardziej udanego międzynarodowego przedsięwzięcia w zakresie ochrony dziedzictwa oraz nowa pozycja naszego kraju w tym ruchu są ważnym powodem, by dokonać całościowej oceny sytuacji. W artykule przedstawiono dwa zagadnienia, które charakteryzują obecną sytuację Listy światowego dziedzictwa. W części pierwszej zawarte zostało generalne podsumowanie dorobku Listy. Został on przedstawiony w postaci ośmiu aspektów, które składają się na dokonania Listy postrzegane z perspektywy minionych 40 lat. W części drugiej podjęto próbę charakterystyki głównych problemów i wyzwań stojących przed światowym dziedzictwem. Problemy te zostały ujęte w postaci czterech głównych zagadnień. Polski udział i problemy związane z funkcjonowaniem Listy UNESCO zostaną przedstawione w odrębnym artykule, który ukaże się w „Ochronie Zabytków” w 2014 r.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2013, 1-4; 167-177
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
POLSKO-UKRAIŃSKIE SEMINARIUM „OCHRONA DZIEDZICTWA KULTUROWEGO – PODSTAWA TOŻSAMOŚCI NARODU” Żółkiew-Zamość, 30 czerwca-3 lipca 2008 r.
POLISH-UKRAINIAN SEMINAR “THE PROTECTION OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE – THE FOUNDATION OF NATIONAL IDENTITY” Żółkiew-Zamość, 30 June - 3 July 2008
Autorzy:
Hanaka, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539469.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego
Żółkiew
Zamość
polsko-ukraińskie seminarium
Opis:
APoli sh-Ukrainian seminar entitled “The Protection of Cultural Heritage – the Foundation of National Identity” was held on 30 June-3 July 2008. The first part of the meeting took place in Żółkiew, and the second one – in Zamość. The participants included representatives of assorted Ukrainian institutions, chiefly deputy starostas of counties in the district of Lviv and employees of the cultural heritage protection departments in county offices. The seminar was organised by the Conservation Centre in Żółkiew, cooperating with the authorities of the University of Management and Administration in Zamość and the European Information Centre Europe Direct in Zamość.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2007, 4; 8-9
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„PRAWNA OCHRONA DZIEDZICTWA KULTUROWEGO POLSKI – DOŚWIADCZENIA I WYZWANIA XXI W.” Ogólnopolska konferencja naukowa, Warszawa, 27 lutego 2009 r.
”THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE IN POLAND – THE EXPERIENCES AND CHALLENGES OF THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY” National Scientific Conference, Warsaw, 27 February 2009
Autorzy:
Zalasińska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539659.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Prawna ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego Polski…
konferencja dotycząca prawnej ochrony dziedzictwa
karnoprawna ochrona zabytków
Opis:
The national scientific conference on ”The Legal Protection of the Cultural Heritage in Poland – the Experiences and Challenges of the Twenty First Century”, held in Warsaw on 27 February 2009, was organised by the Chair of the Administration and Protection of the Natural Environment in the Faculty of Law and Administration at the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw and the Warsaw Seminar on Administration Axiology. The partners of the organisers were the National Heritage Board of Poland, the Centre for the Protection of Public Collections, and the Horyńska & Partners Law Firm. The conference was attended by more than 200 persons, including representatives of the conservation environment, lawyers and museum experts. The papers were followed by the acceptance of the text of the end declaration. The rank which the organisers of the meeting granted to it and the presence of the most outstanding Polish lawyers specialising in the legal protection of the cultural heritage testify to the significance of the state of Polish legislation for conservation administration.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 2; 5-6
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konwencja UNESCO w sprawie ochrony niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego: archeologia pojęć
Convention on Safeguarding of Intangible Heritage: an archaeology of notions
Autorzy:
Klekot, Ewa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539428.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
konwencje UNESCO
ochrona dziedzictwa
zabytek
dziedzictwo niematerialne
kultura ludowa
Opis:
The Convention on Safeguarding of Intangible Heritage arises from the need of including in the discourse on heritage the non–western ways of living the past. We could say that if the Convention from 1972 was aimed at realizing the UNESCO political agenda on the ground of the Western modern utopian project of universalism, the Convention of 2003 puts in motion the post-modern utopia of relativism, yet without renouncing the modern tools with which to realize it. According to the 2003 Convention, it is the multiplicity of value systems, and the heritage as their expressions put in the inventory, that become the assets of humanity construed as a community (UNESCO’s political objective). The multicultural character of heritage affirmed in the Convention from 2003 has an emancipatory meaning: the subaltern, peripheral value systems are given, at least in theory, the same position as the so far dominating value system of the colonizers. In a decentralized world Europe becomes a province in the same way as the rest of the world, and the Indian, Japanese or Australian perspective is equally valid as the European of American. However, the Convention on Safeguarding of Intangible Heritage, which is supposed to enhance the status of phenomena not included in the 1972 Convention, located outside the authorized heritage discourse, requires different safeguarding strategies. First, as it is a human activity that gets protection, and not at all, or to the less extend the material result of this activity, what is not valid here is the safeguarding by conservation, which is the basic strategy in the case of the objects inscribed in the World Heritage List. The crucial strategy in safeguarding of intangible heritage is education which includes the skills and rules into intergenerational transmission. The institutions and persons involved in safeguarding of intangible heritage are first and foremost required to provide suitable conditions for the future development of a cultural practice declared heritage. What is safeguarded are the living cultural traditions, and not their historical reconstructions. The safeguarding based on education can also result in broadening the group of depositaries of a practice which will become being practiced outside of its community of origin. On the other hand, a living practice will evolve and change, and of crucial importance is then the continuity of traditional system of intergenerational transmission. The article addresses several questions related to implementation of the 2003 Convention in Polish cultural context. Some heritage–related notions involved in discursive practices within the field of humanities and social sciences in Polish academic tradition are discussed, and history–related production of hierarchies within the field in Polish academia pointed at in the context of the heritage of local subalterns (peasants) and minorities. The social impact of these practices is exposed, as they have influenced both the translation of international documents and their reception, as well as the safeguarding practices. The local developments are contextualized within the international conservation and heritage studies discourse.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 31-40
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
OCHRONA DZIEDZICTWA KULTURY WE FRANCJI
THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN FRANCE
Autorzy:
Dobrzyn, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538759.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE (FRANCE)
kodeks dziedzictwa Francji
Codedupatrimoine
francuski Kodeks środowiska
francuska ochrona dziedzictwa kultury
Fundacja Dziedzictwa Narodowego
Opis:
A suitable conception of the legal aspects of protecting cultural heritage poses a considerable challenge. While discussing pertinent Polish legislation, it is worth referring to the examples of solutions applied in other countries. On 20 February 2004 France introduced 'Code du patrimoine' - a new regulation relating to the protection of cultural property. The code replaced six previously binding regulations, with the legislator recognising the protection of national heritage as a fundamental state task. The resultant complex regulation can be considered an example for other European countries, including Poland. Regardless of particular regulations, the most important achievement appears to be the endowment of supreme rank to the protection of culture by including it within the code. This choice not only produced the complex character of the legal act, but predominantly placed cultural heritage at the pinnacle of tasks pursued by the state, thus confirming the fulfilment of the latter's mission associated with the protection of the titular heritage.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2007, 3; 79-86
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dziedzictwo i jego ochrona na Kongresie Kultury Polskiej
Autorzy:
Fijałkowski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536613.pdf
Data publikacji:
2001
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Kongres Kultury Polskiej
ochrona dziedzictwa kultury w Polsce
prof. Andrzej Tomaszewski
Andrzej Tomaszewski
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2001, 1; 109-110
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szlak kulturowy formą ochrony dziedzictwa przeszłości. Szlaki św. Jakuba
Cultural route as a measure to protect historical heritage. Routes of St. James
Autorzy:
Orzechowska-Kowalska, Kazimiera
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539222.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
turystyka
ochrona dziedzictwa
Europejskie Szlaki Kulturowe Rady Europy
szlaki św. Jakuba w Hiszpanii i Polsce
Opis:
Among the most important characteristics of contemporary Europe we can mention its cultural diversity and the mobility of its inhabitants. One of the forms of this mobility is the tourism closely connected with the environment in which humans live. Among various methods of heritage protection (including conservation, legal and organisational methods), tourism appears in its various aspects, such as the protection of the cultural environment for tourism or the protection of the cultural environment against the negative consequences of tourism. There is also the possibility of protection of cultural heritage through tourism. Apart from the adaptation of historic objects for the needs of tourist traffic, cultural routes can also contribute to the protection and maintenance of heritage. These opportunities are illustrated by the Programme of European Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe, which connects places with a similar historical, architectural or artistic shape. Its aim is to make Europeans aware of their cultural identity, to maintain and protect the European cultural heritage as a source of the social, economic and cultural development of the environment in which they live, and to grant a special place to cultural tourism. An example of this is the European Pilgrimage Route leading to Santiago de Compostela in Spain and to restore routes leading to it in the entire Europe. The inscription of Camino de Santiago on the UNESCO List, the revival of the cult of St. James and the popularity of the route resulted in the intensification of protection activities relating to the heritage located along various European routes, also in Poland.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 3-4; 89-105
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dekada nowych wyzwań. Następcy Ośrodka Dokumentacji Zabytków w walce z przestępczością przeciwko zabytkom
The decade of new challenges. Successor of the Centre for Documentation of Monuments in the fighting of crime against monuments
Autorzy:
Sabaciński, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539236.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
przestępczość przeciwko obiektom dziedzictwa
skradzione zabytki
OODA
Krajowy Zespół do Walki z Przestępczością Przeciwko Dziedzictwu Narodowemu
policja
ochrona dziedzictwa archeologicznego
Opis:
The transformations of the system in the 1990s resulted in a significant change of the scale and specific nature of the danger of crime against objects of heritage. The consequences of the said process were transformations of central institutions responsible for the protection of monuments and the passing of the Law on the protection and care of monuments, which contained a new definition of the monument and an updated list of crimes and offences against heritage. As regards crime fighting measures, the last decade saw the establishment of the interministerial task force for the fighting of crime against cultural property and the National Team for the Fighting of Crime Against National Heritage in the General Headquarters of the Police. Two unprecedented interministerial agreements regarding the rules of co-operation of uniformed services and the Ministry of Culture in the fighting of crime against monuments were signed, too. The advancing specialisation of state services resulted from the specific nature of the kind of crime concerned. Effective fighting of such crime requires continuous professionalisation and close co-operation with the scientific environment and experts in the protection of monuments. The establishment of specialised units in the Police, the Civil Service and the Border Guard led to the improvement of the effectiveness of their operations in the last few years. Offences against archaeological heritage turned out to be one of the present-day challenges with regard to crime fighting. The National Heritage Board of Poland co-operates actively with the Police and border services to that extent by organising specialist training courses, issuing training materials and opinions, giving professional advice on particular criminal cases and initiating a series of educational projects targeted at a wide group of recipients. Regular co-operation with the Allegro website was also established and the three-year Polish-Norwegian training project “Legal and illegal trade in cultural property” was completed. One of the most topical challenges is the identification of stolen objects of heritage. This is why the National Heritage Board of Poland, a depositary of the national resource of information on heritage, is an institution that can contribute to the solving of many criminal cases, and the international co-operation of NHMP makes it possible to conduct the identification process on a European scale.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 1-2; 191-198
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jak Miasto Kraków opiekuje się zabytkami
How the City of Kraków takes care of monuments
Autorzy:
GLIŃSKA-HOLCER, EWA
BIESIADA, DOMINIKA
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1927204.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Kraków
opieka nad zabytkami Krakowa
zabytki Krakowa
Park Kulturowy Stare Miasto
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego w Krakowie
Opis:
Due to its historical role and numerous monuments, Kraków has become a symbol of Polish identity. The Kraków City Council takes care of the appearance and condition of its monuments — the most valuable treasures of Kraków — by co-financing renovation and conservation works. Over the last 10 years, the amount of funds provided reached a total of nearly PLN 25 million. The historic city centre features many old bourgeois tenement buildings and palaces, numerous churches and monasteries (St. Mary’s Church, Church of saints Peter and Paul, Church of St. Andrew, Dominican and Franciscan monasteries), public buildings, both official and commercial in nature (Town Hall Tower, Wielopolski Palace housing the Kraków City Council Offices, and Cloth Hall), and old university buildings (Collegium Maius, Collegium Iuridicum). The architecture of Kraków is characterised by extraordinary diversity — each artistic epoch left its traces in this city. In order to take care of the City’s image and seek to ensure the preservation and proper maintenance of its numerous historic monuments, Kraków City Council adopted a resolution proposed by Mayor under which the city budget has been used to fund targeted grants for works on historic monuments every year since 2006. Kraków was one of the first cities in Poland to undertake to co-finance conservation, restoration or construction works on historic monuments. The purpose of the subsidies is to support and complement activities enabling owners or holders of historic monuments to take proper care of their valuable elements, in particular their front façades, which undoubtedly have an influence on Kraków’s image. In the years 2006-2016, subsidies for a total of PLN 24,910,000 were granted from the city budget to over 230 applicants. The fact that works on many old buildings that were co-financed by the Municipality of Kraków were also supported financially by the National Fund for the Renovation of Kraków Monuments is of immense importance. The operator of this Fund in the Civic Committee for Restoration of Kraków Heritage is a civic forum. The Committee introduced mechanisms and principles governing the co-financing of the renovation of Kraków’s monuments from national and local government funds and the private funds of the owners. Based on these well-established mechanisms and financing rules, the owners of historic buildings contribute funds at least equal in value to the subsidies. It is an example of effective cooperation for the sake of the culture and image of Kraków. Thanks to such large-scale restoration works, financed jointly by the National Kraków Monument Renovation Fund, the City, and the building owners, Kraków is regaining its original splendour. Additionally, in order to protect the material and landscape cultural heritage more effectively and in order to enhance the beauty of Kraków, the City Mayor has undertaken activities aimed at establishing a specific form of protection, i.e. a cultural park. In accordance with the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments, the Kraków City Council, on a proposal from the City Mayor, adopted a resolution on the establishment of the Old Town Cultural Park, covering the entire area of the Old Town. The resolution, which is an act of local law, places particular emphasis on the preservation and presentation of heritage and the landscape of the historic urban layout; the protection of its historic buildings and the size of its architectural forms; the functional and compositional protection of Planty Park and other green areas, in particular gardens and garden squares; the protection of visual corridors and scenic overlooks; the protection of the cultural landscape through counteracting the domination of commercial activities, advertising, and services which interfere with the historic space and disturb its aesthetics; and the principles of desirable display. The effects of these actions, which are not easy to perform on a daily basis, have been noticed by the local governments of several cities, as well as smaller communities. Observing the positive effects that have been achieved through the introduction of the Old Town Cultural Park and in response to the numerous initiatives of city residents, the Mayor of the Royal Capital City of Kraków has taken steps towards establishing culture parks in other parts of the city. In June 2014, on a proposal from the City Mayor, the Kraków City Council adopted a resolution concerning plans to establish culture parks within the area of North Kraków: “Nowa Huta Cultural Park” and “Stare Podgórze and Krzemionki Cultural Park”. It needs to be emphasised that these activities have a very beneficial effect on the appearance of Kraków, which is very important both for its inhabitants and its large numbers of tourists, not only from Europe, but also from all over the world. In recent years, Kraków has been visited by over 10 million tourists a year, and in 2016, due to the fact that the city hosted the World Youth Day, the number of visitors exceeded 12 million. Taking care of the historic City of Kraków is a special mission that we should carry out both for us — the contemporary inhabitants — and generations to come. This mission is fully reflected in the development strategy of the City, in the close links between its economy, its historic heritage, and its creative and scientific potential.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2017, Dodatek Specjalny. Dziedzictwo w Polsce.; 169-171
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wypowiedź na Kongresie Kultury Polskiej 2000. Forum - Ochrona dziedzictwa kultury w Polsce (7 grudnia 2000 r.)
A STATEMENT MADE AT THE CONGRESS OF POLISH CULTURE 2000. Forum: The Protection of the Cultural Heritage in Poland (7 December 2000)
Autorzy:
Miłobędzki, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537218.pdf
Data publikacji:
2001
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Kongres Kultury Polskiej 2000
ochrona dziedzictwa kultury w Polsce
budowanie Nowej Europy
konserwacja zabytków w Polsce
Opis:
Profound transformations in social historical consciousness, which coincided with the twilight of the cultural formation of modernism, also affected the approach towards the cultural heritage. There are many reasons for assuming that both history, conceived as an academic discipline, and its applied branches, namely, the protection of souvenirs of the past — both dating back to the beginning of the nineteenth century — are going through a crisis. Without a suitable identification of the nature of this crisis — and this problem constitutes the topic of my speech — it would be difficult to delineate new plans for the protection of the cultural heritage of Europe, brought up to date, and its Polish fragment. I would like my statement not to be treated as a critique, but as an attempt at an abbreviated diagnosis of the current situation in this domain. Let us recall that in its modernist dimension history was closely connected with the ideology of a modern, post-Enlightenment nation-state (unless it became an outright ideology of the nation-state) even if, as in the case of Poland, the systemic component did not assume its full form until the twentieth century. The political creation sought support in, i. a. historical artifacts, leading to a definition of the national legacy and, starting with the 1830s, the institutionalisation of its protection. Since that time, the existence of relics of the past was subjected to three overlapping determinants: not only the already consolidated interests of the educated part of society (today nearing its extinction), but also the programmes of politicians and the professional activity of conservators. Our epoch is frequently described as post-historical. This term pertains to the shrinking of historical social awareness, sometimes to the limits of group amnesia, rather than to the exhaustion of heretofore historiographic systems. The process in question embraces also the cult of historical monuments — a laicised eighteenth-century form of a cult of relics, which today have lost their function of a „fetish”, helpful in the awakening and protection of national- social identity. Paradoxically, in the most universal cultural circuit, regardless of the severance of organic ties with tradition, we may observe the growth of a certain new obsession with the past, which would have never developed without the intervention of politics and the support of the press. Public opinion (if such a thing exists) is stimulated more than ever by the celebrations of assorted anniversaries or the discoveries of official monuments of history. Presupposed cultural tradition is compared with a so-called theme park or a son et lumière spectacle. Even the revitalisation of an historical town sometimes aims at the artificiality of a „municipal historical reservation" or the theatrical archaeologism of a Skansen or Williamsburg, not to mention the worst of all — the fairy-tale surrealism of Disneyland. In other words, the fundamental role played in the contemporary world by relics of the past, envisaged as a transmitter of collective memory, appears to be succumbing to limitation and banalisation. Most frequently, the past is exploited for the purpose of two functions. First, its provides a foundation for the accentuation of the cultural identity of certain populations or environments postulated by political structures. Second, it creates resources for the increasingly important tourist industry (the marketing of landscapes and historical monuments). In order to refer my above outlined statements to the most topical issues of greatest interest to us — the present-day idea of European integration is not only at odds with the old model of the nation-state, but also, to a certain degree, with the conception of the national legacy. Does this heritage truly follow a path from the nation-state towards Europe, and along a downward route — to regions and metropolises? Is this the reason why there is less room for it on the national level? Only two geographic-cultural extremities are vividly marked — one is composed of the whole European Continent, including monuments of World Heritage, and the other includes the small homelands of assorted communities, together with their traditional regional culture, local landscapes and a continuum of artistic manifestations. Regardless of the common goal of constructing a New Europe, the world of m odern political, social and artistic conceptions and symbols developing in the West, does not always correspond to Central-Eastern Europe. Moreover, at a time when in Western democracies the conceptions of the heritage and the realisations of its protection increasingly often depend on social interest and the charity of public institutions, in other countries they are subjected more directly to political bodies and, as a consequence, to the administration sector — with conservation acting as the most sensitive barometer of this process. A characteristic feature of the conservation of historical monuments in contemporary Poland is a hybrid tangle of the utilitarian protectionism of the authorities, multifaceted iconoclasm and Romantic reconstructionism. I do not wish to delve into an assessment of the actual outcome of this situation, but merely wish to draw attention to the fact that among the professional circles of Polish conservators a modern identification of monuments on a philosophical and socio- -cultural level is relatively weak. Notice is paid to artistic merits or sentimental, picturesque expressiveness, but, generally speaking, the monument is perceived mainly as an historical source — an approach which indubitably comprises a considerable simplification. Hopefully, the new generation of conservators will be capable of an integrated, interdisciplinary planning of the protection of the past, a profound comprehension of a complicated network of economic, social, political, legal and philosophical problems, rooted at the basis of the policy of the protection of historical monuments. Well aware of the tricks played by history they will have to be open to endless transformations of the criteria of evaluation. No conservation doctrine can aspire to act as an exclusive model. No monument possesses a concrete substance or delineated boundaries. The reason lies not merely in the fact that it is historically multi-tiered and remains in a state of constant transformation, but also in the fact that it depends on irrational interpretations, founded on the binding hierarchy of values, the dominant world outlook and... our taste.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2001, 1; 1-3
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
KRAKOWSKIE SPOTKANIA Z INSPIRE
CRACOW MEETINGS WITH INSPIRE
Autorzy:
Kmicik, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539643.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
„Dziedzictwo kulturowe jako element geoprzestrzeni”
INSPIRE
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego
geoinformacja
System Informacji Przestrzennej
www.gismazowsza.pl
GIS
Opis:
On 17-19 May 2007 the Town Office of Cracow organised a third symposium from the ”Cracow Meetings with INSPIRE” cycle, whose leading topic was ”Cultural heritage as an element of geo-space”. The conference atttracted about 200 representatives of a widely understood protection of the cultural heritage and geo-information. This large and greatly varied group proved conducive for the development of contacts and the establishment of interdsiciplinary and interministerial coopoeration, which remains the essence of INSPIRE. An excellent example of this approach is the progressing collabiration between the National Heritage Board of Poland (KOBiDZ) and the Land Surveyor Office of the Voivodeship of Mazovia, expressed in a paper prepared by the GIS team working at KOBiDZ and dealing with the implementation of contenporary geo-infirmation solutions connected with the inventories and protection of non-movable historical monuments. The conference was also attended by representatives of the Cracow Regional Centre for the Study and Documentation of Historical Monuments, who read a paper on the theoretical premises of monitoring sites of particular importance for Polish cultural heritrage.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2007, 1; 16-17
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Poznanie turystyczne jako element ochrony wartości dziedzictwa kultury
Tourist cognition as an element of the protection of cultural heritage value
Autorzy:
Nowicki, Rafał G.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538709.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
poznanie turystyczne
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego
turystyka kulturowa
wartości zabytkowe
tourist cognition
cultural heritage protection
cultural tourism
historic value
Opis:
Przedmiotem niniejszych rozważań jest zagadnienie społecznej ochrony dziedzictwa kulturowego jako obszaru potencjalnego oddziaływania turystyki. Cel artykułu koncentruje się wokół ukazania edukacyjnego potencjału praktyk poznania turystycznego i ich roli w budowaniu więzi z dziedzictwem kulturowym. Autor w oparciu o literaturę przedmiotu oraz obserwacje uczestniczące rozpatruje intelektualny i emocjonalny kontekst tej specyficznej relacji pomiędzy poznaniem a ochroną. Główny wątek dociekań dotyczy specyfiki zachowań turystów w spotkaniu z dziedzictwem kulturowym i edukacyjnych implikacji tegoż spotkania, które w rezultacie umożliwiają refleksyjną postawę względem reliktów przeszłości, pozwalając na kształtowanie zachowań sprzyjających ochronie wytworów dawnej kultury. Zważywszy na masowość podróży turystycznych w świecie zachodnim, poznanie turystyczne pomimo wielu niedoskonałości i ograniczoności wydaje się odgrywać żywotną rolę w procesie społecznej ochrony reliktów przeszłości. Szczególne znaczenie ma tutaj emocjonalna strona poznania, co potwierdza tezę, że to emocje otwierają drogę do rozumienia i stymulacji postaw ludzi w procesie społecznej reprodukcji dziedzictwa.
The subject of this article is the issue of the social protection of cultural heritage as a sphere of the potential influence of tourism. The objective is to show the educational potential of tourist cognition practices and their role in creating bonds with cultural heritage. The author analyses the intellectual and emotional aspects of this specific relationship between cognition and protection based on the literature on this subject and his own observations. The main subject of consideration is the specific behaviour of tourists coming into contact with cultural heritage and the educational outcomes of that contact, which enable adopting a reflective attitude towards the relics of the past and thus enable shaping behaviours favourable to the protection of cultural property. Taking into account the prevalence of tourism in the West, tourist cognition, despite its many imperfections and limits, seems to play an active part in the process of the social protection of relics of the past. The emotional aspect of cognition occupies a prominent role in this respect, which supports the thesis that emotions open the way to understanding and stimulating people’s attitudes in the process of social regeneration of heritage.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2016, 2; 105-127
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies