Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "diecezja" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-13 z 13
Tytuł:
Wychodzenie z cienia. Wzrost znaczenia eparchii przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1713
Stepping out of the shadow. Growing importance of Przemyśl-Sambor diocese in 1596-1713
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Wojciechowski, Leszek
Ryba, Mieczysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/23352292.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-10-31
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
diecezja przemyska
eparchia przemyska
prawosławna diecezja przemyska
unicka diecezja przemyska
diecezja przemyska greckokatolicka
unia brzeska
prawosławie
Opis:
Unia brzeska była katalizatorem przyspieszającym wyłonienie się diecezji przemyskiej z peryferyjnych mroków metropolii kijowskiej. Zmiany które zaszły po unii brzeskiej wzmocniły pozycję biskupa przemyskiego w hierarchii Kościoła wschodniego. Początkowo dotyczyło to biskupa prawosławnego, ale potem z jego wzmocnionej roli korzystali na przemian biskupi unicki i prawosławny. Wzrost znaczenia biskupa przemyskiego przejawiał się w jurysdykcyjnym przekroczeniu granic diecezji przemyskiej i sprawowaniu funkcji biskupich w sąsiednich diecezjach. Było to spowodowane brakiem w nich własnego biskupa prawosławnego lub unickiego. Przełomem było uzyskanie przez prawosławnego biskupa Antoniego Winnickiego nominacji na metropolitę kijowskiego. Odtąd przez kilkanaście lat metropolita rezydował na terenie diecezji przemyskiej. Znaczenia tej diecezji doceniono obserwując długoletnie zmagania o przyjęcie przez tę diecezję unii kościelnej. Ostatecznie, po stu latach sporów, unie przyjęto w latach 1691–1693, a diecezja przemyska została zjednoczona (z części prawosławnej i unickiej). Ukoronowaniem stopniowego wzrostu znaczenia diecezji przemyskiej i jej biskupów była nominacja Jerzego Winnickiego na metropolitę kijowskiego. Zarówno biskup Antoni, jak i jego bratanek – biskup Jerzy Winnicki, łączyli godność władyki przemyskiego z funkcją metropolity kijowskiego. Łączność ta zachodziła w latach 1667–1679 i (1708-) 1710–1713. Dzieje eparchii przemyskiej z okresu sporów prawosławno-unickich oczekują na nowoczesną syntezę. Powinny się w niej znaleźć (oprócz samych spraw konfliktu prawosławnych z unitami) podstawowe dane dotyczące diecezji (organizacyjne, statystyczne, analizy prozopograficzne).
The Union of Brest was a catalyst spurring Przemyśl Diocese’s emergence from darkness on the periphery of Kiev metropolis. Changes, effected after the Union of Brest, have strengthened the position of Przemyśl bishop in the hierarchy of the Eastern Church. Initially that was the case only of the Orthodox bishop, however later, the strengthened position brought benefits to both Orthodox and Uniate bishops in turn. Increased importance of the Bishop of Przemyśl has manifested in his jurisdiction extending beyond the limits of Przemyśl diocese and performing the functions of a bishop in neighbouring dioceses. This resulted from absence of own Orthodox or Uniate bishops in those dioceses. The breakthrough point was Orthodox Bishop Anthony Winnicki’s appointment as Metropolitan of Kiev. Since then, for several years the metropolitan has resided in Przemyśl diocese. The importance of the diocese is best appreciated when looking at the many years of struggle to accept the Church Union. Ultimately, following a hundred years of disputes, the Union was accepted in 1691–1693, and Przemyśl diocese was united (having previously been divided into Orthodox and Uniate parts). The crowning moment of gradual increase in importance of Przemyśl diocese and its bishops was Jerzy Winnicki’s appointment as Metropolitan of Kiev. Both Bishop Anthony and his nephew – Bishop Jerzy Winnicki have combined the title of Prince-Bishop of Przemyśl and Metropolitan of Kiev. Such a conjunction occurred in 1667–1679 and (1708-) 1710–1713. History of Przemyśl eparchy in the period of Orthodox-Uniate disputes awaits a contemporary synthesis. It should include (besides the issues related to Orthodox vs Uniate conflict in itself) basic information about the diocese (organizational, statistical and prosopographical analyses).
Źródło:
Rola Kościoła w dziejach Polski. Kościoły w Rzeczypospolitej; 552-583
9788394837433
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Anna Krochmal, Archiwum historyczne eparchii przemyskiej, Warszawa–Przemyśl 2016
Anna Krochmal, Historical Archive of the Przemyśl Eparchy, Warsaw–Przemyśl 2016
Autorzy:
Kośka, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11364399.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-22
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
archiwum historyczne
diecezja przemyska (greckokatolicka)
diecezja przemyska (unicka)
diecezja przemyska (prawosławna)
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2021, 28; 327-330
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Anna Krochmal, Archiwum historyczne eparchii przemyskiej, Warszawa–Przemyśl 2016
Anna Krochmal, Historical Archive of the Przemyśl Eparchy, Warsaw–Przemyśl 2016
Autorzy:
Kośka, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11364398.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-22
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
archiwum historyczne
diecezja przemyska (greckokatolicka)
diecezja przemyska (unicka)
diecezja przemyska (prawosławna)
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2021, 28; 327-330
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kapłani uniccy w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej za rządów biskupa Atanazego Krupeckiego (1610–1652)
Uniate priests in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor under the reigns of Bishop Atanazy Krupecki (1610–1652)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1064819.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
przemyska diecezja prawosławna
przemyska diecezja greckokatolicka
przemysko-samborska diecezja
unia kościelna
Atanazy Krupecki
Opis:
The article lists the Uniate priests of the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor under the reign of Bishop Atanazy Krupecki (1610–1652). This issue was overlooked in the existing historiography. The query was performed in the sources, that allowed the religious identification of a single priests, and thus, it was possible to distinguish whether the one was Uniate or Orthodox. The identification was carried out on the basis of the records of parishes created by the owners of the goods where the church was located. There was collected information about 95 Uniate priests and 12 more who probably were Uniates. Krupecki was the one who created the Uniate hierarchical structure in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor. This structure covered all the offices and the entire area of the vast diocese. The name register of the Uniate clergy allowed to determine the names of the following: one bishop ordinary, two bishops coadjutor, two vicars-general, nineteen kryłoszan [‘Russian cathedral canons’], three protopop [Russian dean] and two of them most probably Uniate, ten basilians monks incl., two monastery igumens, and additionaly one basilian nun (probably Uniate), and 71 popes (and additionally 11 popes probably Uniate) as well as three deacons. There were more functions and offices than exercising them priests, because many priests cumulated benefices and ecclesiastical dignities. Majority of the Uniate popes were to be found in the royal estates. The information about the 52 Uniate popes (and further 5 popes who probably were Uniates) was found in 11 districts. Most of the popes were in the royal estate called Sambor estate (21 Uniate popes and one probably Uniate). From the gentry villages was retrieved information on 5 Uniate popes (and one probably Uniate). In cities and towns belonging to the Latin Bishops of Kraków and Przemyśl cities and to the Uniate bishop of Przemyśl were indentified 10 popes of the Uniate denomination (and 4 probably Uniate). Some priests served more than one church. Under the care of the Uniate popes were 52 churches, including 6 in the cities and 46 in the villages. Among the collaborators of bishop Krupecki who occupied important offices in the eparchy were priests from outside the diocese of Przemyśl, who changed the rite from the Latin into the Greek one. The group was joined by only a few local Russians, who took the position in cathedral kryłos of Przemyśl. Many popes received parishes under the condition of their accession to the Union. The information about the Uniate priests cannot be treated as a closed list. The list will be developed in a result of further archival queries.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2014, 21; 137-170
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Diecezja wendeńska w świetle korespondencji miejscowego duchowieństwa z biskupem Marcinem Kromerem (1579–1589)
The Diocese of Wenden in light of the correspondence of the local clergy with bishop Marcin Kromer (1579–1589)
Autorzy:
Sawa, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1064886.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
wendeńska diecezja
Marcin Kromer
Inflanty
Opis:
The article presents the state of the diocese of Wenden (Livonia) in the late 16th c. in the light of the correspondence addressed to Marcin Kromer, bishop of Warmia by three Catholic priests: Fabian Kwadrantyn, Andreas Krüger and Erdmann Tolgsdorf. In the years 1582–1598 these priests did active pastoral work in Livonia. Their mission was to support the structures of the Catholic Church, that were being rebuilt by King Stefan Batory and popes after the losses of the period of the Protestant Reformation.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2014, 21; 57-62
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unicka eparchia przemyska. Uwagi w związku z książką Wioletty Zieleckiej-Mikołajczyk, Gdzie Wschód spotkał się z Zachodem. Dzieje i organizacja unickiej diecezji przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1772, Toruń 2021
On history of Przemyśl Uniate eparchy. Comments with regard to book by Wioletta Zielecka-Mikołajczyk “Where East met West”. History and organization of Przemyśl-Sambor Uniate diocese in 1596-1772, Toruń 2021.
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22784042.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-13
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
artykuł recenzyjny
diecezja przemyska greckokatolicka
eparchia przemyska
unicka diecezja przemyska
Kościół unicki
unia brzeska
Opis:
Artykuł recenzyjny książki Wioletty Zieleckiej-Mikołajczyk, Gdzie Wschód spotkał się z Zachodem. Dzieje i organizacja unickiej diecezji przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1772, Toruń 2021
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2022, 29, 29; 263-305
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nominacja Józefa Szumlańskiego na biskupa białoruskiego (25 IV 1670)
Appointment of Józef Szumlański as Bishop of Belarus (25 April 1670)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/474809.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-10-29
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Józef Szumlański,
Kościół prawosławny (XVII w.),
diecezja lwowska (prawosławna), diecezja białoruska,
diecezja mścisławsko-orszańsko-mohylewska
Orthodox Church (17th century),
Lviv diocese (Orthodox),
Belarus diocese,
Mstislaw-Orsza-Mogilev diocese
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2018, 25; 255-265
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia kościelna w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej za czasów biskupa Prokopa Chmielewskiego (1652–1664)
The Church Union in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor at the time of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1652–1664)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1065079.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Prokop Chmielewski
unia kościelna
diecezja przemyska (greckokatolicka)
Opis:
The church union in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor at the time of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1652–1664) is a neglected page of the historiography. There is no evidence to indicate parts of the diocese where Unites lived, as well as, the number of the churches is unknown, there is also no information about the Uniate priests involved in various levels of the hierarchy. The reign of bishop Chmielewski fall on difficult period of dual power in the eparchy of the Przemyśl-Sambor the Eastern Church. Simultaneous existence of the bishops of the Orthodox and Uniate denomination meant that they competed for the same cathedral, churches and worshippers. This was due to the complicated internal situation of Poland, involved in a civil war with the Cossacks, then in the war with Russia. The aggressors fought the church union in the name of the Eastern Orthodox Church, interfering in the internal affairs of Poland. This influenced the policy of King Jan Kazimierz towards the Church Union and the Orthodox Church. As the cathedral in Przemyśl was occupied by the Orthodox, the Uniate bishop Prokop Chmielewski resided in Walawa. He tried to maintain a semblance of hierarchical structure, thus, he called cathedral kryłos. He exercised jurisdiction over decanate of Krosno, Leżajsk, Muszyna and Oleszyce. Unites were the most represented in the royal estates, particularly in the district of Krosno, as well as, in the noble goods belonging to the Families of Fredro, Korniakta, Krasicki, Lubomirski, Sieniawski and Zamoyski. These are initial findings on the Uniate Church in the days of bishop Chmielewski. This matter requires further detailed research.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2015, 22; 169-202
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawosławny biskup przemyski Jerzy Hoszowski (1667–1674)
Orthodox Bishop of Przemyśl - Jerzy Hoszowski (1667–1674)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1076400.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Jerzy Hoszowski
prawosławni biskupi przemyscy
prawosławna diecezja przemyska
Orthodox Bishops of Przemyśl
Orthodox Przemyśl diocese
Opis:
Bishop Jerzy Hoszowski is a figure that is neglected by historiography. His biographical entries are outdated, inaccurate and full of errors. The article presents a critical analysis of findings preserved in historiography, in order to confirm the veracity of statements or eliminating erroneous information about Jerzy Hoszowski. An attempt was made to elaborate a new biography for the Bishop. New aspects of the biography include previously unknown details from his secular life, and subsequently from the period of holding the position of Bishop of Przemyśl. Jerzy Hoszowski was born about 1610, in Żydaczów county. In mid-17th century he became a co-owner of Chłopczyce village in Sambor county. He was married to Marianna Czernicka and had four sons with her. After her death he abandoned the secular life and, as a widower, chose a career in Church. He became a close associate of the Orthodox Metropolitan of Kiev, Antoni Winnicki. He took over the Przemyśl diocese after Winnicki, and held the position of Bishop of Przemyśl in 1667–1674. Despite the opinion prevalent in historiography, he was not a lavrite hegumen, or even a Basilian monk. Jerzy Hoszowski died before 25 July 1674. He was buried near Chłopczyce Orthodox church
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2019, 26; 49-83
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1664–1670
The Union in the eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor in the years 1664–1670
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1065191.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Antoni Terlecki
Jakub Susza
unia kościelna
greckokatolicka diecezja przemyska
church union
Greek Catholic Diocese of Przemyśl
Opis:
The article shows the state of the Uniate Church in the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor during the transitional period between the death of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1664), and taking the diocese by Bishop Jan Małachowski (1670). At that time, Bishop Antoni Terlecki (1664–1669) ruled this diocese, and after his removal from the office – Jakub Susza, bishop of the neighboring Uniate diocese of Chełm, who was the administrator of the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor until the appointment of the next Bishop Ordinary. The rule by the Bishop Terlecki fell in the most difficult period in relations between the Uniate and the Orthodox churches. In the diocese of Przemysl advantage gained Orthodox under the strong leadership of bishop Antoni Winnicki, later Metropolitan of Kiev. The cathedral and most of the parishes in Przemyśl were in their hands. Orthodox took over another Uniate churches, and tried to expel the Uniate bishop from a residence in Walawa in next to Przemyśl, what they finally succeeded in 1669. An account of the bishop Terlecki’s governance is not clear, and in fact it has to be divided into two parts. The positive assessment gains the first one, launched in the final period of the rule of his predecessor – the bishop Prokop Chmielewski. Antoni Terlecki, first as coadjutor (1662), then Bishop Ordinary (1664) ably led the Uniate part of the Diocese of Przemyśl. He became involved in the efforts to strengthen the Uniate Church in Poland, in cooperation with the Uniate bishop of Chełm Jakub Susza. Antoni Terlecki was well prepared to deal with the high ecclesiastical functions. He was a basilian and a doctor of theology. However, over the time his negative traits as rowdiness and drunkenness prevailed. He neglected the duties of the bishop and voluntarily left the diocese of Przemyśl. As a result, the Uniate Metropolitan of Kiev, first imposed on Terlecki church curse, and then took his episcopal functions. Jakub Susza was entrusted with the administration of the Uniate eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor. At the time of the Bishop Terlecki falls regression in the development of the church union in the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor. Compact complexes of the Uniate churches were operated on the outskirts of the vast Eparchy, in its western and northern parts. There were 65 established churches confirmed by sources as Uniate and consecutive three more likely to be Uniate. A total of 45 identified with the name Uniate priest served (they cumulated several functions simultaneously).
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2016, 23; 179-205
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Duchowieństwo unickie eparchii przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1609
Greek-Catholic clergy of Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy from 1596 to 1609
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1064711.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
duchowieństwo
unici
diecezja przemyska
eparchia przemysko-samborska
unia brzeska
Greek-Catholic clergy
Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy
Union of Brest
Opis:
Orthodox bishop of Przemysl and Sambor Michał Kopysteński (1591-1609) did not join the union of Brest in 1596. Therefore, the Przemyśl-Sambor Emparchy did not have Greek-Catholic bishop until 1609, when Atanazy Krupecki was nominated.The article presents the history of the first phase of the church union in Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy (1596-1609). This issue has been poorly explored in historiography. Many historians thought that before 1609, the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor had no Greek-Catholic priests and Greek-Catholics. This view has been verified. Also the myth that the Greek-Catholic Church initially consisted only of bishops, and was deprived of ecclesiastical structures and followers was challenged. The Church Union of Brest was supposed to combine the two Churches - Catholic and Orthodox. As a result of non-acceptance of the Union by the two bishops and a large part of the Orthodox faithful, there were formed two parallel structures of the Eastern Church: Orthodox and Greek-Catholic. This complex legal and religious situation forced the Orthodox popes of the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy to face the choice between the Ortodox Church or acceptance of ecclesiastical union. The latter was equivalent with the conversion from the Orthodox to the Greek Catholic denomination. Following the adoption of the Union of Brest state authorities outlawed the Orthodox Church, and recognized as the only legitimate one the Greek-Catholic Church. Pope recognizing the authority of the Metropolitan of Kiev, which was of Greek-Catholic denomination, had to object to his hitherto Orthodox bishop. Moreover, the bishops and priests who did not accept the union of church, were excommunicated by metropolitan of Kiev. An important role in determining denomination of a particular parish had landowners of lands where churches were located. The landowner (the king, the nobles and the clergy) was called. "Ktitor", and had the right to choose a pope. After 1596, decisions on filling the church by the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic priests were taken in accordance with the principle of cuius regio, eius religio. Union developed gradually throughout the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy thanks to the support of ktitors. This graduall evolutionary development of the union was followed by natural generational changes that took place in the individual parishes. No information was found on Orthodox priests forcibly removed and replaced by the Greek-Catholics. From 1598 to 1609 Greek-Catholic popes are confirmed in seven decanates of the eparchy, mostly in the towns and villages belonging to the king and Stanisław Stadnicki from Żmigród. Identified were 22 known by name Greek-Catholic priests, plus four popes who were probably of Greek-Catholic denomination. Recognized popes accounted for only about 2% of all priests (both Greek-Catholics and Orthodox) from the eparchy. However, for all Greek-Catholic churches operating at that time this is a significant percentage of the Greek-Catholics parishes. These figures have not been known in historiography yet. During this period, the vast majority of churches and clergy of the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy remained Orthodox. Nevertheless, only 19 known by the name Orthodox priests and eight who were probably Orthodox were identified as a result of a query. The number of identified Greek-Catholic and Orthodox priests are comparable, although on the Orhodox should be much more information in the sources. There was also found information about 12 known by name popes who lived by 1596 but there was no hints about their attitude to the union and 18 popes from the period after 1596, whose denomination can not be determined. Orthodox churches served by popes known by name were of a minor percentage of the total number of operating the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic churches. So far, historians have failed to determine the number of churches that existed in that period in the Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy and all data are based on estimations. Therefore, creation of an inventory of the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic churches is an important research proposal. Another objective should be to determine the number of priests serving in those churches. The article shows religious specificity of Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy over 13 years (1596-1609). Most of the processes had not been completed in that period, so they should be considered in the long term. The final adoption of the church union between 1691 and 1693 ended disputes among Orthodox and Greek-Catholics in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2013, 20; 135-167
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Biskupi uniccy Antoni Angełłowicz i Ferdynand Ciechanowski wobec wydarzeń epoki napoleońskiej
The Greek-Catholic bishops Antoni Angełłowicz and Ferdynand Ciechanowski facing the events of the Napoleonic era
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1063042.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Antoni Angełłowicz
Ferdynand Ciechanowski
biskup przemyski
diecezja przemyska
epoka napoleońska
Galicja
Greek-Catholic bishop
Greek-Catholic diocese of Przemyśl
Napoleonic era
Galicia
Opis:
This article is an attempt to show the attitude of the Greek-Catholic hierarchy in the Polish lands to the events of the Napoleonic era. The subject is discussed on the basis of the behavior of two Uniate bishops, presenting contradictory views and political affiliation. The Greek-Catholic bishop of Przemysl, Antoni Angełłowicz, since 1808 the Greek-Catholic Archbishop of Galicia, was a strong advocate of the alliance with the Habsburg monarchy, moreover, he was loyal to the Austrian emperor and supported his policy. The bishop of the neighboring with Galicia Greek-Catholic diocese of Chelm, Ferdinand Ciechanowski, agreed with the attitudes of Polish society, and clearly supported the policy of the French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. The pastoral letters of metropolitan Angełłowicz (1805), and bishop Ciechanowski (1812) together with other sources to this period became the basis for the analysis and comparison of different attitudes and political views of both representatives of the hierarchy. The pastoral letter of 1805 was released at a critical moment of the history of Austria, after Austrian defeat in the Battle of Ulm with the forces of Napoleon and Vienna and the Czech lands occupied by the French . The letter contained a declaration of the bishop’s and the Galician Ruthenians’ loyalty to the Austrian monarchy and the Emperor of Austria. Anti-French attitudes of Angełłowicz was confirmed in two political pamphlets that were written by him and published under the title Who is the party provoking: Austria or France? (1805) and Austrian Patriot Comments on Certain Articles from Foreign Newspapers (1809). Disclosure of political sympathies forced the Metropolitam to temporarily leave Lviv after the Galicia went under occupation by the Polish army in 1809 A completely different personality was Uniate bishop of Chelm, Ferdynand Dąbrowa Ciechanowski. The cardinal was involved in the political life of the Duchy of Warsaw (as a senator), especially in the events of 1812 and preparations for the "Polish War", led by Emperor Napoleon. Ciechanowski took part in the Parliament of 1812 and the establishment of the General Confederation of the Polish Kingdom, which proclaimed the rebirth of an independent state. Under the influence of the patriotic atmosphere he announced the pastoral letter to priests and faithful of his diocese on June 28th, 1812. He expressed universal joy from the rebirth of an independent Poland and solidarity with the Polish society. The consequences of his pro-Polish speaking incurred after Napoleon’s defeat in Russia and Russian invasion of the Duchy of Warsaw in 1813, then he was forced to temporarily leave his diocese to avoid imprisonment. In the years of his reign (died in 1828) Ciechanowski carried out a number of important reforms for the Greek-Catholic dioceses, patterning the organization and functioning on the Latin Church.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2013, 20; 169-189
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawosławny biskup przemyski Arseniusz Bryliński (1586–1590)
Arsenius Bryliński, Orthodox Bishop of Przemyśl (1586–1590)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11364375.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-22
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Arseniusz Bryliński
prawosławny biskup przemyski
prawosławna diecezja przemyska
Kościół prawosławny
Arsenius Bryliński
Orthodox Bishop of Przemyśl
Orthodox diocese of Przemyśl
Orthodox Church
Opis:
Prawosławny biskup przemyski Arseniusz Bryliński nie miał dotychczas rzetelnego biogramu, a dotyczące go wzmianki w historiografii zawierały wiele luk chronologicznych i faktograficznych oraz błędów w datacji. W artykule ukazano sylwetkę Brylińskiego w świetle nowych źródeł archiwalnych. Ustalono wiele nowych faktów z jego życia, postawiono też liczne postulaty badawcze. Bryliński urodził się około 1541 r. Imię chrzestne Stefan (Steczko, Stećko) otrzymał po swym ojcu, sołtysie i popie prawosławnym w Brylińcach. Była to wieś królewska w starostwie przemyskim osadzona na prawie wołoskim. W 1564 r. w spadku po ojcu Stećko Bryliński otrzymał część sołectwa i popostwa w Brylińcach. Bryliński był popem bezżennym, zachowującym celibat, co może świadczyć, że już w młodości przygotowywał się do objęcia godności biskupiej. W 1581 r. Bryliński otrzymał nominację królewską na koadiutora i administratora diecezji przemyskiej. Jednak nie objął wówczas w niej rządów, bo na trzy lata zniknął z otoczenia Radyłowskiego, przygotowując się do święceń biskupich. Przy Radyłowskim pojawił się w 1584 r. Rządy w diecezji Bryliński objął dopiero na przełomie 1585 i 1586 r. Zmarł we wrześniu 1590 r. (a nie w 1591 r., jak jest podawane w literaturze). Na ocenie Brylińskiego ciąży uzależnienie od władzy świeckiej starosty przemyskiego Jana Tomasza Drohojowskiego. Konsekwencją tego była utrata dóbr należących do prawosławnych biskupów przemyskich. Bryliński nie dbał o stan moralny duchowieństwa parafialnego. Obejmując rządy napotkał na opór części prawosławnej szlachty przemyskiej, lekceważącej go z powodu wątpliwego szlachectwa i uzależnienia od starosty przemyskiego. Niechęć tę Bryliński szybko pokonał, udowadniając przynależność do szlachty. Objęcie godności biskupa podniosło też prestiż rodziny Brylińskich. Rządy Arseniusza Brylińskiego przypadły na trudny okres. Diecezję objął po wybitnym biskupie Antonim Radyłowskim, przez co był oceniany przez pryzmat jego osiągnięć. Władzę w diecezji przemyskiej sprawował przez niespełna pięć lat, jednak nawet tak krótki okres wystarczył, by utracił wiele dóbr należących do biskupstwa. Na okres jego rządów przypada kryzys Kościoła prawosławnego w metropolii kijowskiej, z drugiej zaś strony intensywne próby jego przezwyciężenia, co spotykało się z intensywnymi działaniami na rzecz zjednoczenia podzielonego Kościoła. W tym kontekście umieścić trzeba działania katolicyzacyjne Katarzyny Wapowskiej i Jana Łączyńskiego zakończone przejęciem 7 parafii prawosławnych. Sprawiedliwa ocena biskupa Brylińskiego będzie mogła być dokonana dopiero po przeprowadzeniu dalszych badań. Pomimo nowych ustaleń dotyczących jego życia, biogram biskupa nadal jest niepełny.
No reliable biography of the Orthodox Bishop of Przemyśl Arsenius Bryliński has been published so far, and available historical references concerning him contained many chronological and factual gaps and dating errors. The article presents Bryliński’s profile in the light of new archival sources. Many new facts of his life were established, and numerous research suggestions were made. Bryliński was born around 1541. He received his Christian name Stefan (Steczko, Stećko) after his father, a village leader and Orthodox popes in Brylińce - a royal village in the Przemyśl district, founded on Wallachian law. In 1564, Stećko Bryliński inherited a part of the village office and popedom in Brylińce from his father. Bryliński remained unmarried and observed celibacy, which may indicate that even in his youth he was preparing to assume the bishopric. In 1581, Bryliński received a royal nomination as coadjutor and administrator of the diocese of Przemyśl. However, he did not assume the office at that time, as he had disappeared from Radyłowski’s entourage for three years while preparing for episcopal ordination. He reappeared at Radyłowski’s side in 1584. Bryliński did not assume his responsibilities in the diocese until late 1585 or early 1586. He died in September 1590 (and not in 1591, as reported in the literature). Any assessment of Bryliński must be affected by his dependence on secular power of the starost of Przemyśl, Jan Tomasz Drohojowski. The consequence of this was losing some lands that had belonged to the Orthodox bishops of Przemyśl. Bryliński did not take much care of the moral state of the parish clergy. When he took over the reins of power, he encountered resistance from some of the Orthodox nobility of Przemyśl, who disrespected him because of his dubious nobility and his dependence on the starost of Przemyśl. Bryliński quickly overcame their animosity by proving that he was a noble. Becoming a bishop had also bolstered the prestige of the Bryliński family. The rule of Arsenius Bryliński took place in a difficult period. He took over the diocese after an outstanding bishop Antoni Radyłowski, and because of that he was judged from the perspective of Radyłowski’s accomplishments. He ruled the Diocese of Przemyśl for less than five years, but even this short period was enough for him to lose many properties belonging to the bishopric. During his reign there a crisis of the Orthodox Church in the Kiev metropolis emerged, along with intense attempts to overcome it, which was accompanied by vigorous efforts to unite the divided Church. The efforts at Catholicization by Katarzyna Wapowska and Jan Łączyński, which ended with the takeover of seven Orthodox parishes, should be placed in this context. A fair assessment of Bishop Bryliński can only be achieved after further research. Despite the new findings concerning his life, the Bishop’s biography is still incomplete.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2021, 28; 37-74
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-13 z 13

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies