Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "rule of law" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 17
Tytuł:
The Rule of Law and the Fundamental Role of Lawyers
Autorzy:
Linda, Klein,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902885.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-03
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
rule of law
ABA
legal profession
independent court
państwo prawa
zawody prawnicze
niezawisłe sądownictwo
Opis:
The speech by Linda Klein – immediate past president of the ABA – has been presented as opening remarks during Poland-US Conference on the Rule of Law in Warsaw on 24 June 2018. In her speech Klein stated that the rule of law is expressed by the vigorous and independent legal profession and judicial branch of government. Lawyers must take the lead as advocates for the rule of law. Principles of the rule of law must never, ever yield to any perceived or actual emergency of the moment. Independent legal profession cannot and must not bend to the will of government, that independent courts must not be influenced by public or political pressure, and that access to justice is assured for all, even for the least powerful. The most important responsibility organized bar in every nation is to promote these principles and oppose any efforts to erode them. The core principles of the legal profession articulate the fundamental missions and activities of bar associations the world over. As a global leader of the rule of law issues and the world’s largest voluntary bar association, the American Bar Association has consistently supported efforts to build a strong, cohesive global movement to promote these fundamental principles.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 9-13
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aggressive Judicial Review, Political Ideology, and the Rule of Law
Autorzy:
J, Segall, Eric
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902971.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
U.S. Supreme Court
Constitutional Law
Constitutional Interpretation
Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych
prawo konstytucyjne
interpretacja konstytucji
Opis:
For over one-hundred and fifty years, the United States Supreme Court has been the most powerful judicial body in the world with life-tenured judges consistently invalidating state and federal laws without clear support in constitutional text or history. This paper focuses on what should be the appropriate role of life-tenured, unelected federal judges in the American system of separation of powers. The tension is between wanting judges to enforce the supreme law of the Constitution while at the same time keeping judges within their assigned roles of enforcing not making the law. Much of constitutional scholarship in the United States is devoted to resolving this tension. This article argues that the Court should take a set back and defer more to elected leaders and voters. Although structural reform might help, most needed changes would require a constitutional amendment and are therefore unlikely to occur. The Justices should take it upon themselves to act with more humility and modesty and only overturn laws where there is strong evidence of clear constitutional error.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 68-77
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
How Federalism Can Promote a National Commitment to the Rule of Law
Autorzy:
A, Schapiro, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902635.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
federalism
Rule of Law
standing
federalizm
praworządność
Opis:
Promoting the rule of the law is a national responsibility. The obligation to ensure legality and advance human rights rests on the national government. This article analyzes how federalism, a system of distributing power among subnational entities, can promote this national goal. The article explores how states in the United States have played an important role in encouraging the federal government to enforce the law and safeguard rights. By means of resistance, cooperation, and redundancy, states have moved the United States closer to rule-of-law ideals. The state action sometimes takes the form of litigation, with states bringing suit against the federal government. Such suits have particular significance in challenging illegal inaction by the national government, as when the federal government fails to enforce environmental laws. Litigation by states may overcome standing barriers that would limit such suits by private individuals. States may also engage in direct action by pursuing their own policies that promote the rule of law. In these areas, the states may oppose the federal government, cooperate with the federal government, or act in an independent, parallel manner. What unites all of these modes and instruments of state-federal interaction is that the goal of states is to influence national policy. The state action may begin within the boundaries of a particular state, but what motivates the state initiative is a vision applicable to the nation as a whole. The ultimate aim of state action is not local divergence, but national uniformity. Federalism serves not as a license for local deviation from national norms, but instead as a means for states to engage actively in creating policy at a national level. In this way, independent state activity can indeed promote the national obligation to promote the rule of law throughout the country.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 131-147
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Redefining the rule of law: in search of a universal social dimension
Autorzy:
Dzięgielewska, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48548619.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-06-22
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
rule of law
rule of law definition
social rights
social welfare
Opis:
Bearing in mind that there exists no universally accepted definition of the rule of law, this paper sets out to identify its commonly agreed core, and to expand it by adding substantive elements. While the core is not controversial, the second part of the rule of law framework, comprising social welfare rights, essentially aims to revisit classical accounts of the rule of law. The analysis involves the frequently ignored social dimension of the rule of law, defending the necessity of its translation into a substantive element of the definition. Some general arguments are offered explaining why social rights protection should be included in the definition of the rule of law.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2022, 95; 110-124
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Rule of Law in Turkey: Some Procedural Aspects in Criminal Cases
Autorzy:
Feridun, Yenisey,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902643.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
state of emergency
Rule of Law
supremacy of law
principle of legality
legal certainty
fair trial
protection of vulnerable victims
police custody
pre-trial detention
praworządność
nadrzędność prawa
zasada legalności
pewność prawa
rzetelny proces
ochrona szczególnie narażonych ofiar
stan wyjątkowy
areszt policyjny
areszt przedprocesowy
Opis:
Nadrzędność prawa, zasady legalności, pewność prawa i sprawiedliwy proces uznający prawa podejrzanego i oskarżonego są podstawowymi aspektami państwa prawnego. Trybunał ustanowiony przez prawo, dostępny dla obywateli, składający się z bezstronnych i niezawisłych sędziów, którzy swoje decyzje opierają na zasadach będących rdzeniem „demokratycznego państwa świeckiego i socjalnego, rządzonego przez prawo”, jak stanowi Konstytucja Turcji z 1982 r., ma długą historię w Turcji. Prawa stanowiące o rzetelnym procesie, takie jak ustanowienie obowiązkowego obrońcy przez podejrzanego na wczesnym etapie dochodzenia, prawo do przesłuchiwania świadków zeznających na niekorzyść podejrzanego i ochrona „wrażliwych” pokrzywdzonych, rozwinęły się w Turcji w ramach parlamentarnego systemu demokratycznego, który obowiązywał do 2018 r. Regulacje dotyczące postępowania w przypadku aktów terroryzmu, wprowadzone po okresie stanu wyjątkowego przypadającego na lata 2016-2018, są aktualnie pod nadzorem sędziów i obowiązywać będą przez trzy lata. Nowo wprowadzony reżim demokracji prezydenckiej z pewnością wzmocni rozwój państwa prawa.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 117-130
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Living with the Rules: Gender and the Rule of Law in Herodotus’ Histories
Autorzy:
Helen, Tank,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902844.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-21
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
rule of law
Herodotus
history
law/nomos
gender
legal pluralism
rządy prawa
Herodot
historia
prawo
płeć
pluralizm prawny
Opis:
What does “the rule of law” mean to an ancient historian, Herodotus? This paper uses modern legal theories and a sociological model to consider how he presents the concept in his Histories. The author takes a novel approach in that she considers the rule of law from a gender perspective. She argues that law is as much about social and cultural rules, which involve women as much as men, as it is about institutional practices which exclude women and reinforce an ideology of female inferiority. She also shows that the rule of law is a powerful normative ideal which Herodotus uses to interrogate power. The author uses the theoretical model of law developed by the English legal scholar HLA Hart, who argues that rules have a social as well as a legal dimension (the “internal” view of law), that is, how rules are perceived by community members, and how normative behaviours are enforced by that community. She also uses the work of a legal anthropologist, Leopold Pospίčil, and feminist legal theory, to argue for a wider definition of the rule of law than that used by most contemporary scholars. She uses three case studies to show that the rule of law is a powerful force in the Histories precisely because it combines external coercive force, internal rule of conduct and normative ideal.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 80; 389-403
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Economic and Institutional Determinants of the Rule of Law: A New Empirical Exploration
Autorzy:
Lewkowicz, Jacek
Byler, Jakub
Litwiniuk, Przemysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/47400169.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-12
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
rule of law
legal system
judicial system
civil society
institutional economics
law & economics
rządy prawa
system prawny
sądownictwo
społeczeństwo obywatelskie
ekonomia instytucjonalna
ekonomiczna analiza prawa
Opis:
The rule of law has proved to be significant in economic and social development and the functioning of political systems. At the same time, determinants of the rule of law remain far from transparent. Our study focuses on a novel set of economic and institutional factors potentially shaping the rule of law. The quantitative research is based on econometric and machine-learning apparatus and covers a global sample of countries. The output of our study exposes the crucial role of the quality of the law, access to justice and impartial public administration to assure the rule of law. Apart from the contribution to the literature, our conclusions may be helpful for policymakers.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2021, 88; 237-254
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Procedural Justice as a Rule of Law and Expression of Respect for Human Dignity
Autorzy:
Tatiana, Chauvin,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902995.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
dignity
rule of law
procedural justice
godność
państwo prawa
sprawiedliwość proceduralna
Opis:
Human dignity in the Polish law is considered as the basis for the system of rights and freedoms regulated in Chapter II of the Constitution of 1997. In turn, the rule of law is a principle of constitutional democracy respecting human rights. Procedural rules focus on the manner in which the state operates, also in relation to individuals. Procedural justice as a principle derived from the rule of law can be defined as a set of values whose guarantee in legal norms and implementation in procedural practice affects their fairness and enables their positive evaluation. The jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal considers the principle of procedural fairness as one of the principles of the rule of law and binds it with the right to court which means exactly: 1) the right of access to court, 2) the right to really fair procedure, 3) the right to court judgment, and 4) the right to appropriate shape of the system of the authorities examining cases. Appropriate shaping (fairness) of the procedure within the meaning presented by the Constitutional Tribunal ensures in particular that the parties of proceedings have: the right to be heard; the right to obtain a justification of the decision, which prevents arbitrary action of the court; ensured predictability of the proceedings; guarantee of procedural measures balancing the position of the parties; ensured the control of the decision by a superior instance; guarantee of impartiality of the judge. Meeting these requirements guarantees respect for dignity of a man as a participant in the proceedings.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 48-67
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Short History of the Rule of Law in the United States (1954-2016)
Autorzy:
Ryan, Rowberry,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902447.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-03
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Rule of Law
executive
judiciary
United States
U.S. Constitution
praworządność
władza wykonawcza/egzekutywa
sądownictwo
Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki Północnej
Konstytucja Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki Północnej
Opis:
Many Americans and outside observers assume that the United States of America was founded upon a cluster of principles known as the “Rule of Law”. Indeed, Articles I, II, and III of the United States Constitution of 1789, purportedly establish the rights and authorities of three co-equal branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Adherence to the Rule of Law in the United States, however, has a much shorter history. During the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries, the President of the United States – leader of the executive branch—often ignored or contradicted decisions by the judiciary when it served their ambitions. Monumental architecture and actions by early Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court also testify that the judiciary was the least respected branch in the U.S. government. Not until 1954 with the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education and its vigorous enforcement by the President of the United States – nearly 200 years after America’s founding – can the United States accurately be described as a nation that consistently follows the Rule of Law. With the repeated questionable and unconstitutional tactics deployed by the Trump administration, however, this period of the Rule of Law in the United States is waning. To prevent its continued decline, the Rule of Law in the United States (and elsewhere) must be vigorously protected and nurtured. For in the end, the Rule of Law is merely an idea, a belief that must be acted upon to be realized. When not constantly protected and cultivated, the Rule of Law can and will wither.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 14-28
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The “Rule of Law” and the “Rechtsstaat”: A Historical and Theoretical Approach from a German Perspective
Autorzy:
Christoph-Eric, Mecke,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902591.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-03
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Rule of Law
Rechtsstaat
arbitrariness
judicial independence
Lisbon Treaty
“Venice Commission”
praworządność
państwo prawa
arbitralność
niezawisłość sędziowska
Traktat Lizboński
„Komisja Wenecka”
Opis:
The Rule of Law, understood in its most general and original meaning as an absence of arbitrariness in state power, is not merely one legal principle amongst many, but has been the core of law itself in political philosophy since classical Antiquity. Although the Rule of Law has been given substance to in various different ways since the modern era, the Member States of the European Union (EU) have contractually agreed in Article 2 first sentence of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) on a Rule of Law that is an expression of the community of values within the EU. This is now not just politically but legally binding for all EU Member States, regardless of changing political majorities or national legislative acts within the Member States. However, with the recent initiation of proceedings against Poland and Hungary, to investigate the potential “risk of serious breach” of EU values according to Article 7 para. 1 of the TEU, it has become very clear that there is no longer political consensus amongst the governments of the EU Member States with regard to how the principle of the Rule of Law should be given substance to in practice. It will thus be the task of jurisprudence, not of politics, to ascertain how far-reaching the legal obligation with regard to the “value” of the “Rule of Law” on the basis of Article 2 of the TEU is and where – beyond the scope of European Law – the political prerogative for Member States to act in accordance with their own national circumstances begins.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 29-47
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Constitution, Judicial Review, and the Rule of Law in the Jurisprudence of Administrative Courts in Poland
Autorzy:
Marcin, Wiącek,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902997.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
rule of law
Constitution
administrative courts
Supreme Administrative Court
Constitutional Tribunal
application of the Constitution
judicial review of law
zasada państwa prawnego
Konstytucja
sądy administracyjne
Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny
Trybunał Konstytucyjny
stosowanie Konstytucji
sądowa kontrola konstytucyjności prawa
Opis:
In the light of Article 184 of the 1997 Constitution administrative courts verify the lawfulness of administrative decisions and some other acts of public administration. Furthermore, administrative courts may review the lawfulness, including the compliance with the Constitution, of the so called “enactments of local law” (referred to in Articles 87(2) and 94 of the Constitution). Pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Constitution “The provisions of the Constitution shall apply directly, unless the Constitution provides otherwise”. This constitutional competence is addressed, inter alia, to courts. In practice, administrative courts apply Constitution in three ways: 1) pro-constitutional interpretation of laws, 2) referring the so called questions of law to the Constitutional Tribunal, 3) ruling in a case directly on the basis of a constitutional provision. The provision applied by administrative courts in most cases is Article 2 of the Constitution, which stipulates that “The Republic of Poland shall be a democratic state governed by the rule of law (…)”. The Article is focused on most important cases in which the rule of law principle was applied. Administrative courts, as well as other courts and the Constitutional Tribunal, consider the rule of law principle to be the source of several detailed principles, e.g. the certainty of law, the lex retro non agit principle, the loyalty of the State towards citizens, the citizens’ trust in the State and the law, the principle of proportionality. Each of these principles was referred to in the large number of administrative courts’ judgments as the basis of a ruling. This proves that the Constitution, in particular the rule of law principle, is one of the instruments utilized by administrative courts’ judges in their everyday work.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 92-106
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Importance of the principle of decent legislation for Polish administrative law
Autorzy:
Ziółkowski, Dawid
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48899597.pdf
Data publikacji:
2024-04-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
democratic state under the rule of law
principle of decent (good) legislation
administrative law
Opis:
The paper analyses the principle of decent legislation and its significance for Polish administrative law. The principle in question derives from the concept of a democratic state under the rule of law. The significant role of administrative law in shaping the status of individuals (citizens) in the state as well as the influence of this branch of law on particular areas of social life are indicated. Due to the special characteristics of this branch of law, the principle of correct legislation should be absolutely taken into account in the legislative process that involves drafting of administrative legal acts. The case law of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal has distinguished certain elements or aspects of the principle of good legislation, including the following: non-retroactivity, protection of acquired rights, pacta sunt servanda, respect for pending interests or appropriate vacatio legis. The vast majority of them should be taken into account when working on administrative regulations. The paper also refers to the current crisis of administrative law discussed in the domestic literature from a practical point of view, by presenting two errors made by the legislator when amending administrative procedural laws. The conclusion of the study includes i.a. a proposal for a fuller involvement of experts, legal scholars and commentators, professional attorneys or administrative court judges in the process of drafting administrative laws.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2024, 102; 242-256
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and the Limits of Popular Sovereignty: Rethinking the Polish Experience
Autorzy:
Ryszard, Piotrowski,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902983.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
separation of powers
checks and balances
rule of law
democracy
the Constitution
human rights
values
sovereign
privacy
new technologies
podział władzy
kontrola i równowaga
praworządność
demokracja
Konstytucja
prawa człowieka
wartości
suwerenność
prywatność
nowe technologie
Opis:
The principle of checks and balances counts among the most fundamental constitutional values, as it is connected with the recognition and guaranteeing of human rights – in other words is the very essence of the Constitution, an act that limits the majority rule to allow for the rights and freedoms of the individual. Also of key importance is the connection of this precept with the essence of the democratic system, understood as one where the majority rule is constrained by human rights. The principle of checks and balances could function in full only in correspondence with culture of respect for human rights. The status of the sovereign needs legitimacy, which derives from the sovereign’s subordination to the Constitution. Being sovereign means being unsubordinated to anybody. It is thus fair to conclude that the attribute of sovereignty actually belongs to the values that have been shaped by culture and linked to the timeless moral rules and principles corresponding to humanity’s eternal dilemmas – the values that create the constitutional culture, i.e. a community’s set of values. The sovereign does not exercise the supreme authority over values, and the values are embodied in the Constitution, which is inseparably linked with the people and their sovereignty. The Constitution of the Republic of Poland reflects the precepts of liberal democracy, or such kind of democracy where the sources of human rights do not stem from the will of the majority. The model of governance adopted in the Constitution could be described as consensual democracy. Constitutional practice has taken a course where the system of consensual democracy – as laid down in the Constitution of Poland, with the power of the majority being constrained by rights of the minority – is turning into a system of a majority democracy, based not on a dialogue between the majority and the opposition, but on the power of a parliamentary majority who disregards the systemic role of the opposition.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 78-91
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The System of Justice: European Safeguards
Autorzy:
Hanna, Machińska,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903072.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
independence of judiciary
preservation of the rule of law
European safeguards of the system of justice
respect for human rights
niezależność wymiaru sprawiedliwości
zachowanie rządów prawa
europejskie zabezpieczenie systemu wymiaru sprawiedliwości
poszanowanie rządów prawa
Opis:
The rule of law, human rights, and democracy are the three pillars of functioning of the European states. The concept of the rule of law is very deeply rooted in the idea of the European integration since 1949 when the Council of Europe was established. The rule of law is understood as: respect for the separation of powers, duty for the executive power to respect law, observance of the rule of the compliance with the law, respect for legal certainty and the principle of res iudicata, maintenance of judicial control of the executive power, exercise of the right to court ,guarantee of a fair trial and existence of an effective appeals remedy. In many countries rule of law are in danger. That is why European safeguards plays an important role.European safeguards means different instruments in form of monitoring reports of the Council of Europe institutions , opinion of the Venice Commission, fact finding missions etc. which creates a critical illustration of the situation of the member states. The EU law creates the legal procedures based on the art. 7 of the EU Treaty as well as on the art. 258 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the EU which effectively can stop rule of law backsliding in the EU countries. On the side of the member states of the EU the preliminary ruling procedure can effectively stopped the violation of the EU law and principles. European safeguards are not limited to the European institutions. The UN reports on democracy, rule of law and human rights contribute fundamentally to the proper implementation of these principles. In order to respect fully the rule of law, democracy and human rights a closer cooperation and a better coherence is needed. The way how the violation of the rule of law, democracy and human rights were limited in Poland shows the importance and effectiveness of the European the European safeguards.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 107-116
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The indigenous subject in law: at the intersection of the Cartesian subjectivity and the rule
Autorzy:
Babuśka, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48899394.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-07-07
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
indigenous law
Rule
différend
Lacanian psychoanalysis
discourse
body
Opis:
This paper addresses a key question raised by the tension between the subject of normative law and indigenous, collective systems. Within the framework of the Lacanian psychoanalysis, the author explores Cartesian specificity of a legal subject. He argues that structural nature of that legal construct not only affects an individual ontologically but also reorients the dialectics inherent in legal dogmatism. Following Baudrillardian thought, it is assumed in the paper that the total opposition to normative law is not the absence of law but rather the Rule. The Rule is a concept engaging the individual into dialectics of a game and at the same time ruling out any sense of inherently legal transgression. However, the context of indigenous systems based on the Rule, besides amplifying an alienating effect of the individualization of responsibility, also explains the incongruity of normative law in some cultural contexts. The failure to integrate indigenous, traditional and local legal systems into the post-colonial normative discourse is just one of many illustrations of this. As an exemplary case, the author evokes injustice (in the Lyotardian sense) resulting from litigation simultaneously based both on Brahmanical marriage rules and the Hindu Code Bill. In its final part, the text summarises the impasses of the legal dialogue with indigenous rules and the ways of emancipation for an individual imbedded in the Cartesian subjectivity, which are inspired by transcultural encounters.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2023, 96; 7-20
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 17

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies