Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "dignity" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12
    Tytuł:
    Konsekwencje bezrobocia w wymiarze godności człowieka
    The Consequences of Unemployment in the Sphere of Human Dignity
    Autorzy:
    Potasińska, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1832908.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-05-14
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    bezrobocie
    godność człowieka
    wyuczona bezradność
    społeczna degradacja
    unemployment
    human dignity
    helplessness
    social degradation
    Opis:
    Praca zawodowa spełnia w życiu człowieka szereg funkcji. Stanowi podstawę zaspokojenia potrzeb, jest źródłem społecznej tożsamości, jest wyznacznikiem pozycji społecznej, daje możliwość rozwoju, jak również uczestniczenia w szerszej aktywności społecznej. W sytuacji bezrobocia poprzez pojawiające się konsekwencje ekonomiczne, psychologiczne, moralne i społeczne może dojść do sytuacji, w których godność człowieka pozostanie zagrożona. Bezrobocie zaliczane jest do sytuacji trudnych, traumatycznych. Może być postrzegane jako porażka, sytuacja, która obniża poczucie wartości i bezpośrednio dotyka godności człowieka. Zjawisko braku pracy rozpatrywane ze społecznego punktu zmienia pozycję jednostki w strukturze społecznej. Oznacza społeczną degradację. Na skutek bezrobocia zagrożona staje się podmiotowość jednostki i możliwość jej decydowania o sobie. Badania osób bezrobotnych ukazują obniżenie się poziomu życia na skutek bezrobocia oraz popadanie w ubóstwo. Na skutek utraty pracy, wydłużającego się czasu pozostawania bez pracy, jak i innych czynników, które warunkują sytuację jednostki, pojawić się mogą negatywne uczucia, przygnębienie, apatia, stany depresyjne. Bezrobocie tym samym stanowi sytuację potencjalnego zagrożenia dla godności człowieka.
    Employment has many functions in human life. It gives the opportunity for fulfill human needs, it is a source of social identity, and social status, it gives the opportunity to develop, as well as participate in a broader social activity. The consequences of unemployment can be very serious: from economic consequences, psychological, moral and social can lead to situations in which human dignity is humiliated. Unemployment is classified as difficult and traumatic situation. It can be seen as a failure, a situation which lowers self-esteem and directly affects human dignity. The phenomenon of lack of work changes the position of the individual in the social structure. That means social degradation. Studies show a decrease in the unemployed living standards as a result of unemployment. As a result of job loss the negative feelings may appear, like apathy, depression and even suicidal thoughts.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2015, 43, 4; 73-84
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Godność człowieka a prawa człowieka
    Human Dignity and Human Rights
    Autorzy:
    Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1873047.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1980
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Opis:
    The author narrows down his subject to consider whether the idea of human dignity as found in the documents of the United Nations Organization is inspired by the Christian doctrine. The article also sets out to clarify the relation between natural law and human rights. Human rights are all those rights that follow directly from human dignity; they are for that reason universal, inviolable and inalienable; they are adequate to human dignity and they protect it. Dignity is indicated to be the source of human rights by the entire philosophical tradition regarding natural law as developed within the doctrine of the Church, and also by the documents of the United Nations Organization, in particular the Pacts of Human Rights. Human rights can appear in the form of non-positivized natural law or in the form of positive law, laid down in state or international documents. The author shows the terms „human nature” and „human dignity” to be synonymous. Pacem in terris employs them interchangeably, and the United Nations documents use the term „human dignity”. Much attention is devoted to human dignity in the Scripture, ancient philosophy, patristics, the philosophy of the Middle Ages (Thomas Aquinas), the Renaissance (Picco della Mirandola), the Enlightenment (I. Kant), and in modern thought (J. Messner). Human dignity is considered from theological and philosophical viewpoints. From the point of view of theology it is defined in terms of man’s creation in the image of God and of his adoption as a son of God by grace. From the philosophical, viewpoint, it is defined in terms of reason, conscience and freedom. Dignity is a value that is innate, permanent, inalienable, universal and dynamic, proper only to man. Since human rights follow directly from human dignity, they share its attributes. The contemporary ideas of human dignity and human rights are inspired by the Christian doctrine, as has also been pointed \it by non-Christian thinkers, e.g. E. Bloch and L. Kolakowski. In the author’s opinion, the connection between the idea of human dignity as found in the United Nations documents and the Christian doctrine is manifested by the fact that both make use of the same elements to define human dignity within the natural order. Man, man’s dignity, is the central value for Christianity. Pope John Paul II writes in Redemptor hominis: „In reality, the name for that deep amazement at man’s worth and dignity is the Gospel, that is to say: the Good News’\ That deep amazement, he says, „is also called Christianity”.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1980, 8; 19-48
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Godność osoby ludzkiej jako wartość absolutna
    Dignity of the Human Person as an Absolute Value
    Autorzy:
    Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1861513.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1993
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Opis:
    The author analyzes the relations between various values and he establishes their ultimate criterion and hierarchy. He is of opinion that an incorrectly established criterion of values and an incorrectly constructed and accepted hierarchy of them leads to what Carl Schmitt called − in reference to Nikolai Hartman − the tyranny of value (die Tyrannai der Werte). The author critically appraises the views of those who maintain that there is a conflict, a dilemma or tension between freedom and equality (justice). He shows that the dilemma is not immanent in the mentioned values but in the incorrect conception of freedom as presented by the liberals on the one hand, and in the erroneous (objective) conception of equality as explicated by the Marxists. In fact the dilemma occurs between those philosophical-social trends. Secondly, the dilemma always appears where these values are confronted with each other in the wrong way and separated from other values − especially from the truth about dignity of the human person. And thirdly, in all the views in which it is admitted that there is a conflict between freedom and equality there is a „methodological” error. It consists in the fact that the conflict of interests of individuals or social groups is reduced to tensions between humanistic values − freedom and equality. Egoistic interests are sought to be hidden behind the screen of the values. Freedom without equality (justice) and the truth about dignity of the human person becomes freedom of élites whereas it is a tyrannizing value for most other classes. The situation is analogous in the case of equality without freedom and the truth dignity of the person. The author shows that dignity of the person is the central, absolute value, as the person is related to the Absolute; it is created in God's image and is redeemed by Christ (supernatural dignity). The author also writes about natural dignity to which the mind, conscience and freedom point. All other values, even objective and universal ones − moral norms and human rights − have an adpersonal (relative) character. Accepting freedom or equality as an absolute value without the truth about dignity of the human person lies at the foundations of all forms of totalitarian systems. According to the author dignity of the human person creates an obligation. He formulates the rule: persona est affirmanda propter se ipsam. He shows that dignity of the human person integrates nations as well as the international system of human rights. In the introduction to the United Nations Chart belief in dignity and value of the human person is expressed. In the introductions to both Human Rights Pacts (1966) it is recognized that human rights follow from the inborn dignity of the human person. The notion of dignity of the human person is also found in the constitutions of many countries, e.g. of West Germany (1949). In West German commentaries it is said that dignity of the human person (Art. 1 p. 1) is the highest value (der oberste Wert), it is the norm of norms (Norm der Normen). Dignity of the human person should be − as it not always is − the criterion of all programs and social economic and political systems.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1993, 21, 1; 261-271
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Godność osoby ludzkiej i obiektywne normy moralne jako reguły w działalności gospodarczej
    Dignity of the human person and objective moral norms as rules in economy
    Autorzy:
    Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1852622.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2006
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    osoba ludzka
    godność
    normy moralne
    prawa człowieka
    wartości uniwersalne
    wartość pracy ludzkiej
    bezrobocie
    human person
    dignity
    moral norms
    human rights
    universal values
    value of human work
    unemployment
    Opis:
    The author subjects to revision the economic liberalism supporters’ views, according to which there is no room for universal moral norms in the area of economy. The conception of homo economicus accepted in economy and the exclusive rule of profit are a manifestation of reductionism. The conviction that the free competition – free market – acts mechanically and impersonally and solves all economic-social problems in the best way is basically incorrect. In free competition there are positive and negative elements. Free competition – “yes, but what kind?” In the article a possibly complete picture of man is shown. Man is a reasonable creature, he is internally free and able to recognize good and evil (owing to his conscience) and owing to this he is the most perfect being in the created world. In his nature, man is a social being (ens sociale); a spiritual-bodily unity; he is not completely actualized but he is open to development; he is a religious and working creature (laborem exercens, homo economicus); he is able to do good, devote oneself to others, to build just – albeit not ideal –systems: legal, cultural, social and economic. But man is also able to do evil: to kill others, to steal, to lie, to wage wars, to commit acts of terrorism and of genocide, to build concentration camps, to manipulate the needs and mentality of whole societies and to enslave others by means of mass media – that is to form a one-dimension man. In the theological-biblical language this is called sinfulness of the human nature. And finally, man is capable of – as H. Marcuse writes – “scientific idiotism”. The highest value is the inborn, n a t u r a l, dignity of the human person, which is pointed to by his mind, inner freedom and conscience. Man is created in God’s image (imago Dei). Christ’s incarnation and redemption of man show his s u p e r n a t u r a l dignity. This is theological-biblical justification. Also philosophical (rational) justification is given. The former one is binding for believers, and the latter is for unbelievers. In the Catholic social teaching both justifications are given. The ontic structure of the human person in itself gives rise to obligations, it is the highest norm. It is defined in the following form: the human person should be respected for himself, because he is a person, and not for any other reason (persona est affirmanda propter se ipsam). The very human person, his dignity, is the fundamental norm of morality that is searched for. The Decalogue, objective and universal moral norms as principles show how to respect and protect the human person. It is not recognizing and complying with moral norms and human rights for themselves that is meant here – art for the art’s sake (pure formalism) – but protection of one’s own dignity and the dignity of every other person. Both moral norms as principles and human rights have been discovered slowly, step by step, but regressions also occur; this especially happened in the 20th and at the beginning of the 21st century. Human persons are the subjects of all communities – the family, the nation, the universal human society (familiae humanae), production and service institutions. The communities do not exist by themselves, but human persons are their foundation. Human persons, and not various systems, are the subject of any activity, for the systems are not persons or super-persons – Super Ego. Hence the thesis put forward by some economists that the system is ruled by an invisible hand is absurd. In human rights three elements are distinguished: their source, contents and protection. These constitute an integral whole. However, identifying a part with the whole (pars pro toto) is a logical mistake. The debate about man’s right to work can be solved after removing this logical mistake and introducing a new term: “the right for work”; showing that work is one of man’s fundamental needs, that it is a universal phenomenon, has a multi-aspectual dimension of values. Work is an anthropological (personal), moral, social, cultural, historical and economic value. Together with the multidimensional value of work the multidimensional evil of unemployment can be seen. There have been various economic models, even in capitalism. After the fall of socialism the thesis is proclaimed that capitalism is the only alternative (logical quantifier). Recognizing the priority of the real capital over work treated as a tool and commodity bought in the so-called work market is the essential feature of capitalism. John Paul II perceives numerous positive elements in capitalism, but he also sees a few negative ones: “We have found out that the thesis saying that after the defeat of real socialism capitalism remains the only model (logical quantifier) of economic organization is unacceptable.” He does not suggest another model, but generally he states that it is “… a society in which there are: freedom of work, enterprise and participation” that is meant here. He adds: “Economy that does not take into consideration the ethical dimension and does not attempt to serve the good of man – each man and the whole man – in fact does not even deserve the name of «economy» understood as reasonable and benevolent management of material resources”. Although he sees positive elements in the process of globalization, he puts forward an imperative demand to base it on the principle of the dignity of the human person and his rights, and the good of the whole human family (familiae humanae). In the area of economy “ … in the field of economy nobody may insult the human dignity without a punishment, which dignity God himself respects greatly” (Leo XIII).
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2006, 34, 1; 19-53
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Cielesność osoby a samowychowanie
    Leib von Person und Selbsterziehung
    Autorzy:
    Hiszpańska, Beata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1835134.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-05-12
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    prawda
    osoba
    godność osoby
    cielesność osoby
    wychowanie
    samowychowanie
    odpowiedzialność
    truth
    person
    dignity of a person
    corporality of a person
    education
    self-education
    responsibility
    Opis:
    Dieser Beitrag ist ein Versuch, eine personalistische Interpretation der Erziehung und Selbsterziehung von Prof Wojciech Chudy zu nähern. Ein Kontext für das unternommene Problem ist körperliche Dimension von einem Menschen und ihre Bedeutung im Prozess der Personenpubertät. Zwei erste Teile des Beitrags haben (inhaltlichen) einen sachlichen Charakter; der dritte Teil ist ein Zeugnis von Wojciech Chudy – von dem Menschen, der in des Wortes voller Bedeutung, sich selbst erzogen hat. Im ersten Teil mit dem Titel Die Person und Selbsterziehung wurde Entwicklungsleistungsfähigkeit der Person gezeigt, in der moralische Pflicht der Erziehung des Menschen eingewurzelt ist. Man hat das Wesen von Erziehung und seinen Zusammenhang mit der Selbsterziehung aus der Sicht des ethischen Personalismus dargestellt. Als Schlussfolgerung hat man eine Definition der Selbsterziehung bestimmt, die den Kontext der Verantwortung des Menschen für sich sowie in der weiteren Bedeutung – für erkannte Güte zeigt. Im zweiten Teil mit dem Titel Verantwortung für die Dimension des Leibes hat man Integrationsrolle des Körpers im Prozess der Personenpubertät beschrieben und den Wert des Leibes als Strukturelement des Menschen betont. Problem der Selbsterziehung als Verantwortung für Körper hat man sowohl im positiven Aspekt analysiert, diese Elemente betonend, die entwickelt werden sollen, als auch im negativen Aspekt, diese Elemente zeigend, die Beherrschung und Disziplin brauchen. Im Zusammenfassung des sachlichen Teils hat man Zusammenhang der Selbsterziehung mit dem ganzen Leben des Menschen dargestellt. Es ist eine Konsequenz der Personenweise der Existenz des mit der Würde gekennzeichneten Menschen.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2008, 36, 2; 43-62
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Janusz Mariański, Godność ludzka jako wartość społeczno-moralna: mit czy rzeczywistość? Studium interdyscyplinarne, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek 2016
    Janusz Mariański, Human Dignity as the Social-Moral Value: Myth or Reality? Interdisciplinar Study, Toruń: Wydwnictwo Adama Marszałek 2016
    Autorzy:
    Tarczyński, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1832327.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-04-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2017, 45, 1; 149-153
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Godność osoby ludzkiej czy prawo naturalne podstawą praw osoby ludzkiej w ujęciu Jacquesa Maritaina
    The Dignity of the Human Person or Natural Law as the Basis of the Rights of the Human Person According to Jacques Maritain
    Autorzy:
    Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1860754.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1997
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Opis:
    It is true that Maritain writes that natural law (la loi naturelle) is the foundation of human rights, yet he proves that rights are natural rights in the strict sense of the term, whereas others are necessarily bound with it, and yet others are bound only in a contingent manner. The French philosopher considered natural law at two levels: ontological and cognitive. The human being possesses, likewise all other living creatures, a unique structure and goals, a normal way of its functioning (normalité de son foncionnement) - law. The goals are as follows: maintenance of existence and development. For man this law bears a moral character, for man is person, i.e. a rational, free being that has conscience, and he is the master of his own acts. Maritain calls this right a non-written law (la loi non écrite). Now in the ontic fabric of man reside goods which are his due: existence (life) and freedom. Apart from these goods he is entitled to the rights: to life and freedom. In this ontic fabric resides a natural inclination to maintain life, to give life, and to develop. One may maintain one’s existence and reach integral development by acquiring other goods and fulfilling good deeds (working). He, too, has the duty to do good, without which he will fail to maintain his existence and will not reach his goal. Following St Thomas, Maritain lays down the first principle of natural law: do good and avoid evil acts. In this principle reside the most fundamental rights and duties of the human person. It is characteristic of its interpretation that it puts rights before duties. Either of them has a personal and social aspect. The foundation of natural law is the dignity of the human person. Dignity is a metaphysical absolute value, residing in the ontic fabric of person. The core of dignity is in the soul of man, who was created in the likeness of God (imago Dei). Maritain writes: „The dignity of the human person is a word which denotes nothing, if it does not mean that the person of his or her own natury possesses [...] rights”. To know natural law - its gnoseological aspect - is a different problem. It is known spontaneously, in a nonreflective manner, and progressively as regards the degree of civilizational development of mankind, which is pinpointed by ethnology and history of societies. It was exposed to the hazard of errors just as in all other affairs, due to the fact that human reason is imperfect. However, the sound line of moral experience of the binding power of natural law was still developed and will further be developed. Following St Thomas, Maritain lists natural law, the law of nations (ius gentium), the positive revealed Divine law and (established) human law. He incorporates natural law known by way of reflection, and not spontaneously by inclination, within ius gentium and calls it the common law of civilisation (la loi commune de la civilisation). Now ius gentium is linked with natural law in a necessary manner, whereas human law is linked with it only conditionally and contingently. The author of paper proposes to call human law the law of culture. Following the above division, Maritain gives three groups of human rights: rights which belong to natural law, to ius gentium and to positive law. The rights of the human person which belong to natural law and ius gentium are inalienable, unforfeitable - absolute, yet in the aspect of their being granted to human beings. In the aspect, however, of their application they do not have the character of absolute rights, for the human person is a little god. Maritain has also given a different division of human rights: the rights of the human person as such (droits de la personne humaine comme telle), the rights of the civil person (droits de la personne civique), and the rights of the social person, in particular the working person (droits de la personne sociale, et plus particulièrement de la personne ouwrière). Speaking about the rights of the social person, he lists the rights of the people fulfilling some social, economic and cultural functions: producers, consumers, technicians, creators of culture and science. There is still a debate about the right to work, and some Catholic authors negate it, yet Maritain recognizes this right as a basic right and ranks it first among the rights of the person-labourer. He predicted that along with the progress of economic organization a new right to the title of labour (au titre de travail) would be read out, a right which he also called the title of labour (le titre de travail). Not only does the title of possessing property entitle one to manage enterprise, but also to have the title of labour. He pointed to the necessity to take up reform of capitalism and to shape a new socio-economic order. This order should be an order of the aristocracy of labour, that is such in which social, economic and political life will be run by people who are best in their job. To put this regime into effect requires a „moral revolution”.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1997, 25, 1; 33-61
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Podstawy filozoficzne pedagogii samowychowania
    The Philosophical Foundations of the Pedagogy of Self-Formation
    Autorzy:
    Chudy, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1849010.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-05-12
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    wychowanie
    samowychowanie
    podstawy filozoficzne pedagogiki
    osoba
    byt ludzki
    etyka
    godność
    miłość
    formation
    self-formation
    philosophical foundations of pedagogy
    person
    human being
    ethics
    dignity
    love
    Opis:
    The text is supposed to show from various points of view the philosophical foundations of pedagogy. In its classical form it combines the points of view from the metaphysics of the person and ethics. These aspects complement each other, as the human person cannot be understood without his dimensions: being and development (becoming). The metaphysical foundations of formation determine the human being. On the part of metaphysics, human formation relies on the value of ontic contingence, hence the sense of human becoming as a person is expressed by the fact that man is person, a constant and unchanging structure, and is changing at the same time as person. The personal dimensions of formation indicate that man should be developed in his overall integrity, that is in the following dimensions: physical, psychical, and moral. The educator, as ontically more actualised, is endowed with a vocation to help his disciple in becoming himself. Formative work is an effort invested on behalf of self-formation. Love plays the most essential role in the ontic-moral process of the person's fulfilment. Formation and self-formation make up a pedagogical unity. Self-formation in the external sense complements self-formation in the internal sense. Any, even the best formative measures, will turn out ineffective if there is no readiness in the disciples for self-formation. This tendency is manifested today by the importance of independence and self-formation in social, cultural, and scientific life.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2007, 35, 2; 19-30
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Moralna przestrzeń pracy – wiodące przewartościowania
    Moral space of working – leading reevaluations
    Autorzy:
    Walczak-Duraj, Danuta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788630.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    godność ludzka
    praca
    moralna przestrzeń pracy
    wykorzenienie z pracy
    indywidualizacja pracy
    kultura zarządzania
    human dignity
    work
    moral work space
    uprooting from work
    individualization of work
    management culture
    Opis:
    Wiodącym celem rozważań zawartych w tym opracowaniu jest próba ukazania przyczyn i konsekwencji zawężania moralnej przestrzeni współczesnej pracy. Przestrzeń ta rozumiana jest tutaj jako moralny wymiar stosunków pracy w podmiocie gospodarującym, bazujący na sumieniu. Ogólną ramą interpretacyjną prowadzonych rozważań jest koncepcja godności ludzkiej, zawarta w katolickiej nauce społecznej w odniesieniu do porządku moralnego związanego z pracą. Za wiodącą przyczynę zawężania moralnej przestrzeni współczesnej pracy uznano proces wykorzeniania z pracy, rozumiany dwojako. Zarówno jako odchodzenie od wspólnotowego, społecznego rozumienia pracy i jej etycznego kontekstu w kierunku indywidualizacji pracy, jak i poszukiwanie innych, alternatywnych sposobów budowania własnej tożsamości, w których praca nie stanowi już punktu odniesienia. W odniesieniu do indywidualizacji pracy wskazano na jej dwie dominujące przesłanki: na filozoficzne i etyczne koncepcje dotyczące indywidualizmu jednostki, jej podmiotowości i zindywidualizowanej odpowiedzialności oraz na przemiany dotyczące treści pracy, form pracy i form zatrudnienia. Wskazano również na konsekwencje przewartościowań odnoszących się do pracy i jej indywidualistycznego rysu w odniesieniu do kultury zarządzania.
    The leading goal of the considerations contained in this study is to show the causes and consequences of narrowing the moral space of contemporary work. This space is understood here as the moral dimension of labor relations in an economic subject, based on conscience. The general interpretive framework for the deliberations is the concept of human dignity included in the catholic social science in relation to the moral order related to work. The process of uprooting from work, understood in two ways, has been considering for the leading cause of narrowing the moral space of contemporary work. It means both as a departure from the community, social understanding of work and its ethical context towards the individualization of work, as well as the search for other, alternative ways of building one’s identity, in which work is no longer a point of reference. With reference to the individualization of work, two dominant premises were pointed out: philosophical and ethical concepts concerning the individuality of the individual, its subjectivity and individualized responsibility, as well as changes in the content of work, forms of work and forms of employment. It has also indicated the consequences of reevaluations referring to work and its individualistic features in relation to management culture.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2019, 47, 4; 51-72
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Remarks on the position of John Paul II to the capital punishment
    Uwagi o stanowisku Jana Pawła II wobec kary śmierci
    Autorzy:
    Mazur, Jan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1877484.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    capital punishment
    human dignity
    right to self-defense
    right to life
    church teaching
    kara śmierci
    godność osoby ludzkiej
    prawo do obrony własnej
    prawo do życia
    nauczanie kościelne
    Opis:
    Capital punishment is a specific issue of great importance to be perceived in the context of the powers of the democratic constitutional state. The point is about a clear answer to the question about whether from the ethical point of view the state has the right to inflict capital punishment. A discussion about this issue is not an easy one. Relevant fragments of the latest catholic catechism approved by John Paul II shed a lot of valuable light on the issue of capital punishment.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2012, 40, 4; 193-198
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Partycypacja pracowników w zarządzaniu - model UE i Polski
    Workers’ Participation in Management - Its Model in the European Union and the Polish Model
    Autorzy:
    Gruszecki, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1835041.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-05-12
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    przedsiębiorstwo państwowe
    partycypacja pracowników w zarządzaniu
    współzarządzanie
    rada pracownicza
    Dyrektywa Unii Europejskiej
    partycypacja pracowników w polskim prawie
    osoba ludzka
    godność
    prawa człowieka
    prawa moralne
    wartość uniwersalna
    bezrobocie
    state enterprise
    worker's participation in management
    co-management
    workers council
    EU Directive
    worker's participation in polish law
    human person
    dignity
    human rights
    moral rights
    universal value
    unemployment
    Opis:
    The article is devoted to the origin of the concept of the workers’ participation in the management, and then to its implementation in the EU and in Poland. The history of implementing common principles of workers’ self-management in the EU is quite complex; the participation model, the so-called Mitbestimung introduced after World War II in Germany (the act was passed in 1976) was then slowly and in a limited range (informing and consulting) introduced on the basis of the EU Directive of 1977 into the legislation of particular member states. Implementation became quicker when the EU decided to establish, as one of variants, the so-called European Company. In this model the European company committee was provided for. The directive was implemented in Polish legislation by the act of 2002; in companies acting in more than one country there is an obligatory company committee. Similarly, there should be a company committee in the so-called European Company and European Economic Interest Grouping. The European Company is an alternative legal form of company, the same on the territory of the whole EU. The history of workers’ participation in management in Poland, broadly discussed in the article, is much more complex. It started in 1981, under the pressure of the “Solidarity” trade union, with introducing the acts on the state company and the workers’ self-management in the state company. These acts, although they are included in the participation current, broadly outlined the rights of the workers’ committee and of the workers’ (delegates’) general meeting, actually granting them part of the rights to make decisions, that in fact belong to the owner (e.g. dividing the profit, sometimes electing the manager). The intention of these solutions was to introduce a reformed model of an independent company in a still planned economy, and they started a broad current of discussion on efficiency of these solutions and limitations of workers’ participation not only in managing, but also in ownership after 1989. The model of the state company of 1981 (actually, in the practice of the 1980’s significantly reduced by the martial law authorities) turned out to be a temporary one and under the conditions of market economy was substituted by a form that made it possible to introduce direct or indirect privatization. However, it is characteristic that Poland has, independent of the EU, its own ample experience and traditions in solving the problem of workers’ participation in management. The author, who in the 1980’s was a workers’ self-management advisor, synthetically compares arguments for and against introducing solutions that include workers’ participation in company management, and decidedly defends the limited participation model in the EU’s version introduced in Poland by the act of 2006.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2008, 36, 3; 15-31
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wkład Stolicy Apostolskiej w ochronę prawa człowieka do wolności sumienia i wolności religijnej w Konferencjach Bezpieczeństwa i Współpracy w Europie (KBWE i OBWE)
    The Holy See’s Contribution to the Protection of the Right to Freedom of Conscience and the Religious Freedom in Conferences on Security and Cooperation in Europe and Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE and OSCE)
    Autorzy:
    Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1835193.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-05-12
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    prawa człowieka
    wolność sumienia
    wolność religijna
    Stolica Apostolska
    godność osoby ludzkiej
    human rights
    freedom of conscience
    religious freedom
    Holy See
    dignity of the human person
    Opis:
    The article is the first part of a discussion of the issue of the part taken by the Holy See in the Conferences of Security and Cooperation in Europe. In the analyses the origin and the motives for participation of the Holy See in the international discussion on protecting human rights for the freedom of conscience and the religious freedom are presented. In the area of documents concerning human rights a special attention is paid to the significance of John XXIII’s encyclical Pacem in terris. Also, the Holy See’s postulates and suggestions that deal with the question of the value and dignity of the human person are discussed. The final analyses include the issue of the personal dimension of the right to the freedom of conscience and the religious freedom.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2008, 36, 1; 45-72
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies