Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "tomizm," wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Filozoficzna biografia Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966203.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef M. Bocheński
tomizm
logika
sowietologia
filozofia analityczna
Opis:
Józef Bocheński was born on 30th August 1902. He graduated from the Secondary School in 1920 and immediately after the final exam (matura) he joined the 8th Ulhan (light cavalry) Regiment and took part in a final part of a Polish-Bolshevik war. After the war, in 1922, he joined studies in law at the University of Lwów and after two years he attended the University in Poznań in order to study political economy. These studies were interrupted in 1926 when Bocheński joined the Seminary in Poznań which he left when moving to the Dominican novitiate in Cracow. There he adopted names Innocenty Maria. After one year of a novitiate he was sent to philosophical studies at the University in Fribourg in Swizerland, he graduated in 1934 . Two years earlier however, he was ordained a priest and in 1936, along with Jan Salamucha, Franciszek Drewnowski and Bolesław Sobociński, he organised the so called Cracow Circle. After receiving a doctorate in theology he was appointed a professor of logic at Angelicum, and he officially remained there until 1940. In 1938 he got habilitation in philosophy at the Faculty of Theology at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow. Along with the Polish Corpus of Gen. Władysław Anders he took part in the Italian campaigne. He fought in the battle at Monte Cassino (May 1944). After the end of the Second World War he became a professor of philosophy at Fribourg University and remained at that position until the retirement (1945-1972). He occupied a position of a Dean of Faculty of Philosophy (1950-1952) and a Rector. There he initiated soviet studies which brought him recognition and political significance. He visited Poland in 1987 for the first time since he left in 1939. In the next year he was awarded doctorates honoris causa at the Jagiellonian University and at the Academy of Catholic Theology (ATK) in Warsaw. Moreover, during his emigration he co-operated regularly with the Polish University Abroad established in Londyn. He died in Fribourg on 8th February 1995. During his lifetime Józef Bocheński was changing philosopical schools and views. In his youth he was a Kantian, next, he „converted” to neo-Thomism in its most traditional (handbook and essential) version, which actually was more Aristotelian than Thomistic. The next step was an attempt to „modernise” this sort of Thomism by tools of mathematical logic in order to make Thomas - as Bocheński said himself - no longer his „guru”. In the result, Bocheński ceased to explore the problems and style of classical philosophy in favour of analytical mode of philosophying. He himself divided his scientific work into four periods distinguished as follows, according to interest and passions (and views as well) dominated in particular time: 1) neo-Thomistic (1934–1940), 2) historical- logical (1945–1955) 3) sovietological (1955–1970) 4) systematical- logical (1970–1995).
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 245-264
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Obecność filozofii tomistycznej w polemice Piotra Semenenki z Andrzejem Towiańskim
The presence of Thomistic philosophy in the polemic of Piotr Semenenko with Andrzej Towiański
Autorzy:
Mikucki, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/5956790.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-31
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Piotr Semenenko
Andrzej Towiański
filozofia
tomizm
philosophy
Thomism
Opis:
The presenting article presents the main themes of Piotr Semenenko polemics with Andrzej Towiański, which took place in the environment of the Great Emigration. It concerned many matters, including some philosophical ideas related to the Catholic faith. They belonged mainly to fhe field of interest in the philosophy of cognition, general theory of being, philosophy of God and religion, angelology, philosophy of man and philosophy of history. Semenenko’s polemic with Towiański resulted from their representing different philosophical traditions. The first referred essentially to Thomistic philosophy, while the second drew from ideas to Neoplatonic philosophy and the currents of thought that were close to it, which cannot be reconciled with the Thomistic and Christian vision of the world, especially in the matter of understanding its most important elements, which are God and the human person. The use of Thomism in the fight against Towianism has shown that it is the form of Christian philosophy that best serves the Catholic faith as its intellectual foundation, which seems important in the context of current discussions about the doctrinal shape of this faith and its threats from religious syncretism.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2022, 11; 227-243
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Koncepcja istnienia w ujęciu Mieczysława Gogacza. Przyczynek do dziejów formowania się tomizmu konsekwentnego
The Conception of Existence According to Mieczyslaw Gogacz. A Contribution to the History of Consequential Thomism’s Formation
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452689.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Tomasz z Akwinu
Mieczysław Gogacz
Mieczysław Krąpiec
tomizm egzystencjalny
tomizm konsekwentny
akt istnienia
Thomas Aquinas
Existential Thomism
Consequential Thomism
act of being
Opis:
The concept of existence (esse) as an act of making realistic and actual individual being describes the basic feature of Consequential Thomism which refers to all possible philosophical analysis from the topic of existence (esse), because existence (esse) is the first and initiating principle of being. Professor Gogacz claims that the beginning of the modification of depictions the issue of esse in the context of Existential Thomism is published in book Istnieć i poznawać in 1969. Theses of this book also are found in the script about philosophy of being (1973) entitled Ważniejsze zagadnienia metafizyki. The most mature formula of Consequential Thomism is in the Elementarz metafizyki (1987). Some topics were developed in details in the articles that also are in the following books: Historia filozofii w poszukiwaniu realizmu (2011) and W kierunku tomizmu konsekwentnego (2012). The analysis of these texts allows to separate ten topics connected with the problem of esse: 1) act of existence’s characteristic, 2) types of acts of existence, 3) making realistic and actual as an act of existence’s ‘action’, 4) the issue of Ipsum Esse Subsistens, 5) the problem of not independent being (accident) of act of being (ipsum esse), 6) the issue of transcendentals, 7) the knowledge of the existence (esse), 8) the issue of creatio esse and conservatio esse 9) the order of thesis in metaphysics, 10) the historical and philosophical aspects of the modification of Thomism which led to its consistent version. In Istnieć i poznawać M. Gogacz represents an Existential Thomism and he is influenced by thought of M. A. Krąpiec. Elementarz metafizyki is the most mature version of Consequential Thomism. According it Consequential Thomism is characterized by: 1) Recognition of statements of Avicenna’s philosophy and taking them out from Existential Thomism; 2) Understanding of existence (esse) as a created principle which initiate an individual being; 3) The experience essential principles in verbum cordis; 4) Application the essential order of causes and results with consistent notice of pluralism; 5) Distinguishing the relationship connected with esse and the relationship connected with essentia and joining the experience of ipsum esse with relationship connected with esse and joining experience of unity of esse-principles with essential relationship; 6) Using the depiction of essence (essentia) permeated by existence (esse), what should be understanding as a subsistentia, in the issue of person.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 45-72
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jacek Woroniecki o modlitwie jako czynniku doskonalącym naturę człowieka
Jacek Woroniecki on Prayer as a Factor Improving Human Nature
Autorzy:
Boużyk, Maria M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452632.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
thomism
prayer
humanism
education
philosophy
tomizm
modlitwa
humanizm
wychowanie
filozofia
Opis:
This article investigates the educational role of prayer in Jacek Woroniecki’s works. As Woroniecki (1878–1949) was a Thomist, his philosophical and theological reflection was complementary. In order to reveal the humanism of Christian formation the article concentrates on Woroniecki’s philosophical claims. It consists of six parts. Part 1 defines prayer as a practice and shows that prayer is an important part of human inner culture (formation). Part 2 reveals a relationship, which is vital for prayer, between man and God as a relation between two real and personal beings. Part 3 discusses the topic of relations between grace and nature in man’s growth. Part 4 studies the mysticism of everyday life if man’s actions are considered as a prayer. Part 5 deals with the forms of prayer in the context of the ontic status of man and Part 6 – with the human factors of prayer: the will, the mind, senses and the body. The findings of all those analyses confirm that in the philosophical (i.e. Thomistic) approach prayer is the core of human spiritual growth.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 357-373
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mieczysław Gogacz’s anthropological explanation for the existence of angels
Mieczysława Gogacza antropologiczny argument za istnieniem aniołów
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Izabella
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/5915158.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-31
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
antropologia
tomizm
aniołowie
przyczyny celowe
antropology
thomism
angels
final causes
Opis:
Professor Mieczysław Gogacz, the renowned philosopher and founder of the recent version of Thomism – the Consistent Thomism 1, claims that angels are the final causes (causa finalis) of human soul. He derives his conception from the principle, characteristic not only for Thomism but also for the entire classical philosophy, which says that for the existent results we respectively search the prior causes. Ultimately, such established philosophical stance regards searching for causes and asking about causes. Hence in analysing the problem of final causes understood as the external causes which constitute the essence of human being, it is worth to define the scope of the research. First of all, we search for the answer to the question about the causes of human being, therefore metaphysics of real beings is the area of our study, what results in further implications. Primarly, we need to acknowledge that each essential state or activity inevitably must possess its real cause in another being. When we notice there is no such cause it means that we encounter the subsistent being (ens subsistens). It belongs to the essence of the method of metaphysics to demand theses cause to be indicated. Metaphysical methodology, when applied consequently, allows to claim that within the area of human being, reality is that what the essence exclusively receives from its existence (esse). Consequently, there must be some other causes that constitute the essence in its internal content, endowed with an act and potency (potentia), both spiritual and material. The aim of this paper is to follow the thought of Gogacz exactly in the area of discovering the role of angels as causes for the particular development of human soul. Therefore Gogacz’s proposal becomes the „proof for the existence of angels”, on the basis that each thing in order to act and cause results must, first of all, exist.
Mieczysław Gogacz, twórca tomizmu konsekwentnego, zaproponował własne, oryginalne uzasadnienie istnienia aniołów. W ramach tego uzasadnienia, zauważa, że o zewnętrznych przyczynach człowieka możemy mówić wtedy, gdy ujmiemy strukturę bytu ludzkiego genetycznie (od strony powiązań i zależno-ści między wewnętrznymi elementami strukturalnymi człowieka). W ten sposób dochodzimy do stwierdzenia, że specyficzna struktura człowieka daje się wyjaśnić tylko przez dostrzeżenie przyczyn zewnętrznych jego wewnętrznych pryncypiów (istnienia oraz istoty). Inne przyczyny powodują jego istnienie i inne wpływają na kształt istoty. Skoro w obrębie istoty człowieka dostrzegamy złożenie z duszy i ciała, to oznacza, że przyczynami celowymi duszy – na miarę niematerialnego skutku – muszą być jakieś substancje niematerialne (podobnie jak niematerialna jest dusza człowieka). W ten sposób możemy mówić o aniołach jako realnie istniejących bytach i przyczynach celowych ludzkiej duszy.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2022, 11; 31-37
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór o filozofię moralną św. Tomasza z Akwinu. Próba wskazania na źródła odmiennych stanowisk É. Gilsona i F. van Steenberghena. Na marginesie dyskusji M. Prokopa z artykułem W. Golonki
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Izabella
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452471.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
É. Gilson
F. van Steenberghen
tomizm
filozofa moralna
thomism
moral philosophy
Opis:
The attitude to Thomas’ moral philosophy notably determined opinions of two well-known historians of philosophy: Étienne Gilson and Fernand van Steenberghen. The positions of the two scholars about the issue where Thomas has entered more complete his moral philosophy are divergent. Van Steenberghen claimed that ethics of Thomas we can find in his ‘Commentarry to Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle’ but Gilson claimed that it is in Summa Theologiae and Summa contra gentiles. In Gilson’s opinion these two composition are sources of whole and mature ethical thought of Thomas Aquinas. It seems really interesting that so far no one has hold a position in these two different opinions. The discussion between Gilson and van Steenberghen has not been solv and both scholars had got their own views. It seems that a lack of any continuation of this ‘dispute’ is a gap in a discourse about the value of commentaries of St. Thomas to Aristotle’s compositions. That is why it is important to show behind-the-scenes of this dispute and indicate possible reasons which caused that opinions of two eminent historians of philosophy had got so different views about this issue.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2015, 4; 397-409
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Józef M. Bocheński jako tomista
Autorzy:
Zembrzuski, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966205.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
J.M. Bocheński
filozofia tomistyczna w Polsce
Opis:
The aim of the paper is to present the following, how Thomism was understood by Bocheński, next, path of Thomistic inspirations he had followed, and finally we show Thomism Bocheński had explored when teaching his own philosophical abbreviation (ABC tomizmu). Analysis based on these issues would allow to identify the specific features of Thomism studied and explored by Bocheński. Hence, the question we might pose does not to regard the fact whether Bocheński was a Thomist or not but, what sort of Thomism he represented. Bocheński should rather be considered to be a traditional Thomist than existential one because in his philosophical work he barely treated the problem of act of existence and importance of this particular problem. However, he refrained from adopting the method fundamental for traditional Thomism, which is strict adherence (fidelity) to source texts of Aquinas. Bocheński, in being open to achievements of contemporary philosophy, especially logic, was closer to Louvain Thomism. But, he never decided to implement modern scientific trends to philosophy of Aquinas, the tendency which was foreign to the very essence of philosophy, at least in its shape understood by Bocheński. In his philosophical views Bocheński was closer to Aristotle and the Aristotelian tradition. And because he preferred to follow Aristotelian realism he consequently kept that stance. His interest in analysis the utterances of Thomism from a perspective of logic allow to classify Bocheński to analytical Thomism, but we should remember that in times contemporary to Bocheński, the very notion of analytical Thomism had not been coined. The aforementioned conclusions allow to recognize originality of Thomistic thought represented by Bocheński and also, to admit that Bocheński’s thought cannot be classified univocally to a particular school of Thomism.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 265-289
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Etyka w ujęciu Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966034.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef Bocheński
etyka
moralność
tomizm
filozofia analityczna
Ethics
morality
Thomism
analytic philosophy
Opis:
The notion of ethics has been developed by Bocheński in four areas: 1. Ethics is a normative science regarding human behaviour. Its scientific character means a „systematic research on a particular part of reality”. In the result of its normativity it „not only describes object but also indicates what this object should be like”. When speaks of human behaviour it „makes research on this set of acts who derive consciously (voluntarily) from human free will”. 2. Ethics as a normative science makes research and establishes general goal of human activity and then it considers, from the psychological point of view, a nature of human act which should be an act of realisation of a goal. In this way ethics works out the problem of ethical norm, a principle which should be followed to fulfill human act in order to achieve a goal proper to human being. Additionally, when ethics is grounded in Christian Revelation we may apply the matter of grace as supernatural support from God in fulfilling ethically good human act. 3. „There are two areas of each properly constructed ethics”. The first, in a theoretical way considers five sets of problems: the general goal of human act, the structure of human act, the problem of moral norms, the theory of character and the subject of God’s grace. The aim of the second area is practical analysis of particular features of human character, we understand them as „steady dispo-sition toward proceeding human act easily and energetic” according to a moral norm. 4. Ethics understood in that way can be atrributed to each human being. Hence, each men should adopt and cultivate in himself all properties and ethical norms. „Each human being should posses entirely human and Christian character”. 5. Individual human life shows that a teacher suppose to be equippped in some properties more than a merchant. For that reason, even there exists unity in ethics in general, we may speak of particular ethics. They consists of general ethics and on that ground they develop further principles in particular domains. In the result there may exist business ethics, academic ethics, ethics of prie-sthood, political ethics and military one.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 385-391
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Józefa M. Bocheńskiego elementarz etyki wojskowej
Autorzy:
Niepsuj, Jerzy
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966053.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef Bocheński
etyka
etyka wojskowa
tomizm
męstwo
Ethics
military ethics
Thomism
bravery
Opis:
Military ethics as one of a „special ethics” is built, according to Bocheński, on morally obvious right to self-defense and obligation to defend the closest people. It is related to patriotism understood as love of the country, love is a prominent value in defense of which man is willing to sacrifice his life. With regard to characteristics of a soldier Bocheński suggests the following shape of skills and virtues proper for a military job: of prime importance is bravery, connected rather with heroism and honour than with patience and persistence. Also, virtues demanded for the process of taking decision are, as Bocheński claims, key for all militaries regardless their rank, because even the lowest, a private soldier has to decide. When it comes to taking decision, the most essential is a set of skills and values which enable its accurate conduct. Apart from suitable knowledge and skills there are wisdom and prudence as the most important virtues in taking decision. The most significant virtues of superiors, according to Bocheński, are integrity and justice, generosity and humility. Integrity means respect for law. Justice regulates all human relations. Generosity is related to a task of being a superior, and always to some socially important good, furthermore, it is a task of a superior to guide toward that important good. Humility, hence, is a condition to judge themselves and the others properly, what is indispensable for managing people. Taking decisions and superiority are related to a question of military obedience. Ethical fundament of that obedience is common good, to which army is subordinated. That common good is a principle which joins efforts of both, superiors and subordinates. The first condition of obedience is conviction that all members of community serve the same common goal. Order received from a su-perior can be a decision held at one of its stage. There are situations when an order speaks only about the task of planned activity, or it can indicate a set of means available or it may just order so-me action. The virtue of obedience means that we do not question and ponder on particular stages of a process of decision performed by superior but proceed as effectively as possible until the task is fulfilled. In his military ethics Józef Bocheński promotes the ethos of Polish soldier as a knight, hence the spiritual culture is a matter of prime importance in the army. It is crucial to develop this culture within a proper, which is humanist, frame. Advanced development of military technology must be accompanied by a care for advanced moral development.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 393-404
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Klasyczne ujęcia problemu prawdy w „post-świecie”
The Classic Approaches to the Problem of Truth in the “Post-World”
Autorzy:
Pawlikowski, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075958.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
prawda
filozofia współczesna
tomizm
arystotelizm
platonizm
Truth
Contemporary Philosophy
Thomism
Aristotelianism
Platonism
Opis:
1. For many people, the contemporary culture seems to be something different from modernity, it is something resembling a special period of “post-”. At the same time, different trends are present in current culture. Some reach the genesis of nearly two and a half thousand years back, others have about half a century. Perhaps also breaks some modern belief that in every culture, “newer” means “better”. 2. Representatives of the philosophical and theological trend of “Radical Orthodoxy” noticed in this the approach of postmodernism to the pre-modern tradition. Therefore, we can say that we live and operate in a “post-world”, without leading currents of thought. On the other hand, is the current culture very different from the others when you look at it from the perspective of centuries? 3. For many philosophers, it is still important to reach to the great traditional approaches to the problem of truth. These are above all three concepts related to three great philosophical syntheses created by Plato, Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas. This is also evident among the basic contemporary trends critical of the classics and philosophical tradition. 4. M. Heidegger created a certain idea of being reduced to the time determinant. For the supporters of his views, it became the overcoming of Aquinas’s theory. The German thinker also formulated a specific interpretation of Plato's views on truth. He contrasted it with Thomas's concept, especially with the definition of truth as the adequacy of thing to intellect. 5. T. Bartoś – Polish author of the new attempt to read the essence of the concept – believes, in turn, that the statements of the Angelic Doctor can be found close to the characteristics of post-modernity. He points to a certain incoherence and fragmentary nature of the problem, anthropocentrism and pragmatism of the approach, and a rejection of the unity of truth. It seems, however, that there is a lot of exaggeration in this interpretation. De facto, we are dealing here with radical criticism of Thomism as a trend that develops the views of Saint Thomas Aquinas, because none of the known Thomists do not even come close in their deliberations to the view that T. Bartoś formulated. 6. Finally, a group of philosophers using in the method of reflection the achievements of contemporary logic, representatives of analytic philosophy, generally seems to be aimed at getting rid of the term “truth” from his vocabulary. The idea of reaching their assumptions of logical positivism is difficult to discuss with his followers because of the difference in approach to the practice of philosophy itself between the “analysts” and “non-analysts”. The classic concept of philosophy, under which situates itself Platonism, Aristotelianism and Thomism, is different from the concept of linguistic or neo-positivist, which locates to analytic philosophy. 7. The classical approach to truth, especially the definition developed in the final shape in the Middle Ages, indicating the adequacy of things and the intellect as the essence of truth, therefore meets with criticism from various directions. This does not mean that they should go into oblivion, that they have been replaced by newer and better concepts, or simply refuted. The proclamation of the slogans such as “The End of the Era ...”, “The End of Truth ...” sounds propaganda. 8. The classical approach to the problem of truth has lost nothing in its argumentation. In fact, the current forms of criticism do not rely on any discussion, but on the rejection of the principles on which it is based. Heidegger proclaimed his vision of being and truth, supporting it with a hermeneutic analysis of ancient works. He claimed that this vision is contained in the properly read outlooks of ancient Greek thinkers. The current of philosophy practiced with the use of modern logic tools considers reality only in so far as it can be translated into a “language fact”. This is the analysis of language and not reality. The proposal to read the theory of truth contained in the works of Aquinas, submitted by T. Bartoś to be a projection of some interpretative grid on the expression Thomas's interpretation, wherein the radically differs from the recognized positions. 9. It seems that in the whirlwind of ideologies present in philosophy, science and culture in general, it remains to preserve the classical approach to the problem of truth and develop them according to their essential elements. Compilation with principles that are not appropriate to them will not result in the presentation of their authentic content. They are permanent achievements of culture, philosophically justified. Recourse to reality, confrontation with it, makes the classic approaches open in terms of development. None of them provides a closed system also adopted a priori or received by the conversion performed according to a specified number of regulations. The development of the classical approaches to the problem of truth is theoretically interesting for the whole field of philosophy and as such should be supported.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 313-344
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór o koncepcję życia. Polemika Mieczysława A. Krąpca z Kazimierzem Kłósakiem
A dispute about the concept of life. Discussion of Mieczysław A. Krąpiec with Kazimierz Kłósak
Autorzy:
Sakowicz, Kacper K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2078939.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
życie
Krąpiec
Kłósak
tomizm
stworzenie
ewolucja
metafizyka
Life
thomism
creation
evolution
metaphysics
Opis:
This paper presents a philosophical dispute on the nature and the origin of life. At the beginning author analyzes the central philosopical concepts of life which appeared in the history of philosophy and examines a main manifestations of life in its action. This inquiry leads to recogniton of a living substance as different from matter. Than author recalls the discussion between K. Kłósak and M. A. Krąpiec on the philosophical explanation of life and its genesis. Kłósak postulated a concept in which God have established such laws of nature, so the matter could yield life on its own. Krąpiec rejected Kłósak's concept of an indirect creation of life and argued that the only rational explanation of life is the special, direct act of God's creation. Krąpiec, relying on St. Thomas Aquinas, argued that God cannot use matter (or any other intermediary tools) in creation of a substance. Author concludes that reductionism in explanation of life bears ethical consequences, because cannot set any barriers to the artificial modifications of living organism.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2019, 8; 257-274
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy relacja – najsłabszy rodzaj bytowości w metafizyce św. Tomasza – może stanowić fundament realnego bytu narodu?
Can relation that has the weakest kind of being in St. Thomas’ metaphysics constitute a foundation for the real being of a nation?.
Autorzy:
Grzybowski, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452607.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
relation
substance
Thomism
nation
society
metaphysics
relacja
substancja
tomizm
naród
społeczeństwo
metafizyka
Opis:
Relation is defined by St. Thomas as ordo unius ad aliud, in which three elements – the subject (the thing that is referred), object (the thing to which the subject is referred) and finally the cause of this referring (ground or fundament) – can be distinguished. Though relations are real, they are dependent in the order of existence upon their elements and, in a similar way as accidental properties, are forms of being secondarily added to a substance. Being of a relation is added to that of a substance and connected with it. Relation existing by virtue of its subject is the most imperfect being (imperfectissimum esse). It is the weakest form of beingness (esse) because it requires not only previous existence of a substance but also existence of other accidents that are causing relations. However, relations are the least perfect beings because a proper principle of relation presupposes its referring to something else (since its existence implies the reference to its opposed terms). Relation is an accident, because it inheres in the being of its subject. Furthermore, it depends for its being on the existence (esse) of something else besides this subject. A nation thus is a relation- based community that has an accidental character. It means that it does not exist in its own right, but always has existence due to individuals creating a community as a collective. The very idea of nation is based on social dimension of an individual, as well as on pursuit of the common good. A nation is a specific organism composed of individuals united by blood ties, common ancestry, territory, history, and broadly understood culture intricately connected through various relations.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 247-262
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metodologia historii filozofii w ujęciu wybranych tomistów
Thomistic account of methodology of history of philosophy
Autorzy:
Nowik, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452671.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
metodologia historii filozofii
tomizm
Etienne Gilson
methodology of history of philosophy
Thomism
Opis:
Etienne Gilson relied his concept of doing history of philosophy on Thomistic metaphysics, so it enable him to distinguish between the proper history of philosophy and history of philosophical texts or history of philosophical doctrine; the former concerns philosophical problems disregarding their historical contexts. He referred to the way of studying history of philosophy, which was worked out by St. Thomas Aquinas as well as Aristotle and Alexandrian scholars before him, who were distinguishing between publication, understanding, interpretation and valuation of the text in text studying. Such history of philosophy allows not only to make synthesis within its framework, but also to pose a question on the adequacy of historical solutions of philosophical problems to real being; in that way history of philosophy becomes auxiliary and supporting science.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2012, 1; 173-181
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływ Étienne’a Gilsona na filozofię w Polsce
The Influence of Étienne Gilson on Philosophy in Poland
Autorzy:
Gogacz, Mieczysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075829.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Étienne Gilson
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
Stefan Swieżawski
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Thomas Aquinas
Thomism
Opis:
After the Second World War, Stefan Swieżawski gave his lectures on the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics at the Catholic University of Lublin. The lectures were based on the approaches and methodologies of Etienne Gilson. In this way, Gilson’s thought came in Polish culture. The influence of Gilson’s thought on Polish philosophers had three tangible effects. First of all, positive knowledge about the Middle Ages as such and in particular the medieval philosophy was more able to penetrate the insightful minds. Secondly, a completely new, different from Aristotelian definition of metaphysics was adopted. The definition was developed by Gilson who based on the texts of Thomas Aquinas. Finally, thirdly, Gilson’s theory of history was creatively developed in Poland philosophy, as a study of the philosophical problems that ancients authors took and which have been elaborated in ancient texts. Pedagogical activity of Swieżawski and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, who in the creative way took over Gilson’s thought, caused that existential Thomism has become one of the most known philosophical trends in Poland. At the end of the Stalinist night in Poland, Swieżawski manager to send to Gilson a series of philosophical works done at the Catholic University in Lublin; the texts concerned the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics. In a response, Gilson encouraged him to step up his efforts to initiate research on the history of Polish medieval philosophy and philosophy of the fifteenth century in Europe. With time, a number of translations of Gilson’s books appeared in Poland. Until today they influence their readers. Today, in 21st century, Gilsonian works are used by the next - after the Swieżawski’s and Krąpiec’s students - Polish generation of Thomists.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 119-128
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Komentarz Tomasza z Akwinu do Liber de causis – odyseja tekstów i koncepcji przez kultury, epoki i szkoły filozoficzne
Le commentaire de Thomas d’Aquin à Liber de causis – odyssée de textes et de conceptions à travers les cultures, les époques et les écoles philosophiques
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2057886.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Tomasz z Akwinu
Arystoteles
Proklos
neoplatonizm
tomizm
Thomas d'Aquin
Aristote
Proclus
néoplatonisme
thomisme
Opis:
Liber de causis, à savoir Le Livre des Causes c’est une suite d’extraits d’Éléments de théologie de Proclos commentés par un auteur arabe anonyme. Traduit du latin par Gérard de Crémone avant l’an 1187 ce texte était jusqu'à la parution en 1272 de son commentaire effectué par Thomas d’Aquin, attribué à Aristote. Le texte en version arabe a paru probablement à Toledo au début du XIIe siècle ou peut-être encore plus tôt à « l’époque des traductions » initiée par le calife abbasside al-Mamun, fondateur de la « Maison de la sagesse » à Bagdad (vers 830). Pourtant ce n’est pas ça ce qui est le plus important – la grande « carrière » de ce texte résultait du fait que l’on avait attribué à Aristote même. Dans ce fait il n’y aurait rien de spécial si on ne savait pas que le véritable auteur des idées contenues dans Liber de causis – Proclos (412–485) était l’un des plus éminents philosophes néoplatoniciens, disciple de Plutarque, réformateur de l’Académie de Platon, bref quelqu’un se situant presque aux antipodes du Lycée d’Aristote. La genèse de Liber de causis et de son commentaire Thomasien influence le texte. En effet, la philosophie que nous découvrons dans ce texte est extraordinaire. Dans la première couche, celle de Proclos, nous retrouvons le classique néoplatonisme grec, polythéiste et radicalement païen, mais considérablement émoussé par le choix approprié de thèses de Stoichéosis theologiké et le commentaire arabe écrit dans un ésprit monothéiste et créationniste. C’est ce texte néoplatonicien que commente par le suite Thomas d’Aquin – le plus célèbre partisan de l’école d’Aristote au Moyen Age, à qui la doctrine contenue dans Liber de causis devrait être extrêmement étrangère. Thomas ne le dissimule pas en exposant dans l’introduction ses constatations concernant l’attribution de Liber de causis. Néanmoins, il trouve dans le Livre des questions qui l’intéressent. L’une des questions qui intéressent Aquinate est sûrement la problématique d’esse – de l’existence. Aquinate interprète esse du Livre des causes dans l’esprit de sa propre métaphysique ce qui nous apporte la couche suivante du texte – philosophique. Il est pourtant très rare que l’on puisse en un seul texte passer par plusieurs sphères de la pensée et de la langue ainsi que quelques frontières qui les séparent. Nous pouvons aussi examiner comment la problématique qui nous intéresse se transformait depuis la classique version grecque dans Stoichéiosis theologiké de Proclos, à travers les transformations d’un auteur arabe anonyme dans Liber de causis, jusqu'à la version de Thomas d’Aquin dans son commentaire latin. Nous avons aussi « chemin faisant » deux, peut-être trois traductions de l’œuvre de Proclos : du grec à l’arabe (il n’est pas exclu que « entre » elles il existait aussi une version syrienne) et ensuite une traduction de l’arabe au latin (et une version polonaise du latin).
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2021, 10; 115-126
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies