Wszystkie pola: children studies - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: W poszukiwaniu małej dziewczynki. O twórczości Doroty Terakowskiej
The Search for a Little Girl in the Works of Dorota Terakowska
Autorzy:: Szymborska, Karolina
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16270783.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2023-01-26
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe
Tematy:: Child
Dorota Terakowska
children’s literature
children studies
girlhood studies
divine girl archetype
dziecko
archetyp boskiej dziewczynki
Opis:: Autorka podejmuje w artykule próbę rekonstrukcji ontologii dziewczynki w twórczości Doroty Terakowskiej na przykładzie powieści Lustra Pana Grymsa. Rewiduje zarówno patriarchalne poglądy Lacana na temat tożsamości dziecka, koncepcję „bycia dziewczynką” Pierra Péju, mitopoetycką refleksję Josepha Campbella, jak i współczesne koncepcje feministyczne dotyczące kobiecej tożsamości (Lasara Allen, Pinkola Estés, Maureen Murdock). Celem artykułu jest poznanie sensu bycia i bytu dziewczynki. Bycie to jawi się jako komponent złożonych procesów i przemian, które ustalane są przez ciąg archetypowych procesów identyfikacji na drodze puella rite de passage.
In the article, the author tries to establish a new language for imaging the complex process of identification in adolescent girls in Terakowska’s work (especially in Lustro Pana Grymsa) in the light of girlhood studies. She revises the male-centered theories of Lacanian views on the child’s identity, the concept of “becoming-girl” of Pierre Péju, the mythopoetic reflection of Joseph Campbell, and contemporary feminist concepts on female identity (Lasara Allen, Pinkola Estés, Maureen Murdock). The subject’s analysis led her to conclude that analyzing Terakowska’s work can contribute to developing the “girl-method”. Terakowska constructs an uncanny way of thinking about “becoming-a-girl”, where she redefines the female archetype Femella – the divine girl and introduces the patterns of adolescent identity development in girls, which the author calls the second phase of the Mirror Stage.
Źródło:: Filoteknos; 2022, 12; 281-298
2657-4810
Pojawia się w:: Filoteknos
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Paul Maar’s Sams: a Revolutionary Bestseller in German Children’s Literature and its Polish Rendition
Autorzy:: Pieciul-Karmińska, Eliza
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031246.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe
Tematy:: children’s literature translation studies
Paul Maar
intertextuality in translation
Opis:: Paul Maar (born in 1937) is one of the most important modern German writers for children and young people. He is widely known for his bestselling series of books about Sams (1973) – a strange creature – a mixture of a child, a monkey and a pig that can grant wishes. Sams is an incorporation of anarchy and playfulness and in this way resembles Astrid Lindgren’s Pippi Langstrumpf, but first of all it refers to E. T. A. Hoffmanns fantastic tale “The strange child” (1817). Hoffmann’s and Paul Maar’s stories reveal a lot of similarities and both are revolutionary as far as the methods of children’s education are concerned. Both underline the importance of play, creativity and freedom for children’s development. The first book about Sams was translated into Polish in 2009, more than 35 years after its German premiere. The Polish version was probably too late to be able to play a similarly revolutionary role. The connection to E. T. A. Hoffmann’s “The Strange Child” could also not be noticed as its Polish rendition was published even later – in 2014 (translated by the author of the paper). But the shape of Polish translation can also be one of the reasons why Sams did not gain a comparable popularity as the original story. Polish Sams – due to some modifications in the translation – is a much more well-behaved and disciplined creature than the anarchic and playful German Sams.
Źródło:: Filoteknos; 2020, 10; 427-437
2657-4810
Pojawia się w:: Filoteknos
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: A Separate Domain of Play: On Jerzy Cieślikowski’s Theoretical Concepts of Children’s Literature
Autorzy:: Skowera, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/450726.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe
Tematy:: children’s literature
Jerzy Cieślikowski
the ‘fourth’ literature
history of literary science
literary theory
play
Polish studies
‘separate’ literature
Opis:: The paper focuses on theoretical concepts proposed by Professor Jerzy Cieślikowski (1916–1977), one of the most renowned Polish figures in the field of children’s literature studies. After providing a short outline of the theories of children’s literature in Poland (with the focus on two scholarly orientations towards the subject of research: ‘universalism’ and ‘autonomism’), the author of the article presents Cieślikowski’s main ideas. The first one, introduced in a monograph on children’s folklore and literature, Wielka zabawa (The Great Play, 1967), claims that such writing is inextricably associated with play, while the second one, which can be derived from essays included in the collection Literatura osobna (Separate literature, 1985), indicates that children’s texts constitute a separate literary system (the ‘fourth’ one, alongside ‘highbrow’ literature, folk literature, and ‘pulp’ literature). As both theories were met with polemics, Polish scholarly debate about Cieślikowski’s concepts is discussed in the paper as well. Finally, the author of the article presents several examples of using or referring to Cieślikowski’s ideas by contemporary Polish scholars, which, in a way, show his continuous impact on children’s literature studies in Poland. Therefore, Cieślikowski’s prominence in the country’s academic discourse about children’s texts, although his theories remain controversial, is indisputable.
Źródło:: Filoteknos; 2019, 9; 48-63
2657-4810
Pojawia się w:: Filoteknos
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki