Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Mękarski, Artur" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
    Tytuł:
    Ideologiczno-metodologiczne meandry Rozważań o wojnie domowej Pawła Jasienicy. Uwagi o dziele i jego recepcji
    Autorzy:
    Mękarski, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2042767.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-09
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
    Tematy:
    Paweł Jasienica
    historiografia
    powstanie w Wandei
    rewolucja francuska
    ideologia
    komunizm
    PRL
    historiography
    the Vendée Rebellion
    the French Revolution
    ideology
    communism
    the Polish People’s Republic
    Opis:
    Przedmiotem artykułu są Rozważania o wojnie domowej, ostatnia książka Pawła Jasienicy, eseisty i uznanego pisarza historycznego, znanego głównie z książek o historii Polski. Artykuł proponuje analizę książki i jej recepcji. Realizując pierwsze zadanie, autor skupia uwagę na krytyce ideologii komunistycznej, którą Jasienica w nieco zawoalowany sposób włączył do opisu głównego przedmiotu swej ostatniej książki – powstania w Wandei w 1793 r. W artykule wykazano, że Jasienica wykorzystał opis jednego z epizodów rewolucji francuskiej do krytyki systemu politycznego PRL, opowiadając się, należy dodać, za jego zastąpieniem przez demokrację liberalną. Analiza ukazuje także, że recepcja dzieła Jasienicy była w istotnym stopniu zapośredniczona przez preferencje ideologiczne recenzentów.
    This article deals with Rozważania o wojnie domowej (Reflections on the Civil War), the last book by Paweł Jasienica, an essayist and acclaimed history writer known mainly for his books on the history of Poland. The article offers analysis of both the work and its reception. In executing the first task, the author focuses on extracting the critique of the communist ideology which Jasienica included, in some veiled way, in his account of the main topic to which his last book is devoted – the Vendée rebellion of 1793. In the article Jasienica is shown to have used his account of one of the episodes of the French revolution to criticise the PRL’s political system, arguing, one should add, in favour of replacing it with liberal democracy. Analysis also shows that the reception of Jasienica’s work was significantly mediated by the ideological preferences of its reviewers.
    Źródło:
    Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej; 2020, 12; 137-164
    2450-8381
    2450-8373
    Pojawia się w:
    Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Między Polską Piastów i Polską Jagiellonów a Rzeczpospolitą Obojga Narodów. Refleksje „anarchologiczne” i ich miejsce w rozwoju myśli historycznej Pawła Jasienicy
    Between the Piast Poland, Jagiellonian Poland, and The Commonwealth of Both Nations. ‘Anarchological’ reflections and their place in the development of Paweł Jasienica’s historical thought
    Autorzy:
    Mękarski, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2089403.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    Jasienica Pawel
    Piast Poland
    Jagiellonian Poland
    anarchy
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
    historiography of the Polish People’s Republic
    Marxism
    Jasienica Paweł
    Polska piastowska
    Polska jagiellońska
    anarchia
    Rzeczpospolita polsko-litewska
    historiografia PRL
    marksizm
    Opis:
    In March 1962, Paweł Jasienica, known chiefly for his books on the history of Poland, published an article entitled ‘Polska anarchia’ (‘Polish anarchy’). The article, which appeared in the weekly Przegląd Kulturalny, sparked off a heated debate on the sources of the anarchy into which the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth began to descend in the latter half of the seventeenth century. Among those who contributed to the debate were some of the leading historians of the day. Encouraged by the response to his article, Jasienica decided to expand it into a full-length book (completed in the spring of 1963). The author first presents the views expounded in the article from Przegląd Kulturalny, and then he reconstructs the debate and examines how Jasienica referred to it in his work on the anarchy. Since Jasienica’s account of the anarchy covers the period with which he was also concerned in Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów (published in English as The Commonwealth of Both Nations) - the third part of his series on the history of Poland for which he is most acclaimed - the author also attempts to compare the interpretations advanced in one work with those advanced in the other. As regards the anarchy, Jasienica traced its origin back to the reign of the last two kings of the Jagiellonian dynasty . In compliance with their commitment to securing the support of the great magnates on whom they chose to base their power, Sigismund I the Old (1467-1548) and Sigismund II Augustus (1520-1572) refused to endorse political arrangements advocated by the representatives of the Lower House of Parliament. The failure to reform the country along the lines suggested by the latter group led, in the long term, to political chaos. Unlike Jasienica, according to whom the Commonwealth degenerated into anarchy because of the errors committed almost exclusively by the rulers, the academic historians, whose views were inspired by Marxism, linked the state’s political impotence with the policy pursued by the whole nobility as a class. However, as the author shows, in Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów Jasienica radically changed his views. In his later work, all responsibility for the future anarchy was shifted onto Sigismund III Vasa (1566-1632) and his Catholic fanaticism. In revising his interpretation of what is known as the nobles’ anarchy, Jasienica drew, at least to some extent, on works by Jarema Maciszewski and Władysław Czapliński, historians who also represented the official historiography of the Polish People’s Republic.
    Źródło:
    Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki; 2022, 67, 1; 43--68
    0023-589X
    2657-4020
    Pojawia się w:
    Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    W kręgu kosmogonii i metodologii. Obraz Piastów-herosów w refleksji historycznej Stanisława Zakrzewskiego (1873–1936)
    Cosmogony and methodology. The image of the Piast rulers in the historical reflection of Stanisław Zakrzewski (1873–1936)
    Autorzy:
    Mękarski, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28689777.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
    Tematy:
    myth
    the Piast dynasty
    Stanisław Zakrzewski
    historiography
    mit
    dynastia Piastów
    historiografia
    Opis:
    Tematem artykułu są poglądy Stanisława Zakrzewskiego, wybitnego badacza wczesnośredniowiecznej Polski, na temat historycznej roli Piastów, a przede wszystkim pierwszych dwóch chrześcijańskich przedstawicieli dynastii – Mieszka I (922–945–992) i Bolesława Chrobrego (ok. 967–1025). Autor twierdzi, że Zakrzewski jako wyznawca heroistycznej koncepcji dziejów przedstawił głęboko zmitologizowaną reprezentację przeszłości. Świadczy o tym powiązanie panowania wspomnianych wyżej władców z ideą wielkich ludzi-twórców, którzy realizując plany Opatrzności, podjęli się misji przekształcenia chaosu, który ogarnął Europę, w nowy, trwały porządek. Druga część artykułu dotyczy teoretycznych założeń Zakrzewskiego. Autor pokazuje, że przyjmując heroistyczną koncepcję dziejów, Zakrzewski bagatelizował historyczne znaczenie ustaleń prawno-konstytucyjnych. Poparcie historyka dla zamachu stanu dokonanego przez Józefa Piłsudskiego w 1926 r. można zatem uznać za wymowną ilustrację jego preferencji teoretycznych.
    This article presents Stanisław Zakrzewski’s views of the historical role of the Piast rulers, especially the first two Christian representatives of the dynasty – Mieszko the First (922–945–992) and Boleslaus the Brave (c. 967–1025). According to the author, Zakrzewski, as an adherent of the heroic conception of history, presented a thoroughly mythologised representation of the past. This is evidenced by the linking of the reigns of these two rulers with the Great Man Theory. Great men-creators, implementing the plans of Providence, undertook the mission of transforming the chaos reigning in Europe into a new and lasting order. The second part of the article deals with Zakrzewski’s theoretical assumptions. The author shows that Zakrzewski downplayed the historical significance of legal and constitutional arrangements by adopting a heroic conception of history. The historian’s support for Józef Piłsudski’s 1926 coup d’état can thus be seen as a telling illustration of his theoretical preferences.
    Źródło:
    Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej; 2023, 14; 133-150
    2450-8381
    2450-8373
    Pojawia się w:
    Klio Polska. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Między mitem a polityczną racjonalnością. Myśl historyczna Pawła Jasienicy i jej recepcja w dobie Polski Ludowej
    Autorzy:
    Mękarski, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/602374.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
    Opis:
    Between Myth and Political Rationality. Paweł Jasienica’s Interpretation of Polish History and its Reception in the Era of the Polish People’s RepublicKnown for writing popular books on the history of Poland, Paweł Jasienica (1909–1970) established himself as one of the most distinguished, non-fiction authors of his era. Looked upon as an history writer who exercised his craft in defiance of the Marxist paradigm, he gained much popularity in the Polish People’s Republic, reaching bestseller status. It would probably be difficult to find a history-lover – at least during the Communist era – who never read one of his books. The paper presented here deals with Jasienica’s historical thought. It has been divided into two parts. The first one aims at offering some insight into key elements of his vision of Polish history, while the second one deals with the reception of his books in the period of the Polish People’s Republic. The author advances the thesis that the interpretation of Polish history put forward by Jasienica had the foundation myth at its core. It was already unknown predecessors of Mieszko the First whom Jasienica wanted to give credit for establishing a code of political action to be followed by future generations of the Polish people. Following the code was necessary to keep the country on the right track. It included abandonment of imperialistic tendencies in what – for want of a better word – can be referred to as foreign policy. Founding fathers of Poland were perspicacious enough to know that they should confine themselves to uniting the so-called “core” Polish lands. Not only were they prepared to drop any plans for territorial expansion but they also fostered the policy of religious toleration, which went hand in hand with their willingness to forge alliances with Pagan rulers whenever it was found necessary for the protection of the country.Jasienica was unstinting in his praise of almost all historical rulers of the Piast dynasty for their adherence to the code just mentioned. Their attitude allowed Poland to survive all historical storms. Unlike the Piast monarchs, however, those of the Jagiellonian dynasty failed – argued Jasienica in the first phase of his writing career – to rely for the conduct of their policy on the ancient principles, inculcating into the Polish politics standards and habits which compared highly unfavorably with those once established by legendary rulers of Poland. With the conclusion of the Polish-Lithuanian Union, the country embarked on a policy clearly out of tune with what Jasienica considered to have been the real Polish ways, veering sharply off its right European track.However, in his last books he changed his views to a surprising extent. The union which at first seemed to be a source of most problems Poland was supposed to struggle with for years to come, now, in the trilogy written in the second phase of his career and dealing with the history of Poland from 1572 to 1795 was glorified as a great historic achievement worth copying by other European nations. The most important conclusion arrived at in the second part of the paper is that critical remarks to be found in the reviews of his books tended to fracture the aforementioned mythical framework of Jasienica’s interpretation of Polish history.
    Źródło:
    Kwartalnik Historyczny; 2013, 120, 1
    0023-5903
    Pojawia się w:
    Kwartalnik Historyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Michał Stachura, "Wrogowie porządku publicznego. Studium agresji językowej w Kodeksie Teodozjusza, Nowelach Postteodozjańskich i Konstytucjach Sirmondiańskich"
    Autorzy:
    Filipczak, Paweł
    Mękarski, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/682217.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Źródło:
    Studia Ceranea; 2013, 3; 218-221
    2084-140X
    2449-8378
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Ceranea
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    An introduction to the Byzantine administration in Syro-Palestine on the eve of the Arab conquest
    Autorzy:
    Paweł, Filipczak
    Wiewiorowski, Jacek
    Mękarski, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/books/24964694.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Opis:
    The work is an introduction to the topic of the Byzantine administration in Syro-Palestine between the reign of Justinian the Great and Heraclius. The book is based both on a thorough analysis of primary sources and on a skillful use of scholarly literature, produced by all the important centres of Byzantine studies. The author combines the findings of other scholars into a coherent whole, discussing a variety of phenomena which characterized the operation of the provincial administration in Syro-Palestine. The work’s main focus is on the administrative geography, the prosopography of the governors and duces of the Syro-Palestinian provinces and of the governors of the Diocese of the East. The book is particularly distinctive in its analysis of various issues from three different perspectives. The topic of the monograph is well-chosen. A monographic study devoted to the Syro-Palestinian administration in the period of the Late Roman Empire remains absent from scholarly literature. The topic choice is also determined by the kind of research into Byzantine civilization which the Łódź centre for Byzantine studies has long been involved in carrying out. The way in which the Author approaches the issues dealt with in the book is also fully justified. In addition to juxtaposing a variety of views, scattered throughout a huge body of literature, the Author offers his own original analyses of source material. Prof. Jacek Wiewiorowski Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Książka
      Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies