Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Anastasius" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9
    Tytuł:
    Lilingis, the Bastard Half-Brother of Illus
    Autorzy:
    Leszka, Mirosław J.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2027739.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Lilingis
    Illus
    emperor Zeno
    emperor Anastasius I
    Isaurians
    Opis:
    The paper is devoted to Lilingis – one of the leaders in the Isaurian uprising against emperor Anastasius I. He was Illus’ half-brother. Illus was an Isaurian who, aside from Zeno, played the most important role in the life of the Byzantine state in the 470s and 480s. It is possible that from 484, Lilingis held the position of the Isaurian comes and was so successful at it that he probably retained it until the end of Zeno’s reign and gained authority among his tribesmen, which resulted in his participation as one of the leaders in the Isaurian uprising. Lilingis was co-commander in the first rebel clash with the emperor’s forces at Kotyaeum (492). He met his death in the battle.
    Źródło:
    Studia Ceranea; 2021, 11; 623-631
    2084-140X
    2449-8378
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Ceranea
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Portrayal of Anastasius I (491–518) in the Church History by Theodore Lector. A Few Remarks
    Autorzy:
    Leszka, Mirosław J.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436311.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    eodor Lector
    Emperor Anastasius
    Early Byzantine Empire
    Church history
    Opis:
    The portrayal of Anastasius’ reign as presented by eodore is both one-dimensional, focusing on the Emperor’s activities related to religious matters, and entirely negative. For Theodore, Anastasius was a ruler who fought against the orthodox Church (of which the author of the Church history was a member himself). Furthermore, Theodore Lector became, in a sense, subject to Emperor’s repressions, as he was a secretary to patriarch Macedonius, who was removed from his position and exiled from Constantinople. For Theodore, Anastasius was an evil, impious and weak ruler, against whom even his own subjects rebelled (rising of Vitalian, riots in Constantinople).
    Źródło:
    Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2017, 5; 73-82
    2450-4475
    Pojawia się w:
    Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Herulian Settlements in Byzantium under Emperors Anastasius and Justinian
    Autorzy:
    Turlej, Stanisław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/637966.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    Late Antiquity
    Byzantium
    Anastasius
    Justinian I
    Heruli
    Procopius of Caesarea
    Opis:
    The aim of this article is to draw attention to the need to intensify historical research on Herulian settlements in Byzantium under Emperors Anastasius and Justinian based on the analysis of written sources. The starting point for studying the history of the Heruli in Late Antiquity should be a historical analysis of the excursus devoted to them by Procopius of Caesarea in the book VI Wars. As a result of a historical analysis based on literal interpretation and critical examination, taking into account legal circumstances and the historical context, it can greatly contribute to our knowledge of Herulian history. To sum up the results of the conducted research, it is possible to give quite a precise description of the relations between the empire and the Heruli based on an analysis of the accounts of Procopius of Caesarea and Marcellinus Comes. In 512, Emperor Anastasius settled the tribe on the empire’s lands. Taking advantage of their diffi cult situation, he probably forced them into full subordination. It seems that the Heruli, deprived of their tribal organisation and striving to keep their independence, rebelled and attacked the Romans at the fi rst opportunity, i.e. ca. 514. The imperial army managed to defeat them as early as 515 or 516, and Anastasius refused to give them the status of allies, i.e. improve their position. In this situation it seems most likely that the empire completely broke its ties with the Heruli and the tribe left the empire’s lands. At this stage of the analysis it is diffi cult to determine to what extent Procopius was aware of the nuances of Anastasius’ policy, as his account of the Herulian migration in search of new lands is very brief and schematic. All the details he provides, apart from the information about the Heruli crossing the Danube River on their own initiative, are in complete agreement with the reconstruction of events based on Marcellinus Comes’ mention. Only after completing the analysis of Procopius’ whole account on the Heruli will it be possible to formulate conclusions about its reliability and the sources he used.
    Źródło:
    Electrum; 2013, 20; 163-176
    2084-3909
    Pojawia się w:
    Electrum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Marcellinus Comes on Emperor Anastasius. A Handful of Remarks
    Autorzy:
    Leszka, Mirosław J.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31234126.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Marcellinus Comes
    Anastasius I
    Justin I
    Justinian I
    Byzantine historiography
    Opis:
    Anastasius was for Marcellinus not only a historical figure, but a ruler whose reign he was first able to observe from the perspective of his native Illyricum, and later as an inhabitant of Constantinople. The dominant influence on Marcellinus’ attitude towards Anastasius, as has already been pointed out many times, had been the Emperor’s religious policy, to which the chronicler, as a supporter of the orthodoxy, was opposed. Undoubtedly it was also not indifferent to the manner of Anastasius’ portrayal that at the time of the creation of the first Chronicle Marcellinus was either already associated with Justinian, or wanted to gain recognition in the eyes of Justin I, who after taking over the power after Anastasius’ death had taken action to reverse the negative outcomes of his predecessor’s religious policy.
    Źródło:
    Studia Ceranea; 2022, 12; 689-698
    2084-140X
    2449-8378
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Ceranea
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Trisagion Riots (512) as an Example of Interaction between Politics and Liturgy
    Autorzy:
    Ginter, Kazimierz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/682407.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Trisagion
    liturgy
    Antioch
    Constantinople
    Anastasius I
    Monophysitism
    theopaschism
    state-Church relations
    Ecclesiastical politics
    Opis:
    This article explores the political and cultural context of the riots provoked by changes in the Trisagion (512). Along with the advancing integration of the Byzantine Empire with Christianity, the state’s interest in theological problems increased; these problems were also reflected in the liturgy. Worship was used as a tool of imperial policy. This mutual interaction between politics and liturgy can be observed particularly clearly in the history of the Trisagion. This hymn, in its primitive form appearing in the book of Isaiah (as the familiar Sanctus Sanctus Sanctus), had two interpretations from the first centuries. According to the first one, the hymn referred to God, or – with the development of theology – to the whole Holy Trinity. According to the second interpretation (probably originating from Antioch), it referred to Christ. Already in the 4th century, the Trisagion entered the liturgy. In the middle of the 5th century, we encounter a new version of the Trisagion (known as SanctusDeus, Sanctus Fortis), which was an elaboration of the above-mentioned hymn. It also found use in the liturgy and originally had a Trinitarian sense. The Monophysites, in order to give the hymn an anti-Chalcedonian sense, added to it the expression who was crucified for us; this makes the hymn unambiguously Christological, but it may also suggest theopaschism (all of the Trinity was crucified). In Antioch, where the Trisagion first appeared in that form (and where the hymn had always been interpreted as referring to Christ), this addition did not provoke protests from the Chalcedonians. However, when the Monophysite emperor Anastasius decided to introduce this version to the liturgy in Constantinople, the inhabitants of the capital – accustomed to understanding the Trisagion in the Trinitarian sense – interpreted the change as an offence against the Trinity. This caused the outbreak of the Trisagion riots (512). Not long afterwards, restoring the anthem in the version without the addition became one of the postulates of military commander Vitalian’s rebellion against Anastasius. Thus, in the case under analysis, we see theology and liturgy blending with current politics; one and the same hymn could be understood as heretical in one city and as completely orthodox in another.
    Źródło:
    Studia Ceranea; 2017, 7; 41-57
    2084-140X
    2449-8378
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Ceranea
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Flawiusz Patrycjusz, konsul roku 500
    Flavius Patricius, consul for the year 500
    Autorzy:
    Leszka, Mirosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32316962.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Byzantium
    Flavius Patricius
    Anastasius I
    Justin I
    Bizancjum
    Flawiusz Patrycjusz
    Anastazjusz I
    Justyn I
    Opis:
    Artykuł poświęcony jest Flawiuszowi Patrycjuszowi, konsulowi roku 500. Przez kilkanaście lat był on bliskim współpracownikiem cesarza Anastazjusza, który powierzał mu odpowiedzialne zadania zarówno w sferze wojskowej, cywilnej, jak i religijnej, co świadczyło o tym, że mu ufał i go doceniał. W czasie wy[1]borów władcy w lipcu 518 r. to prawdopodobnie on został okrzyknięty cesarzem przez gwardzistów podległych Celerowi, magistrowi officiorum. Wybór ten został utrącony przez podwładnych Justyna, komesa excubitores. W początkach panowania Justyna I (schyłek 518 początek 519 r.) po zrealizowaniu interwencji w Edessie — wobec tamtejszego biskupa Pawła — popadł w niełaskę, został pozbawiony majątku i skazany na wygnanie. Po tym wydarzeniu znika ze źródeł.
    This article is devoted to Flavius Patricius, consul for the year 500. For several years he was a close associate of the emperor Anastasius, who entrusted him with important tasks in the military, civil and religious spheres, which indicated that he placed his confidence and esteem in him. During the election of the ruler in July 518, it was probably him who was proclaimed emperor by the guards subordinate to Celer, magister officiorum. This appointment was thwarted by the subordinates of Justin, the comes excubitorum. At the start of the reign of Justin I (late 518, early 519), after intervening in Edessa against the local bishop Paul, Patricius fell out of favour, was deprived of his property and sentenced to exile. After this event he disappears from the sources.
    Źródło:
    Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2022, 29; 25-42
    0239-4278
    2450-3177
    Pojawia się w:
    Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Flavius Areobindus – wódz jednej wojny
    Flavius Areobindus – the one-war general
    Autorzy:
    Leszka, Mirosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/910246.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-13
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Byzantium
    Persia
    Flavius Areobindus
    Anicia Iuliana
    Anastasius I
    Bizancjum
    Persja
    Flawiusz Areobind
    Anicja Juliana
    Anastazjusz I
    Opis:
    Artykuł poświęcony został Flavius Areobindus, przedstawicielowi wojskowej arystokracji ostatnich dekad V i pierwszych VI w., magistrowi militum per Orientem i konsulowi roku 506.  Areobindus pojawia się wyraźniej na kartach źródeł jedynie w kontekście wojny bizantyńsko-perskiej z lat 503–505.   Wzmiankowany jest również w związku z wydarzeniami  rozgrywającymi się na tle religijnym w Konstantynopolu w  listopadzie 512 r. Został wówczas, bez żadnego zresztą własnego udziału, wskazany przez buntujących się przeciw cesarzowi Anastazjuszowi,  jako kandydat do cesarskiego tronu. Był mężem  Anicji Juliany, jednej z najwybitniejszych kobiet wczesnego Bizancjum.
    The article is dedicated to Flavius Areobindus, a member of military aristocracy during the turn of the 5th and the 6th centuries; who was a magister militum per Orientem and a consul in the year 506. Areobindus appears more explicitly in the sources only in relation to the Byzantine-Persian war of 503–505. He is also referenced in the context of religious developments in Constantinople that took place in November, 512. At that point, with no contribution of his own, he was named a candidate to the imperial throne by the rebels against the emperor Anastasius. He was a husband of Anicia Juliana, one of the most prominent women of the early Byzantium.
    Źródło:
    Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2020, 27, 1; 5-16
    0239-4278
    2450-3177
    Pojawia się w:
    Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    List papieża Hormizdasa do cesarza Anastazego I
    The Letter of Pope Hormisdas to Emperor Anastasius I
    Autorzy:
    Koczwara, Stanisław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613717.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2008
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    list
    papież
    cesarz
    Rzym
    Bizancjum
    tłumaczenie
    Hormizdas
    Anastazy I
    Letter
    Pope
    Emperor
    Rome
    Bizantium
    Translation
    Hormisdas
    Anastasius I
    Opis:
    Hac in brevi dissertatiuncula post introductionem cum annexa bibliographia proponitur prima in linguam Polonorum translatio Epistolae Hormisdae papae ad Anastasium I imperatorem.
    Źródło:
    Vox Patrum; 2008, 52, 1; 489-494
    0860-9411
    2719-3586
    Pojawia się w:
    Vox Patrum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    „Et ait: «Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram»” (Rdz 1, 26). Próba egzegezy bizantyńskiej na przykładzie Komentarza do Księgi Rodzaju Anastazego z Synaju
    “Et ait: «Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram»” (Gen 1:26). An attempt of Byzantine exegesis on the example of A commentary to the book of Genesis by Anastasius of Sinai
    Autorzy:
    Jóźwiak, Magdalena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613032.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    Św. Anastazy z Synaju
    egzegeza bizantyńska
    Komentarz do Księgi Rodzaju
    Rdz 1, 26
    St. Anastasius of Sinai
    byzantine exegesis
    Commentary on the Book of Genesis
    Gen 1:26
    Opis:
    The Hexaëmeron, traditionally ascribed to Anastasius of Sinai may be one of the most important works of Christian mysticism from the Byzantine era. Three factors make it especially significant. First, it is one of the longest and most detailed surviving examples of Christian mystical exegesis as practiced in the Byzantine period. Second, this commentary is an extensive and unified exposition of the theology of an important Church writer. And finally, the Hexaëmeron is not only steeped in biblical literature, but also contains a large reservoir of quotes and paraphrases of the early Church Fathers on the first three chapters of Genesis. In this article, I analyzed book VI of the Commentary to the Book of Genesis (PG 89, 921-938) by Anastasius of Sinai, in which Anastasius comments, inter alia, the verse from Genesis 1, 26. The main goal of my analysis was to answer the question whether Anastasius – the Byzantine exegete – in her exegesis of the Holy Scriptures, using the earlier considerations of the Fathers of the Church, is at least to a small extent original or uncritical rewrites the previous interpretations, not including any of these interpretations?
    Źródło:
    Vox Patrum; 2018, 70; 545-557
    0860-9411
    2719-3586
    Pojawia się w:
    Vox Patrum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies