Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "sejm" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów

Dostawca treści

Podbaza

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 859
Tytuł:
Zmiany w składzie osobowym senatu i izby poselskiej w okresie Sejmu Wielkiego
Changes in the Composition of the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies during the Great Sejm
Autorzy:
Kacperczyk, Urszula
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/23352272.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-12-31
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Senat
Sejm
Sejm Czteroletni
Sejm Wielki
posłowie
Opis:
The Four-Year Sejm (diet) was held from October 6th, 1788 to May 29th, 1792 and resulted in significant changes in the composition of parliament, both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate. To 177 members elected by the regional diets in August 1788 joined 182 new members elected by regional diets in November 1790. Finally, there were 359 deputies. But such number of deputies never worked together because at the time of a single deliberations several members of parliament died, and other were promoted to the senate. In total, during the sessions of the Four-Year Sejm died at least 10 members (8 of the first term and second term of The Sejm), and 15 members (14 first term of the Sejm, including deputy of Bielsko J. K. Ossolinski, whose nomination has been not thoroughly explained, and one during second term of the Sejm) were promoted to the senate. Major changes also occurred in the composition of the senate. During the sessions of the Sejm 38 senator’s seats became vacant. 22 senators died, thus 23 senatorial offices became vacant (two ministries, two bishoprics, 8 provinces (voivodeship) and 11 castellanies). 14 senators resigned from offices (a minister, four voivodes and 9 castellans). A sentence of the Sejm court deprived Grand Treasurer of the Crown of the office. Uniate Metropolitan entered Senate but the resolution of Sejm deprived Field Crown Hetman of the office thereby abolishing offices of the field Hetman. During the Four-Year-Sejm King Stanislaw August nominated 57 senators, including 16 people who were promoted within the Senate. Not all senators joined the confederation. It was joined by 148 senators (including 15 senators who were promoted from among Sejm deputies and accession to the Confederation did as deputies) of a total of 191. Total number of persons entitled to join the Confederacy, including king Stanislaw August Poniatowski was 536 (assuming that Mr Ossoliński, deputy of Bielsko and Castellan of Podlasie Ossoliński is one person). 493 people took advantage of this right: Stanislaw August Poniatowski, all deputies and about 77% of senators.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2010, 17, 17; 97-124
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 157 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543270.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
Sejm oversight
Opis:
The opinion deals with the exercise of parliamentary oversight functions by Sejm committees. It provides an analysis of whether the representatives of State administration might be held responsible for failure to discharge their duties resulting from Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, Sejm committees have at their disposal the means to enforce only political responsibility. Moreover, as concerns suspension of work on a bill in the event of breach of the obligations specified in Article 157 by the representatives of public administration, the author believes that the legitimacy of such action cannot be assessed in abstracto. The author does not rule out that, depending on circumstances and seriousness of the infringements, suspension of work on a bill may be justified.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 121-124
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zgłoszenia wniosku o odwołanie członka prezydium komisji przez posła niebędącego członkiem komisji
Legal opinion on the admissibility of making a motion to recall a member of a committee presidium by a Deputy who is not a member of the committee
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11868274.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Deputy to the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion addresses the question of autonomy of a Sejm committee in the situation when a Deputy who is not its member – exercising his/her right to take part in a committee meeting and making motions – puts a motion to recall a member of the presidium (bureau) of that committee. The author gives her opinion, based on her own interpretation of the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, that such motion should be considered admissible, since there is no legal basis that would make that motion illegitimate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 181-184
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Around the Issue of Convening Meetings of the Sejm
Wokół problematyki zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu
Autorzy:
Pastuszko, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/940697.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
convening meetings of the Sejm Marshal of the Sejm
the Sejm
zwoływanie posiedzeń Sejmu Marszałek Sejmu
Sejm
Opis:
This article provides an analysis of selected problems regarding the mechanism for convening sessions of the Sejm by its Marshal. The author criticizes the adopted legal solutions, first of all paying attention to the excessive strengthening of the role of the chair- man of the first chamber of parliament in this respect. In his opinion, doubts must be raised by the fact that under the regulations, the right to convene meetings of the Sejm has got only the Marshal, whereas such entities such like parliamentary factions, as well as the President and the government, are formally deprived of it. In addition, he also shows the dilemmas that may arise in the course of applying those provisions in systemic practice. M. in here, he indicates the problem of setting dates of a sitting of the Sejm, inviting guests and the situation when a sitting cannot be convened for objective reasons.
Niniejszy artykuł zawiera analizę wybranych zagadnień związanych z problematyką zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu przez jego Marszałka. Autor krytykuje w nim przyjęte rozwiązania prawne, zwracając uwagę przede wszystkim na nadmierne wzmocnienie w tym zakresie roli przewodniczącego pierwszej izby parlamentu. Jego zdaniem wątpliwości musi budzić fakt, że na gruncie postanowień regulaminowych prawo do skutecznego zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu ma jedynie Marszałek, a nie dysponują nim podmioty takie jak frakcje parlamentarne, a także Prezydent i rząd. Obok tego wskazuje on również na dylematy jakie mogą się pojawić w toku stosowania rzeczonych przepisów w praktyce ustrojowej. Sygnalizuje on m. in. tutaj problem ustalania terminu posiedzenia Sejmu, zapraszania gości oraz sytuacji, gdy posiedzenie nie może zostać zwołane z przyczyn obiektywnych.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2019, 5 (51); 83-95
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych skutków wycofania petycji skierowanej do Sejmu
Legal opinion on the normative consequences of a withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216673.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
petition
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The specificity of the proceedings in relation to petitions precludes the admissibility of discontinuance of the proceedings regarding consideration of a petition on the basis of appropriate application of Article 105 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. In case of withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm, the body responsible for its consideration, i.e. the Petitions Committee, should make a decision about the way of proceeding with the petition. Withdrawal of the petition does not prevent its consideration. Given the open catalogue of the ways in which petitions can be proceeded, the Committee should be allowed to adopt a resolution to refuse consideration of the petition because of the applicant’s willingness to withdraw the petition
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 64-68
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat konsekwencji utraty mandatu przez posła popierającego wniosek o zwołanie posiedzenia komisji (art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu)
Legal opinion on the consequences of the loss of the mandate by a Deputy who has supported the motion to convene the sitting (Article 152, para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216101.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
Opis:
The author is of the opinion that the loss of the mandate by a Deputy, who has supported the motion to convene a sitting of the committee in accordance with Article 152 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, does not affect the effectiveness of the motion, even if it will result in the number of members supporting the motion (putting their signatures thereupon) being less than 1/3 of the committee membership. An obligation to establish the date and time of the sitting of the committee arises at the time of submission of the properly formulated motion, and should be satisfied immediately. It cannot be accepted that the tardiness in the implementation of the obligation, which arose at the time of submission of the motion, could have an impact on its binding efficiency.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 1(49); 59-63
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Digital quorum, digital deliberations and digital voting (ECPRD Request No. 5056)
Cyfrowe kworum, cyfrowe obrady i cyfrowe głosowanie (wniosek ECPRD nr 5056)
Autorzy:
Branna, Justyna
Kupis, Daniela
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2194725.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm
COVID
voting
sitting of the Sejm
Opis:
The authors present amendments to the acts regulating the functioning of the Polish Sejm, adopted in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. The introduced changes included, among other things, new regulations concerning the organisation of the Sejm’s plenary sittings. The text analyses in particular the issue of conducting sittings and voting with the use of means of remote communication.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2022, 3(75); 173-178
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie art. 30 ust. 5 regulaminu Sejmu RP
Opinion on Article 30 (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12232901.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The purpose of the opinion is to examine the possibility of referring the recommendation for election or appointment by the Sejm of individual persons to particular State offices specified in Articles 26, 27–29 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, or dismissal therefrom, to more than one Sejm committee for their opinion thereto. In the author’s view, a flexible interpretation of Article 30 (5) is possible, as it is implied by the wording of that article which does not state that the recommendation is to be referred to “one” committee, so it does not preclude referring it to a greater number of committees.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 70-72
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prace Sejmu Ustawodawczego 1919-1922 nad uregulowaniem uposażenia duchownych i służby kościelnej
The Activities of the Legislative Sejm of 1919-1922. Relating to Remuneration for the Clergy and Church Servants
Autorzy:
Balicki, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/38907965.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Sejm Ustawodawczy
Kościół
Legislative Sejm
Church
Opis:
In this article the author presents a number of essential issues concerning the endowment of the Church, which the members of the Legislative Sejm worked on. The argument begins by stating that Church possessions were confiscated illegally by the governments of the occupant states. An important deduction is made that the endowment of the Church was closely related to the hotly debated agrarian reform conducted with reference to ecclesiastical possessions. In his dissertation, the author presents opinions of many members of Parliament who insisted on a bill which would improve the material conditions of the clergy. It is worth noticing, however, that what they had in mind was the poor clergy in the eastern borderlands of the Republic of Poland. On the opposing side, the author mentions the point of view of those who were against maintaining the Church by the State. Also presented are the arguments of the supporters of the State maintenance of Catholic clergy. Their main argument was the fact that clergy has always played a major role in Polish history. Clergymen were described as promoters and advocates of Poland. The author of the text juxtaposes the opposing view of the supporters and adversaries of the bill which would regulate the discussed issues. Having investigated the above problems and analyzing them in the context of various issues, the author presents in a brief outline the material situation of Catholic clergy in the first years of the independence of the Second Republic of Poland. Debates and conclusions from the described issues, as well as the opinions of the Sejm members are also presented in the text.
Źródło:
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL; 2007, 3, 1; 265-280
1896-6365
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tryb rozpatrywania przedłożonego przez Radę Języka Polskiego „Sprawozdania o stanie ochrony języka polskiego za lata 2016–2017”
Procedure for considering the “Report on the state of protection of the Polish language in 2016–2017” submitted by the Polish Language Council
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215979.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Polish language
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The report, submitted by the Council for the Polish Language, entitled “Language of political information”, contains an analysis of the problem that is narrow in scope. In the light of the current parliamentary practice, the narrow scope of the Council’s reports is typical and this has not been questioned in the course of parliamentary work. The decision of the Culture and Media Committee, resulting in a refusal to consider the document in question, is an expression of negation of the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to recognize this document as a report. Formally, the committee proceedings on the report had not been completed. The Committee should return to examining this document and complete its work, formulating an appropriate opinion.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 69-75
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie interpretacji art. 10a ust. 4 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223414.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal of the Sejm
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The author provides an analysis of the provisions of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the context of the time period within which it should consider a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm. She points out that the opportunity to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is complicated as compared to the election procedure,. The character of the time limit for consideration of the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is not indicative, but mandatory. From an analysis of the concept of ‘the next sitting of the Sejm, it follows that the consideration of the motion and the putting thereof to a vote at the sitting that is “the first one after 7 days of its submission”.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 71-74
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 859

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies