Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "turing machines" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Turing machine approach to runtime software adaptation
Autorzy:
Rudy, J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/952943.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie. Wydawnictwo AGH
Tematy:
runtime change
dynamic modification
computability theory
turing machines
Opis:
In this paper, the problem of applying changes to software at runtime is considered. The computability theory is used in order to develop a more general and programming-language-independent model of computation with support for runtime changes. Various types of runtime changes were defined in terms of computable functions and Turing machines. The properties of such functions and machines were used to prove that arbitrary runtime changes on Turing machines are impossible in general cases. A method of Turing machine decomposition into subtasks was presented and runtime changes were defined through transformations of the subtask graph. Requirements for the possible changes were considered with regard to the possibility of subtask execution during such changes. Finally, a runtime change model of computation was defined by extension of the Universal Turing Machine.
Źródło:
Computer Science; 2014, 15 (3); 293-310
1508-2806
2300-7036
Pojawia się w:
Computer Science
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Relativized helping operators
Autorzy:
Cintioli, P.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1964198.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Politechnika Gdańska
Tematy:
oracle Turing machines
structural complexity
relativizes separations
helping
Opis:
Schöning and Ko respectively introduced the concepts of helping and one-side-helping, and then defined new operators, Phelp(•) and P1-help(•), acting on classes of sets C and returning classes of sets Phelp(C) and P1-help(C). A number of results have been obtained on this subject, principally devoted to understanding how wide the Phelp(C) and P1-help(C) classes are. For example, it seems that the Phelp(•) operator contracts NP ∩ coNP}, while the P1-help(•) operator enlarges UP. To better understand the relative power of P1-help(•) versus Phelp(•) we propose to search, for every relativizable class D containing P, the largest relativizable class C containing P such that for every oracle B PBhelp(CB)? PB1-help(DB). In the following paper: Cintioli P. and Silvestri R. 1997 Inf. Proc. Let. 61 189, it has been observed that Phelp(UP ∩ coUP)= P1-help(UP ∩ coUP), and this is true in any relativized world. In this paper we consider the case of D=UP ∩ coUP and demonstrate the existence of an oracle A for which PAhelp(UPA2 ∩ coUPA2) is not contained in PA1-help(UPA ∩ coUPA). We also prove that for every integer k ≥ 2 there exists an oracle A such that PAhelp(UPAk ∩ coUPAk) ? UPAk.
Źródło:
TASK Quarterly. Scientific Bulletin of Academic Computer Centre in Gdansk; 2005, 9, 3; 357-367
1428-6394
Pojawia się w:
TASK Quarterly. Scientific Bulletin of Academic Computer Centre in Gdansk
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Turing’s Wager?
Autorzy:
Copeland, B. Jack
Proudfoot, Diane
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31233733.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
Tematy:
Alan Turing
Turing’s Wager
mechanized encryption
laws of behaviour
unspecifiability of the mind
brain modelling
whole-brain simulation
cipher machines
Enigma
fish
Tunny
early computer-based cryptography
Opis:
We examine Turing’s intriguing claim, made in the philosophy journal Mind, that he had created a short computer program of such a nature that it would be impossible “to discover by observation sufficient about it to predict its future behaviour, and this within a reasonable time, say a thousand years” (Turing, 1950, p. 457). A program like this would naturally have cryptographic applications, and we explore how the program would most likely have functioned. Importantly, a myth has recently grown up around this program of Turing’s, namely that it can be used as the basis of an argument—and was so used by Turing—to support the conclusion that it is impossible to infer a detailed mathematical description of the human brain within a practicable timescale. This alleged argument of Turing’s has been dubbed “Turing’s Wager” (Thwaites, Soltan, Wieser, Nimmo-Smith, 2017, p. 3) We demonstrate that this argument—in fact nowhere to be found in Turing’s work—is worthless, since it commits a glaring logical fallacy. “Turing’s Wager” gives no grounds for pessimism about the prospects for understanding and simulating the human brain.
Źródło:
Filozofia i Nauka; 2023, 11; 23-36
2300-4711
2545-1936
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia i Nauka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies