Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "konserwacja dziedzictwa" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12
    Tytuł:
    Integrated natural sciences approaches to the protection of medieval ruins
    Zintegrowane podejście nauk przyrodniczych do ochrony średniowiecznych ruin
    Autorzy:
    Novotný, Jakub
    Bláha, Jiří
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2063935.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
    Tematy:
    natural sciences
    innovations
    heritage conservation and preservation
    ruin
    nauki przyrodnicze
    innowacje
    ochrona i konserwacja dziedzictwa
    ruina
    Opis:
    The aim of this paper is to present the Report of innovative restoration techniques, technologies and materials used in conservation in the context of natural sciences and heritage science of the RUINS Project. First, the specifics of preservation and maintenance of ruins are briefly described. Subsequently, the context of natural sciences and the new scientific discipline of heritage science, including the link to innovation, are indicated. The paper then presents the structure of the report and an example of one record representing one specific technique. Record structure is ready to be transferred to versatile data set so it could be converted into an updatable online database in the future.
    Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie raportu o innowacyjnych technikach restauratorskich, technologiach i materiałach stosowanych w konserwacji w kontekście nauk przyrodniczych i dziedzictwa przyrodniczego Projektu RUINS. W pierwszej kolejności opisano specyfikę ochrony i konserwacji ruin. Następnie omówione zostały nauki przyrodnicze oraz związane z nimi innowacje w kontekście dziedzictwa. W artykule przedstawiono również strukturę raportu oraz przykładowe badanie. Przedstawione badania mogłaby w przyszłości stać się wirtualną, aktualizowaną na bieżąco bazą danych, która posłuży jako narzędzie wykorzystywane przy ochronie i konserwacji ruin.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2020, Nr 10; 73--84
    2543-6422
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Urban development in Ghent offers new opportunities for industrial heritage and the museum
    Rozwój Gandawy i wynikające z niego nowe możliwości dla dziedzictwa przemysłowego i muzealnictwa
    Autorzy:
    Neirinckx, Pieter
    Pinte, Marc
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/293848.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Politechnika Wrocławska. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
    Tematy:
    przebudowa miast
    dziedzictwo przemysłowe
    ruchome dziedzictwo kulturowe
    konserwacja dziedzictwa
    urban redevelopment
    industrial heritage
    movable cultural heritage
    heritage conservation
    Opis:
    The subject of the article is the process of establishing, and the role of an industrial museum in the former port areas of Ghent. Although Ghent is located about 32 km from the coast, the city is a real sea port. The construction of the Ghent–Terneuzen Canal in 1823–1827 created a direct corridor to the North Sea. From the 19th century, large textile factories began to arise in and around the medieval city center, so that at the end of the 2nd half of the 19th century, Ghent became the most important industrial city of Flanders. This continued until the 1970 crisis. At that time, textile production was moved to countries with lower labor costs and factory buildings were demolished, but the old port basins remained. Port activities were moved north of the city to areas along the canal. The first Museum for Industrial Archaelogy was founded in this area. Fearful of potential loss of important industrial heritage, the small museum took over large steam engines and even port cranes. It gradually became understood that the collection of these large industrial objects in museum conditions is not easy. The Department for Urban Planning began the re-evaluation of the 19th-century industrial belt and the area of the old port. Currently, there is the integration of large technology objects (big stuff) with urban tissue and social life. The port’s heritage is raised to act as a visual and identity carrier, with a particular focus on port cranes. The cooperation between the Department of Urban Planning and the Museum of Industry offers the Museum the opportunity to go outside the walls of the museum to restore big industrial facilities (big stuff) to the old port of the city.
    Tematem artykułu jest proces powstawania i roli postindustrialnego muzeum na dawnych terenach portowych Gandawy. Mimo że Gandawa leży około 32 km od wybrzeża, miasto jest prawdziwym morskim portem. Wybudowanie w latach 1823–1827 kanału Ghent–Terneuzen stworzyło bezpośredni korytarz do Morza Północnego. Od XIX w. w średniowiecznym centrum miasta i wokół niego zaczęły powstawać wielkie fabryki tekstylne, tak że pod koniec 2. połowy XIX w. Gandawa stała się najważniejszym miastem przemysłowym Flandrii. Trwało to do kryzysu z roku 1970. Wówczas produkcja tekstylna została przeniesiona do krajów o niższych kosztach siły roboczej, budynki fabryk zostały zburzone, pozostały stare baseny portowe. Działalność „portową” przeniesiono na północ od miasta, na tereny wzdłuż kanału. Na opuszczonym terenie założono pierwsze Muzeum Archeologii Industrialnej. Obawiając się potencjalnej utraty ważnego dziedzictwa przemysłowego, niewielkie muzeum przejęło duże maszyny parowe, a nawet portowe dźwigi. Stopniowo zrozumiano, że gromadzenie tych wielkich obiektów przemysłowych w warunkach muzealnych nie jest łatwe. Departament Planowania Miejskiego rozpoczął rewaloryzację XIX-wiecznego pasa przemysłowego i terenu starego portu. Obecnie zachodzi tu integracja dużych obiektów techniki (big stuff) z tkanką miejską i życiem społecznym. Dziedzictwo portu jest podniesione do pełnienia funkcji nośnika wizualnego i tożsamościowego, ze szczególnym skupieniem uwagi na dźwigach portowych. Współpraca między Departamentem Rozwoju Miejskiego a Muzeum Przemysłu ofiarowuje temu drugiemu możliwość wyjścia poza mury muzeum, by przywrócić duże obiekty przemysłowe staremu portowi miasta.
    Źródło:
    Architectus; 2020, 1 (61); 37-44
    1429-7507
    2084-5227
    Pojawia się w:
    Architectus
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Doroczne spotkanie Związku Konserwatorów Krajowych : wieczór naukowy w siedzibie Związku Polaków w Austrii "Strzecha" w Wiedniu
    Autorzy:
    Kalinowski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536851.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1982
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    ochrona i konserwacja dziedzictwa kulturowego w RFN
    Związek Konserwatorów Krajowych w RFN
    zjazd w Hamburgu Związku Konserwatorów Krajowych w RFN
    ochrona architektury mieszkaniowej okresu Republiki Weimarskiej w Hamburgu
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1982, 3-4; 250
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Poland for World Heritage/La Pologne pour le patrimoine mondial, Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, Warszawa 2013
    Autorzy:
    Olbryś, Mirosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536409.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    konserwacja zabytków
    Lista światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego UNESCO
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 2; 245-250
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Drodzy Czytelnicy,
    Dear Readers,
    Autorzy:
    Stachańczyk, Renata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536474.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    „Ochrona Zabytków”
    konserwacja zabytkowych ogrodów
    ogrody zabytkowe
    Opis:
    It is with pleasure that we present to you the recent issue of “Ochrona Zabytków” magazine. It differs from previous editions as it is entirely devoted to conservation of historic gardens. Here, in Poland, this field has truly impressive achievements as we are one of the few European countries to hold a considerable collection of garden documents (records), and to develop – in the post-war period – research methods as well as following methodology taught in a plethora of academic centres. Furthermore, it may seem that applicable legal acts and international recommendations are sufficient tools to protect this particular type of heritage. Nevertheless, as a consequence of failing to grasp the phenomena of a garden – with its essence and artistic value – and due to the necessity to adopt measures other than for historic architecture, decisions regarding gardens often raise much controversy. We are observing occurrences that prove disturbing especially in the context of the increasing resources allocated to conservation and restoration of historic gardens. As a result, we are witnessing a process which would be unthinkable a few decades ago, when the majority of works was carried out within the inner management of the historic site. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the notion of recreating historical garden compositions, which should be an aftermath of a far-reaching process and not a one-time act. This process involves conservators struggling to make various substantive decisions, and as there is no one universal path to follow, all options and conditions must be taken into account. In 2014, the celebration of the 10th anniversary of inscribing the Polish-German Mużakowski Park on the UNESCO World Heritage List proved to be a unique opportunity to call to mind the principles of conduct towards historic gardens, in particular, the doctrine for conservation in relation to this type of heritage, and to discuss current issues and tendencies. Inscribing Mużakowski Park, whose eastern part is managed by the National Heritage Board of Poland on behalf of the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, on the UNESCO World Heritage List is one of the key points of park’s revitalisation process which started at the beginning of 1990s and was initiated by predecessors of the Board in cooperation with the manager of German part of the site. The inscription emphasised the efforts of Polish manager that went into rescuing the park – without it, this precious site would go down only in the history of landscape gardening. The wide range of conservation works carried out by both managers is unprecedented in Europe and constitutes an example of good practices in the field of historic garden conservation. The National Heritage Board of Poland – an organiser of the “Historic gardens as objects of maintenance, conservation and restoration” conference which was held from 11 to 13 September 2014 in the Żagań Palace and outdoors in the Mużakowski Park to commemorate the inscription – has committed to remind us that historic gardens must be treated in a different manner than other types of heritage due to special characteristics of their material, longevity and value of composition. Moreover, the conference was to present European views on standards of conduct and to discuss on a spectrum of possibilities related to selecting the right path prior to deciding on measures to be adopted. Most papers read by speakers from Poland and abroad have been adapted to the requirements set out for academic writing, and subsequently collected in a volume that is presented to you. We strongly believe that our Readers will learn more on the subject of historic gardens which so far has rarely been raised in “Ochrona Zabytków” magazine. A garden is a type of historic site that requires continuous care, in particular constant and professional maintenance. Understanding its complexity is the foundation of any revitalisation process and a guarantee for maintaining its inherent value. Without it, our conservation efforts will result in passing to future generations our mere representations of historic garden achievements that will have nothing to do with the real thing. dr inż. Renata Stachańczyk The Manager of the Revitalisation Project of Mużakowski Park, Head of the Team for expert opinions and analysis of historic landscape The National Heritage Board of Poland
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2016, 1; 3-4
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Konserwacja zapobiegawcza dziedzictwa archeologicznego : wprowadzenie do problematyki
    PREVENTIVE CONSERVATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SUBJECT AREA
    Autorzy:
    Kobyliński, Zbigniew
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536557.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    dziedzictwo archeologiczne
    konserwacja zapobiegawcza
    konserwacja zapobiegawcza dziedzictwa archeologicznego
    niszczenie dziedzictwa archeologicznego
    niszczenie stanowisk i zabytków archeologicznych
    ochrona ginących zasobów archeologicznych
    filozofia konserwacji zapobiegawczej
    teoria konserwacji
    konserwacja in .situ
    zachowanie zabytków in situ
    czynniki destrukcji stanowisk archeologicznych
    konstrukcje ochronne
    stabilizacja warunków środowiskowych
    stworzenie stabilnego mikroklimatu
    europejskiej strategii konserwacji zapobiegawczej.
    błędne rozwiązania ochronne
    teatr grecki w Heraclea Minoa na Sycylii
    błędy konserwatorskie
    Villa del Casale w Piazza Armerina na Sycylii
    zagrożenia dla dziedzictwa archeologicznego
    Opis:
    ICOMOS Charter for the Protection and Management o f the Archaeological Heritage issued in 1990 can be regarded as the final moment of the long-term process of formation of the belief in the archaeological branch that it is necessary to assign priority to preventive conservation in all actions undertaken towards the authentic substance of archaeological sites and relics. \\ ith regard to archaeological heritage, the strategy of preventive conservation must cover at least (lie implementation of the following rules: 1. Creation of optimum conditions of duration and exposure for the monument (elaboration of the monument protection plan). 2. Non-disturbance of the monument substance (restriction of excavation work to a necessary minimum). 3. Monitoring of the condition of the monument (conservator’s inspections and ensuring that the monument will be cared about by social caretakers of monuments). *+. Intervention in the case of any danger (carrying- -out of minimum required repair activities and legal and administrative interventions). The elaboration of the plan of long-term protection and management of the monument must be a key element of the strateg)7. Such a plan must be based on multidisciplinary scientific research aimed at understanding the fragment of the heritage that is to be covered by the conservation. This understanding covers not only an in-depth knowledge of the monument itself, but also of the historical and contemporary context in which the monument is situated, including th<‘ conditions of natural environment and social attitudes. Only with such a knowledge at our disposal can we elaborate an action plan that will allow us to retain the monument substance of the site, at the same time giving the possibility of I lie widest and most diverse use of monument values that are carried by that site. The article deals with practical problems related to the implementation of such proactive approach to the in situ conservation of architectural relics, such as th<‘ conservation of archaeological sites by refilling them with soil, ensuring of proper humidity and other soil conditions for the given site, impact of plants on the maintenance of archaeological sites, problems arising during the construction of roofs for archaeological sites, or special problems connected with the provision of access to archaeological sites for tourists. The problems discussed in the article lead to the conclusion that preventive conservation consists mainly of planning based on scientific research and anticipation of long-term results of undertaken actions.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2009, 3; 77-104
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Między teorią a praktyką. Aktywność Józefa Łepkowskiego w dziedzinie konserwacji zabytków
    Autorzy:
    Antoniewicz-Goraj, B.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/218214.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2005
    Wydawca:
    Stowarzyszenie Konserwatorów Zabytków
    Tematy:
    Łepkowski Józef Aleksander
    konserwacja zabytków
    ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego
    conservation of monuments
    protection of cultural heritage
    Źródło:
    Wiadomości Konserwatorskie; 2005, 17; 14-24
    0860-2395
    2544-8870
    Pojawia się w:
    Wiadomości Konserwatorskie
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wypowiedź na Kongresie Kultury Polskiej 2000. Forum - Ochrona dziedzictwa kultury w Polsce (7 grudnia 2000 r.)
    A STATEMENT MADE AT THE CONGRESS OF POLISH CULTURE 2000. Forum: The Protection of the Cultural Heritage in Poland (7 December 2000)
    Autorzy:
    Miłobędzki, Adam
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537218.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2001
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    Kongres Kultury Polskiej 2000
    ochrona dziedzictwa kultury w Polsce
    budowanie Nowej Europy
    konserwacja zabytków w Polsce
    Opis:
    Profound transformations in social historical consciousness, which coincided with the twilight of the cultural formation of modernism, also affected the approach towards the cultural heritage. There are many reasons for assuming that both history, conceived as an academic discipline, and its applied branches, namely, the protection of souvenirs of the past — both dating back to the beginning of the nineteenth century — are going through a crisis. Without a suitable identification of the nature of this crisis — and this problem constitutes the topic of my speech — it would be difficult to delineate new plans for the protection of the cultural heritage of Europe, brought up to date, and its Polish fragment. I would like my statement not to be treated as a critique, but as an attempt at an abbreviated diagnosis of the current situation in this domain. Let us recall that in its modernist dimension history was closely connected with the ideology of a modern, post-Enlightenment nation-state (unless it became an outright ideology of the nation-state) even if, as in the case of Poland, the systemic component did not assume its full form until the twentieth century. The political creation sought support in, i. a. historical artifacts, leading to a definition of the national legacy and, starting with the 1830s, the institutionalisation of its protection. Since that time, the existence of relics of the past was subjected to three overlapping determinants: not only the already consolidated interests of the educated part of society (today nearing its extinction), but also the programmes of politicians and the professional activity of conservators. Our epoch is frequently described as post-historical. This term pertains to the shrinking of historical social awareness, sometimes to the limits of group amnesia, rather than to the exhaustion of heretofore historiographic systems. The process in question embraces also the cult of historical monuments — a laicised eighteenth-century form of a cult of relics, which today have lost their function of a „fetish”, helpful in the awakening and protection of national- social identity. Paradoxically, in the most universal cultural circuit, regardless of the severance of organic ties with tradition, we may observe the growth of a certain new obsession with the past, which would have never developed without the intervention of politics and the support of the press. Public opinion (if such a thing exists) is stimulated more than ever by the celebrations of assorted anniversaries or the discoveries of official monuments of history. Presupposed cultural tradition is compared with a so-called theme park or a son et lumière spectacle. Even the revitalisation of an historical town sometimes aims at the artificiality of a „municipal historical reservation" or the theatrical archaeologism of a Skansen or Williamsburg, not to mention the worst of all — the fairy-tale surrealism of Disneyland. In other words, the fundamental role played in the contemporary world by relics of the past, envisaged as a transmitter of collective memory, appears to be succumbing to limitation and banalisation. Most frequently, the past is exploited for the purpose of two functions. First, its provides a foundation for the accentuation of the cultural identity of certain populations or environments postulated by political structures. Second, it creates resources for the increasingly important tourist industry (the marketing of landscapes and historical monuments). In order to refer my above outlined statements to the most topical issues of greatest interest to us — the present-day idea of European integration is not only at odds with the old model of the nation-state, but also, to a certain degree, with the conception of the national legacy. Does this heritage truly follow a path from the nation-state towards Europe, and along a downward route — to regions and metropolises? Is this the reason why there is less room for it on the national level? Only two geographic-cultural extremities are vividly marked — one is composed of the whole European Continent, including monuments of World Heritage, and the other includes the small homelands of assorted communities, together with their traditional regional culture, local landscapes and a continuum of artistic manifestations. Regardless of the common goal of constructing a New Europe, the world of m odern political, social and artistic conceptions and symbols developing in the West, does not always correspond to Central-Eastern Europe. Moreover, at a time when in Western democracies the conceptions of the heritage and the realisations of its protection increasingly often depend on social interest and the charity of public institutions, in other countries they are subjected more directly to political bodies and, as a consequence, to the administration sector — with conservation acting as the most sensitive barometer of this process. A characteristic feature of the conservation of historical monuments in contemporary Poland is a hybrid tangle of the utilitarian protectionism of the authorities, multifaceted iconoclasm and Romantic reconstructionism. I do not wish to delve into an assessment of the actual outcome of this situation, but merely wish to draw attention to the fact that among the professional circles of Polish conservators a modern identification of monuments on a philosophical and socio- -cultural level is relatively weak. Notice is paid to artistic merits or sentimental, picturesque expressiveness, but, generally speaking, the monument is perceived mainly as an historical source — an approach which indubitably comprises a considerable simplification. Hopefully, the new generation of conservators will be capable of an integrated, interdisciplinary planning of the protection of the past, a profound comprehension of a complicated network of economic, social, political, legal and philosophical problems, rooted at the basis of the policy of the protection of historical monuments. Well aware of the tricks played by history they will have to be open to endless transformations of the criteria of evaluation. No conservation doctrine can aspire to act as an exclusive model. No monument possesses a concrete substance or delineated boundaries. The reason lies not merely in the fact that it is historically multi-tiered and remains in a state of constant transformation, but also in the fact that it depends on irrational interpretations, founded on the binding hierarchy of values, the dominant world outlook and... our taste.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2001, 1; 1-3
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    MEANDRY WSPÓŁCZESNEJ ODBUDOWY
    CONTEMPORARY RECONSTRUCTION MEANDERS
    Autorzy:
    Guranowska-Gruszecka, Krystyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/509256.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Finansów i Biznesu Vistula
    Tematy:
    konserwacja zabytków
    odbudowa
    rekonstrukcja
    tematyzacja
    autentyzm dziedzictwa historycznego
    building restoration
    rebuild
    reconstruction
    thematization
    authenticity of historical
    heritage
    Opis:
    W artykule przedstawiono obowiązujące do czasów obecnych doktryny konserwatorskie związane z ochroną dziedzictwa kulturowego (utrwalone po II wojnie światowej) zarówno w skali architektonicznej, jak i urbanistycznej. Dokonano wyboru charakterystycznych przykładów odbudowy z Polski i ze świata. Następnie przeprowadzono syntetyczną analizę porównawczą wybranych współczesnych przykładów odbudowy z doktrynami konserwatorskimi. Wydobyto te elementy działań realizacyjnych, które odstawały od przyjętych wcześniej zasad teoretycznych. Opisano przeanalizowane kierunki, realizacji odbudowy wskazanych zespołów historycznych. Przeprowadzono także analizę jakie czynniki i argumenty wpływają na działania, będące odstępstwem od doktryn konserwatorskich.
    The article presents conservation doctrines binding up to the present time, and connected with the protection of cultural heritage (recorded after World War II) both on an architectural and urban scale. Characteristic examples of reconstruction from Poland and the World were chosen. A synthetic comparative analysis of selected contemporary examples of reconstruction with these conservation doctrines was then carried out. Elements of implementation activities were extracted that departed from theoretical principles adopted earlier. The analyzed directions and implementation of the reconstruction of selected historical complexes were described. An analysis was also made of what factors and arguments affect activities that are a departure from conservation doctrines. To maintain the logic of these considerations, the article began with an objective presentation of the clear rules of dealing with the historical urban space, which were in force at the end of the 20th century, and which have not been officially changed until today. On this background, an analysis was carried out of the selected issues concerning Polish examples from Warsaw and Elbląg, as well as from the Asian continent from China and Iraqi Kurdistan. A today’s necessity is to open a multilateral scientific discourse aimed at formulating conclusions about further preferences in dealing with damaged buildings in the context of global trends.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Naukowe Uczelni Vistula; 2019, 66(3) Architektura; 5-17
    2353-2688
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Naukowe Uczelni Vistula
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Fenomeny społecznej roli sztuki a demokratyzacja - od zarania kultury do sztuki Kantora i Abakanowicz. Percepcja, ochrona i zachowanie
    Phenomena of the social role of art and democratization - from the dawn of culture to Kantor and Abakanowicz. Perception, care and protection
    Autorzy:
    Szmelter, Iwona
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/424616.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Sztuk Pięknych w Gdańsku
    Tematy:
    społeczna rola sztuki
    sztuka wizualna
    wartości dziedzictwa kultury
    konserwacja sztuki współczesnej
    wspólnotowe działania artystyczne
    paleolityczna sztuka jaskiniowa
    Multipart
    Tadeusz Kantor
    Opis:
    Art is not a collection of objects but a form of human activity with great social impact. It is in constant process with the next audiences and their successive generations. Based on Gadamer’s hermeneutic circle it can be interpreted as an action in the democratic sense, a kind of game. The following principal case study is analyzed: Tadeusz Kantor (1915-1990), an excellent painter and interdisciplinary creator organized a programme of conceptual art called Multipart (multiplication and participation). The first exhibition in the series was held in the Foksal Gallery in Warsaw on February 21st 1970 as an "exhibition of one image in 40 copies". Numbered copies of a single picture, entitled Parapluie-emballage, were made according to the artist's instructions. A big broken umbrella, (at that time an symbol associated with the art of Kantor) was glued onto canvas on a stretcher measuring 110cm × 120cm and everything was painted white. At the launch of the exhibition, all the pictures were sold for a symbolic price. Buyers had to sign a contract with Kantor, according to which they could add to the image: "Insults, expressions of approval, praise, sympathy, swear words, (...) erasures, deletions, drawings (...) changes to the image according to their own tastes (...) pierce it, burn it (...) sell, buy, speculate, steal it". The important thing was that the buyers were obliged to re-exhibit the works in the Foksal Gallery after a year of such treatment. Thus, on 20 February 1971, a second exhibition of works by Kantor was held, Multipart 2. This presented the year-old participatory works parapluie-emballage and there were surprising forms of ‘participation’. One unique form of ‘participation-democratisation’ included in the programme Multipart, was the picture which was bought by the “Zuzanna group”. They sowed cress seeds on the image, then treated it as a dish at banquets. Moreover the picture that they had bought was used as a banner in the May 1st communist parade in 1970, where students chanted ‘Kantor’ instead of ‘Lenin’, which was then risky. The event was immortalized in the artistic film Multipart by Christopher Kubicki and Mark Młodecki, which was shown during the exhibition at the Foksal Gallery in 1971. Kantor was positively surprised by the democratisation of his project. This was not the end of the participation of owners. After the exhibition the picture was officially buried in the earth along with a ‘procession’ to the accompaniment of string instruments. After 44 years, at the request of a group of architect-owners, on the 18th of May 2015 conservators undertook the careful exhumation of the object under the title Multipart in process. The remains were removed from the ground and conserved, making reference to documentation of its state before burial and was reassembled on a mount. Very important is the sense of Multipart. Kantor, by departing from his personal creation of the works, questioned and redefined the very concept of a work of art, traditionally treated as the creation of specific authors, the effect of the artist's work. In this case, the idea of these works was his and he created and presented their concept and their technical description. Denying the uniqueness of works of art, at the same time Kantor challenged the position of museums, galleries and collectors – directly to democracy in art. The action Multipart is one of the best-known projects organized by Kantor. It opened a new chapter in thinking about art in the world and in Poland. Paradoxically the Multipart continues (!) as does interest in it among collectors and museums. Due to the unusual character of the work and the need of dissemination, the arrangement of the 'learning zone' explains the conceptual design of Kantor and presents his ideas and their consequences in terms of the fate of an object called Multipart in process. Other case studies are devoted to the spectrum of time, starting from a democratic sense of paleolithic art as well as from the contemporary sense of Magdalena Abakanowicz’s art in public space. The phenomena of art, which consists in its constant inclusion and conservation, allows various forms of social roles to be presented and preserved. Finally, the idea of democracy is based on a paradoxical antinomy: ‘art in process - process in art’. It also requires maintenance for subsequent generations, protection, conservation and sometimes reconstruction.
    Źródło:
    Sztuka i Dokumentacja; 2017, 16; 49-61
    2080-413X
    Pojawia się w:
    Sztuka i Dokumentacja
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Qualitative analysis of architectural education in the protection of a historic city
    Analiza jakościowa edukacji architektonicznej w zakresie ochrony miasta zabytkowego
    Autorzy:
    Kuśnierz-Krupa, Dominika
    Kobylarczyk, Justyna
    Malczewska, Joanna
    Ivashko, Yulia
    Lisińska-Kuśnierz, Małgorzata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1841718.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Stowarzyszenie Konserwatorów Zabytków
    Tematy:
    architectural education
    protection of a historic city
    heritage protection
    monument
    conservation
    quality of education
    edukacja architektoniczna
    ochrona miasta zabytkowego
    ochrona dziedzictwa
    konserwacja zabytków
    jakość edukacji
    Opis:
    This paper presents the findings of a study in which students of architecture schools rated their need for education about the scope of conservation and respect for the historical cultural landscape, primarily including the values of historic cities and towns. This subject appears to be highly essential as historic cities and towns, particularly smaller ones, are currently under the risk of losing their values due to development pressure that is often uncontrolled. It should be noted that architects who design new buildings in historic city and town centres often have contribute to this phenomenon. Therefore, in the authors’s opinion, the education of architecture school students on the need to respect and conserve historic towns can be seen as an essential issue, as well as its quality level.
    W artykule przedstawiono wyniki badań dotyczących oceny przez studentów uczelni architektonicznych potrzeby edukacji w zakresie ochrony i poszanowania historycznego krajobrazu kulturowego, w tym przede wszystkim wartości zabytkowych miast. Przedmiotowa problematyka wydaje się bardzo istotna, gdyż miasta zabytkowe, szczególnie te mniejsze, są obecnie – w wyniku presji inwestycyjnej, często niekontrolowanej – narażone na utratę swoich wartości. Należy zauważyć, że niejednokrotnie w procesie tym mają swój udział architekci, projektujący nowe obiekty na terenach historycznych centrów miast. Zatem, zdaniem autorów, zarówno edukacja studentów uczelni architektonicznych w zakresie potrzeby poszanowania i ochrony miasta zabytkowego, jak i jej poziom wydają się niezwykle ważne.
    Źródło:
    Wiadomości Konserwatorskie; 2021, 65; 20-25
    0860-2395
    2544-8870
    Pojawia się w:
    Wiadomości Konserwatorskie
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies