Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "kancelaria królewska" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Archiwum Główne Królestwa kontynuatorem zadań kancelarii koronnej w zakresie badania dokumentów
The Central Archives of the Kingdom of Poland as a Successor of the Crown Chancellery Task of Documents’ Examination
Autorzy:
Chorążyczewski, Waldemar
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/23051034.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011-12-31
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
AGAD
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
kancelaria królewska
Archiwum Główne Królestwa
dokumenty
Opis:
Currently judgment on the authenticity and reliability of records is not one of the tasks of the archives. However, such judgment constituted one of the main tasks of the former chancelleries. So if the Central Archives of the Kingdom of Poland acted in this area in the 19th century it was done as a continuator of the pre– partitions crown chancellery. Author based his analysis of the title phenomenon on the examination of documents executed by the Central Archives, and preserved as a correspondence from the Commission for Governmental Justice [Komisja Rządowej Sprawiedliwości] in Warsaw with the Secretariat of State of the Polish Kingdom [Sekretariat Stanu Królestwa Polskiego] in St. Petersburg. Opinions on the authenticity and reliability of documents were needed by the central offices of the Russian Empire which were located in St. Petersburg, in the cases studied in this article: Ministry of Justice or Department of Heraldry of the Ruling Senate [Departament Heroldii Senatu Rządzącego]. Secretariat of State acted as a go–between. Legal and political system required this kind of mediation but this lengthened significantly the time of doing things. Only about 20% of the time took appropriate consideration of the merits of a matter or archival query, the remaining time took translation of documents from Russian to Polish and vice versa, and transfer them between offices. Studying records of Secretariat of State of the Polish Kingdom author came across a trail of 43 records examinated by the Central Archives of the Kingdom. 5 out of these records were from the 16th century, 10 from the 17th century and 28 from the 18th century. Documents were usually issued by Kings of Poland (39 documents — 91%). It is striking that very often apparently erroneous, documents were directed to the Central Archives, although they could be checked at the Lithuanian Metrica (Acta Magni Ducatus Lithuaniae) stored in St. Petersburg. However, detailed and thorough analysis of the official correspondence leads to the conclusion that more important than finding of the paper at the Crown Register (Metrica Regni Poloniae) was to obtain the opinion on the original from experts working at the Central Archives, regardless whether it was a document of the Crown or Lithuanian and whether it concerned of the Polish Kingdom, or territories annexed to the Russian Empire.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2011, 18, 18; 165-186
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Geneza przybrania przez Jerzego Ossolińskiego tytułu „hrabia z Tęczyna”
Genesis of use of the title "Count of Tęczyn" by Jerzy Ossoliński
Autorzy:
Górny, Rafał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1065338.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Jerzy Ossoliński
szlachectwo
genealogia
kancelaria królewska
Tęczyńscy
the nobility
genealogy
the Royal Chancellery
Tęczyński Family
Opis:
In 1621 Jerzy Ossoliński (1595–1650) assumed the title of "Count of Tęczyn". Because he used the coat of arms Topór (an Ax), there was a widespread belief that Ossolińskis Family was a descendant of Tęczyńskis Family who used the same coat of arms. This view was repeated in the old Polish armorials but overthrown in the 1990s. Due to the absence of source documents it was failed to explain how the Ossoliński family assumed the title of "Counts of Tęczyn". The argument that the dying Jan Tęczyński, chamberlain of Cracow, allegedly adopted Zbigniew Ossoliński in 1593. seems to be unconvincing. More likely it was the outcome of the action of the Royal Chancelery, which added that title to Jerzy Ossoliński’s envoy mandate to England. This was made to increase prestige of an envoy who did not held any office or dignity at that time. Jerzy Ossoliński, however, facing the spreading ideology of the nobility that was based on religion and mythologized genealogies and took care to preserve the title "from Tęczyn" that finally permanently stayed with the name of his family. For this purpose, he used the authority of the Crown Office.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2016, 23; 163-177
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Malarski i rysunkowy wystrój ksiąg Metryki Koronnej ze zbiorów Archiwum Głównego Akt Dawnych
Painting and Drawing Decor of the Books of the Crown Record from the Collection of the Central Archives of Historical Records
Autorzy:
Wieczorek, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/15582243.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Sztuki PAN
Tematy:
Metryka Koronna
kancelaria królewska
iluminatorstwo
iluminowane dokumenty
malarstwo książkowe
Dagobert Ludwik
Domański Wojciech
Crown Metrics
royal Chancellery
illumination
illuminated documents
book painting
Opis:
Artykuł podejmuje temat dekorowanych ksiąg należących do zespołu Metryki Koronnej ze zbiorów Archiwum Głównego Akt Dawnych w Warszawie. Zdobienia zidentyfikowano na kartach 31 woluminów powstałych w XVII i XVIII w. Analiza zgromadzonego materiału wykazała pokrewieństwa łączące dekorowane księgi regestru z iluminacjami dokumentów wydawanych przez polskich monarchów. Oprócz analogii kompozycyjnych odnotować można także udział tych samych twórców. Na kartach woluminów udało się zidentyfikować dzieła artystów opisywanych we wcześniejszej literaturze (Ludwika Dagoberta, Wojciecha Domańskiego), a także dekoratorów dotychczas nienotowanych (Jana Raweckiego, Jakuba Czechowicza). Zaobserwowano również, że większość autorów zdobień rekrutowała się z personelu kancelarii królewskiej. Dekoracje ksiąg Metryki Koronnej mogą zatem stanowić cenne źródło informacji dla badań nad składem osobowym centralnych urzędów państwa.
The set of the Crown Registrum kept at the Central Archives of Historical Records in Warsaw testifies to the registrum system operating in the Polish Crown of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Among 768 books forming the set, 31 volumes (17th – 18th c) have been identified as those featuring painterly or drawing decoration. Most commonly the decoration was placed on title pages of respective volumes, less frequently on pages opening entries for subsequent years. In single cases they are in the form of initials or ornaments within the text, or stemma compositions dedicated to respective sealers.             The analysis of the collected material has allowed to divide it into three categories. The criterion for classification was the identity of the decoration authors, their bonds with the Chancellery, and skill potential. The first group encompasses the majority of decoration created on the registrum pages. The decoration was authored by lower-ranking Chancellery staff who can be provisionally termed ‘artists-chancellists’. At the same time, it was on their initiative that the books were decorated, which may have been a method of pleasing their supervisors. The discussed works reveal little artistry and the use of simple drawing techniques. Among the identified artists there are both individuals recorded in studies on Old-Polish diplomacy: Michał Meger (d. after 4 September 1652), Maciej Ładowski (ca 1640 – ca 1715), as well as individuals previously unrecorded in literature: Jan Rawecki (active in 1642–1645) or Jakub Czechowicz (active in 1659–1669). In this context the analysis of the iconographic source can be seen as a complement to the research into royal Chancellery staffing. It also reveals interesting potential for identifying print models the ‘artists-chancellists’ made reference to. A substantial dependence of the decorated pages on book prints has been noted. The identification of definite  graphic patterns would provide insight into the interests and intellectual scope of the Chancellery staff.             It is frontispieces of two books of Chancellor Andrzej Lipski created in ca 1620 that are classified in the second category of decorations. Their author remains anonymous, however certain analogies with the illuminations by Marcin Proszowski (d. before 1642) suggest that the decoration author was a guild painter. Meanwhile, the initiative to have the decoration executed may be attributed to Royal Secretary Jan Szałapski, an official directly supervising the registrum. He is likely to have commissioned the book decoration in order to emphasize his own importance within the structures of the Chancellery.             The last category encompasses two title pages executed by professional calligraphers focusing on decorating documents and Chancellery books: Ludwik Dagobert (b. 1661, active in the 1680s and 90s) and Wojciech Domański (active in 1742–1769). Both were employees of a central office, yet it is difficult to unequivocally ascertain whether decorating books was their own initiative, or whether it was commissioned by the metricant responsible for the registrum. In the case of Domański it is likely that he served several chancelleries parallelly. It is also known that apart from royal diplomas, he also decorated bishops’ documents.         As for Dagobert, the technique he applied was intriguing, since he printed his decoration from  engraved and etched copper plates. It is, however, likely that he himself did not work out the matrixes he used. Regrettably, the etcher whose services he may have used has not been identified. Nonetheless, a certain affinity has been observed of Dagobert’s decoration to the oeuvre of Charles de la Haye (1641 – after 1707?) and Jerzy Eleuter Szymonowicz-Siemiginowski (ca 1660 – before 13 March 1711).             The analysis of the decoration of the Crown Metrics has proven useful in the study of illuminated documents of Polish kings. Furthermore, the observations made point to the urgent need to thoroughly research into decorated Chancellery books of the Old-Polish period.
Źródło:
Biuletyn Historii Sztuki; 2022, 84, 1; 43-105
0006-3967
2719-4612
Pojawia się w:
Biuletyn Historii Sztuki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kancelaria królewska Andegawenów i Jagiellonów jako środowisko awansu na drodze do arcybiskupstwa gnieźnieńskiego
The Royal Chancellery of the Angevins and Jagiellos As a Circle From Which to be Promoted on Ones Way to Become the Gniezno Archbishop
Autorzy:
Kuźma, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1954992.pdf
Data publikacji:
2000
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
arcybiskupstwo gnieźnieńskie
kancelaria koronna (królewska) /urzędy kancelaryjne
kariera
nominacja
promocja
Gniezno Archbishopric
Crown (King's) chancellery
Chancellery offices
nomination
promotion
Opis:
The Polish Royal Chancellery of the Angevins and Jagiellos (1370-1572), as the central institution of the King's executive power, was the basic circle in which to enter on one's State and Church career that lead, based on a loyal service to the ruler, to high State offices and Church dignities. The monarch, who, starting from the end of the 14th century, had an ever-greater influence on nominations to the bishop's position, in the sixties of the 15th century finally gained advantage over other factors competing for this capacity. His creative role in forming the composition of the Episcopate also included the highest position in the Polish Church – the Metropolitan See in Gniezno where from 1418 the Primates of Poland resided. The Gniezno Archbishop who was only second to the Monarch as far as prestige, wealth and territorial range of his power were concerned, belonged to the close elite of power in Poland at the close of the Middle Ages and at the threshold of the modern times. In the years 1374-1562 the Gniezno Archbishopric was governed by 22 dignitaries of which 18 had worked in the Crown Chancellery at one stage of their career. The later archbishops may be found at all the grades of the Chancellery career. The average time of work in the Chancellery for this group was nearly 17 years. The executive posts (those of Chancellor and Deputy Chancellor) were held by 10 people altogether, that is 55% of the Archbishops who had Chancellery experience. The average length of time of staying at such a post was a little over 9 years. The post of the Secretary was the most often held office: 12 people had held it. At least one third of the latter ones were next promoted to the office of the Great Secretary which was the third most important in the Chancellery hierarchy. The average age at which the Chancellery career was begun was 29, and the average age of promotion to the post of the Chancellor – 38. The average age of appointment to the position of Archbishop was 53 and it is not significantly different from the age of those people who had not had any Chancellery experience. The factor that accelerated promotions was education, especially studies in law crowned with obtaining a degree, accompanied by a magnate family background.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2000, 48, 2; 5-28
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies