Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "kontrowersji" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Tytuł:
POCZĄTEK „KONTROWERSJI ARIAŃSKIEJ”
Autorzy:
Pietras SJ, Henryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640786.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Opis:
THE BEGINNING OF THE „ARIAN CONTROVERSY”We know today that the so called „Arian controversy” began with a certain theological dispute; the dispute was initiated by bishop Alexander and presbyter Arius. The argument concerned the interpretation of a certain fragment of the Holy Scripture. It is not known when exactly the dispute took place, but in all likelihood, it occurred at the beginning of the twenties of the IV century. In the article, the author analyzes the three texts which are fundamental to the above controversy, namely: Arius’ Letter to Alexander in which he presents his own credo, Alexander’s Letter to All the Bishops, from which we learn about the condemnation of Arius and his followers by the synod which had gathered specially for this end in Alexandria, and finally Arius’ Letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia. In his letter, Arius appeals to his followers for support in his dispute with the bishop. In the article, the author draws our attention to the fact that the above controversy could not have been the real reason for calling the Nicene Council as Emperor Constantine tended to ignore its significance which is best borne out by his letter to Alexander and Arius sent in the autumn of A.D. 324 and delivered in person by bishop Hosius of Cordoba. When the emperor had learnt about the fiasco of Hosius’ mission, it was already too late to invite the bishops to Nice for July 325, as they would not have received the invitation in time to be able to travel to Nice and attend the Council.
Źródło:
Studia Religiologica; 2006, 39
0137-2432
2084-4077
Pojawia się w:
Studia Religiologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Formalizacja kontrowersji idealizm-realizm
A Formalisation of the Idealism-Realism Controversy
Autorzy:
Krysztofiak, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/967290.pdf
Data publikacji:
1997-03-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Opis:
This is an attempt of formalizing the language of the idealism-realism debate in terms of possible worlds. Different versions of idealism and realism are presented within the proposed framework. Finally, the proposed formal construction is applied to the interpretation of some philosophical positions that can be found in the history of philosophy.
Źródło:
Filozofia Nauki; 1997, 5, 1; 39-58
1230-6894
2657-5868
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia Nauki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Grzegorz Palamas wobec kontrowersji hezychastycznej
Gregory Palamas in the face of Hesychast Controversy
Autorzy:
Kroczak, Justyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/426713.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Opis:
This paper is an attempt of characteristics concerning theological phenomena called Hesychast Controversy. The presentation includes analysis of history of hesychasm and important facts from Gregory Palamas biography. The main source for research on that field is work of Palamas entitled Triads. Many of the orthodox theologians state that Triads appears as the most important work of orthodox spirituality. In my opinion the problem of fourteenth-century hesychasm and controversy around this spiritual movement, as an interesting field of research, is worth exploring.
Źródło:
Logos i Ethos; 2012, 1(32); 127-139
0867-8308
Pojawia się w:
Logos i Ethos
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metafizyka w filtrze neopozytywizmu. Śladem kontrowersji: Karl Popper - Koło Wiedeńskie
Metaphysics through the Neopositivistic Filter
Autorzy:
Pietruska-Madej, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/965608.pdf
Data publikacji:
1996-06-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Opis:
In Polish philosophical literature, especially didactic, a stereotype of Popper as a neopositivist is suprisingly stubborn. This stereotype does not help in understanding the relation between Popper and Vienna Circle, and the evolution of Popper's own views. Antimetaphysical bias of the neopositivists stands in evident contradiction to Popper's approach, who based his conceptual system on metaphysical ideas. In the article I qrgue that „late” Popper did not conctradict himself from the Vienna period. I show that „Logik der Forschung” is usually read through the neopositivistic filter, and that is why Popper's statements are so often misinterpreted.
Źródło:
Filozofia Nauki; 1996, 4, 2; 95-104
1230-6894
2657-5868
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia Nauki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Patenty na drugie medyczne zastosowanie – niekończąca się historia wątpliwości i kontrowersji
Autorzy:
Żakowska-Henzler, Helena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788243.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-03-06
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
ochrona patentowa
drugie medyczne zastosowanie
patent protection
second medical use
Opis:
The notion of “second or further medical use” encompasses inventions whose the subject-matter is new medical use of a known product (substance). It means that the product as such, as well as its other medical use, are a part of the state-of-the-art. In our times patent protection of this kind of inventions is common but the concept and model of this protection are differentiated. They mainly depend on whether it is allowed or banned to patent medical procedures (medical methods). The article concerns the patent protection of the second medical use under European patent system, i.e. the system based on EPC and on national patent systems of the countries which are the parties to this Convention. In all these systems, patenting medical methods is banned. The aim of the article is to present the process of establishing the model of patent protection of the second medical use in these systems, and to discuss some of the main hesitations and controversies resulting from this model. They mainly concern the question of compliance of this model with the rules and concepts of patent protection which until recently seemed indisputable.The subject matter and purpose of this kind of inventions evoked also additional questions and problems. In particular, the discrepancy between the patent protection of these inventions and the system of reimbursement of pharmaceuticals, which is common in the countries-EPC parties, is clearly visible. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the apparent difficulties in protecting such patents illustrate the negative consequences of treating legal instruments as tools for achieving specific objectives, but operating in a legal and economic vacuum.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2017, 4 (212); 7-36
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies