- Tytuł:
- Comparison of the O-arm and C-arm guided pedicle screws placement
- Autorzy:
-
Krakowiak, Mateusz
Sokal, Paweł
Rusinek, Marcin
Rudaś, Marcin - Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/25715742.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2022-11-25
- Wydawca:
- Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
- Tematy:
-
spine surgery
transpedicular screws
minimally invasice surgery
O-arm
C-arm - Opis:
- Background Transpedicular screw placement remains the gold standard technique for destabilization of the lumbar spine. Material and methods This is a retrospective study that analyzes patients that underwent the spinal stabilization surgical procedure. We compared results from two independent neurosurgical centers. At the turn of years 2012-2015, O-arm and StealthStation neuronavigation system was used for implantation of transpedicular screws. In 2018 to 2020 transcutaneous pedicle screw placement procedure was performed using standard C-arm device. Results In 208 procedures performed with the O-arm device, the accuracy of the positioning of the screws was 98.08 %. Screw repositioning was necessary in 1.92 % of all cases. In 30 procedures that were performed using the C-arm, the accuracy of the screws was 86.7% and the screw reposition procedure accounted for 10% (in one case crews were not replaced due to clinical sequelae). Conclusions Our data show that the spinal fusion with the O-arm tool has more accuracy, thus might be more indicated in procedures that require minimally invasive spinal stabilization.
- Źródło:
-
European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine; 2022, 5, 2; 31-36
2657-3148
2657-3156 - Pojawia się w:
- European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł