Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "methodology of art history" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9
Tytuł:
Turning Points, Crises, Evolutions
Autorzy:
Bałus, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909538.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
turning point
crisis
evolution
kairos
methodology of art history
Opis:
When Aristotle asked at what particular moment we can say that an army is fleeing, which is certainly not when individual soldiers start leaving the battlefield, he formulated a problem that is important also for today’s art history: are there any moments in the history of art that can be called turning points? In individual artistic careers, such points are related to crises, allowing the artist to overcome an impasse and find a way toward reaching a goal. Quite often, such a turn occurs suddenly, at some particular moment which ancient Greeks called the kairos. The changes in art approached en bloc also happen thanks to the background of values and some goal of artistic creation. A turning point may imply overcoming a crisis or a period of decline and decadence – always a state of affairs defined in negative terms. A separate case is definitely a political decree that triggers off a change, which implies violence committed on culture. Finally, in academic art history a turning point may be related not only with a crisis, but also with evolution. It’s perception is relative, but because of that the history of art can be rewritten.  
Źródło:
Artium Quaestiones; 2019, 30; 21-35
0239-202X
Pojawia się w:
Artium Quaestiones
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przełomy, kryzysy, ewolucje
Autorzy:
Bałus, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909540.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
turning point
crisis
evolution
kairos
methodology of art history
Opis:
When Aristotle asked at what particular moment we can say that an army is fleeing, which is certainly not when individual soldiers start leaving the battlefield, he formulated a problem that is important also for today’s art history: are there any moments in the history of art that can be called turning points? In individual artistic careers, such points are related to crises, allowing the artist to overcome an impasse and find a way toward reaching a goal. Quite often, such a turn occurs suddenly, at some particular moment which ancient Greeks called the kairos. The changes in art approached en bloc also happen thanks to the background of values and some goal of artistic creation. A turning point may imply overcoming a crisis or a period of decline and decadence – always a state of affairs defined in negative terms. A separate case is definitely a political decree that triggers off a change, which implies violence committed on culture. Finally, in academic art history a turning point may be related not only with a crisis, but also with evolution. It’s perception is relative, but because of that the history of art can be rewritten. 
Źródło:
Artium Quaestiones; 2019, 30; 323-337
0239-202X
Pojawia się w:
Artium Quaestiones
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Facing the Work of Art. Memories of My Student Years
Autorzy:
Skubiszewski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909539.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
University of Poznań – art history
University of Poitiers – art history
methodology of art history
art history around 1950
Opis:
The present essay includes the author’s memories of his university studies and the intellectual formation that he received as a student of art history at the University of Poznań in 1949-1954. His first professor who opened to him the door to art history and exerted on him a strong intellectual influence, was Szczęsny Dettloff, a disciple of Heinrich Wölfflin in Munich and Max Dvořák in Vienna. Dettloff taught his students that the foundation of studying art in history is the study of the form of an individual artwork He believed that without a proper analysis of form it is impossible to construct appropriate series of the works of art and specify their position in the culture of the times of their origin. Similar sensitivity to form and the understanding of its significance for the art historian’s work were represented by two other professors important for the author, both educated by Dettloff already before World War II: Gwido Chmarzyński and Zdzisław Kępiński. When in 1957-1968 the author was a postgraduate student in the Centre d’Études Supérieures de Civilisation Médiévale at the University of Poitiers (CÉSCM), it turned out that the local methodological tradition was similar to what he had learned in Poznań before. The CÉSCM was founded as a multidisciplinary institute for the study of the Middle Ages, combining history, art history, literary history, and the history of ideas. It was important that one of them could shed light on an object studied by another, but each of them, including art history, kept its material and methodological identity. In the French tradition, art history had an “autonomous” status, focusing on artistic creation as a special sphere of human activity. That idea influenced also quite strongly the study of medieval architecture, originated in the early 19th century by Arcisse de Caumont, and continued until today by many generations of French scholars. What is characteristic of their research is meticulous analysis of form, articulated with a precise, detailed, and comprehensive specialist vocabulary. The lectures of French scholars on medieval architecture, which the author attended in Paris and Poitiers, taught him precision in the analysis of the artwork’s structure and its components, as well as responsibility for every single statement made on art. For a young art historian who did not specialize in architecture but in representational arts, that French experience was a lesson of methodological rigor necessary in the intellectual pursuits of the humanities scholar.
Źródło:
Artium Quaestiones; 2019, 30; 7-20
0239-202X
Pojawia się w:
Artium Quaestiones
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przed dziełem sztuki. Wspomnienia ze studiów
Autorzy:
Skubiszewski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909541.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
University of Poznań – art history
University of Poitiers – art history
methodology of art history
art history around 1950
Opis:
The present essay includes the author’s memories of his university studies and the intellectual formation that he received as a student of art history at the University of Poznań in 1949-1954. His first professor who opened to him the door to art history and exerted on him a strong intellectual influence, was Szczęsny Dettloff, a disciple of Heinrich Wölfflin in Munich and Max Dvořák in Vienna. Dettloff taught his students that the foundation of studying art in history is the study of the form of an individual artwork He believed that without a proper analysis of form it is impossible to construct appropriate series of the works of art and specify their position in the culture of the times of their origin. Similar sensitivity to form and the understanding of its significance for the art historian’s work were represented by two other professors important for the author, both educated by Dettloff already before World War II: Gwido Chmarzyński and Zdzisław Kępiński. When in 1957–1968 the author was a postgraduate student in the Centre d’Études Supérieures de Civilisation Médiévale at the University of Poitiers (CÉSCM), it turned out that the local methodological tradition was similar to what he had learned in Poznań before. The CÉSCM was founded as a multidisciplinary institute for the study of the Middle Ages, combining history, art history, literary history, and the history of ideas. It was important that one of them could shed light on an object studied by another, but each of them, including art history, kept its material and methodological identity. In the French tradition, art history had an “autonomous” status, focusing on artistic creation as a special sphere of human activity. That idea influenced also quite strongly the study of medieval architecture, originated in the early 19th century by Arcisse de Caumont, and continued until today by many generations of French scholars. What is characteristic of their research is meticulous analysis of form, articulated with a precise, detailed, and comprehensive specialist vocabulary. The lectures of French scholars on medieval architecture, which the author attended in Paris and Poitiers, taught him precision in the analysis of the artwork’s structure and its components, as well as responsibility for every single statement made on art. For a young art historian who did not specialize in architecture but in representational arts, that French experience was a lesson of methodological rigor necessary in the intellectual pursuits of the humanities scholar. 
Źródło:
Artium Quaestiones; 2019, 30; 307-321
0239-202X
Pojawia się w:
Artium Quaestiones
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Widzenie ześrodkowane, ogląd, epopteia. O twórczości naukowej Wiesława Juszczaka
Concentrated Vision, Perception, Epopteia. On the Scholarly Output of Wiesław Juszczak
Autorzy:
Kasperowicz, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/15596841.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Sztuki PAN
Tematy:
Wiesław Juszczak (1932–2021)
art theory
methodology of art history
dilemmas of historical cognition
interpretation of the past
imagination
ecphrasis
myth
origins of artistic creativity
Romanticism
post-Impressionism
Modernism
teoria sztuki i metodologia historii sztuki
dylematy poznania historycznego
interpretacja przeszłości
wyobraźnia
ekfraza
mit
geneza twórczości artystycznej
romantyzm
postimpresjonizm
modernizm
Opis:
W naukowej twórczości Wiesława Juszczaka, bardzo zróżnicowanej pod względem tematycznym, ale także konceptualnego ujęcia konkretnych problemów, można jednak dostrzec stałe wątki, powracanie do fundamentalnych problemów: roli wyobraźni w poznaniu historycznym i tworzeniu artystycznym, genezy sztuki i jej poznawczych dążeń, znaczenia relacji pomiędzy słowem a obrazem (w ekfrazie, w krytyce artystycznej). Problemy te Juszczak podejmował czy to artykułach o metodologicznym charakterze, czy to w niezrównanych interpretacjach poszczególnych dzieł i artystów, czy to – z czasem coraz częściej – w tekstach – esejach o charakterze filozoficznych rozważań. Dokonania naukowe Profesora pozwalają zobaczyć w nim historyka sztuki i filozofa sztuki, cechującego się oryginalnością myśli i mistrzowską formą jej wyrazu, świetnego znawcy sztuki romantyzmu i symbolizmu europejskiego, niestrudzonego poszukiwacza początków tworzenia w kulturze archaicznej Grecji, humanisty godnego tego miana w najwyższym znaczeniu.
The scholarly output of Wiesław Juszczak (1932–2021) is very diverse with regard to both the range of topics and the conceptual approaches to particular issues; yet it is possible to discern in it certain permanent themes, a desire to revisit fundamental problems, such as the role of the imagination in historical cognition and artistic creativity, the origins of art and of its cognitive pursuits, or the significance of the relationship between the word and the image (in ecphrasis, in art criticism). Those issues he approached sometimes in articles of a methodological nature, sometimes in incomparable interpretations of particular artworks and artists, and sometimes – with time, increasingly frequently – in essayistic texts that had the quality of philosophical deliberations. Wiesław Juszczak’s scholarly achievements allow us to see him as a historian and at the same time a philosopher of art, endowed with an originality of thought and a masterful form of its expression, an exceptional authority on the art of European Romanticism and Symbolism, a tireless hunter for the beginnings of artistic creation in the culture of archaic Greece, and a humanist worthy of this name in the highest degree.
Źródło:
Biuletyn Historii Sztuki; 2022, 84, 4; 689-714
0006-3967
2719-4612
Pojawia się w:
Biuletyn Historii Sztuki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Historia sztuki w polu metodologii. Aktualne problemy i wyzwania
Art History in the Field of Methodology. Current Problems and Challenges
Autorzy:
Czekalski, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32352273.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
art history
scientific knowledge
methodology
theory
philosophy of science
structuralism
Opis:
At the end of the 20th century, the theory of art history shifted from the area of methodology understood as a normative field of the philosophy of science to the area of the social practice of constructing knowledge. The term “art historical methodology” itself became trivialized when its meaning was detached from the horizon of epistemology and became extremely inclusive, encompassing all methods practised in the discipline, with a method being considered to be the use of any theory as a tool of interpretation. As a consequence, the basic problem of scientific methodology, which is the critical assessment of explanatory and interpretive theories due to the value of their justification, is not addressed in the self-reflection of contemporary art history. The retreat from the rigors of methodology was related to the reception of structuralism, initiated by Ernst Gombrich in the book Art and Illusion. Popper’s model of situational logic as a method of historical explanation of works of art was transformed into a structuralist model, referring to constant rules of pictorial representation, symbolization and communication. Michael Fried and Norman Bryson formulated their own theories of invariant rules defining the necessary initial conditions for the formation and reception of pictures, so that individual works could be interpreted in terms of these rules and, as a result, confirm the general theory, which created a vicious circle. Structuralist theories did not function as hypotheses requiring critical testing, but as interpretive codes that served to read each work of art within their own conceptual system. The next step in the process of the reception of structuralism was the development of theories defining general rules that would govern the discursive practice of art history, and the detection of which at the basis of this practice would discredit or invalidate its epistemological dimension. Hayden White’s narrativism was the theory that historical discourse is subject to narrative conventions, not to the laws of logic and the rigors of methodology that serve to limit the pool of alternative explanations or interpretations. This theory was intended to justify the pluralism of equal versions of history as a politically correct idea, appropriate for a “democratic” model of knowledge. Theorists developing White’s theses in the field of art history claimed that the discursive practice of this discipline was not governed by methodological rules but by political motivations (Keith Moxey) or aesthetic principles of artwriting (David Carrier). After the phase of open denial of the dependence of the art history discourse on methodology, the theory of the discipline turned into an analysis of techniques for building this discourse, which no longer included methodological issues, as in James Elkins’ book Our Beautiful, Dry, and Distant Texts. A critical review of theories separating art history from methodology leads to the conclusion that they are untenable. It is impossible to maintain the scientific status of our discipline without respecting the principles of methodology founded in the contemporary philosophy of science.
Źródło:
Artium Quaestiones; 2023, 34; 293-336
0239-202X
Pojawia się w:
Artium Quaestiones
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Badania nad sztuką średniowieczną w Polsce po roku 1989
Research on Medieval Art in Poland after 1989
Studien zur mittelalterlichen Kunst in Polen nach 1989
Autorzy:
Horzela, Dobrosława
Walczak, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/666110.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Geschichte der Kunstgeschichte
Mittelalterforschung
Methodologie der Kunstgeschichte
Mittel- und Osteuropa
1989
the history of art history
medieval studies
art history methodology
Central and Eastern Europe
Opis:
The geopolitical changes in Central and Eastern Europe which began in 1989 influenced also changes in the status of the field of history. In an attempt to change the perception of the field, a turn to the Middle Ages could be observed, as the times of prosperity in the Kingdoms of Bohemia, Hungary and Poland could serve as an excellent foundation for building a national identity. Thus, the authors propose a complex picture of historically and artistically oriented Medieval Studies in Poland against the backdrop of the situation in Central and Eastern Eu‑ rope, trying to ascertain how and to what extent the events of 1989 influenced the status and development of the discipline. Thirty years after the Yalta Conference, what can be observed is a gradual process of opening the discipline onto new methodologies and technological changes, as well as realizing its capabilities, which were hitherto suppressed by the oppressive political system. The natural generational change contributes to solidifying practices which the youngest generation of art historians takes for granted. However, the influences of inertia, deeply-rooted complexes and post-mortem victory of communist propaganda cannot be omitted. For the ma‑ jority of academic centers in Poland, it is virtually paradigmatic to talk about art in a very nar‑ row geographical context, accompanied by the tendency to isolate phenomena with clear ties to the European context. Too often is art in Poland seen as an expression and a consequence of its peripheral status, while almost overlooking the uniqueness and originality of many artistic phenomena. Moreover, a vision of Poland as a homogenous entity in its contemporary borders persists in the subconscious of the society, which constitutes a serious hindrance in the spread‑ ing of knowledge and is often used as a tool in historical politics. In addition, it should be noted that, unfortunately, many good practices, such as the obligation of familiarity with the entirety of the literature on the subject, begin to disappear, perhaps in connection with the “publish or perish” mentality and the need to fulfill the obligations towards the academic institution. Para‑ doxically, then, the political upheaval of 1989 brought in the discipline of art history, as well as the field of humanities as a whole, both positive as well as detrimental changes.
Źródło:
Średniowiecze Polskie i Powszechne; 2019, 11; 262-297
2080-492X
2353-9720
Pojawia się w:
Średniowiecze Polskie i Powszechne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Between Practice and Theory. Comments on the Specificity of Art History and Art Education in Poland and Ukraine
Między praktyką a teorią. Uwagi o edukacji artystycznej i z zakresu historii sztuki w polsce i na Ukrainie
Autorzy:
Gryglewski, Piotr
Chernyshev, Denys
Kashchenko, Oleksandr
Shilo, Alexander
Ivashko, Yuliа
Dmytrenko, Andrii
Ivashko, Oleksandr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2041826.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-11-25
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
art theory
artistic education
teaching methodology
history of art
Łódź
Kiev
teoria sztuki
edukacja artystyczna
metodologia nauczania
historia sztuki
Kijów
Opis:
Changes taking place in the area of artistic practice happen in parallel with transformations in the social area. Artistic and architectural activity coexists with theoretical reflection in the field of art. Changes of this kind also translate into assumptions that guide research in the area of art history. Contemporary art is characterized by dynamic changes and re-evaluations, in which practice and theory are intertwined. The nature of these phenomena is also a challenge on the level of academic education dealing with the subject of art, architecture and art history. The specificity of the analyzed phenomena makes it necessary to combine theoretical knowledge with broadly understood practice in this process. The aesthetic premises of contemporary art are widely used in the process of artistic education. An example of this can be activities undertaken by the Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture (KNUCA). Successive lecturers at this university have consistently combined theory with creative practice in the educational process. These premises have found application in architectural design that uses plastic elements. The ties between theory and practice are also inherently inscribed in the history of the history of art department at the University of Lodz. It was largely influenced by the specificity of Łódź as an artistic center in which, very early, before World War II, there was an interest in modern art at the level of theory, practice and museology. This attitude was also close to the academic activity of prof. G. Sztabiński who successfully combined in-depth aesthetic and theoretical reflections with the experiences of an artistic practitioner
Przemiany zachodzące w obszarze praktyki artystycznej dokonują się równolegle z przekształceniami w obszarze społecznym. Plastyczna i architektoniczna aktywność współistnieje z refleksją teoretyczną z zakresu sztuki. Zmiany tego rodzaju przekładają się również na założenia jakimi kierują się badania z obszarów historii sztuki. Współczesna sztuka charakteryzuje się dynamicznymi przemianami i przewartościowaniami, w których przeplata się praktyka i teoria. Charakter tych zjawisk jest wyzwaniem również na poziomie edukacji akademickiej podejmującej tematykę sztuki, architektury czy historii sztuki. Specyfika analizowanych zjawisk wpływa na konieczność łączenia w tym procesie wiedzy teoretycznej z szeroko pojmowaną praktyką. Estetyczne założenia sztuki współczesnej są szeroko wykorzystywane w procesie edukacji artystycznej. Przykładem tego mogą być działania podejmowane w ramach Kijowskiego Narodowego Uniwersytetu Budownictwa i Architektury (KNUCA, Kyiv Civil Engineering Institute). Kolejni wykładowcy tej uczelni konsekwentnie w procesie edukacyjnym łączyli założenia teoretyczne z praktyką twórczą. Założenia te znalazły zastosowanie w projektowaniu architektonicznym, wykorzystującym elementy plastyczne. Związki teorii i praktyki są immanentnie wpisane również w dzieje historii sztuki na Uniwersytecie Łódzkim. Duży wpływ na to miała specyfika łódzkiego ośrodka, w którym bardzo wcześnie, już przed II wojną światową, pojawiło się zainteresowanie sztuka nowoczesną, na poziomie teorii, praktyki i muzealnictwa. Taka postawa była też bliska aktywności akademickiej prof. G. Sztabińskiego, który pogłębione refleksje estetyczno-teoretyczne w udany sposób łączy z doświadczeniami artysty praktyka.
Źródło:
Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts; 2021, 23; 168-190
1641-9278
Pojawia się w:
Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prolegomena do studiów nad wojną, konfliktem i ładem międzynarodowym
Prolegomena to the Studies into the War, Conflict and International Order
Autorzy:
Komorowski, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1601621.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
war
military art
geopolitical analysis
philosophical reflection
methodology of history
system logic
logic of defining
international order
peace
fight
conflict
logika systemów
metodologia historii
refleksja filozoficzna
analiza geopolityczna
logika definiowania
ład międzynarodowy
pokój
walka
konflikt
wojna
sztuka wojenna
Opis:
Wprowadzenie wyjaśniające do tematu wojen i konfliktów zbrojnych jako czynników kształtujących ład międzynarodowy odnosi się do zasadniczej terminologii i problematyki, z uwzględnieniem ich przedmiotu, zakresu znaczeniowego i kontekstu narracyjnego. Dotyczy to takich zjawisk i faktów historycznych jak wojna, konflikt, sztuka wojenna, walka, pokój, ład międzynarodowy, przełomy i cykle hegemoniczno/geopolityczne, które są najczęściej definiowane i przyjmowane przez pryzmat poszczególnych dyscyplin naukowych, m.in. historii, socjologii, prawa, politologii, stosunków międzynarodowych i wojskowości. Zatem nie stanowią domeny doświadczeń stricte militarnych. Odwieczna wykładnia określa bowiem wojnę jako narzędzie i środek do osiągnięcia politycznego celu jakim jest pożądany pokój. Konflikty międzynarodowe zaś występują tu głównie nie jako podrzędne wobec wojny starcia militarne, a jako kategorie niezgodności między stronami dążącymi do dominacji religijnej, etnicznej, gospodarczej, społecznej itp. Postrzeganie zjawiska pokoju zdeterminowane kantowskim "wiecznym pokojem" należałoby natomiast interpretować jako okresy geopolityczne/hegemoniczne, wyznaczane osiągnięciami militarnymi dla utrzymania lub zdobycia dominacji (władzy, panowania).
An introduction explaining the character of wars and armed conflicts as factors shaping the international order refers to the basic terminology and the main issues, including their subject, their scope of meaning and their narrative context. It deals with such phenomena and historical facts as war, conflict, military art, fight, peace, international order, turning points, and geopolitical/hegemonic cycles. They are most frequently defined and accepted from the angle of particular scientific disciplines, among other things history, sociology, law, political science, international relations, and military science. As a result, they do not fall only into the domain of military questions. An old interpretation of war is that it is a tool and means to achieve the political aim, which is peace. International conflicts are interpreted here not as military confrontations subordinate to war, but as categories of incompatibility between the sides that aspire to a dominance of some type: religious, ethnic, economic, social, and the like. On the other hand, the perception of the phenomenon of peace determined by Kant’s perpetual peace should be interpreted as political/hegemonic periods, marked by military achievements to maintain or acquire dominance (of power).
Źródło:
Studia Maritima; 2016, 29; 5-21
0137-3587
2353-303X
Pojawia się w:
Studia Maritima
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies