Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Marcus Porcius Cato" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
„Nec Hercules contra plures”. Literacki aspekt Liwiańskiej debaty nad zniesieniem lex Oppia (AUC 34, 1-8)
“Nec Hercules contra plures”: The Literary Aspect of the Debate for Repeal of the Lex Oppia in the Ab Urbe Condita (34, 1-8) by Livy
Autorzy:
Dziuba, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2119687.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Liwiusz
historiografia
Marek Porcjusz Katon
kobieta
Lex Oppia
mowa
Livy
historiography
Marcus Porcius Cato
woman
speech
Opis:
One of the most essential features of Roman historiography is the rhetoric. Historians differently understood the most renowned law in history which was expressed by Cicero in „De legibus I, V”: opus oratorium maxime. The extent and the way of applying rhetorical elements in a text depended on writer’s skills and literature fashion of the epoch. Livy was one of the most eminent rhetors in the times of August. Thus, it is not astonishing that rhetorical device was used. Among another thing, it contained the agon of politicians. One of them is the subject of a consideration in this article. In such dispute, which was in fact a verbal duel, two politicians took part – consul Marcus Porcius Cato and not known tribune Lucius Valerius. The subject of contestation was abolition of the law Lex Oppia which was enacted in 215 BC during the Second Punic War. This act in a reasonably restrictive way limited the women’s expenses on luxury goods. Livy’s text regarding the debate is the oldest and the most extensive work concerning the course of agon. On the other hand , it is only known that such debate took place and may be it was connected with a serious social discussion and also that Cato took part in it. Livy, who gave the debate attention in first eight chapters of XXXIVth book also made from it well-elaborated literary episode in rhetorical sense. In the beginning and in the end of the work historian described the situation which took place on the streets of Rome – procession of courageously and unconventionally behaving women. In centre of episode there was oratorical duel between politicians. The figure of Cato was created as a model of conservative politician, the defender of mores maiores, who by means of words was fighting with willfulness of women. Lucius Valerius is a conciliatory politician whose arguments are similar to the women’s methods of persuasion. Livy withstand the feminine way of speaking used by Valerius with Cato’s military vocabulary. Since it is known with no doubt that the Cato’s speech is a historians display of rhetorical abilities. Furthermore, their substantial value ought to be analyzed in the context of moral politics of August not as a republic narration.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2011, 58-59, 3; 73-87
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Apologia sroki albo August i dziedzictwo optymatów [Rec. The Alternative Augustan Age, eds. Kit Morrell, Josiah Osgood, Kathryn Welch, New York 2019]
Apology for the Magpie, or Augustus and the Legacy of the Optimates [Rev. The Alternative Augustan Age, eds. Kit Morrell, Josiah Osgood, Kathryn Welch, New York 2019]
Autorzy:
Jurkowski, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2058098.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
August
republika
L. Korneliusz Sulla
Gn. Pompejusz Wielki
M. Porcjusz Katon
Augustus
republic
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Gnaeus Pompeius the Great
Marcus Porcius Cato
Opis:
Przedmiotem artykułu recenzyjnego jest praca zbiorowa The Alternative Augustan Age. Jej autorzy intencjonalnie nie koncentrują narracji na samym Auguście, zwracając uwagę m.in. na republikańską metrykę części inicjatyw cesarza. Te, w których zdawał się on podążać śladami wytyczonymi przez Sullę, Pompejusza i Katona Utyceńskiego, omówili K. Morrell i P. Hay. Choć nie wszystkie przywołane przez badaczy analogie znajdują równie solidne oparcie w źródłach, en masse rzucają interesujące światło na kwestię stosunku Augusta do tradycji republiki.
This article presents the basic assumptions and theses of the collection of essays The Alternative Augustan Age (ed. K. Morrell, J. Osgood, K. Welch, New York 2019). This book is a post-conference publication; the conference papers, according to the intention of the organisers, are concerning the so-called the Age of Augustus and not the princeps directly. Moving away from the narrative focus on Augustus’s actions in literary sources is the most characteristic feature of the book. When discussing its content, Paul Hay’s and Kit Morrell’s articles have been discussed most copiously. These scholars draw attention to the analogies between some of Augustus’s initiatives and the ideas and reforms with which the three politicians associated with the faction of the optimates, Lucius Cornelius Sulla, Gnaeus Pompeius the Great and Marcus Porcius Cato came up towards the end of the republic. According to the author of this article, not all the similarities identified by those researchers find equally robust support in the sources. Nevertheless, their research sheds new light on the problem of Augustus’s relationship to the traditions of the republic.
Źródło:
Wieki Stare i Nowe; 2021, 16, 21; 191-204
1899-1556
2353-9739
Pojawia się w:
Wieki Stare i Nowe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies