Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "de Brito, Silveira" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    O problema de Deus segundo Cunha Seixas: A Filosofia e a Ciência no Pantiteísmo
    Autorzy:
    de Araújo, Maria Amélia
    de Brito, Silveira
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2158731.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
    Tematy:
    God
    Cunha Seixas
    Pantiteism
    Opis:
    According to Cunha Seixas pantheism focuses on the essential principle that God is all and in all things. The importance of three laws is also emphasized, that is: harmony, revelation and being. Finally, the authors note that in science pantheistic laws include all reality.
    Źródło:
    Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2012, 2(4); 149-166
    1730-0266
    Pojawia się w:
    Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A Humanização em saúde: entre a virtude e o dever segundo Ricoeur
    Health Humanization between the virtue and the duty according to Ricoeur
    Autorzy:
    Silveira de Brito, José Henrique
    Borges de Meneses, Ramiro Délio
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2151292.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
    Tematy:
    Humanizing Health
    Paul Ricoeur
    justice
    morals
    ethics
    and care
    Opis:
    Following the thought of Ricoeur, humanization of health lies between virtue and duty. The first observation is to emphasize the effort. Ricoeur focuses the articulation that the author makes the teleological tradition, embodied especially in Aristotle, with the deontological tradition, with attention mainly Kant. Noting that each tradition has its share of truth, since the moral life is looking good and obedience to rules, Paul Ricoeur seeks to articulate the two traditions: the search for the good life must pass the scrutiny of the rules, that the tradition cultural consecrated. In this articulation, the first set as a criterion of the moral demand of the good, the good life, the life fulfilled life. Meanwhile, Ricoeur gives primacy to the Aristotelian tradition.
    Źródło:
    Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2016, 4(17); 87-99
    1730-0266
    Pojawia się w:
    Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O Homo Viator na parábola do Bom Samaritano (Lc 10,25-37): pela responsabilidade anárquica
    The Homo Viator in the parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10: 25-37): for anarchic responsibility
    Autorzy:
    Silveira de Brito, José Henrique
    Borges de Meneses, Ramiro Délio
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2157842.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
    Tematy:
    Jesus Christ
    Homo Viator
    theology
    philosophy
    Opis:
    According to Lévinas, the Face is the most expressive part of the Other. And it is in the Face E. Lévinas begins by considering that the Other reveals itself as the “distant”, where transcendence is ensured, then, the “philosopher of the Other”, to accept the Other as the neighbor, affirming transcendence here. The Other is the one I meet face to face (facie ad faciem). The Other has a similarity to the “Un-valid”, on the way, in the street, (street man) of the parable of the Good Samaritan. It is the one who is helpless (Other) in the street and that the encounter in the condition of needy, marginalized and treated by brother. that the other manifests as truly Another. It seems evident in the “philosophy of the Other” that it manifests itself in the Face. Who’s the other one? But, according to Levinas, transcendence would not be possible when the Other was initially the similar or the next. The effort of Lévinas that goes beyond considering the other just as the friend or relative. The Other arrives, confronts me with “flip-flops,” facing me, as if he has all the rights to me, facing me regardless of my will or my adhesion to him. Inevitably, the Other presents me hostile, my friend, my teacher, my student, through my Idea of Infinity. It could be said that the Other (the next) is the man of the street, the man of the road (helpless), who passes, the first one that arrives. The next as another, “says Lévinas,” does not allow himself to be preceded by any forerunner who would describe or announce his silhouette. Similarly, in the parable of the Good Samaritan, the Other is the man of the road half-living (Jesus Christ), who was the first to be present because of the robbers (Luke 10:30). The Other is the “halfdead” on the side of the road of life. The Other is the first to appear, which falls into the hands of the robbers. The Other is the first to arrive. According to the parable of the Good Samaritan, the first who came, from the way from Jerusalem to Jericho, was the Other (represented symbolically in Jesus Christ).
    Źródło:
    Społeczeństwo i Edukacja. Międzynarodowe Studia Humanistyczne; 2016, 4(23); 95-142
    1898-0171
    Pojawia się w:
    Społeczeństwo i Edukacja. Międzynarodowe Studia Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O sujeito moral: pelas implicações e fundamentos
    Autorzy:
    Silveira de Brito, José Henrique
    Borges de Meneses, Ramiro Delio
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2158635.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
    Tematy:
    morality
    basis
    implications
    Opis:
    Morality has a place in human action. There must be present knowledge, freedom and purpose, hence the importance of analysis and moral responsibility and wisdom in practice.
    Źródło:
    Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2012, 2(4); 167-186
    1730-0266
    Pojawia się w:
    Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A Humanização em saúde:entre a virtude e o dever segundo Ricoeur
    Autorzy:
    Borges de Meneses, Ramiro Délio
    Silveira De Brito, José Henrique
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131505.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
    Tematy:
    Humanizing Health
    Paul Ricoeur
    justice
    morals
    ethics
    and care
    Opis:
    Following the thought of Ricoeur, humanization of health lies between virtue and duty. The first observation is to emphasize the effort. Ricoeur focuses the articulation that the author makes the teleological tradition, embodied especially in Aristotle, with the deontological tradition, with attention mainly Kant. Noting that each tradition has its share of truth, since the moral life is looking good and obedience to rules, Paul Ricoeur seeks to articulate the two traditions: the search for the good life must pass the scrutiny of the rules, that the tradition cultural consecrated. In this articulation, the first set as a criterion of the moral demand of the good, the good life, the life fulfilled life. Meanwhile, Ricoeur gives primacy to the Aristotelian tradition
    Źródło:
    Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2015, 3(18); 13-25
    1898-8431
    Pojawia się w:
    Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Investigadores do Centro de Estudos Filosóficos da Faculdade de Filosofia de Braga da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
    Autorzy:
    Silveira de Brito, José Henrique
    Borges de Meneses, Ramiro Délio Borges de Meneses
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2158821.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
    Tematy:
    philosophy
    Opis:
    E. Lévinas begins by considering that the Other reveals itself as the “distant”, where transcendence is ensured, then, the “philosopher of the Other”, to accept the Other as the next, affirming here transcendence. The Other is the one I meet - face to face - (facie ad faciem). The Other has a similarity with the “Un-valid”, on the way, in the street, (street man) of the parable of the Good Samaritan. It is the one who is helpless (Other) on the street and that the meeting in need, marginalized and treated by brother. According to Lévinas, the Face is the most expressive part of the Other. And it is in the Face that the other manifests as truly Another. It seems evident in the “philosophy of the Other” that it manifests itself in the Face. Who’s the other one? But, according to Levinas, transcendence would not be possible when the Other was initially the similar or the next. The effort of Lévinas that goes beyond considering the other just as the friend or relative. The Other arrives, confronts me with the “flip-flops,” facing me, as if he has all the rights to me, facing me regardless of my will or my adhesion to him. Inevitably, the Other presents me hostile, my friend, my teacher, my student, through my Idea of Infinity. It could be said that the Other (the next) is the man of the street, the man of the road (helpless), who passes, the first that arrives. The next as another, “says Lévinas,” does not allow himself to be preceded by any forerunner who would describe or announce his silhouette. Similarly, in the parable of the Good Samaritan, the Other is the man of the road - half-alive - (Jesus Christ), who was the first to be present because of the robbers (Luke 10:30). The Other is the “half-dead” on the side of the road of life. The Other is the first to appear, which falls into the hands of the robbers. The Other is the first to arrive. According to the parable of the Good Samaritan, the first who arrived, from the way from Jerusalem to Jericho, was the Other (represented symbolically in Jesus Christ).
    Źródło:
    Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2015, 4(13); 35-82
    1730-0266
    Pojawia się w:
    Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies