Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "sobór" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Tytuł:
Sobór w Konstancji wobec monarchii polsko-litewskiej
Autorzy:
Graff, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640467.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
sobór w Konstancji, monarchia jagiellońska, proces doktrynalny i prawny, chrystianizacja Żmudzi, unia kościelna
Opis:
The Council of Constance and its attitude towards the Polish-Lithuanian monarchy In the article the involvement of the delegation of the Kingdom of Poland in the work of the Council of Constance (1414–1418) was assessed. The analysis was carried out chiefly from the point of view of the key issues in the external policy of the Jagiellon monarchy; the analysis also focused on the reactions of the participants of the Council to the activities of the Polish delegation. Although the author agrees with the opinions that the Polish Kingdom did achieve an image success in Constance, yet he is of the opinion that the success played a secondary role as regards real-life events which took place in Central Europe; he also thinks that the success tends to be exagerated by Polish historiography. Apart from a narrow group of intellectuals, the contention between Poland and the Teutonic Order was of little interest to the Council participants, and hence he comes to the conclusion that military activities were a much more effective weapon in the defense of Polish-Lithuanian interests.Although without a doubt, Jagiello and Witold overestimated the significance of the Council in respect of solving the conflict with the Teutonic Order, yet they achieved a tangible success which consisted in a change of perception of their states as well as subjects by the contemporary European elites. Therefore, the author puts forward a hypothesis that the mission of the delegation of the Ja-giellon monarchy to the Council of Constance was one of those episodes in the history of Poland and Lithuania, which constitutes a permanent legacy of common historical identity.
Źródło:
Prace Historyczne; 2014, 141, 2
0083-4351
Pojawia się w:
Prace Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sobór chalcedoński. Kontekst historyczny, teologiczny, następstwa
The council of Chalcedon: its theological and historical context and its consequences
Autorzy:
Grzywaczewski, Józef
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613355.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
sobór chalcedoński
Logos
The council of Chalcedon
Opis:
The article presents the Council of Chalcedon; its theological and historical context and its consequences. The author starts with the theological context of this Council. In that time the question of relation between humanity and divinity in Christ was discussed. Apollinarius of Laodicea taught that in the person of Christ there were two elements: the Logos and the body. The Logos replaced the soul. He propagated the formula mia physis tou theou logou sesarkomene. Others theologians were not agree with his opinion. Generally, there were two theological schools which worked on this matter: school of Alexandria and of Antioch. In the first one, the Christ was seen especially as God who became man. In the second one, He was seen as the man who was God’s Son. With other words, in Alexandria the starting point of reflection was the Divinity of Christ. In Antioch the starting of reflection was His humanity. The author mentioned Eutyches whose ideas on Christology produced a lot of trouble. In such a context, the Council of Chalcedon was organized (451). It was the proposal of Emperor Marcjan. The Council, after having condemned Eutyches and Dioskur of Alexandria because of their position on theological matter, proclaimed a new definition of the catholic faith. The base of this definition was the Letter of Pope Leo the Great Ad Flavianum. The most important point of this definition was the statement that Divinity and humanity meet in Christ, and both form one person. Such a declaration seems to be clear, but it did not satisfy Greek theologians. They did not want to accept the formula two natures (duo physeis) in one person, because in their opinion it signifies a separation between the Divinity and the humanity of Christ. They preferred to speak about mia physis tou Theou Logou sesarkomene. Surely, by the term physis they did not understand nature, but a being. While saying mia physis they did not mean one nature, but one being. In their conception, Jesus Christ was a Being in which met Divinity and humanity. Many theologians were suspicious of the term person (prosopon); they supposed that it had a modalistic meaning. The main opinion of Modalists is: there is only One God who appears sometimes as Father, sometimes as Son, sometime as Holy Spirit. There were also other reasons of contesting the definition of Chalcedon. It was known that that this definition was imposed by the Greek emperor, influenced by the Bishop of Rome (Pope). Many theologians, especially in monastic milieu, did not want to accept the intervention of the civil authorities in religious matter. They did not have a very good opinion about Latin theology. In the fifth century there were some anti-Hellenic tendencies in the eastern part of the Empire. Many Oriental theologians rejected the definition of Chalcedon because it was „a formula of Rom and Constantinople”. In such circumstances, a lot of Christians separated themselves from the Catholic Church, forming Monophysite Churches. Those who remained in unity with Rome and Constantinople, keeping the definition of Chalcedon, were called Melchites. Another problem was the canon 28, which gave some privileges to the bishop see of Constantinople. Pope Leo the Great did not approve this canon. Anti-Hellenic tendencies were so strong that in the time of Islamic invasions the people of Palestine, Syria, and Egypt welcomed Arabic soldiers as liberators from Byzantine domination. It is to be said that Arabic authorities, after having taken power in a country, were friendly towards Monophysites and persecuted Melchites. So, the contestation of the definition of Chalcedon prepared the ground for the victory of Islam in the East. The article is ended by an observation of a French theologian Joseph Moingt: declaration that Divinity and humanity make union the person of Jesus Christ produced division not only in the Church, but also in the Roman Empire. This is one of great paradoxes in the history of Christianity.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2012, 58; 137-179
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jan Hus and Vatican II
Jan Hus a Drugi Sobór Watykański
Autorzy:
Kantyka, Przemysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2040523.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Jan Hus
husytyzm
eklezjologia
II Sobór Watykański
John/Jan Hus
Hussitism
ecclesiology
Vatican II
Opis:
W artykule rozwinięto tezę prof. Stefana Swieżawskiego, że Jan Hus, czeski reformator uznany za heretyka przez Sobór w Konstancji i w wyniku tego spalony na stosie, może być uznany za prekursora II Soboru Watykańskiego. Po krótkim wstępie historycznym następuje analiza tych poglądów Husa, które znalazły odzwierciedlenie w dokumentach Vaticanum II: Dei verbum, Lumen gentium i Dignitatis humanae. Wywody uzupełnia zwięzły opis współczesnego katolickiego podejścia do Husa, a także wskazanie, że nowe odczytanie jego postaci jest możliwe dzięki wielkiej metanoi, zapoczątkowanej w Kościele katolickim przez Vaticanum II.
The article develops the thesis of Professor Stefan Swieżawski that Jan Hus, the Czech Reformer sentenced as a heretic by the Council of Constance and in consequence burnt at the stake, can be considered as a precursor of the Second Vatican Council. After a short historical introduction there is an analysis of those ideas of Hus that were reflected in the Vatican II documents Dei verbum, Lumen gentium and Dignitatis humanae. The arguments are completed by a description of the present Catholic approach to Hus and by indicating a possible re-interpretation of his person thanks to the great metanoia launched in the Catholic Church by Vatican II.
Źródło:
Roczniki Teologiczne; 2015, 62, 7; 105-119
2353-7272
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tak zwany Sobór Jerozolimski wyrazem troski o jedność pierwotnego Kościoła
Autorzy:
Rakocy, Waldemar
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1177974.pdf
Data publikacji:
1996
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Sobór Jerozolimski
Dz 15
Ga 2
1-10
Council of Jerusalem
Acts 15
Gal 2
Opis:
Der Artikel betrifft das sogenannte Konzil von Jerusalem, das in der Anfangszeit des Christentums mit einer Streitfrage befaßte, die in dem Augenblick entstanden war, als die ersten Heiden in die Kirche aufgenommen wurden. Das Konzil äußerste sich nicht nur in der Frage der Beschneidung zugunsten der Heideenchristen, sondern erließ auch ein Dekret mit vier Bedingungen, das zum einträchtigen Miteinander von Judenchristen und Heidenchristen beitragen sollte. Das Dekret mit den vier Bedingungen ist Ausdruck einer Übereinkuft, das das Wohl des jüdischen Teils der Kirche im Sinne hatte. Das Jerusalemer Konzil in Apg 15 erkennt einerseits die Freiheit der Heiden vom mosaischen Gesetz an und schützt andererseits die jüdische religiöse Tradition. Es ist ein Ausdruck der Sorge um die Einheit der Urkirche.
Źródło:
The Biblical Annals; 1996, 43, 1; 139-148
2083-2222
2451-2168
Pojawia się w:
The Biblical Annals
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sobór Watykański I w świetle "Dziennika Poznańskiego": studium źródłoznawcze
Autorzy:
Kowalik, Józef
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1044721.pdf
Data publikacji:
1977
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
rozprawa
Sobór Watykański I
dziennik
źródło
historia
treatise
the Vatican Council I
daily paper
reference
source
history
Źródło:
Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne; 1977, 35; 195-214
0518-3766
2545-3491
Pojawia się w:
Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór o nieomylność papieża - od Haec sancta do Pastor aeternus
Autorzy:
Ferdek, Bogdan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/607167.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Council of Constance
Conciliarism
Gallicanism
First Vatican Council
Papal Infallibility
Sobór w Konstancji
koncyliaryzm
gallikanizm
I Sobór Watykański
papieska nieomylność
Opis:
The decree Haec Sancta approved by the Council of Constance at its 5th Session (6th April 1415) helped the Council fathers to put an end to the scandalous schism which since 1378 had divided the Latin Church between rival lines of claimants to the papal office. The Council of Constance declared for the superiority of the Council over the Pope. In Gallicanism the theory      of the superiority of a General Council lived on for hundreds of years. The great body of the bishops of the nineteenth century had little sympathy with Gallican principles, which disappeared entirely after the definition of Papal Infallibility at the First Vatican Council in 1870. There are several requirements for a dogmatic, papal infallible pronouncement: (1) The pronouncement must be made by the lawful successor to Peter. (2) The subject matter must be in the area of faith and morals. (3) The pope must be speaking ex cathedra, that is from the very seat and office of Peter. In this way he must be specifically intending to proclaim a doctrine, binding the entire Church to its assent. If one or more of these elements is missing, there is no infallible  pronouncement.
Źródło:
Poznańskie Studia Teologiczne; 2015, 29; 183-196
0209-3472
Pojawia się w:
Poznańskie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Upadek patriarchy aleksandryjskiego Dioskura
The Fall of Dioscuros of Alexandria
Autorzy:
Milewski, Ireneusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/612598.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Dioskur z Aleksandrii
patriarcha
Aleksandria
upadek
Sobór Efeski
Sobór Chalcedoński
Dioscuros of Alexandria
patriarch
Alexandria
fall
Council of Ephesus
Council of Chalcedon
Opis:
The overthrow of patriarch Dioscuros appertains to the breakthrough events, which influenced the doctrinal countenance of Late Antique Christianity. Despite the fact that the decision to deprive the patriarch of the throne remained solely political, the very depositional proceedings were commenced on the charge of wrongdoings committed by Dioscuros prior to and in the course of the second Ephesian Council. During the Chalcedonian Councii there were also four Alexandrians who maintained accusations against the patriarch, those being: two deacons (Theodoros and Ischyrionis), presbyter Athanasius and Sophronios, of whom we possess little knowledge. It was proved, however, that even the substantial charges did not destine Dioscuros to be overthrown as much as did his refusal to attend the council. The overthrown patriarch was exiled and therein died in 454. His relics were translated to Alexandria during the reign of Tymotheus Ailuros.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2008, 52, 1; 647-659
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies