Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Seneka" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Od uwielbienia do wzgardy: Seneka w oczach Rzymian (do połowy II wieku)
Autorzy:
Pigoń, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/702828.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Opis:
The present discussion collects and examines judgements about Seneca’s life and works which were passed by his contemporaries and later writers (down to Aulus Gellius). However, we have only a few testimonies coming from the period before Seneca’s death. More can be found in later writings, especially in the anonymous play Octavia (where Seneca is introduced as trying to persuade Nero that justice is the basis of good government), in Book X of the Institutio Oratoria (where Quintilian explains and confirms his former opinion about Seneca’s works), and in Tacitus’ Annals (where the historian’s attitude towards both Seneca’s earlier career and his death seems not to be as hostile as it is sometimes represented). At the end of the paper, after a brief mention of Martial and Juvenal, there is a discussion of opinions about Seneca’s style held by two representatives of the archaising movement, Fronto and Gellius.
Źródło:
Meander; 2009-2012, 64-67; 83-100
0025-6285
Pojawia się w:
Meander
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Death Penalty, the “Marriage Penalty” and Some Remarks on the Utility of Senecan Research in the Study of Roman Law
Autorzy:
Joanna, Kulawiak-Cyrankowska,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902772.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Roman rape
lex raptarum
controversia
Seneca Maior
Roman Law
Roman Rhetoric
gwałt
Seneka Starszy
prawo rzymskie
retoryka łacińska
Opis:
The problem in the 5th controversia from the work of Lucius Annaeus Seneca the Elder, entitled Oratorum et rhetorum sententiae divisiones colores, is presented as follows: one man seduced two women during the same night. According to the law, which in the literature is referred to as lex raptarum, a woman who was kidnapped may choose between the death penalty for the ravisher or marrying him, but without giving him a dowry. Here, two women were granted the right of option and one of them demanded the death of the man, but the other wanted to marry him. The declaimers were trying to find an answer to the question: which solution is worthier to prevail? Since, in fact, the main problem raised in the controversia is the interpretation of law, it constituted quite a significant intellectual challenge. The declaimers employed very impressive legal reasoning techniques. This controversia constitutes then not only an interesting starting point to conduct the research on the borderline of law and declamation, but also might be a strong argument that the law and rhetoric, at least in some aspects, could have been complementary to each other.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 80; 197-214
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies