Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Król, Z." wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Główne kierunki nowelizacji kodeksu karnego w drodze ustawy z dnia 20 lutego 2015 r. oraz ustaw z dnia 11 marca 2016 r.
Autorzy:
Małgorzata, Król-Bogomilska,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902629.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
amendments
penalties
conditional suspension of execution of custodial sentences
fines
Opis:
This article contains a presentation of all the main amendments to the Penal Code introduced by the Act of February 20, 2015 amending the Act on Penal Code and certain other acts of law (Journal of Laws of 2015, item 396). Most of the provisions of this Act entered into force on July 1, 2015. The change of the criminal law carried out by this Act provides the most extensive amendments to the Penal Code of 1997 from the time of its adoption. The reform of the criminal law was decided due to the defectiveness of practice. At the stage of preparatory works, an emphasis was put on the abuse of custodial sentences with a conditional suspension of their execution, a low rate of individual fines and a too infrequent use of fines and penalties of restriction of liberty. Also, a defective practice was underlined referring to determining the length of a penalty period involving deprivation of liberty at an excessive level in the case of applying conditional suspension of its execution (when the courts determined the term of imprisonment sentences at the level which is much higher than if this sentence was awarded without a conditional suspension of its execution). An emphasis was also put on the presence of high levels of prison population, a high percentage of those serving prison sentences and the existence of a large group of approx. 70 000 people waiting to undergo imprisonment. Most of the changes introduced by this Act refer to penalties. The main changes include creating a broader possibility of applying non-custodial measures. Also, a novelty is an introduction of the possibility of combining the penalty of restriction of liberty with the penalty of imprisonment (which is often referred to as a so-called “mixed punishment”). A number of changes concerning the rules of application of probation measures was introduced. When it comes to conditional suspension of punishment, the possibility of conditional suspension of the penalty of restriction of liberty or an independent fine was excluded; moreover, the possibility of applying this institution was limited – as a rule – only to custodial sentences with a maximum term of imprisonment of one year. In the summary description of the changes to the Penal Code in the article it was emphasized that the far-reaching changes which were introduced were justified mainly by ad-hoc practical considerations. It was considered that the amendments to the Penal Code follow the erroneous – from the point of view of rationality – trend of attempting to solve the current problems of practice by introducing substantive changes. The article also presents subsequent changes to the Penal Code resulting from two acts enacted on the day of March 11, 2016 (Journal of Laws of 2016, item 428) and Journal of Laws of 2016, item 437). The changes referring to the regulations amended or introduced by the act which was discussed in the article were indicated. These changes consist, e.g. in eliminating the new form of execution of the penalty of restriction of liberty associated with the use of an electronic surveillance system and in repealing Article 59a giving rise to the discontinuation of criminal proceedings against the perpetrator, who, prior to the start of the trial in the first instance, repaired the damage or compensated the harm caused, as well as in repealing Article 60a on the so-called “plea-bargaining”.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2016, 65; 7-24
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy „Król może czynić źle”? Odpowiedzialność cywilna za wykonywanie władzy publicznej w prawie angielskim
Autorzy:
Paweł, Słup,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903023.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-01-18
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
civil liability
public authorities
tort law
administrative law
Crown proceedings
odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza
władze publiczne
prawo deliktów
prawo administracyjne
postępowania z udziałem Korony
Opis:
The principle of state liability has been widely recognised in 20th century and codified in certain jurisdictions. English law, however, has been traditionally reluctant to recognise the liability of Crown distinct from the of its servants. According to the long-standing principle of rule of law, servants of the Crown should be liable for torts committed in their official capacity just as individuals. The principle has been allegedly designed to protect the individuals from arbitrary decisions of public authorities, which fall in their actions under jurisdiction of common courts. It was not until the advance of Crown Proceedings Act 1974 when the Crown took material liability for torts committed by its servants. The nature of tortious liability of the public bodies, however, remained peculiar. The aim of this article is to indicate that the underlying concept of individual liability of servants, once designed to protect the individuals, now restricts the scope of civil liability of public bodies in English law.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 76; 341-362
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dzieło dziejopisarskie przedmiotem debaty sejmów w czasie trzeciego bezkrólewia
The Polish Sejm Debating over a Work of History: The Case of ‘De bello Moschovitico’ by Reinhold Heidenstein, in 1587
Autorzy:
Dzięgielewski, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/472420.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Dziennikarstwa, Informacji i Bibliologii
Tematy:
bezkrólewie z 1587 roku
cenzura
dziejopisarstwo
Heidenstein Reinhold
król Stefan Batory
sejm konwokacyjny i elekcyjny
Zamoyski Jan
Zborowscy
interregnum of 1587
censorship
historiography
Heidenstein, Reinhold
King Stephen Bathory of Poland
Convocation and Election Sejm
he Zborowski brothers
Opis:
Artykuł poświęcony jest reakcji szlachty uczestniczącej w sejmach okresu bezkrólewia po śmierci Stefana Batorego na druk poświęcony ówczesnym dziejom najnowszym: De bello Moschovitico commentariorum libri VI autorstwa Reinholda Heidensteina. Było to dzieło dziejopisarstwa oficjalnego przygotowane przy osobistym zaangażowaniu kanclerza koronnego, które po wprowadzeniu cenzury prewencyjnej miało, zdaniem opozycji, narzucać opinii publicznej wizję przeszłości korzystną dla rządzących, a więc stronniczą. To wyjątkowe w dziejach I RP wydarzenie jakkolwiek nie doprowadziło do konfiskaty książki, gdyż rzecznicy tego rozwiązania nie zdołali zapewnić tronu swemu kandydatowi ani też sprawić, że wprowadzenie cenzury na druki historyczne nie zostało uznane za bezprawne, doprowadziło jednak do zaniechania takich praktyk w czasach Zygmunta III. Prawdopodobnie dlatego, że kanclerz Jan Zamoyski, staropolski mistrz gry wizerunkowej, przechodząc do opozycji względem młodego Wazy, uznał, iż znacznie szybciej będzie można manipulować opinią publiczną przy użyciu anonimowych pism ulotnych.
The article deals with the reaction of the Polish nobility, convened during the interregnum after the death of King Stephen Bathory to elect the new monarch, to the book De bello Moschovitico commentariorum libri VI by Reinhold Heidenstein, which treated on recent historical events. Heidensteins work conveyed the offi cial views of the ruling circles, and Chancellor Jan Zamoyski was personally engaged in its preparation. However, the opposition was of the opinion that in combination with preventive censorship the book was supposed to impose upon the public a vision of the past favourable to the governing elite, e.i. a biased one. This episode, exceptional in the history of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, did not result in the confi scation of the book. The anti-Zamoyski faction failed both to bring about the election of their candidate to the Polish throne, and to persuade the Sejm to delegalize censoring historical works. Nevertheless, the affair resulted in refraining by the ruling circles from such actions during the reign of the next king, Sigismund III Vasa. Most probably, Jan Zamoyski, who soon after the election found himself in opposition to the throne, himself a master of political propaganda, decided that it would be much more effective to manipulate public opinion with anonymous effemeral prints.
Źródło:
Z Badań nad Książką i Księgozbiorami Historycznymi; 2015, 9; 187-198
1897-0788
2544-8730
Pojawia się w:
Z Badań nad Książką i Księgozbiorami Historycznymi
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies