Temat: Public Relations - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: The distinction between administrative and other legal relationships that arise during the implementation of anticorruption policy
Розмежування адміністративних та інших правовідносин, що виникають під час реалізації антикорупційної політики
Autorzy:: Demianchuk, Vitalii
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/469961.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017-09-01
Wydawca:: Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De Gasperi w Józefowie
Tematy:: anticorruption policy
corruption
anticorruption measures
legal relations
public administration
Opis:: The article is focused on the scientific and practical research of the problem of distinction of administrative and other legal relations arising during the implementation of anticorruption policy of the modern legal state. Purpose. The objective of the article is to determine theoretical and practical principles of delimitation between administrative and other legal relations that arise during the implementation of anti-corruption policy in Ukraine. Methods. The author of the research has applied formal and legal, historical and legal, logical and method of system and structural analysis. Results. The author has considered the most important features of administrative and legal relations as the main form of the implementation of anticorruption measures. The author has analyzed the major doctrinal approaches to determining legal content and value of the distinction of different types of legal relations in the anticorruption field to find the best practical ways of counteracting corruption as a negative social phenomena and overcoming corruption in society. It has been noted that the basic form of the practical implementation of anticorruption regulations is administrative and legal relations, as they occur in the sphere of public administration, cover all major types of anticorruption measures, are spread to the actions of state officials and are implemented, especially by the executive state authorities through regulative, prescribing, everyday actions and decisions on combating corruption as an extremely dangerous negative social phenomena for normal functioning of the society.
Źródło:: Intercultural Communication; 2017, 3, 2; 209-225
2451-0998
Pojawia się w:: Intercultural Communication
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Джерела і методологія дослідження сучасних українсько-польських відносин
Źródła i metodologia badań współczesnych stosunków polsko-ukraińskich
Autorzy:: Горбатенко, Володимир
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/489349.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2018
Wydawca:: Polskie Towarzystwo Naukowe w Żytomierzu
Tematy:: bilateral relations
Ukrainian-Polish cooperation
dialogue of cultures
strategic interests
security policy
public events
Opis:: One of the most important vectors of Ukraine’s contemporary development is its active policy in bilateral relations with the leading European countries, since such a policy opens the way for recognition of its European identity and forms unlimited opportunities for international cooperation on a mutually beneficial basis. Among the closest partners and the most reliable allies of Ukraine was and remains Poland, because here, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians live, work and study without any special problems. In addition, the strengthening of strategic partnership with Poland contributes to the practical realization of the European choice of Ukraine. On the other hand, Poles are interested in the territorial integrity, independence and European orientation of Ukraine, seeing it an ally in confronting external threats. In connection with the aforementioned one of the most important directions of the study of the state and prospects of modern Ukrainian-Polish relations is the elucidation of the sources and methodology of their comprehension comprehension. Although any classification is conditional, it is still worth trying to identify the main sources whose potential is intended to strengthen the relations between the two countries and outline the methodological aspects of their use in order to strengthen Ukrainian-Polish cooperation. First of all, such sources should include the following. 1. The ideological and theoretical work of the representatives of Ukraine and Poland, aimed at finding ways to deepen mutual understanding between the two peoples. At the same time, particular attention should be paid to strategic considerations expressed on both sides, as well as reservations about the risks that accompany bilateral relations. Along with this, the important points for studying are the positions of people who are distinguished for their diligence, openness to mutual respect and mutual understanding. The ideological and theoretical potential of Ukrainian and Polish intellectuals, aimed at convergence, the dialogue of the cultures of the two countries, still needs to be properly studied and systematized, and can serve as an important basis for the state-building efforts of Ukraine and Poland in the future. 2. External and domestic legal acts and documents of strategic direction aimed at strengthening of bilateral relations. This vector of relationships was already established at the turn of the 20th - 21st centuries in the relevant international legal and internal documents: the Declaration on the Principles and Main Directions of Ukrainian-Polish Relations (October 13, 1990); Treaty on Good Neighborhood, Friendly Relations and Cooperation (May 18-19, 1992); Agreement on the legal status of the Ukrainian-Polish border (January 12, 1993); Communique on the results of the meeting of the Consultative Committee of the Presidents of Ukraine and the Republic of Poland (September 27-28, 1995); Joint Statement for Understanding and Integration (May 21, 1997); Security Strategies of the Republic of Poland (2000); National Concept of Strategic Partnership Relations with the Republic of Poland (July 27, 2001); in a paper presented by the Polish political experts «The Eastern Policy of the Union in the Perspective of its Expansion through the States of Central and Eastern Europe - the Polish Point of View» (October 2003). Sufficiently strong legal and regulatory framework for bilateral relations between Ukraine and Poland is evidence of a gradual strengthening of political, economic, international legal and cultural cooperation. At the same time, a number of problems remain inadequate. First of all, it concerns border cooperation, common historical heritage, education, labor migration, etc. 3. Institutional system for the provision and coordination of mutual strategic interests of the two states. Today, this coordination is jointly carried out by: the Advisory Committee of the Presidents of Ukraine and the Republic of Poland; Ukrainian-Polish Mixed Commission on Trade and Economic Cooperation; Ukrainian-Polish and Polish-Ukrainian parliamentary groups; Permanent Ukrainian-Polish Conference on European Integration; Polish Institute in Kyiv; Ukrainian-Polish, Polish-Ukrainian forums, Foundation Research Center Poland-Ukraine and others. In addition, there are a number of research structures in each of the countries that are highly specialized in the Polish-Ukrainian and Ukrainian-Polish issues. Accordingly, this direction should be monitored and the current evaluation of the effectiveness of these or other structural units should be carried out on the subject of a real impact on the quality of bilateral relations. At the same time, mutual understanding should be sought on the basis of openness, dialogue, compromise, and the avoidance of the formation of structures focused on unilateral consideration of disputed problems. 4. State-political decisions in the field of security policy, anti-hybrid foreign-policy threats. A real threat to the entire European security system was the aggressive policy of Russia in 2014. Under these conditions, Ukraine was the leading outpost of protecting European values and democratic order. Systemic comprehension of the existing experience in a vital military-strategic sphere will help to optimize the directions of further cooperation, in particular on such important issues as: the final determination by Ukraine of the transition to international standards in the military sphere; exchanging experience of reforming the troops and maintaining their combat readiness at an appropriate level; combining the efforts of all EU countries in combating hybrid threats, as well as conducting a single foreign and security policy; consolidated actions of the European states in relation to the offending state (point of application of sanctions, embargo, etc.); to develop, on the basis of the UN, a common position on the unconditional implementation by all countries of the world of the requirements of international law and the search for ways to improve it in order to resolve non-standard situations; the study of the NATO countries by the unique Ukrainian experience of functioning the state in a hybrid war. 5. The ideological and theoretical potential of public events (scientific conferences, debates, discussions, official meetings) that promote reconciliation with respect to controversial historical events, the dissolution of persistent stereotypes. From time to time, the recurrence of historical hostility between the two neighboring countries is given significant, including at the official level. First of all, these are the negative manifestations of mutual opposition, such as: the war of monuments to the dead Poles and Ukrainians; the dissemination at the level of mass consciousness of outdated stereotypical ideas humiliating national dignity; attempts to politicize the policy of memory through speculation on the tragic events of the past, in which the representatives of both nations suffered; the criticisms of the Polish radicals about the re-establishment of the Commonwealth at the borders of 1939 and the ill-conceived statements of some Ukrainians, which prompted «to forget about Poland for 25 years». The realization by Poland of offensive historical politics in Ukraine creates a reciprocal reaction in the issue of Ukraine’s implementation of its policy of memory and causes various kinds of distortions. Therefore, under the current conditions, monopolization of the policy of memory at the state level, without involving the general public, is extremely dangerous for the future. This remark applies to both Poland and Ukraine. Thus, despite current problems, today we have every reason to state the significant level of Ukrainian-Polish cooperation. At the same time, in the bilateral relations between Ukraine and Poland it is worth looking first and foremost on positive things, consolidating in the mass consciousness what unites the two Eastern European countries, to highlight the views of people who for years build a Polish-Ukrainian understanding: translate books, establish scientific cooperation, restore cemeteries, collect help for soldiers who guarantee European security in eastern Ukraine. The progressive forces of both countries, regardless of the various kinds of provocations, should be abstracted from the insinuations of the marginal environment, reveal wisdom in assessing historical events, and determine common priorities not only for the medium term, but also for the long-term perspective. The level of mutual relations between the two countries depends on the possibility of realizing the needs of national minorities - Ukrainian in Poland and Polish in Ukraine. In addition, the strengthening of intergovernmental cooperation will contribute to establishing closer cooperation between Ukrainian and Polish societies in general, which depends largely on the future of both countries in the European House of Spies.
Źródło:: Studia Politologica Ucraino-Polona; 2018, 8; 51-57
2312-8933
Pojawia się w:: Studia Politologica Ucraino-Polona
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Separation of administrative and other legal relations arising during the Implementation of anti-corruption policy
Pозмежування адміністративних та інших правовідносин, що виникають під час реалізації антикорупційної політики
Autorzy:: Дем’янчук, Віталій Анатолійович
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/951158.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017
Wydawca:: Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De Gasperi w Józefowie
Tematy:: правові відносини
антикорупційна політика
корупція
антикорупційні заходи
державне управління
anti-corruption policy
corruption
anti-corruption measures
legal relations
public administration
Opis:: The article is focused on the scientific and practical research of the problem of separation of administrative and other legal relations arising during the implementation of anti-corruption policy of the modern legal state. The author has considered the most important features of administrative and legal relations as the main form of the implementation of anti-corruption measures. The author has analyzed the major doctrinal approaches to determining legal content and value of the separation of different types of legal relations in the anti-corruption field to find the best practical ways of counteracting corruption as a negative social phenomena and overcoming corruption in society. It has been noted that the basic form of the practical implementation of anti-corruption regulations is administrative and legal relations, as they occur in the sphere of public administration, cover all major types of anti-corruption measures, are spread to the actions of state officials and are implemented, especially by the executive state authorities through regulative, prescribing, everyday actions and decisions on combating corruption as an extremely dangerous negative social phenomena for normal functioning of the society.
Стаття присвячена науково-практичному дослідженню проблеми розмежування адміністративних та інших правовідносин, що виникають під час реалізації антикорупційної політики сучасної правової держави. Розглянуто найважливіші ознаки адміністративно-правових відносин як основної форми реалізації антикорупційних заходів. Проаналізовані найважливіші доктринальні підходи до визначення юридичного змісту та значення розмежування різних видів правовідносин в антикорупційній сфері для пошуку оптимальних практичних шляхів протидії корупції як негативному соціальному явищу та подолання корупційних проявів у суспільстві. Наголошується, що основною формою практичної реалізації антикорупційних норм є адміністративно- правові відносини, оскільки вони відбуваються у сфері державного управління, охоплюють усі основні види антикорупційних заходів, поширюються на дії державних службовців та реалізуються, перш за все, органами державної виконавчої влади шляхом підзаконних, розпорядчих, повсякденних дій та рішень з протидії корупції як вкрай небезпечному для нормальної життєдіяльності суспільства негативному соціальному явищу.
Źródło:: Journal of Modern Science; 2017, 35, 4; 249-264
1734-2031
Pojawia się w:: Journal of Modern Science
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Проблемні питання у визнанні Республікою Хорватія Голодомору геноцидом українського народу
Problematic Issues in the Recognition of the Holodomor by the Republic of Croatia as Genocide of the Ukrainian People
Autorzy:: Sagan, Galyna
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22676883.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2023-11-20
Wydawca:: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. The Institute of History of Ukraine
Tematy:: Голодомор 1932-1933 років
українсько-хорватські зв’язки
визнання Голодомору
геноцид
українці Хорватії
діаспора
громадська діяльність
The Holodomor of 1932-1933
Ukrainian-Croatian relations
recognition of the Holodomor
genocide
Ukrainians in Croatia
diaspora
public activity
Opis:: У статті проаналізовано п`ятнадцятирічний шлях Республіки Хорватія з визнання Голодомору 1932-1933 років в Україні геноцидом українського народу. Зазначається, що впродовж тривалого часу стратегічне партнерство, яке розвивалося між нашими країнами, на жаль, мало вплинуло на те, аби Хорватія на офіційному рівні висловила своє ставлення до жахливого злочину комуністичного режиму. У цьому випадку, на жаль, недопрацьовувала Україна. Зазначено, що за часів президентства В. Януковича в Україні не лише практично не приділялася увага міжнародній роботі із роз’яснень питань Голодомору, але й сам В. Янукович зробив протиправну заяву про те, що визнавати Голодомор 1932–1933 рр. як факт геноциду українців є неправильним і несправедливим. Ця заява не лише продемонструвала зневагу В. Януковича до мільйонів невинних жертв геноциду українців, але й перекреслила вже наявні напрацювання, у т. ч. й у РХ. В. Янукович фактично здійснив злочин – порушив Закон України «Про Голодомор 1932–1933 років в Україні». Наголошується, що найбільших зусиль в інформуванні хорватської громадськості, політичної еліти в РХ доклали активісти української діаспори. Їхніми стараннями з початку 1990-х років регулярно проводилися заходи із вшанування пам’яті загиблих у роки Голодомору. Українські культурно-просвітні товариства видавали книжки, брошури, організовували виставки, підтримували міжнародну акцію «Незгасима свічка» тощо. Причому робота велася у двох напрямах – для широкого загалу громадян РХ та для українців Хорватії. Акцентується, що значні зусилля наших діаспорян були спрямовані на роботу із хорватськими парламентарями, від яких у кінцевому рахунку й залежало офіційне визнання Голодомору геноцидом. Зазначається, що до цієї роботи також активно долучалися представники українського Посольства, які були співорганізаторами заходів із вшанування жертв Голодомору, працювали на поширення інформації про цей злочин комуністичного режиму. Вказано, що повномаштабне вторгнення Росії в Україну 24 лютого 2022 року та нові злочини проти людяності, здійснені російськими солдатами, стали тим вирішальним аргументом, який переконав політичну еліту Республіки Хорватія визнати Голодомор геноцидом українського народу.
The article analyses the fifteen-year journey of the Republic of Croatia to recognise the Holodomor of 1932-1933 in Ukraine as genocide of the Ukrainian people. It is noted that, unfortunately, the long-term strategic partnership that developed between our countries had little effect on Croatia expressing its attitude to the terrible crime of the communist regime at the official level. In this case, as a rule, the Ukrainian State did not do enough. It is noted that during the presidency of V. Yanukovych in Ukraine, not only practically no attention was paid to the international work on clarifying the issues of the Holodomor, but also V. Yanukovych himself made an illegal statement that recognizing the Holodomor of 1932-1933 as a fact of genocide of Ukrainians is wrong and unfair. This statement not only demonstrated V. Yanukovych's disdain for millions of innocent victims of the Ukrainian genocide, but also crossed out already existing developments, including and in the Republic of Croatia. V. Yanukovych actually committed a crime - he violated the Law of Ukraine “On the Holodomor of 1932-1933 in Ukraine”. It is emphasized that the greatest efforts in informing the Croatian public and the political elite in the Republic of Croatia were made by activists of the Ukrainian diaspora. Due to their efforts, since the beginning of the 1990s, events were regularly held to honor the memory of those who died during the Holodomor. Ukrainian cultural and educational societies published books, brochures, organized exhibitions, supported the international campaign “Unquenchable Candle”, etc. Moreover, the work was carried out in two directions - for the general public of citizens of the Republic of Croatia and for Ukrainians in Croatia. It is emphasized that significant efforts of our diaspora were directed to work with Croatian parliamentarians, on whom the official recognition of the Holodomor as genocide ultimately depended. It is noted that representatives of the Ukrainian Embassy, who were co-organizers of events honoring the victims of the Holodomor, were also actively involved in this work, and worked to spread information about this crime of the communist regime. It is indicated that the full-scale invasion of Russia into Ukraine on February 24, 2022 and the new crimes against humanity committed by Russian soldiers became the decisive argument that convinced the political elite of the Republic of Croatia to recognize the Holodomor as a genocide of the Ukrainian people.
Źródło:: The International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches and Findings; 2023, 32; 220-243
2411-345X
2415-7198
Pojawia się w:: The International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches and Findings
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Public Relations" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język