Temat: regulation by law - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Stereotypy dotyczące płci a przemoc wobec kobiet w dorobku prawnomiędzynarodowym. Od identyfikacji do kształtowania instrumentów prawnych
Autorzy:: Sękowska-Kozłowska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788179.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2016-09-01
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:: przemoc wobec kobiet
prawo międzynarodowe
Międzynarodowy Trybunał Praw Człowieka
Konwencja Stambulska
Konwencja o zapobieganiu i zwalczaniu przemocy wobec kobiet i przemocy domowej
regulacje prawne
przemoc
kobiety
płeć
dyskryminacja
violence against women
international law
European Court of Human Rights
Committee on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
regulation by law
violence
women
discrimination
Opis:: The obligation to counteract gender stereotypes resulting in discrimination against women, including violence against women, was anchored in international law by the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 1979. The article aims to demonstrate that although the relevant regulations are of a very general nature, the recognition of this issue in international law allowed the particular instruments which may counteract violence against women to be developed. The international output in this matter may be divided into two key stages – a stage of recognition of particular stereotypes in the case law of international human rights bodies and a stage of development of legal instruments aimed to counteract gender stereotyping. Thus the article attempts to link the stereotypes identified in the practice of the Committee on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and the European Court of Human Rights with instruments developed in the most comprehensive international treaty concerning the violence against women, i.e. the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence of 2011.
Źródło:: Studia Prawnicze; 2016, 2 (206); 7-29
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:: Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Wybór prawa jako klauzula abuzywna w umowach konsumenckich zawieranych przez Internet
‘Choice of law’ as an unfair provision in consumer contracts concluded online
Autorzy:: Jagielska, Monika
Kunkiel-Kryńska, Aleksandra
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/508520.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2016-05-31
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:: umowy konsumenckie
wybór prawa
klauzule abuzywne
sprzedaż on-line
umowy zawierane przez Internet
działalność kierowana
prawo prywatne międzynarodowe
rozporządzenie Rzym I
consumer contracts
choice of law
abusive clause
online sale
contracts concluded by the Internet
directed activity
international private law
Regulation Rome I
Opis:: W umowach konsumenckich zawieranych przez Internet (z elementem międzynarodowym) zwiększa się ryzyko trudności z ustaleniem prawa właściwego, a w razie sporu na tle umowy z przedsiębiorcą zagranicznym, konsument może napotkać także trudności natury proceduralnej. Ponadto, może okazać się, że zastosowane prawo nie zapewnia konsumentowi takiej ochrony, jaką miałby w miejscu swojego zwykłego pobytu. Problematyka ta była przedmiotem rozważań Sądu Najwyższego, który w wyroku z dnia 17 września 2014 r., (Sygn. akt I CSK 555/13), orzekł, że zamieszczenie we wzorcu umowy konsumenckiej postanowienia przewidującego zastosowanie prawa obcego dla konsumenta, a właściwego dla twórcy wzorca, stanowi klauzulę niedozwoloną w rozumieniu art. 3851 § 1 k.c. Niniejszy wyrok skłania do pytania: czy w relacjach B2C (business to consumer) w praktyce dochodzi do wyłączenia możliwości wyboru prawa.
An increased risk exists now related to the correct determination of the applicable law in consumer contracts (with an international aspect) concluded online. In case of a dispute regarding contracts between a consumer and a foreign entrepreneur, the consumer may face procedural difficulties. It is also possible that the law which has been applied, on the basis of the ‘choice of law’ clause, does not provide the type of protection which the consumer may have in his own place of residence. The Polish Supreme Court Such analysed this issue in a judgment dated 17 September 2014 (I CSK 555/13). The Court ruled therein that a clause in standard consumer contracts predetermining the application of law foreign to the consumer, but ‘domestic’ to the entrepreneur, should be considered an unfair contractual provision in light of Article 385(1) § 1 of the Polish Civil Code. The above mentioned ruling leads to the question if, in practice, the ‘choice of law’ clause is thus excluded in consumer transactions (B2C).
Źródło:: internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny; 2016, 5, 3; 29-38
2299-5749
Pojawia się w:: internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Wybór prawa dla umowy o pracę. Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 15 lipca 2021 r. w sprawach połączonych DG, EH c/a SC Gruber Logistics SRL (C-152/20) oraz Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi, TD c/a SC Samidani Trans
The gloss to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 1 July 2021 in the joined cases of DG, EH v. SC Gruber Logistics SRL (C-152/20) and Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi, TD v. SC Samidani Trans SRL (C-218/20)
Autorzy:: Kurowski, Witold
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20745505.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2021-12-29
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:: a choice of law to the individual employment contract
the law applicable to the individual employment contract in the absence of a choice
an employee’s protection, a concept of „provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement”
the minimum wage
Rome I Regulation
Opis:: This paper comments on a recent ruling concerning the choice of law to the individual employment contract according to the Rome I Regulation. In the judgement in the joined cases C–152/20 and C–218/20 (DG, EH v. SC Gruber Logistics SRL and Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi, TD v. SC Samidani Trans SRL), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) provided the interpretation of Article 8 of the Rome I Regulation on two issues. At first, the EU Court was asked about the freedom of choice of law applicable to the individual employment contract if (a) national law required the inclusion of a clause into that contract under which the contractual provisions are supplemented by national law and (b) the contractual clause concerning that choice was drafted by the employer. The second issue was connected with the concept of the employee’s protection, under which the choice of law may not have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him (her) by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement, under the law that would have been applicable to the contract in the absence of choice. Regarding the first question, the CJEU admitted that the parties to an individual employment contract dispose of freedom to choose the law applicable to that contract, even if the contractual provisions are supplemented by national labour law under a (relevant) national provision, if “the national provision in question does not require the parties to choose national law as the law applicable to that contract”. Secondly, the Court found that the parties to an individual employment contract were “to be regarded as being, in principle, free to choose the law applicable to that contract, even if the contractual clause concerning that choice is drafted by the employer”. Therefore, the CJEU confirmed the application of the rules concerning the choice of law resulting from Article 3 of the Rome I Regulation to the individual employment contracts. Referring to the second issue of the commented ruling, the CJEU confirmed that Article 8 (1) of the Rome I Regulation must be interpreted as meaning that, where the parties have chosen the law governing the individual employment contract, the application of the law that would apply to the contract in the absence of choice must be excluded, with the exception of “provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement”, if those provisions offer the employee concerned greater protection than those of the law chosen by the parties. The EU Court underlined that rules on the minimum wage could be treated as “provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement” and the law that, in the absence of choice, would be applicable should decide about it. Unfortunately, it is necessary to follow the commented judgment’s justification to correctly understand the concept of an employee’s protection applied in Article 8 (1) of the Rome I Regulation. The thesis of the ruling in this regard seems to be too laconic, and it can be misinterpreted.
Źródło:: Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2021, 29; 169-190
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:: Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "regulation by law" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język