Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "lease agreement" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Uprawnienia i obowiązki Agencji Nieruchomości Rolnych jako wydzierżawiającego nieruchomości rolne Skarbu Państwa
    Rights and obligations of the Agricultural Property Agency as the lessor of the agricultural properties owned by the Treasury
    Autorzy:
    Stańko, Marek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/531101.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2011
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Temida 2
    Tematy:
    Agricultural Property Agency
    lease agreement
    agricultural property
    Opis:
    The principle of this article was not only the legal analysis of the content of the agricultural property lease agreement concluded by Agricultural Property Agency but, above all, positioning of this Agency in the process of concluding the abovementioned agreement. The necessity of looking into this matter again resulted from large scale changes in the Act dated 19 October 1991 on the management of agricultural properties owned by the Treasury and accompanying acts, introduced by the amending Act dated 16 September 2011 which came into effect as of 3 November 2011. The changes largely concerned the lease of agricultural properties owned by the Treasury. The basis of the article constituted also a lawsuit, during which the Agency was a party. The lawsuit caused changes in the property sale and lease procedure. The article also presents the basic legal requirements for the functioning of Agricultural Property Agency. The introduced legislative changes exposed the monopolistic position of the Agency. The statutory tendency to liquidate lease of the state–owned agricultural properties was also clearly presented, what met with criticism in the doctrine. Moreover, concerns were also aroused due the fact that the amended Act on the management of agricultural properties owned by the Treasury introduced legal instruments which allow for the unilateral interference in the content of lease agreements concluded for a definite period of time. Undoubtedly, the tenant of the state–owned agricultural property, in case of the greement concluded for a definite period of time, should receive a far–reaching legal protection. Only this type of protection guarantees achievement of the economic objective and allows for the permanence of management of the land held under lease. The amended act questions this permanence.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica Agraria; 2011, 9; 60-71
    1642-0438
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica Agraria
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kara umowna z tytułu odstąpienia od umowy najmu w związku z nieuiszczeniem kaucji zabezpieczającej
    Autorzy:
    Szanciło, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788226.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-07-22
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    kara umowna
    umowa najmu
    kaucja zabezpieczająca
    dzierżawa
    contractual penalty
    lease agreement
    security deposit
    tenancy
    Opis:
    The subject of consideration is the admissibility of the cessation of contractual penalties in the event of the lessor's withdrawal from a tenancy agreement, as a result of the tenant's failure to pay a security deposit against the lessor’s future rentals under the contract. Additional reser-vation of contractual penalty may relate only to non-performance or undue performance of a non-monetary obligation and therefore can’t be related to non-performance or undue perfor-mance of a monetary obligation (art. 483 § 1 k.c.). It’s important that the security deposit – in contrast to other forms of security – has a monetary nature. If you consider that this method of payment determines the nature of the security deposit as a cash payment and the tenant fails to pay the it or doesn’t restore the security to the original amount, then the provision for a contractual penalty for withdrawal from a tenancy agreement for that reason would be invalid. The question is if the nature of the rendition determines the manner in which it is fulfilled, or the purpose for which the debtor pays a specified amount of money. This issue may raise seri-ous doubts, but the automatic recognition of a security deposit as a cash rendition, although – literally speaking, possibly to consider – could lead to unlikely conclusions, given the nature and purpose of this form of warrant, especially in comparison to other forms. Consequently, in certain situations, the purpose and the essence of the rendition, its economic character, should be explored, since those elements determine the nature of the remdition within the meaning of art. 483 § 1 k.c.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawnicze; 2017, 2 (210); 129-152
    0039-3312
    2719-4302
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies