Temat: ewolucja nauki - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Od informacji ku mądrości
From Information towards Wisdom
Autorzy:: Lubański, Mieczysław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015710.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2004
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: system
dane
informacja
wiedza
mądrość
twórcza intuicja
ewolucja nauki
data
information
knowledge
wisdom
creative intuition
evolution of science
Opis:: The contemporary science can be defined in a cybernetic language as a self-organising system. The development of this system is guided and controlled by streams of information items produced by science. At present this development assumes more and more clearly the shape of the evolutionary variability. In its input there are data. Their united sets constitute information items which, owing to their bringing together, form the human knowledge. Integration process of the human knowledge results in the wisdom. In this way the post-industrial science has an evolutionary character coming in a form of a system “from information towards wisdom”. It is very important to state a simple sum of data not to give any information, and as well a simple sum of information items not to give any knowledge, and then a simple sum of items which constitute knowledge not to give any wisdom. Only the process of integration causes a conversion from a lower level of cognition to its higher one. The essence of this process seems to be inspired by a creative intuition of an explorer-researcher who executes the above mentioned integration.
Źródło:: Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2004, 52, 1; 27-41
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Znaczenie teorii cerkomeru Janickiego dla rozwoju badan nad systematyka i ewolucja plazincow
Autorzy:: Pojmanska, T.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/837859.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2005
Wydawca:: Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:: rozwoj nauki
cerkomer
ewolucja
systematyka
Janicki Konstanty
plazince
Źródło:: Annals of Parasitology; 2005, 51, 4; 345-358
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:: Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Znaczenie teorii cerkomeru Janickiego dla rozwoju badań nad systematyką i ewolucją płazińców
THE INFLUENCE OF JANICKI CERCOMER THEORY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLATYHELMINTHES SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION INVESTIGATIONS
Autorzy:: Pojmańska, T.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2146410.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2005
Wydawca:: Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:: rozwoj nauki
cerkomer
ewolucja
systematyka
Janicki Konstanty
plazince
Opis:: The aim of this article was to present the development of ideas about the provenience of parasitic helminths and the phylogenetical relationships within this taxon, since the publication of the "cercomer theory" just to nowadays. The following essentials of the Janicki theory are outlined: main differences between free-living Turbellaria and parasitic platyhelminths (ciliated epithelium in Turbellaria versus unciliated surface in the others); universality of the cercomer presence in Monogenea, Digenea and Cestoda; evolutionary changes in the morphology and function of the cercomer; homology of the caudal appendices of all parasitic helminths; the subsequent evolution of parasitic platyhelminthes from the ancestor to Monogena, Digenea and Cestoda; proposition to establish a new common taxon — Cercomerophora — for these three groups. In this background the evolution of evolutionary ideas is reviewed, divided into two periods: up to the eighties of the XX century, and up to date. The first period can be characterised by the criticism of some points of the "cercomer theory" and formulation of some new hypotheses; these are those of Fuhrmann, Bychovsky, Llewellyn, Price and Malmberg, which: questioned the homology of the cercarial tail with the caudal appendices of Monogenea and Cestoda; rejected Digenea from the common group; established the common taxon — Cercomeromorpha — comprising only Monogenea and Cestoda; opposed the idea of radial evolution of three main groups of Platyhelmithes (Turbellaria, Digenea and Cercomeromorpha) to the idea of subsequent evolution presented by Janicki. The differences between these last hypotheses are also underlined, arising mainly from the different ideas on the importance of particular features as the evolutionary indicators of affinities between and within the taxons. As to the hypotheses dealing with the evolution of particular groups of parasitic platyhelminths formulated at the same period, the publications of Freeman and Jarecka (Cestoda), Heynemann, Ginetsinskaja, Pearson, Cable, Rhode and Gibson (Trematoda), Bychovsky, Lambert and Malmberg (Monogenea) are referred, with special emphasises on the differences in the ideas presented by their authors. In the second period two points are underlined: a dynamic development of new techniques and methods (including molecular investigations) allowing to gather more and more different data on the parasites, and, as a consequence of this phenomenon, a new approach to the evolutionary problems — the birth of numeric and phylogenetic systematics. In this period "the cercomer theory", as well as supporting the group Cercomeromorphae generally are not accepted (exception: Brooks et al.). In contrast, the new taxon — Neodermata has been created by Ehlers. The importance of this publication for further evolutionary study is stressed. In this background some publications are quoted, especially those, presenting the results of searching for monophyletic groups and joining them in hieratic kladograms (Brooks and al., Rohde at al., Littlewood at al., and the others). It is stated, that in spite of some differences in the kladograms builded by various authors (resulting mainly from the set of features being analysed) the monophyly of big taxons of Neodermata (Trematoda, Monogenea, Cestoda) is fairly well documented. In conclusion several points connected with the "cercomer theory" are emphasized. It is now obvious, that the base of this theory — homology of caudal appendices of Janicki’s Cercomerophora has to be rejected, as well as his concept of subsequent evolution of Platyhelminthes. But the base of his joining of Monogena, Trematoda (in his theory — Digenea) and Cestoda in one group (lack of cilia on the body surface), opposite to the Turbellaria (ciliary ephitelium) is maintained by the creation of Neodermata, undoubtedly documented better and in a different way. Also his idea (after many years of rejecting) on close affinity of Digenea and Cestoda seems to have returned due to the study of Lockyer at al., who write: "Among the Neodermata, the Cercomeromorphae (Cestoda + Monogenea) was not supported, whereas Cestoda + Trematoda was supported".
Źródło:: Wiadomości Parazytologiczne; 2005, 51, 4; 345-358
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:: Wiadomości Parazytologiczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Twarde jądro ewolucjonizmu
Evolutions Hard Core
Autorzy:: Jodkowski, Kazimierz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015782.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2003
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: ewolucja
filozofia nauki
twarde jądro
ewolucjonizm
Darwin
evolution
philosophy of science
hard core
evolutionism
Opis:: The hard core of a theory is understood here as a set of those of its claims, which if contradicted by facts, lead to complete abandoning of the theory (in other cases scientists rather modify theoretical statements of minor importance). I argue therefore that it is an illusion that a set of statements about variation and natural selection is such a hard core of Darwinistic theory. In real practice these statements are compatible with almost all imaginable facts, therefore they have non-empirical character. They are only a camouflage for deeper and more fundamental claims, philosophical ones, and more exactly: materialistic, naturalistic and anti-religious ones. In this paper the I analyze a number of citations proving that leading evolutionists, from Darwin onwards, openly accepted this philosophical beliefs which are the true hard core of evolution.
Źródło:: Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2003, 51, 3; 77-117
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Ewolucja - ...najwznioślejsze zjawisko, jakie możemy pojąć...
Autorzy:: Bobrowski, M.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/857223.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017
Wydawca:: Polskie Towarzystwo Przyrodników im. Kopernika
Tematy:: nauka
historia nauki
ewolucjonizm
ewolucja
homologia
analogia
konwergencja
klasyfikacja
gatunek [definicja]
zmiennosc
mutacje
dobor naturalny
Źródło:: Wszechświat; 2017, 118, 01-03
0043-9592
Pojawia się w:: Wszechświat
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Świętochowskiego pozytywistyczne dumania nad nauką jako motorem postępu cywilizacyjnego
Świętochowski’s Positivist Musings on Science as the Engine of Civilizational Progress
Autorzy:: Szotek, Barbara
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/25805851.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2021-12-30
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:: nauka
funkcje nauki
pozytywizm
scjentyzm
Aleksander Świętochowski
ewolucja pozytywizmu
science
functions of science
positivism
scientism
evolution of positivism
Opis:: Filozofia pozytywistyczna jest skoncentrowana na problemie nauki, a zwłaszcza na jej wynikach poznawczych i zastosowaniu. W świadomości polskich środowisk intelektualnych tej epoki można mówić o zjawisku gloryfikacji nauki. W artykule podjęto próbę przedstawienia tego zjawiska na podstawie idei najbardziej znanego przedstawiciela i ideologa pozytywizmu naukowego – Aleksandra Świętochowskiego. Jego prace najlepiej ilustrują tezę o ewolucji poglądów pozytywistów na naukę i jej społeczną rolę.
Positivist philosophy is focused on the problem of science and especially on its cognitive results and applications. We can say that Polish intellectual circles of this era glorified science. In her article, Barbara Szotek presents this phenomenon through the figure of Aleksander Świętochowski, the most famous representative and ideologist of scientific positivism. His works best illustrate the evolution of positivist views on science and its social role.
Źródło:: Folia Philosophica; 2021, 46; 1-20
1231-0913
2353-9445
Pojawia się w:: Folia Philosophica
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Phillipa E. Johnsona krytyka naturalizmu w naukach przyrodniczych
Phillip E. Johnsons Criticism of Naturalism in Natural Science
Autorzy:: Bylica, Piotr
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015774.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2003
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: naturalizm metafizyczny
naturalizm metodologiczny
ewolucja
ewolucjonizm
kreacjonizm
inteligentny projekt
teizm
nauki przyrodnicze
metaphysical naturalism
methodological naturalism
evolution
evolutionism
creationism
intelligent design
theism
natural science
Opis:: For hundreds of years the theory of creationism according to which people were created purposely by omnipotent and omniscient God caring for his creatures were the primary and fundamental idea of Western civilization. According to the contemporary scientific view all creatures appeared on earth as a result of purposeless process of random mutations and natural selection. Only Nature exists, and if we are going to say the same about God, we deny at the same time that He influences the way the world goes in any way. According to Johnson it is this metaphysical naturalism and not the empirical data, that is the main tenet of Darwinism. Johnson claims that that the incompatibility of the naturalistic and biblical stories is fundamental and there is no possibility of any compromise between them. Naturalistic methodology of science limits the kinds of explanation of the world that can be regarded as acceptable. But according to Johnson the lack of any serious alternative methodology is very disadvantageous for contemporary science, which should search for truth and not just for the best naturalistic explanations of the phenomena.
Źródło:: Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2003, 51, 3; 197-214
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "ewolucja nauki" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język