Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Rejestr zabytków" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 29
Tytuł:
Weryfikacja zabytków
Autorzy:
Charytańska, Maria
Maliszewski, Przemysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536095.pdf
Data publikacji:
1962
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
weryfikacja zabytków
akcja weryfikacji zabytków
klasyfikacji zabytków
zabytki grupy 0
rejestr zabytków
Główna Komisja Weryfikacyjna
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1962, 4; 3-5
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Działalność UNESCO w dziedzinie ochrony dóbr kultury
ACTIVITÉ DE L’UNESCO DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA PROTECTION DES BIENS CULTURELS
Autorzy:
Ptaśnik, Mieczysław
Sieroszewski, Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536507.pdf
Data publikacji:
1969
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Międzynarodowa konwencja o ochronie dóbr kultury w wypadku konfliktu zbrojnego
ochrona zabytków w czasie wojny
Konwencja Haga 1954
UNESCO
Protokół haski
Międzynarodowy Rejestr Dóbr Kultury objętych Ochroną Specjalną
roboty inwestycyjne zagrożeniem dla zabytków
„dobra kultury”
ratowanie zabytków w Nubii
Opis:
L ’UNESCO ex e rc e son a c tiv ité dans le domaine de la p ro te c tio n des b ien s c u ltu re ls sous fo rm e d ’une n o rm a lis a tio n des p ro b lème s ju rid iq u e s su r l ’a rè n e in te r n a tio n a le , de l ’o rg an isa tio n de la s au v e g a rd e im m é d ia te des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s menac és, d ’un e coo rd in a tio n des ré a lis a tio n s s c ie n tifiq u e s e t te ch n iq u e s de la co n s e rv a tio n e t de la re s ta u ra tio n . La „Conventio n in te rn a tio n a le su r la p ro te c tio n d e s b ie n s c u ltu re ls en cas d ’u n co n flit a rm é ” a d ap té e en 1954, c o n s titu e le d o cum en t fo n d am e n ta l ju r id iq u e d ans ce d omaine. Elle a p o u r b u t, en cas d ’u n co n flit armé, d e m e ttr e à l ’a b ri les m o n um e n ts de la c u ltu re de fa ço n q u ’ils ne p u is sen t s e rv ir d ’o b je c tifs d ’o p é ra tio n s de g u e rre . D’a u tr e s o rd o n n an c e s ju rid iq u e s p u b lié e s p a r l ’UlNESOO, non encore comp rises d ans la Conv e n tio n , so n t p u b lié e s sous fo rm e d e re com m an d a tio n s, e lle s c o n c e rn e n t l ’in te rd ic tio n de l ’e x p o rta tio n illic ite des o eu v re s d ’a r t de leu rs pays re sp e c tifs e t la po ssib ilité de le u r échange légal, a in si q u e la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s men a c é s p a r la cons tru c tio n de n o u v e a u x o b je c tifs in d u s trie ls ou p a r la ré u rb a n is a tio n . O u tre l ’a c tiv ité ju rid iq u e , l ’in té rê t q u e l ’UNESCO ■porte au x p ro b lèm e s de la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s se m a n ife s te dans l ’o rg an is a tio n d’une a id e p o u r les p ay s, d o n t les en sembles de m o n um en ts, p a r su ite de cata clysme, ont é té d é tru its . In s titu é sous le p a tro n ag e de l ’UNESCO à Rome, le C e n tre In te rn a tio n a l d ’E tu d e s p o u r la C o n se rv a tio n e t la R e s ta u ra tio n des Biens C u ltu re ls e s t ch a rg é de la d o c um en ta tio n des re ch e rch e s s u r les p ro b lèm e s sc ie n tifiq u e s e t te ch n iq u e s liés à la c o n se rv a tio n et la re c o n s tru c tio n . L e C e n tre v e ille à la co o rd in a tio n e t donne l ’essor a u x tr a v a u x de ce g en re , e t l ’ICOMQS, c réé en 1965, te n d au re n fo rc em e n t de la coopéra tio n e n tre les sp é c ia liste s de d iv e rs p ays. Bien que de n omb reu se s ré a lis a tio n s a ie n t é té accomp lie s dans le d omaine de la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s, il c o n v ie n d ra it, d ans u n e p lu s la rg e m e su re , de d év e lo p p e r la fo rm a tio n de sp é c ia liste s -c o n - s e rv a te u rs e t r e s ta u r a te u r s a in si qu e le u r co lla b o ra tio n in te rn a tio n a le en ce q u i concerne la p ra tiq u e d ire c te de la co n se rv a tio n .
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1969, 4; 249-256
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ogólnopolska Konferencja Konserwatorska
Autorzy:
Krzyżanowski, Lech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537838.pdf
Data publikacji:
1970
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ogólnopolska Konferencja Konserwatorska 1970
ochrona zabytków ruchomych
dyr. Ptaśnik
rejestr zabytków ruchomych
zabezpieczanie dóbr kultury
współpraca z MO
wywóz dzieł sztuki za granicę
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1970, 2; 138-141
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dział Archeologii
Autorzy:
Żółkowski, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535207.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
ODZ
działalność ODZ
historia ODZ
Dział Archeologii
Archeologiczne Zdjęcie Polski (AZP)
Marek Konopka
Rejestr zabytków
program AZP
Informator Archeologiczny
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 1; 42-53
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
PRAWNA OCHRONA ZABYTKÓW NA WYPADEK WOJNY
THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS IN CASE OF WAR
Autorzy:
Zajadło, Jerzy
Zeidler, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535518.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
prawna ochrona zabytków
działania wojenne
konwencja o ochronie dóbr kulturalnych
dziedzictwo kultury
kultura
dobra kultury
Konwencja Haska
Międzynarodowy Rejestr Dóbr Kulturalnych Objętych Ochroną Specjalną
ochrona specjalna
Opis:
The protection of cultural property at the time of an armed conflict comprises an extremely essential problem. International law foresees detailed guidelines concerning this issue in its Convention on the protection of cultural property in the case of an armed conflict, the Executive rules to this convention and the Protocol on the protection of cultural property in case of an armed conflict, signed at The Hague on 14 May 1954. These documents list the instruments and legal institutions protecting historical monuments during this particularly dangerous time. From the practical viewpoint, particular importance is attached primarily to a detailed definition of the object of protection. The instruments of protection include the specially noteworthy special protection, the International Register of Cultural Property under Special Protection, as well as the storage and transport of cultural property. Apart from the above mentioned detailed rules, which have not as yet been accepted by all countries, cultural property is protected according to assorted general principles. International law indubitably exerts direct impact on the contents of domestic law. Nonetheless, importance should be attached not only to law, but also to suitable social policies which ought to focus universal awareness on the necessity of preserving material cultural heritage for successive generations.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2003, 1-2; 116-121
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
NIERUCHOMOŚCI ZABYTKOWE W ROZUMIENIU USTAWOWYM
HISTORICAL REAL ESTATE IN THE LIGHT OF LAW
Autorzy:
Sławomirska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536345.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
nieruchomości zabytkowe
ochrona a opieka
przedmiot ochrony i opieki
otoczenie zabytku
organizacja organów ochrony zabytków
rejestr zabytków
właściciel nieruchomości zabytkowej
posiadacz nieruchomości zabytkowej
obrót nieruchomościami zabytkowymi
nabycie nieruchomości zabytkowej
przejęcie nieruchomości zabytkowej
Opis:
In the wake of a lengthy discussion, on 23 July 2003 the Polish Sejm (Parliament) passed a statute based on a government project. Dealing with the protection and custody of monuments, it replaced the statute of 15 February 1962 on the protection of cultural property, becoming the first legal act to interpret the protection of historical monuments in Poland in a complex manner, and to comprise a foundation for pertinent legal regulations. The statute of 1962 was not adapted to the contemporary legal turnover, and contained numerous indefinite concepts; it also lacked certain fundamental definitions, such as that of historical real estate. The legislator distinguished duties encumbering public administration organs and the owners of historical monuments by employing two distinct concepts : “protection” and “custody”, which have been accurately defined. In comparison with the previous statute, the new legal act identified the object of protection and custody by dividing all historical monuments into immobile, portable, and archaeological. Furthermore, the legislator had expanded the object of protection by including non-material property, thus deciding that protection may encompass also the geographic, historical or traditional names of a building, a square, a street, or a settlement unit. The statute of 2003 rendered more precise principles concerning the inclusion and elimination of real estate in a register of historical monuments; it also contains a legal definition of the historical monument, including the immobile monument, the first such distinctness to appear in Polish legislation. In contrast to the previous statute, the new act has expanded the range of subjects which could be obligated to conduct conservation and are conceived as an objective element, essential in a sales contract, exchange, or lease of real estate listed in the register and constituting property of the State Treasury or a territorial self-government unit.The owners of historical real estate or real estate possessing the features of a historical monument have received new privileges, including the right to compensation for eventual losses incurred as a result of research involving the objects, based on principles defined in the civil code. The duties of the possessors of historical real estate, which stem from the contents of statute regulations about the protection and custody of monuments, basically do not differ from those which had been formulated upon the basis of the regulations of the previous statute. Greater sanctions have been imposed as regards neglect of the majority of those obligations. The most severe penalty is foreseen in article 108, excerpt 1, according to which all those who have destroyed or damaged a historical monument face imprisonment from three months to five years. On the other hand, article 100 introduces penal liability for the owners of those historical monument which have not been suitably protected against damage, destruction, loss or theft.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2004, 3-4; 200-208
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rejestr zabytków czy lista dóbr kultury architektury współczesnej?
Autorzy:
Włodarczyk, M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/218453.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Konserwatorów Zabytków
Tematy:
rejestr zabytków
lista dóbr kultury
architektura współczesna
register of monuments
list of cultural goods
contemporary architecture
Źródło:
Wiadomości Konserwatorskie; 2006, 19; 86-89
0860-2395
2544-8870
Pojawia się w:
Wiadomości Konserwatorskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„PARKI ZABYTKOWE – OCHRONA I KONSERWACJA” Seminarium, Warszawa, 16- 17 czerwca 2009 r.
”HISTORICAL PARKS – PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION” Seminar, Warsaw, 16-17 June 2009
Autorzy:
Sikora, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535750.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
parki zabytkowe
ochrona
konserwacja
ogrody zabytkowe
stan zachowania ogrodów
rejestr zabytków
WKZ
Fundusz Ochrony Środowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej
Opis:
The organiser of the seminar on ”Historical Parks – Protection and Conservation,” held in Warsaw on 16-17 June 2009, was the National Heritage Board of Poland. The seminar was attended by the staff of the voivodeship offices for the protection of historical monuments and their delegatures dealing with historical vegetation, representatives of science, and employees of the National Heritage Board of Poland. The purpose of the seminar was to discuss numerous essential questions pertaining to the protection and conservation of historical parks and gardens, the state of their preservation, and the ways of their administration and use. The participants also considered problems associated with the creation by the National Board of a new reference list of historical parks and gardens for the National Fund for the Protection of the Natural Environment and Water Management, while a representative of the Fund defined the tasks that this institution can finance. One of the seminar blocks dealt with tree cultivation, and the debates ended with a presentation of examples of historical parks and gardens, which in recent years were subjected to conservation. The next meeting will be held in 2010.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 3; 5-6
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
REJESTR ZABYTKÓW W PRAKTYCE OCHRONY KONSERWATORSKIEJ
THE REGISTER OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS IN THE PRAXIS OF CONSERVATION PROTECTION
Autorzy:
Gawlicki, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535590.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
GENERAL CONSERVATOR
HISTORICAL MONUMENTS' REGISTER
PRAXIS OF CONSERVATION PROTECTION
stan rejestru zabytków
rola rejestru zabytków
rejestr jako narzędzie ochrony
historia rejestru zabytków
klasyfikacja zabytków nieruchomych
Spis zabytków architektury i budownictwa
diagnoza zawartości rejestru zabytków
formy ochrony zabytków
ochrona obszarowa
Opis:
The intention of this article is to assess the state of the register of historical monuments, the role it plays in the domestic system of the protection of the cultural heritage as well as its character and representative nature. Should it be regarded as an important protection instrument, is it shaped in a planned manner, what sort of forms does it assume, and are they an effective element of the protection system? The present-day condition of the register of monuments is the outcome of a more than 90-years long process that essentially affected its shape. The reasons for the current problems tackled by the national system of the protection of monuments should be sought in the history of the formation of this most important tool applied by conservation protection. The Polish register of historical monuments dates back to a decree issued by the Regency Council in 1918. The necessity of differentiating the collection by means of a scientific assessment of its value and the application of a classification of the monuments was noticed soon afterwards. Although work on a complete inventory of monuments, interrupted by the war cataclysm, was never finished, conservation legislation from the interwar period, especially concerning the creation of a register of monuments, should be regarded as a modern and complex treatment of assorted questions relating to protection. The conservation views that assumed shape the 1930s and the conceptions of the creation and valorisation of an inventory of monuments were never developed during the post-war period. The introduction of a classification of immovable monuments was not finalised until 1964 and the preparation and publication of a complete list of the monuments of architecture and construction, divided into five categories. In the face of numerous later negative experiences and critical opinions stemming from daily praxis and, primarily, the destruction of a significant number of monuments from the lower groups, it would be difficult to find any arguments in favour of the categorisation launched at the time. Let us note, however, that it was carried it in a totally different political system and that the assumed objectives were quite dissimilar from the attained effect. In time, the absence of a firm coordination, including administrative, of the activity pursued by the voivodeship conservators of historical monuments upon a central level, i,e. the General Conservator of Historical Monuments, with the exception of the State Service for the Protection of Historical Monuments in 1991-1996, produced a further discernible erosion of uniform principles for classifying monuments for the register, and furthered the differences and divisions within the range of the already existing resources. Meanwhile, the register of historical monuments is one of the statutory forms of protection, and daily praxis confirms that an unregistered object is deprived of all chances for effective conservation protection or for benefitting from financial aid provided by public funds. In this way, the register plays the role of the most important and, as daily activity demonstrates, in many cases the sole instrument for shaping the conservation policy. Within this context special relevance is assumed by its contents, measured not with the number of the registered objects and regional statistics, or even the correctness of administrative documents, but with the contents and representativeness of a collection assessed from the vantage point of the dimension of the cultural heritage of the whole country. The extensive Polish cultural heritage resource protected by law is composed of several collections of immovable, movable and archaeological monuments. In the presence of an almost universal general definition of historical value, formulated in administrative decisions, effective protection is significantly restricted; this factor too hinders a definition of the range and character of the planned conservation undertakings and the financing of the protection of historical monuments. In practical terms, such a state of things gives rise to a number of potential conflicts between owners and conservation offices, and favours the relativism of the assessments of historical values and the principles of conservation activity, rendered dependent upon current pragmatic needs and investment pressure; it also hampers the propagation of knowledge about the actual resources of the protected heritage. Finally, it limits the possibility of winning allies involved in protection ventures. Despite the ostensibly considerable number of monuments listed in the register of immovable monuments, the content of this collection is far from complete. The elementary criteria of historical, scientific or artistic evaluation, determined by a general statutory definition and not modified for decades, are applied in totally arbitrary manner. As a result, numerous valuable monuments with distinctive historical values still remain outside the range of legal protection, while conservation is encompassing a growing number of examples of contemporary architecture. The great differentiation of the register of monuments can be perceived upon the basis of just several select instances. Its range also contains a number of inner divisions whose justification poses a difficult task. Alongside monuments possessing supreme values that do not require any validation, we come across buildings with highly doubtful features, at times giving rise to warranted reservations concerning the presence of even elementary cultural values. The register, a theoretically uniform collection of administrative decisions devoid of divisions into categories, remained unaltered, thus forcing the conservation services to treat equally all the components of this, after all, by no means uniform collection. The possibilities of an actual impact of the voivodeship conservators of monuments upon the contents of the register, in other words, the establishment of areas and objects to be subjected to legal conservation protection, are becoming more limited. It is also impossible to perceive features indicating an actual and well-conceived influence of the voivodeship conservator of monuments upon the ultimate contents of the register. Owing to a profound crisis of spatial planning and the absence of effective instruments shaping the landscape, the register has become the most prominent form of treating the cultural environment. Its representative nature should correspond to the richness and diversity of the Polish heritage. Imperfections and errors weaken the effectiveness of the whole national system of the protection of monuments. Due to the dynamic development of studies dealing with cultural heritage, the progress of scientific theories, and the almost total disappearance of the time barrier, which used to be one of the most important criteria for delineating historical value, the very concept of the object of the conservation protection is becoming increasingly capacious. True, the number of monuments listed in the register is constantly growing, but the needs are so considerable that the attainment of a state that would fully reflect the historical resources is becoming part of a distant future. Meanwhile, the lack of cohesive criteria for assessing values, whose outcome is the non-existence of a hierarchy of the monuments, makes it difficult to establish protection standards. Different ways of solving this problem should be sought in more profound reflections about the current state, function and directions of indispensable legislation changes concerning the register of monuments, with one of the key issues being a precise and, at the same time, modern definition of the object of protection. The principles and role of the register in the Polish system of the protection of monuments must be perceived in a way different from the applied one. The philosophy of transformations has to be based on a determined conviction that we are dealing with resources differentiated as regards their contents. A suitable solution would be to seek an alternative organisation of conservation administration, together with a conception of an intentional sharing of responsibility for the fate of the recorded monuments by the government administration and local self-governments. The favourable effects of the merely outlined but necessary directions of activity will involve the introduction of order into the register, the amassment of numerous scattered entries into a single cohesive register of information about historical resources, and the creation of a collection of the most valuable national heritage monuments. The ensuing outcome will make it possible to conceive of a uniform state policy in reference to monuments representing assorted values within a wide range of research and documentation, to define forms of protection, and to finance conservation undertaking, promotion and effective administration.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 2; 55-82
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dwór szlachecki w Niegowici – historia, problemy konserwatorskie
Manor house in Niegowić – history, restoration problems
Autorzy:
Szlezynger, Piotr S.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536012.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Niegowić
dwór szlachecki
Atlas zabytków architektury
Katalog Zabytków Sztuki
założenie dworskie
rabacja chłopska
polski dwór szlachecki
konkurs na projekt nowego dworu
styl francuskiego baroku
rejestr zabytków województwa małopolskiego
kultura ziemiańska
architektura dworu szlacheckiego
Bogdan Treter
Opis:
Niegowić village in Lesser Poland – existing from Middle Ages, with rich history, belonged to well-known lines: Ligęzas, Niewiarowskis, Lubowieckis, and in 19th, to Boene and Włodkowie. The manor, erected in the 1st half of the 18th century, was rebuilt in mid-19th century. In 1913, a concept was formulated of demolition of the manor and construction of a new, bigger, and more splendid building in its place. In 1913, the then owner of the property Jan Zdzisław Włodek organised and financed the competition for construction of the new manor. The completion – in line with the results of the competition, was interrupted by the outbreak of the World War I. The client returned to the idea 10 years after its ending, and did not take into account the competition results. He ordered the design to Bogdan Treter who has not participated in the competition, an architect, and monuments restorer at the same time. The project was implemented in 1927-28. The manor and property were seized in 1945 by the State Treasury, and a police station, a school, flats, etc. were located at it, which contributed to its devastation. After the purchase, in 2004, of a very devastated building and remnants of the park, the present owner – an architect by profession, undertook design and renovation works, personally supervising them.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2010, 1-4; 45-60
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Modernistyczne wiaty i przystanki kolejowe Warszawskiego Węzła Kolejowego. O konieczności ochrony konserwatorskiej
Modernist railway platform umbrella roofs and train stations of the Warsaw Railway Junction. About the need for protection and conservation
Autorzy:
Skalimowski, Andrzej
Tucholski, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539375.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
modernistyczne wiaty
przystanki kolejowe
Warszawski Węzeł Kolejowy
linia średnicowa
linia kolejowa
wysoki peron
elektryfikacja
ruch podmiejski
peron
peron wyspowy
poczekalnia
konstrukcja żelbetowa
dach dwuskrzydłowy
liternictwo
funkcjonalizm
architektura kolejowa
rozwiązania komunikacyjne
rejestr zabytków
linia otwocka
linia grodziska
Opis:
The subject of the article is the history of some of the interesting interwar period constructions, namely the modernist railway platform umbrella roofs and the train station waiting halls of the Warsaw Railway Junction electrified railway lines. In 1933, an agreement was concluded between the Polish State Railways (PKP) and a consortium of British entrepreneurs on the electrification of the suburban railway lines of the Warsaw Railway Junction (to Otwock, Żyrardów and Mińsk Mazowiecki). The completion of this railway investment, one of the most significant in the interwar period, required the redevelopment of the track systems of the electrified lines and the construction of new platforms, umbrella roofs and stations. The design works related to the electrification and redevelopment of the Warsaw Railway Junction lines were conducted by the Polish State Railways Design and Study Bureau in cooperation with the Polish State Railways Warsaw Railway Junction Electrification Bureau and the Regional Directorate of the State Railways in Warsaw, under the supervision of the Ministry of Communication. At the stage of drawing up the concept of the communication system for the electrified lines, experiences of European railway management boards using electrified lines to handle suburban traffic were used to a large extent. In creating the communication system of the electric urban railway, the Polish State Railways Design and Study Bureau based their work largely on the Berlin Stadtschnellbahn (S-Bahn). The author of the concept of track systems and stations, as well as traffic organisation for the electrified railway lines of the Warsaw Railway Junction was Kazimierz Centnerszwer, Eng., a 1927 graduate of the Faculty of Railway Transport Engineering of the Warsaw University of Technology, an employee of the Polish State Railways Design and Study Bureau. Platforms adapted to the new electric rolling stock were designed at the suburban stations of the electrified lines. They were island, bay and side platforms. At the time, the Polish State Railways Design and Study Bureau created a repeatable design of a station/ platform umbrella roof connected to the waiting hall and the ticket office building or office building. Depending on the local conditions, single-pitched umbrella roofs were also built on island platforms and double-pitched ones in the case of cross-platform interchanges. Unfortunately, in spite of the preliminary research having been conducted, the name of the architect who was the author of the project remains unknown. However, the authorship of Arseniusz Romanowicz, Eng., architect, was ruled out beyond doubt. The modernist platform umbrella roofs and waiting halls constitute an extremely interesting example of Polish modernist railway architecture of the 1930s. At the same time, they are a relic of one of the most prominent investments of the interwar period, namely the construction of the cross-city railway line and the electrification of the Warsaw Railway Junction. Their value is especially high in the context of the destruction of all the railway stations in Warsaw (including the modernist Warszawa Główna main railway station) and a considerable part of Warsaw’s railway architecture and infrastructure during the war.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2010, 1-4; 73-84
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawna ochrona XX-wiecznych układów urbanistycznych na przykładzie Gdyni
Legal protection of 20th-century urban layouts on the example of Gdynia
Autorzy:
Hirsch, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536069.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
układ urbanistyczny
Gdynia
rejestr zabytków
śródmieście Gdyni
nowy port
budowa portu
budynki modernistyczne
architektura modernistyczna
plan zagospodarowania przestrzennego
dotacje
dofinansowanie
elewacja
Szlak Modernizmu Gdyni
zabytki Gdyni
Opis:
In 2007, the urban layout of the city centre of Gdynia, shaped and built in the 1920s and 1930s, was entered into the register of monuments of the Pomeranian Voivodeship. The area concerned covers about 91 hectares, i.e. more than 0.9 square km. The entire area is very densely built-up. There are about 450 different buildings, most of which are five- to six-storey tenement houses. The area includes 24 complexes and buildings entered into the register of monuments, on the basis of separate decisions. It is therefore an area of the greatest concentration of significant architectural works in Gdynia. Including the city centre layout in the register has inspired numerous activities related to this unique – still rather young and very extensive – historic area. The Gdynia Commune has taken up works on creating and implementing local development plans for the entire area. Conservation decisions and arrangements in development plans are prepared in cooperation with planners, monument conservators, residents and users, among others. Such plans include detailed and precise regulations concerning spatial issues, such as the height and type of new developments, as well as the protection of and possible changes to the existing buildings. The plans also contain a division of the preserved houses into groups of different historic value and the scope of protection is dependent on this value. In accordance with international trends, the protection also covers some valuable buildings from the 1960s and 1970s. The regulations of the development plans constitute the local law – they are enacted by the City Council and are accessible to all interested parties. By the end of 2011, around 95% of the historical area will be included in the local development plans. After including the layout of the city centre in the register of monuments, a funding system for conservation works has also been introduced for all the buildings in the area that were built before 1989. Every year, more than 1 million PLN is allocated for this purpose from the City of Gdynia’s budget. The funding may cover 30% to 75% of renovation costs, depending on the building’s historical value. In the last 3 years, owners of about 30 buildings, mainly private tenement houses, have taken advantage of the funding scheme. Public financial support for the works enables better control and provides a broader scope of possibilities of restoring historic solutions or using more complicated technologies. It also creates a good basis for communication and long-term cooperation with monument owners. The inclusion of the city centre of Gdynia in the register of historical monuments has also been a symbolic recognition and an official acknowledgement of the cultural value of this part of the city. Many people have found a new interest in modernism and the history of Gdynia, and the unique architecture of the 1930s has gained more enthusiasts. The City of Gdynia widely implements research and popularising works related to modernist architecture. In the scientific and conservation circles, academic conferences under the theme of “Modernism in Europe – Modernism in Gdynia” have become well-known. They were held in 2007 and 2009, and the next one will take place in September of 2012. Apart from events for specialists, open mass events dedicated to getting to know and visiting the city’s monuments have been taking place since 2010. Each of them has attracted hundreds of people. The tourist Trail of Modernism of Gdynia, where people can buy folders and souvenirs related to modernism, has been functioning for almost a year. Activities related to the protection and conservation of modernist Gdynia have aroused interest throughout the country and have provoked positive comments also among international specialists. In the German newspaper, Der Tagesspiegel, Berlin columnist Thomas Flierl published an article on the history of Gdynia and discovering the city’s value in contemporary times, as well as the protection of the city centre. German monuments conservator, Professor Jörg Haspel, has suggested that Gdynia should apply for inclusion in the Heritage Label list that is being created by the Council of Europe.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2010, 1-4; 263-278
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rejestr zabytków jako narzędzie chrony i wyznacznik kierunków konserwacji zabytków sakralnych
Register of monuments as a tool of protection and a determinant of trends in conservation of sacral monuments
Autorzy:
Rusak, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535602.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
rejestr zabytków
zabytki sakralne
wartość edukacyjna
konserwator diecezjalny
Opis:
The Catholic Church in Poland and the Polish state should undertake joint initiatives for the purpose of proper and effective care of cultural property. An adequate tool for these activities is the register of monuments, which constitutes a primary source of information about the diverse cultural material of past centuries. It is simply an indispensable working tool for diocesan conservators of historic monuments and conservation services. The register is valuable in terms of education, particularly for frequently changing administrators of historic monuments, and helps to control both the state of preservation of these monuments and the proper exhibition of movable works of art, their storage and preservation. It is also useful for preparation of the list of successive activities concerning a given historic monument, determination of the schedule of works, control and acceptance of conservation works. Undertaking these types of activities jointly on the basis of the register of monuments guarantees and ensures the proper care of preservation of cultural heritage. We should also comply more strictly with the obligation to record the history of activities carried out for a given monument in register cards, both those kept in offices of conservation services and near monuments. Cultural value is often more precious than material value. It is, therefore, worth paying close attention to relatively new monuments that bear distinct traits of a work of art. Entering such monuments into the register of monuments can help to preserve them.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2010, 1-4; 211-213
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Inwentaryzacja dzieł sztuki i rzemiosła artystycznego w dawnym klasztorze Cystersów w Krzeszowie
Inventory of works of art and artistic handicraft in the former Cistercian Monastery at Krzeszów
Autorzy:
Sebzda, Beata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536367.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Krzeszów
Lwów
cystersi
benedyktyni
benedyktynki
inwentaryzacja
dzieła sztuki
karty ewidencyjne
rejestr zabytków
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Opis:
The complex of the former Cistercian Abbey at Krzeszów has a long history that dates back to the 13th century. Its heyday were the second half of the 17th and the 18th centuries, when refurbishments and expansions made it an important centre of Baroque, that attracted the then leading Silesian and Czech artists. On 31 May 1946, Benedictine sisters deported from the All Saints’ monastery in Lwów (Lviv) arrived at the abbey with their belongings. They noticed the need to record the works of art collected in the Krzeszów monastery. The inventory has been carried out by the Local Division of the National Heritage Board of Poland (NHBP) in Wrocław, since 2008. In December 2012, the first phase of the operation was concluded. Until then, 1006 items were registered, for which 710 records of movable historical items were established. The records, developed by the Local Division of the NHBP in Wrocław in the years 2008-2012, set the basis for three decisions to include in the register of historical monuments 416 works of art from both the Krzeszów and Lwów collections. Another such decision is currently being prepared. Previous decisions enabled the sisters to gain funds necessary to renovate the Baroque painting of St. Fortunate from the Lwów monastery church, as well as 12 portraits of Lwów prioresses. The developed records were disseminated in the scientific and museum communities, i.a. as an auxiliary material attached to a publication on Roman-Catholic churches and monasteries of the former Ruthenian Voivodeship. Works of art from the abbey were first displayed at the exhibitions “Glory of Krzeszów” („Blask Krzeszowa”) and „Ora et labora” at Kamienna Góra in 2010-2012. The inventory completed until now, covers works of art from the Cistercian and Benedictine collections. The planned second phase of operation will mainly address the items the Benedictine sisters managed to salvage, by bringing them to Krzeszów.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 3-4; 161-164
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 29

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies