Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Institutiones" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
Tytuł:
Wkład Aleksandra Cukrowicza w polski przekład „Instytucji” Gajusa i nie tylko
Aleksander Cukrowicz’s contribution to the Polish translation of Gaius’ “Institutiones” and other works
Autorzy:
Jońca, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/502237.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
Instytucje Justyniana
Instytucje Gajusa
Aleksander Cukrowicz
Franciszek Maciejowski
Fryderyk Zoll
Iustiniani Institutiones
Gai Institutiones
Franciszek Maciejowki
Opis:
In 1850 an Austrian Prosecutor Aleksander Cukrowicz for the first time translated Iustiniani Institutiones into Polish. His version caused Franciszek Maciejowski to write a long review in which he started a discussion about the form and quality of the future Polish legal terminology. A scholar from Warsaw Teodor Dydyński profited a lot from them both, when he was preparing the first Polish translation of the Gai Institutiones.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 49-59
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Teodor Dydyński i legenda Gaiusa
Teodor Dydyński and the legend of Gaius
Autorzy:
Czech-Jezierska, Bożena Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/503591.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
Gaius
Instytucje Gaiusa
Theodor Dydyński
Institutiones by Gaius
Opis:
The author analyses the place of Gaius in the research of Teodor Dydyński – a Polish law historian. Gaius, though not well known, became a famous Roman jurist, recognized as a great authority. His Institutiones was a complete exposition of the elements of Roman law. Dydyński thought that Gaius and his works were significant so he devoted much research to him. Dydyński translated Institutiones from Latin into Polish and published them with his own notes. He regarded Gaius as a great teacher of Roman law, he had much reverence and admiration for him, which was reflected in Dydyński’s writings. Therefore Dydyński should be seen as a scientist who created a kind of legend – the legend of Gaius.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 21-32
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gai Institutiones według Cezarego Kunderewicza
Gaius’ “Institutiones” by Cezary Kunderewicz
Autorzy:
Jakubowski, Ireneusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/956070.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
Instytucje Gaiusa
polskie tłumaczenie
Cezary Kunderewicz
Institutiones by Gaius
Polish translation
Opis:
In his work the author presents the process of creating the first complete Polish translation of Gaius’s Institutiones by Cezary Kunderewicz (in the 19th c. the first two books were translated into Polish by Dydyński). The translation was published by PWN in 1982 (in 2003 another Polish edition was published by Rozwadowski). The author supposes that professor Kunderewicz probably started his translation in the early 1970s. He refers to his own memories as he is now the oldest disciple of Professor Kunderewicz. The author mentions that Kunderewicz was excellently prepared for this difficult work. Several years earlier Kunderewicz translated the treatise on Roman Aqueducts written by Frontinus. The article is clearly based on memories. This is the reason why the author is quoting only one review of Kunderewicz’s translation and why he does no try to evaluate the translation. In the end the author writes also about Kunderewicz’s another translation – Polish edition of Justinian’s Institutes, which was published in 1986.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 41-47
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawo spadkowe w systematyce „Instytucji” Gaiusa
Inheritance law in the systematics of the Gaius “Institutiones”
Autorzy:
Świrgoń-Skok, Renata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32407333.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
Gaius
Instytucje Gaiusa
prawo spadkowe
systematyka
spadki
Institutiones of Gaius
inheritance law
systematics
inheritance
Opis:
The study examines the position of inheritance in the systematics of Institutiones of Gaius and discusses the significance of such approach to inheritance law in the subsequent development of private law. In Institutiones of Gaius issues related to succession account for approximately 1/3 of the entire contents. Presentation of matters connected with inheritance comprises a larger part of the second book (G. 2, 99–289) focusing on various legal aspects of testate succession (G. 2, 100–190) and the related acquisition of material benefits at the expense of the legacy, through endowments (G. 2, 192–289); additionally, the beginning of the third book comprised rules of intestate succession (G. 3, 1–87). While analysing the specific problems associated with succession, Gaius presents them as examples of property rights acquisition under general and specific terms. Similar approach to inheritance in Rome was also adopted in Institutiones of Justinian. It was only the German Pandectists that distinguished succession law as a separate segment of law. However, the nineteenth century European civil codes in their contents and systematics make reference to the three-fold distinction of law (personae – res – actiones) introduced by Gaius in his Institutiones. For instance the Civil Code of Austria (ABGB) did not treat succession law as a separate segment of law but, following the systematics in the Institutes of Gaius, as a part of property law related to acquisition of ownership rights per universitatem. Similar approach was adopted in Napoleonic Code where matters related to succession were contained in Book Three, entitled "Of the Different Modes of Acquiring Property".
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 125-134
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jak „kupowali” Grecy? Kilka uwag do wywodu Gajusza poświęconego umowie kupna-sprzedaży (Gai. 3.141)
How were Greeks “buying”? Remarks to Gaius’ commentary regarding a purchase contract (Gai. 3.141)
Autorzy:
Grochowski, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/503123.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
kupno
Grecja
kontrakt
Gajusz
Institutiones
Instytucje
Homer
Prokulianie
Sabinianie
purchase
Greece
contract
Gaius
Proculians
Sabinians
Opis:
The article discusses the problem what an ancient trade contract was called. Did Greeks perceive it only as a barter exchange or a purchase agreement? Perhaps this difference was insignificant or irrelevant? In order to solve this mystery the author follows the footsteps of Gaius’ way of thinking, dating back to the Roman times. Although Homer cannot be considered a jurist, his texts provided Gaius with valuable input. They enabled the ancient jurist to a make well-grounded point in one of the most renown juridical discussion of ancient times between Sabinians and Proculians. The author analyzed Gaius’ text and searched for the original sense of Homer’s poetry so as to rediscover the true nature of an original trade transaction in ancient Greece.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 33-40
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gaius a działalność naukowa Jana Kantego Rzesińskiego
Gaius and scientific activity of Jan Kanty Rzesiński
Autorzy:
Korporowicz, Łukasz Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/502696.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
Instytucje Gajusa
Jan Kanty Rzesiński
metoda badawcza
systematyczny wykład
Gaius’ Institutiones
Jan Kanty Rzesińsk
scientific method
systematic lecture
Opis:
Jan Kanty Rzesiński was a nineteenth-century Polish scholar from Kraków. He never became a famous Romanist. Nevertheless, his contribution to the development of Polish studies on Gaius and his Commentaries is important. Rzesiński was the very first Polish scholar who presented the discovery of Gaius’ Commentaries to Polish society. In the academic year 1831–1832 Rzesiński lectured on Gaius at the Jagiellonian University. The lectures soon ceased, nevertheless, it was the first academic attempt to talk about Niebuhr’s discovery. In 1838 Rzesiński published a Polish translation of Gans’s Scholien zum Gajus. The translation attracted much interest among Polish legal scholars and was broadly commented on. In the latter part of the century, it became a standard point of reference for the next generation of Romanist, including Teodor Dydyński.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 61-71
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Polemika Euzebiusza z Cezarei z Sossianusem Hieroklesem na temat porównania Apoloniusza z Tiany i Chrystusa jako reprezentantów kultury pogańskiej i chrześcijańskiej
The polemic of Eusebius of Caesarea against Sossianus Hierocles on the subject of the comparison between Apollonius of Tyana and Christ as representatives of the pagan and Christian culture
Autorzy:
Tondera, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/612851.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Sossianus Hierokles
Przyjaciel prawdy
Euzebiusz z Cezarei
Przeciwko Hieroklesowi (Contra Hieroclem)
Laktancjusz
Boże nauki (Divinae Institutiones)
porównanie Apoloniusza z Tiany z Chrystusem
Sossianus Hierocles
The Lover of Truth
Eusebius of Caesarea
Against Hierocles (Contra Hieroclem)
Lactantius
The Divine Institutes (Divinae Institutiones)
comparison between Apollonius of Tyana and Christ
Opis:
In the period of the growing importance of Christianity the pagan culture put forward Apollonius of Tyana as its eminent representative and a rival of Christ. At the beginning of the “great persecution” of the Christians Sossianus Hierocles, a high official in the administration of Diocletian, published his anti-Christian tract called The Lover of Truth, in which he drew a formal comparison between Apollonius and Christ. This way he tried to exalt Apollonius and the authors of the stories about him and the followers of the pagan culture. On the other hand he wanted to humiliate Christ and his apostles and all the Christians. Eusebius of Caesarea, the Christian historian, wrote a treatise in answer, in which he submitted the imagine of Apollonius, used by Hierocles in his anti- Christian propaganda, to a critical examination. His historical and philosophical critique reverses the objections of the adversary and shows some elements of pagan culture, represented by Apollonius, which should pass away.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2015, 64; 491-502
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies