Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "SOVEREIGNTY" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    La souveraineté ou les souverainetés ? Réflexions sur les relations entre souveraineté de l’État et souveraineté de la nation
    State sovereignty versus nation sovereignty
    Autorzy:
    Chęciński, Remigiusz
    Departout, Alexandre
    Mądry, Tymoteusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/962347.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    theory and philosophy of law
    state sovereignty
    nation sovereignty
    Opis:
    The study attempts an analysis of the relationship between the concepts of state and nation sovereignty. The thesis has been proposed that state sovereignty could be regarded as a derivation of nation sovereignty. While attempting to approve of the proposed thesis, the authors describe the relationship between both institutions by referring to their origins. In the light of concepts of sovereignty, the relationship between state and international law is presented from a philosophical perspective. Approving the proposed thesis, the authors conclude that regardless of whether state sovereignty derives from nation sovereignty or not, the two concepts refer to different backgrounds which can be seen both in their origins and contemporary realities.
    Źródło:
    Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2013, 2; 235-245
    2450-0976
    Pojawia się w:
    Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    L’exemple, sous l’Ancien Régime, d’une juridiction française de droit privé non dépourvue de prérogatives administratives
    An Example, in the Old Régime, of a French Jurisdiction with Administrative Prerogatives
    Autorzy:
    Jaulin, Arnaud
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27308753.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
    Tematy:
    France
    justice
    bailliage and seneschalsy
    Présidiaux
    La Rochelle (Aunis)
    French old regime (before 1789)
    monarchy and sovereignty
    politics
    administration
    1685-1790
    offices
    venality
    centralization
    protestantism
    intendant (administrator of province)
    Opis:
    The Présidiaux were created in 1552 in order to speed up trials and diminish the influence of the high judicial courts (Parlements). They were at the core of a complex judicial organization and helped to enforce the Justice of the King. Although the Presidial of La Rochelle appears to be relatively unknown (and even forgotten) nowadays, it was of paramount importance in the judicial and political background of La Rochelle under the Monarchy. It embodied the power of the King. After the 1627 siege, its members were forced to declare themselves Catholics. Not only did the Presidial exercise Justice, it was also a source of Law, especially thanks to its administrative and police powers. For the King, it was a tool of social regulation, dedicated to fighting the Protestants and supervising citizens’ activities. But the Presidial of La Rochelle was also a political and social body, longing for autonomy – it was structured as a provincial parliamentary oligarchy. It was socially powerful and, as such, took precedence over the other jurisdictions and easily competed with rival bodies. Although it had been undermined by the judicial reforms, its Officers attempted to work themselves up the social ladder towards nobility, as is shown by the Presidial’s external signs of wealth and grandeur. In the 18th century, the Presidial of La Rochelle was still a middle jurisdiction, torn between its capacities and its ideals – a jurisdiction whose dilemma was to be neither lower, nor yet supreme.
    Źródło:
    Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2023, 22, 1; 11-40
    1732-9132
    2719-9991
    Pojawia się w:
    Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies