Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Implication" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Stratégies discursives et communicationnelles de persuasion dans les genres journalistiques dopinion: le cas des critiques de cinéma
Autorzy:
Topa-Bryniarska, Dominika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/677033.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Slawistyki PAN
Tematy:
film review
discursive and communicative strategies
implication
presupposition
cultural association
Opis:
Discursive and communicative strategies of persuasion in opinion forming media: the case of film reviewsThis study aims at analysing the discourse as a way of using language for specific purposes. On the basis of a corpus consisting of forty reviews of the French comedy Intouchables (2011) selected from various film magazines and web pages, the author offers a reflection on the nature and functions of the genre “film review”. Thus, different invariant elements of the mentioned genre can be established in the light of discursive and communicative strategies whose persuasive dimension is connected both with the presence of informative and evaluative elements about the film and the situation of the participants. Thanks to the described strategies, activating various kinds of hidden and connotative meaning i.e. implications, presuppositions, cultural associations, the journalist contributes to the co-creation of human perception.
Źródło:
Cognitive Studies; 2015, 15
2392-2397
Pojawia się w:
Cognitive Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Il ne faut pas se laisser tromper par la langue : entre syntaxe et sémantique
Don’t Be Fooled by the Language: Between Syntax and Semantics
Autorzy:
Śmigielska, Beata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31341237.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Semantic grammar
predicate
argument
adjoint
modifier
valence
semantic implication
paraphrase
contradiction
Opis:
In this article, Beata Śmigielska describes the questions used to determine the number and nature of arguments of predicates within the framework of Stanisław Karolak’s semantics-based grammar. Since syntactic structures do not directly reflect the semantic structures of predicates, the distinction between arguments and adjunct elements (modifiers) often becomes problematic. This fact is related to the lack of a single methodology by which this can be done in a simple and unambiguous way, resulting in different results of analyses of the same predicates. To solve this problem, it is necessary clearly to define the theory within which we work, because it is the adopted perspective and its well-defined principles that will decide both the path of thought during the research and its results. In her analyses of the selected predicates, Śmigielska defines the tools that can be used in predicate description such as the semantic decomposition of predicates into simpler elements, supplemented, where necessary, by contradiction tests and paraphrasing.
Źródło:
Neophilologica; 2022, 34; 1-19
0208-5550
2353-088X
Pojawia się w:
Neophilologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Inférences textuelles et constructions à verbes supports
Textual Inferences and Support Verb Constructions
Autorzy:
Banyś, Wiesław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31341221.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Inference
textual inferences
implication
implicative
phrasal implicative
implicative signature
paraphrase
multi-word expressions
support verbs
Opis:
Pour comprendre le langage naturel, les systèmes automatiques doivent avoir la capacité et la possibilité de savoir ce qui est inféré, et si oui, comment cela est inféré, et à partir de quoi dans un texte. Les implications linguistiquement déterminées imposées par un prédicat sur ses arguments propositionnels, apparaissant dans un texte comme des inférences textuelles, sont, avec d'autres éléments, tels que la connaissance du monde, les hypothèses des locuteurs sur l'utilisation de la langue, les stéréotypes situationnels, les implicatures, etc. l'un des éléments nécessaires pour qu'un système soit considéré comme comprenant le langage naturel. Dans cet article, nous nous concentrons sur l'une des parties importantes des inférences textuelles, qui n'a pratiquement pas été étudiée, à savoir les relations entre une catégorie particulière d'inférences textuelles constituée d'implicatifs phrastiques au sens de Karttunen (2012) et une catégorie particulière d'expressions polylexicales constituée de verbes supports. Nous donnons d'abord une brève introduction à l'état actuel de la description des deux catégories générales : les inférences, dont un type particulier d'inférences : les paraphrases (sec. 1), et les expressions polylexicales avec un type particulier de ces constructions : les verbes supports (sec. 2), ce qui nous permet de présenter les relations entre les verbes supports et les paraphrases (sec. 3). Nous passons ensuite à une discussion sur les implicatifs, y compris les implicatifs phrastiques (sec. 4), au sens de Karttunen (2012) et nous présentons une esquisse de la description de certains types de constructions à verbes supports du point de vue de leur pouvoir implicatif (sec. 5). Les analyses du type présenté sont à poursuivre et doivent être étendues à toutes les constructions du type analysé et font en même temps partie d'un projet beaucoup plus général. Elles sont un début d'une implémentation systématique à faire sur les matériaux français et polonais en corrélation avec l'anglais de la combinatoire des valeurs de vérité, "signatures implicatives", des prédicats, qu'ils soient verbaux, adjectivaux ou nominaux.
To understand natural language, automatic systems must have the ability and possibility to know what is inferred, and if so, how it is inferred, and from what in a text. The linguistically determined implications imposed by a predicate on its propositional arguments, appearing in a text as textual inferences, are, with other elements, such as knowledge of the world, speakers’ assumptions about language usage, situational stereotypes, implicatures, etc., one of the necessary elements for a system to be considered as understanding natural language.  In this paper, Wiesław Banyś focuses on an important part of textual inferences, one which has been given hardly any scholarly attention so far, namely the relations between a particular category of textual inferences constituted by phrasal implicatives in the sense of Karttunen (2012) and a particular category of multi-word expressions constituted by support verbs.  Banyś first gives a brief introduction to the current state of the art of the description of the two general categories: inferences, including a particular type of inferences: paraphrases (sec. 1), and multiword expressions with a particular type of these constructions: support verbs (sec. 2), which allows us to present the relations between support verbs and paraphrases (sec. 3). He then moves on to a discussion of implicatives, including phrasal implicatives (sec. 4), and presents a sketch of the description of some types of support verb constructions from the point of view of their implicative power (sec. 5).  The analyses of the type presented are to be continued and need to be extended to all constructions of the type analysed and are at the same time part of a much more general project. They constitute the beginning of a systematic implementation to be done on French and Polish material, in correlation with the English, of the combinatorics of truth values, “implicative signatures”, of predicates, whether verbal, adjectival or nominal.
Źródło:
Neophilologica; 2022, 34; 1-37
0208-5550
2353-088X
Pojawia się w:
Neophilologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Inférences au pays de la prosodie
Inferences in the land of prosody
Autorzy:
Banyś, Wiesław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31341247.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Implication
entailment
presupposition
implicature
prosody
theme
rheme
two-way implicative verbs
one-way implicative verbs
text-to-speech synthesis
Opis:
When it comes to language, it’s not just the grammatical structure and the literal meaning of words that matter. The way a predicate imposes inferences on its propositional arguments is crucial to understanding the true meaning of a message. However, these inferences are influenced by many factors, such as prosody, world knowledge, speakers’ expectations regarding language use, situational stereotypes, and other implicit or contextual elements.In this paper, we examine the inferential status of the verbs referred to by Karttunen as “implicative verbs”. On the one hand, two-way implicative verbs, and on the other, one-way implicative verbs. The latter have been little studied from this perspective. This will lead us to highlight the fundamental role, too often forgotten, of prosody and focus/theme in this type of analysis and in determining the inferential status of predicates. Our analyses show that, once prosody has been considered, the classification of theoretically possible verb inferences accepted until now needs to be modified. We do not have 4 groups of one-way implicative verbs, as has been argued, but 2, namely the groups: [+/+/– // –/–] [affirmed > true or false // denied > false] of the type être capable, pouvoir and [+/+/– // –/+] [affirmed > true or false // denied > true] of the type hésiter à.The remaining two groups, considered as distinct and autonomous one-way implicative verbs with the suggested characteristics: [+ + // – +/–] [affirmed > true // denied > true or false] of the type forcer to and [+ – // – +/–] [affirmed > false // denied > true or false] of the type refuser de, belong to the canonical groups of two-way implicative verbs, respectively: forcer à to the group of verbs of the type réussir à: [+/+ // –/–] [affirmed > true // denied > false] and refuser de to the group of verbs of the type oublier de: [+/– // –/+] affirmed > false // denied > true].Naturally, this classification differentiation, important as it is, only reflects the different behaviour of certain types of predicate, and this is the most important element of these analyses with a view to automating the recognition of predicate inferences.
Źródło:
Neophilologica; 2023, 35; 1-33
0208-5550
2353-088X
Pojawia się w:
Neophilologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies