Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "the history of linguistics" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
The Scientific Discourse of Contemporary Humanities. Towards Postmodern De/Normalization (?)
Autorzy:
Rejter, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/35164624.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Polish scientific discourse
discourse transformations
discourse linguistics
history of the Polish language
humanities
Opis:
This article addresses the latest stage of transformations in Polish scientific discourse, the origins of which are commonly traced back to the 16th century in relation to Polish culture. The paper provides a synthetic and report-like overview, offering several key insights regarding the examined area of communication: 1. Changes in the discourse in contemporary humanities, influenced by the intellectual aura of postmodernism, pertain to certain areas of scientific reflection. 2. Science reflects the transformations in cultural and social nature, thus scientific discourse absorbs the characteristics of the world it describes. 3. Revaluations within scientific discourse serve as a certain signal of its denormalisation, although this process does not encompass the entirety of scientific communication but rather signifies cracks and shifts that emerge in the proposed and normative understanding of discourse. 4. Transformations within scientific discourse should not be regarded as a crisis, but rather as manifestations of certain qualities and general tendencies in culture that may bring new and surprising effects in the future. 5. The transformations of scientific discourse are also influenced by the field in which it operates. The specific nature of humanities sciences, situated in a particular way in relation to other branches of knowledge, should be taken into account. 6. Despite changes in the scope of scientific discourse, many of its characteristics remain relevant. 7. Scientific discourse should not be regarded as monolithic; on the contrary, it is a complex, multidimensional quality dependent on various aspects. 8. The specificity of scientific discourse as one of the areas of communication becomes more graspable when examined from a certain distance. Therefore, a historical perspective on the issue proves fortunate for the proposed conclusions.
Źródło:
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza; 2023, 30, 1; 141-151
1233-8672
2450-4939
Pojawia się w:
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O czym świadczą białoruscy korespondenci Antoniny Obrębskiej-Jabłońskiej?
Autorzy:
Smułkowa, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/624882.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
history of science, Belarusian linguistics, Department of Belarusian Studies at the University of Warsaw, scientific collaboration between Poland and Belarus in the humanities, role of researchers’ correspondence in the history of science
historia nauki, językoznawstwo białoruskie, Katedra Filologii Białoruskiej Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, naukowa współpraca polsko-białoruska w zakresie humanistyki, rola korespondencji uczonych w historii nauki
гісторыя навукі, беларускае мовазнаўства, Кафедра беларускай філалогіі Варшаўскага універсітэта, польска-беларускае супрацоўніцтва ў галіне гуманітарных навук, значэнне ліставання вучоных для гісторыі навукі
Opis:
After analysing the content of previously unpublished letters to Antonina Obrębska-Jabłońska written by her Belarusian correspondents over the years 1955–1990 (AUW Sp 37/76, 79–81), it was possible to add to and correct existing research data in the field of literature and culture, folk culture in particular, but, more importantly, on Belarusian linguistics. Apart from various greeting and congratulations cards, the data were classified in six categories: 1. Organization and functioning of the Department of Belarusian Studies at the University of Warsaw; 2. Academic publication of papers authored by Belarusian researchers in Poland and of Polish researchers’ papers in Belarus as well as joint publications; 3. Reviews and peer reviews of papers and research programmes; 4. Mutual supervision of exchange internships; 5. Book and journal exchange; 6. Miscellaneous. The collection of correspondence presented in the paper is proof of active and sincere collaboration between Antonina Obrębska-Jabłońska, together with the research units she led, and her Belarusian partners, who welcomed both her academic expertise and charismatic personality. This leads to a general conclusion that genuine commitment of particular people can go a long way towards ensuring advancements in research, despite adverse political and organizational circumstances.
Na podstawie analizy niepublikowanych listów korespondentów białoruskich do Antoniny Obrębskiej-Jabłońskiej  napisanych  w latach 1955–1990 (AUW Sp 37/76, 79–81) dokonano uzupełnienia i sprostowania dotychczasowych oficjalnych ustaleń w zakresie badań literatury i kultury (historia nauki), zwłaszcza ludowej,  i przede wszystkim białoruskiego językoznawstwa. Dane pozyskane z listów, z wyłączeniem listów z życzeniami i gratulacyjnych,  podzielono zgodnie z tematyką: 1. Organizacja Katedry Filologii Białoruskiej na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim i jej funkcjonowanie; 2. Wspólne publikacje oraz druk prac badaczy polskich na Białorusi i białoruskich w Polsce; 3. Recenzowanie i wzajemna ocena publikacji drukowanych i programów naukowych; 4. Wzajemna opieka nad stażystami;  5. Wymiana książek i czasopism; 6. Inne. Zaprezentowana korespondencja świadczy o rzetelnej, niepozorowanej współpracy Obrębskiej-Jabłońskiej i kierowanych przez nią jednostek naukowych z partnerami z Białorusi. Kompetencje naukowe i cechy osobowościowe badaczki spotkały się z życzliwym przyjęciem strony białoruskiej. Analiza wzajemnych relacji prowadzi do wniosku, że dzięki autentycznemu zaangażowaniu można osiągnąć wiele w badaniach naukowych, nawet w niezbyt sprzyjających warunkach politycznych i organizacyjnych.
Аналіз зместу лістоў, напісаных беларускімі гуманітарыямі да Антаніны Абрэмбскай-Яблонскай у 1955–1990 гг. (АUWSp 37/76,79–81), даў магчымасць папоўніць, а таксама выправіць некаторыя афіцыйныя дадзеныя, важныя для гісторыі навукі ў галіне літаратуры і народнай культуры, а, перад усім, беларускага і параўнальнага мовазнаўства. Ліставанне, акрамя святочных і віншавальных паштовак, канцэнтруецца вакол наступных тэм: 1. Арганізацыя і дзейнасць Кафедры беларускай філалогіі Варшаўскага ўніверсітэта, 2. Сумесныя навуковыя публікацыі і друкаванне артыкулаў беларускіх даследчыкаў у Польшчы, а польскіх на Беларусі, 3. Узаемнае рэцэнзаванне друкаваных прац і рэкамендацыя навуковых праграм і праектаў. 4. Апякунства над стажорамі абодвух бакоў. 5. Багаты абмен кнігамі. 6. Іншыя. Апісанае ліставанне сведчыць аб добрасумленным супрацоўніцтве А. Абрэмбскай-Яблонскай і навуковых устаноў, якімі даследчыца кіравала, з беларускімі партнёрамі. Яе навуковыя кваліфікацыі і асабістыя рысы характару сустракаліся з добразычлівай і высокай ацэнкай беларускага боку. Можна зрабіць агульную выснову, што ва ўмовах аўтэнтычнага зацікаўлення ўдзельнікаў супрацоўніцтва можна многа дасягнуць у навуцы, нават у неспрыяльных палітычных і арганізацыйных умовах.
Źródło:
Studia Białorutenistyczne; 2019, 13
1898-0457
Pojawia się w:
Studia Białorutenistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies