Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "rancière" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
    Tytuł:
    In Defence of the Political The Crisis of Democracy and the Return of the People from the Perspective of Foucault and Rancière
    Autorzy:
    Błesznowski, Bartłomiej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1929973.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012-10-01
    Wydawca:
    Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne
    Tematy:
    democracy
    Foucault
    people
    politics
    the political
    Rancière
    Opis:
    Taking as his point of departure the London Tottenham riots, a product of a mob lacking political consciousness and postulates, the author strives to identify the fundamental deadlock (aporia) confronting western parliamentary democracy.Nowadays, collective phenomena are analyzed within a moral-economic frameworkwhich reduces the perspective on society to a sumof individuals. This contradiction is responsible for the reductionism which is leading the latest theories of social and political philosophy to the conclusion that we have reached “the end of politics” and are venturing into the “postpolitical era.” According to this author, rather than describing the essence of the problem, these terms are merely skimming the discursive problem. If, as Foucault would have it, discourse is always a specific practice, the aforementioned reductionism can also be approached as a political strategy. Therefore, in order to grasp the “political” as a feature of the situation in which the people are participants, rather than in substantial terms, the author discusses the theory of development of the modern political subject within the framework of Michel Foucault’s liberal “government” paradigm and Jacques Rancière’s theory of democracy as a proper political element. Drawing upon these two thinkers, he sketches the genealogy of contemporary liberal democracy, stigmatized by the increasing rift between the people’s political activity and the managerial class’s apolitical reproduction.
    Źródło:
    Polish Sociological Review; 2012, 179, 3; 331-348
    1231-1413
    2657-4276
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Sociological Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Moral of the Novel: Rorty and Nussbaum on the Ethical Role of Literature
    Autorzy:
    Bednarski, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/985692.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-03-31
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Tematy:
    rorty
    nussbaum
    ethics
    literature
    novel
    rawls
    rancière
    Opis:
    This paper’s aim is to provide a new interpretation of Martha C. Nussbaum’s and Richard Rorty’s views on the ethical role of literature. I pursue this aim in a threefold manner. First of all, I shortly discuss and provide a critique of previous comparisons by other authors. Afterwards, based on the presented critique of other comparisons, I present concise summaries of their respective views. Finally, I propose a double context for interpreting and assessing their views together. The main claim of the paper is the following: despite several differences in their philosophical underpinnings, Nussbaum’s and Rorty’s views on literature can be interpreted together using the context of John Rawls and Jacques Rancière. This interpretation consists of showing how uncovering a shared Rawlsian characteristic of Nussbaum’s and Rorty’s views paves a way for explaining how literature actually does ethical work, using some concepts of Rancière. Such a contextual reading allows for both a more thorough understanding of their respective projects and assessing their shared shortcomings.
    Źródło:
    Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2020, 4, 4; 175-189
    2544-302X
    Pojawia się w:
    Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Egalitarian Democracy between Elitism and Populism
    Autorzy:
    Cerovac, Ivan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/628180.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
    Tematy:
    Ranciere, democratic legitimacy, elitism, populism, epistemic proceduralism, deliberative democracy
    Opis:
    In his influential book Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy Jacques Ranciere builds a substantial critique of liberal regimes present in most Western countries. He finds them defective because: (1) they allow wealth and economic power of groups and individuals to influence public decision-making, making those with economic power an elite group; (2) they allow knowledge and expertise of groups and individuals to influence public decision-making, making those with epistemic power an elite group; (3) they allow and encourage social and economic conditions that make people inappropriate for decision-making on important issues, making those with certain characteristics thus acquired an inferior group. We focus on the Ranciere’s second objection by relying on Estlund’s epistemic proceduralis approach and claim that one does not have to embrace postmodernist idea of reducing reason to relations of power in order to present a substantial critique of our contemporary society. Furthermore, we argue that one does not have to base egalitarian democracy on postmodernist ideas that reject the truth-tracking potential of democratic procedures – egalitarian democracy is perfectly compatible with the idea of truth in politics.
    Źródło:
    Journal of Education Culture and Society; 2014, 5, 2; 31-42
    2081-1640
    Pojawia się w:
    Journal of Education Culture and Society
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Regimes of Identification of Art
    Porządki interpretacyjne sztuki
    Autorzy:
    Czekaj, Rafał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/593761.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
    Tematy:
    porządki interpretacyjne sztuki
    Jacques Rancière
    Fryderyk Schiller
    Skup łez
    regimes of art
    Friedrich Schiller
    Purchase of tears
    Opis:
    W tekście hasłowo przywołuję problem demarkacji sztuki i XX wieczne próby jej definiowania podejmowane na gruncie filozofii analitycznej. Przyjmuję interpretację, że są one wyrazem roz¬poznania zasadniczej niemożliwości wskazania jakichkolwiek własności, którymi w sposób ko-nieczny lub wystarczający powinien charakteryzować się przedmiot o statusie dzieła sztuki. Stąd zaczęto więc pytać nie o to, czym jest dzieło sztuki, ale o kontekst w jakim sztuka się konstytuuje. Jedną propozycji jest koncepcja Jaquesa Rancière’a mówiąca o różnych “porządkach interpre¬tacyjnych sztuki”. W najbardziej ogólny sposób można ją sprowadzić do twierdzenia, że to jakie przedmioty będą rozpoznawalne jako dzieła sztuki jest kwestią dominującego dyskursu. To on decyduje o tym, które działania będą postrzegane jako praktyka artystyczna, a produkty tych działań jako dzieła sztuki. W prezentowanym tekście omówię rozpoznane przez Rancière’a po¬rządki interpretacyjne i podejmę próbę skonfrontowania ich z dzisiejszą praktyką artystyczną.
    The problem of the demarcation of art and the efforts of analytical philosophy to work out the definition of art were the key issues in aesthetics through most of the 20th century. Tho¬se issues emerged from recognizing the impossibility of indicating any sufficient or substantial attributes to being art. Instead of working out the definition the theorists eventually focused on the context which can by essential for recognize some actions or objects as an art. In my paper I cite one of the contemporary efforts of solution of that issues. I am referring to Jaques Rancière’s “regimes of art,” which can be consider as frames for not only interpretation of art but mostly as condition for recognition of art as visible. In other words: the dominant discourse decides what is recognized as art or what is visible as art. I will briefly present his “regimes of art” and I will try to confront them with one of the examples of contemporary socially engaged art.
    Źródło:
    Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts; 2019, 21; 59-67
    1641-9278
    Pojawia się w:
    Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    British Sociology, the Bourgeois Media-Sociology Hybrid and the Problem of Social Class
    Autorzy:
    Blackshaw, Tony
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/462288.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Opolski
    Tematy:
    class
    social inequality
    sociology
    bourgeois media
    distribution of the sensible (partage du sensible)
    ideology
    legislators
    Bourdieu
    Rancière
    Opis:
    This article advances the scandalous argument that we live in a post-social class modernity, and that the perpetual reinvention of class as the key concept for understanding social inequality is untenable. Class is not only a zombie concept but also an ideology that reflects a set of normative attitudes, beliefs and values that pervade sociology. Its starting point is that, sociology, once adept at imagining new ways to interpret the world, has become a subject field that wants to claim a radical space for itself while simultaneously relying on outworn theoretical frameworks and denying the work radicals do. The article begins by suggesting that the problem of class has its roots in the deep structure of sociology. Taking its cue from Jacques Rancière’s classic study The Philosopher and His Poor it develops the argument that if class was once upon a time the fundamental issue in the study of social inequality, today sociology urgently needs an alternative cognitive framework for thinking outside this paradigm which it uses to open up a critical space for its own intellectual claims rather than reflecting society in the round. After arguing that we a living at the ‘end of Class’, the critique explores the limits of the work of Pierre Bourdieu, who has replaced Marx and Weber as sociology’s key theoretician of class. It is argued that in Bourdieu’s sociology, contentment is permanently closed to ‘the working class’ that thumps about like a dinosaur that survived extinction, anachronistic proof of the power and privilege of the theorist and his sociology rather than proof of the usefulness of his ideas. The key to understanding the limits of this interpretation, it is argued, is that it assumes a ‘working class’ that has little or no agency. It is subsequently argued that sociology and the bourgeois media are coextensive. The specific function of the bourgeois media-sociology hybrid is to provide ideological legitimation of class inequality and of integrating individuals into sociology’s interpretation of social and cultural life. Focusing on the work of two self-identified ‘working class’ journalists who have successfully made the transition into the bourgeoisie and who seek solid validation of their new found status in the bourgeois media it is demonstrated that social inequality is neither expressed nor examined in a convincing way. Framing ‘working class’ worlds even more ‘working class’ than ‘working class’, the bourgeois media, at best, lay them bare for clichéd interpretation. Here the article argues vis-à-vis Quentin Skinner that words are not so much mere ‘reflections’ of the world, but ‘engines’ which actively play a role in moulding the worlds to which they refer. Drawing on Rancière’s idea of the partage du sensible (distribution of the sensible) it is argued thereafter that here thinking ends up as the very thought of inequality because by posing social inequality as the primary fact that needs to be explained the bourgeois media-sociology hybrid ends up explaining its necessity. The final part of the article offers some suggestions about how to rethink social inequality after class, and it concludes with the observation that the predicament facing sociology derives not just from its theoretical limits but also from its failure to give social inequality human meaning and the people who suffer it the proper respect by acknowledging their own interpretations of their own lives.
    Źródło:
    Studia Krytyczne/ Critical Studies; 2016, 3; 13-43
    2450-9078
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Krytyczne/ Critical Studies
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Aesthetics and the political turn in art
    Estetyka wobec zwrotu politycznego w sztuce
    Autorzy:
    Czekaj, Rafał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/593933.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
    Tematy:
    Jacques Rancière
    Zoon Politikon
    Friedrich Schiller
    Immanuel Kant
    Berlin Biennale
    Artur Żmijewski
    socially engaged art
    Fryderyk Schiller
    sztuka zaangażowana społecznie
    Opis:
    It was observed as early as the mid-twentieth century that aesthetics as a philosophical theory of art differs from its objects. The products of contemporary artistic practice go beyond the horizon of traditional aesthetics. Artists are involved increasingly often and on a wide scale in the actions aimed at transforming and constructing the common space. In the face of such activities as took place, for example, as part of the 7th Berlin Biennale for Contemporary Art in 2012, traditional aesthetics seems to be helpless. That is why, if art is to continue to be the focus of aesthetic investigations, it must, as it were, redefine itself. Jacques Rancière is one of the authors who have outlined the new horizon of aesthetics. In my paper I will briefly present his conception. It provides some theoretical tools which I will use for the description and interpretation of some selected examples of contemporary socially engaged artistic practices. I will show that his distinction of the „aesthetic regime“ of the interpretation of art reveals the competence that combines all artistic practices, past and present, into one concept of art: art as politics. The foundations for setting such perspective were already provided by Schiller and Kant – the classics of modern philosophical aesthetics.
    Już w początkach XX wieku dostrzeżono, że przedmiot badań estetyki – jako dziedziny filozoficznej – stał się nieoczywisty. Także i dzisiaj produkty praktyk artystyczny wykraczają daleko poza horyzont tradycyjnej estetyki, a artyści coraz częściej angażują się w konstruowanie i kształtowanie przestrzeni społecznej. W obliczu praktyk artystycznych, jakich nagromadzeniem stało się na przykład 7. Berlińskie Biennale sztuki współczesnej, tradycyjna estetyka wydaje się bezradna. Jeśli nadal chce utrzymać w swoim polu badawczym przedmioty sztuki, musi niejako na nowo zdefiniować swoje granice. Jednym ze współczesnych teoretyków, którzy kreślą nowy horyzont tego, co estetyczne, jest Jaques Rancière. W tekście przedstawiam jego koncepcję “estetyki jako polityki” i wydobywam z niej narzędzia teoretyczne, które posłużą mi do opisu i interpretacji wybranych przykładów praktyk artystycznych zaangażowanych społecznie. Pokażę, że Rancierowski “reżim estetyczny” pozwala umieścić całość dorobku sztuki w jednym pojęciu: sztuki jako polityki. A uzasadnienie takiego ujęcia znajdziemy także u takich klasyków nowożytnej estetyki jak Schiller i Kant.
    Źródło:
    Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts; 2015, 17; 83-92
    1641-9278
    Pojawia się w:
    Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    POLISH FUTURISM AND ITS PROJECT OF EMANCIPATION
    Polski futuryzm i jego projekt emancypacyjny
    Autorzy:
    Pfeifer, Kasper
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1036025.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-11-26
    Wydawca:
    Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
    Tematy:
    futurism
    utopian studies
    aesthetic and politics
    polish literature
    revolutions
    jacques
    rancière
    bruno jasieński
    futuryzm
    studia nad utopią
    estetyka i polityka
    literatura polska
    rewolucje
    Opis:
    The aim of this article is to present the forward-looking project of Polish Futurism, seen as a radical critical movement. It focuses on the concept of the “futurization of life”, one of the main ideas postulated by the Polish Futurists, also referred to as the quasiaccelerationist modernization of the social reality of interwar Poland, which served as a response to the semi-peripheral status of the country. Taking recourse to Jacques Rancière and Immanuel Wallerstein, the article discusses the postulates of the Polish Futurists and the ways in which they wanted to achieve the following goals: to intervene in language in a revolutionary manner, to break free from the bourgeois culture, to democratize art, to emancipate women, to extend the notion of a nation, and to abolish the division of the world into the core and its periphery.
    Źródło:
    Prace Polonistyczne; 2020, 75; 87-106
    0079-4791
    Pojawia się w:
    Prace Polonistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies