Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "early modernism" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    The Cads of Young Poland according to Julian Przyboś: echoes of the early modernist apocalyptic tone
    Młodopolskie chamuły według Juliana Przybosia – o apokaliptycznej tonacji przyjętej z wczesnego modernizmu
    Autorzy:
    Misiak, Iwona
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087995.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Polish literature of the early 20th century
    Young Poland
    Modernism
    literary dialogue
    Quarrel between the Moderns and the Ancients
    spoof
    manifesto
    plasticity
    Julian Przyboś (1901–1970)
    Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)
    Catherine Malabou (b. 1959)
    pamfletowy manifest
    apokalipsa
    plastyczność
    awangarda i ariegarda
    Opis:
    This article presents a new reading of the spoof poetic manifesto ‘Chamuły poezji’ [‘The Cads of Poetry’] written by Julian Przyboś in 1926. His use of the apocalyptic tones of early modernist poetry to lampoon a trio of acclaimed poets associated with Young Poland (especially Jan Kasprowicz) suggests a complex nature of Przyboś’s rejection and dependence on that movement. In general, the influence of Young Poland, though quite conspicuous in is juvenilia and early publications, tends to fade away. ‘Chamuły’ is a pejorative nonce word which alludes to the Biblical Ham as well as a Polish word for a cad or ill-bred bumpkin. This article adds to it another layer of meaning, based on Derrida’s interpretation of the Apocalypse, with allusions to sexual and genital imagery. And more generally, it reframes the whole Przyboś’s poetic work (not just his early poems) using Catherine Malabou’s concept of plasticity. Seen in a broader historical perspective, Przyboś’s struggles to break with Young Poland are not unlike the predicament of many eighteenth-century writers caught in the dispute between the Moderns and the Ancients, satirized in Swift’s Battle of the Books. The overall conclusion of this study is that at all times the avant-garde and the arrière-garde remain in a continuous dialogue and the innovators never lose sight of those left behind. Poetry is, after all, metamorphic and cannot be contained within within the bounds of manifestoes and artistic programmes.
    Źródło:
    Ruch Literacki; 2020, 1; 48-68
    0035-9602
    Pojawia się w:
    Ruch Literacki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Jabłonowski after 1918: Continuation/Breakaway
    Władysław Jabłonowski po roku 1918 – kontynuacja/zerwanie
    Autorzy:
    Urbanowski, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087248.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Polish literary criticism in the early 20th century
    Modernism and Young Poland
    impressionistic criticism
    Polish nationalism
    revival of classical taste
    Polish Occidentalism
    Władysław Jabłonowski (1865–1956)
    Władysław Jabłonowski
    modernistyczna krytyka literacka
    impresjonistyczny model lektury
    międzywojenna krytyka literacka
    nacjonalizm
    faszyzm
    okcydentalizm
    katastrofizm
    klasycyzm
    literatura nowoczesna
    Opis:
    After 1918 it was by no means uncommon for literary critics of renown to give up their familiar pursuits and move on to new fields. This article traces and brings to light the largely forgotten literary criticism of Władysław Jabłonowski, better known as an influential politician and journalist. He had made his name as a prolific literary critic with the rising tide of the Young Poland movement, but, as life resumed in an independent Poland, he scaled down his activity in that field quite considerably. Moreover, he abandoned the ‘empathic’ model of Modernist criticism for a steady commitment to classical aesthetics, especially as it manifested itself in French literature, of which he was always a great admirer. In this new phase he remained invariably loyal to nationalist ideology and a mythologized idea of ‘the West’.
    Źródło:
    Ruch Literacki; 2021, 1; 41-59
    0035-9602
    Pojawia się w:
    Ruch Literacki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Yeży Yankowski vs. Jankowski: a breakup with young Poland and with himself (act I)
    Yeży Yankowski kontra Jerzy Jankowski. Akt zerwania z Młodą Polską i samym sobą (pierwsza odsłona)
    Autorzy:
    Okulicz-Kozaryn, Radosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087964.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Polish literature of the early 20th century
    Young Poland
    Modernism
    Futurism
    Jerzy Jankowski (1887–1941)
    Zenon Przesmycki (1861–1944)
    Tadeusz Miciński (1873– 1918)
    Leon Choromański (1873–1952)
    Zygmunt Kisielewski (1882–1942)
    Filippo Tommaso Marinetti (1876–1944)
    Jerzy Jankowski
    futuryzm
    modernizm
    Młoda Polska
    krytyka młodopolska
    Tadeusz Miciński
    Leon Choromański
    Zygmunt Kisielewski
    witalizm
    urbanizm
    Opis:
    This article deals with the first phase of Jerzy Jankowski’s severing ties with the Young Poland movement and his access to the futurist avant-garde. His conversion to the new poetic worldview, which he pioneered in Poland, was reflected in his articles and poems published in Widnokrąg [Horizon], a magazine he founded in 1913 to replace Tydzień [The Week], of which he was the main publisher. The rebranding came on top of disagreements between the magazine’s contributors. The divergent views focused on the assessment of Tadeusz Miciński’s novel Xiądz Faust. In May 1913, in his former magazine, Jankowski heaped praises on it. However, the following year, when it came up for debate in the Widnokrąg between Miciński’s aficionado Zygmunt Kisielewski and the skeptically-minded Leon Choromański, Jankowski sought to distance himself from both the emotionalism and the intellectualism of his colleagues. By that time he was absolutely adamant that the antinomies of Young Poland’s high art were a trap. Now that the worship of art striving for timeless perfection would have to give way to an unpretentious concern for ‘fugitive art’, the time was ripe for working out a new aesthetic, centered on the thrilling ‘beauty of big cities’, cabaret, cinema, and modern machines. Jankowski broke with his erstwhile mentor Ferdynand Ruszczyc and Zenon Przesmycki-Miriam, to follow the incomparably more exciting Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. Meanwhile, Choromański made one last attempt to bring the young man back on track by writing an article, in which he argued that Futurism was crude, and shallow, a throwback rather than a modern breakthrough. However, his warnings made no dint in Jankowski’s faith in futurism. For him its triumph was a matter of historical necessity. And, he had already thrown in his lot with the new movement by publishing his first futurist poems, ‘Spłon lotnika’ [‘Pilot in flames’] and ‘Maggi’.
    Źródło:
    Ruch Literacki; 2020, 1; 33-46
    0035-9602
    Pojawia się w:
    Ruch Literacki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies