Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "destabilisation risk" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    The Risk of Destabilising Pension Fund Bodies, and the Procedural Position of Candidates for Members of the Governing Bodies of Supervised Entities
    Autorzy:
    Jankiewicz, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2189116.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Fundacja Instytut Nauki o Polityce
    Tematy:
    financial supervision
    conflict of interest
    destabilisation risk
    PFSA
    unconstitutionality of amendments
    transparency of proceedings
    mitigation of risks
    Opis:
    The author analyses the position of a candidate for member of a governing body in an entity supervised by the Polish Financial Supervisory Authority (PFSA) and discusses the related problems. The aim of the article is to identify the area of an increased risk level in financial institutions in the process of appointing members of the governing bodies of supervised entities. The PFSA assumes that the selection of the candidates for members of the governing bodies in Pension Fund Companies may be carried out by either the management board or the supervisory board. This leaves a large space for the activity of the boards. The management board can gain influence over the course of these proceedings. When the selection is conducted by the supervisory board, the risk is significantly reduced. The second aspect addressed therein concerns the position of a candidate for member of the governing bodies in supervised entities in legal proceedings. In jurisprudence it has been established that a candidate is to be treated as a party to the proceedings. The administrative courts found that inadmissibility of a candidate as a party would violate Article 77(2) of the Constitution by closing the judicial path for the candidate and preventing them from asserting protection of their rights and freedoms. Despite this, the Act of 21 July 2006 on Financial Market Supervision (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 2059, as amended) was amended in April 2021 to the effect that a candidate was not a party to the proceedings thus enhancing the risks, including conflicts of interest. The effect of these provisions has been instrumentalisation of those to whom a great deal of responsibility is entrusted – if the approval of the PFSA is obtained. The PFSA's decisions may affect the career path of candidates. In certain cases, they may even 'block' it, leaving little room for defence and narrowing the possibilities of adjusting the competence level to the positions held. There is also no timeframe for the PFSA’s decision. The risks associated with such situation have been described in the article.
    Źródło:
    Polish Journal of Political Science; 2022, 8, 2; 18-36
    2391-3991
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Journal of Political Science
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Evaluation of the Macroeconomic Stability of Central and Eastern European Countries with a View Toward their Membership in the European Union. Multidimensional Risk Analysis
    Autorzy:
    Pera, Jacek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633147.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    stability
    risk
    imbalance
    destabilisation
    divergence
    Opis:
    The economies of European countries have been undergoing constant turbulence for several years. This is the consequence of a range of factors, in particular: the 2007 crisis; violations of the convergence criteria and fiscal discipline; problems with the liquidity of international financial markets; depreciation of the euro currency; increasing unemployment in European Union Member States; the slow increase in productivity in the majority of EU economies; growing indebtedness of public finance sectors; problems with retirement schemes – in particular with correlation between their effectiveness and unemployment and low rate of natural increase. Thus, the author posits that it is important to analyse the key aspects related to these economic parameters which may affect this process in a significant way and decide the risk of its occurrence. This is the assumed aim of this work. The work shows the results of the author’s own study, carried out with the use of different methods, such as the macroeconomic stabilisation pentagon, the Scoreboard, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The variety of test methods employed results on one hand from the problem's complexity, and on the other from a profound analysis of all dependencies and risks resulting from this complexity. The conducted study shows that there is a significant correlation between the Scoreboard parameter imbalances and the intensity of crisis phenomena in case of violations of the acceptable thresholds in terms of current account balance, net international investment position, export market shares, nominal unit labour costs, real house prices, private sector debt, government debt, and the unemployment rate. The imbalances of these eight indicators may form an adverse macroeconomic environment favouring the occurrence of intense crisis phenomena, which means that they should be subject to special monitoring. The shapes of the macroeconomic stabilisation pentagon for CEEC economies in 2014 shows that none of the analysed countries is characterised by total filling of the pentagon. This means that the economic situation in these countries is not stable and requires constant monitoring. The figures related to all analysed indicators, apart from GDP, are characterised by a flattened shape, which is characteristic for such a situation.
    Źródło:
    Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe; 2016, 19, 3; 69-92
    1508-2008
    2082-6737
    Pojawia się w:
    Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The risk of destabilisation in the European Unions integration. PIIGGS group assessment in the model of macroeconomic stabilisation pentagon
    Ryzyko destabilizacji w integracji unii europejskiej. Ocena grupy PIIGGS w modelu pięciokąta stabilizacji makroekonomicznej
    Autorzy:
    Pera, Jacek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/587336.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    Destabilisation
    Integration
    Macroeconomic stabilisation
    Model
    Risk
    Destabilizacja
    Integracja
    Ryzyko
    Stabilizacja makroekonomiczna
    Opis:
    Decentralised fiscal policy conducted until the outbreak of 2008 crisis (but also after that period) and the lack of an efficient system of monitoring the financial situation of eurozone Member States caused the problems of peripheral countries (PIIGGS group), i.e. Portugal, Italy, Greece, Spain, Ireland and Great Britain, to be emphasised and aggravated. Although the EU has been using various methods and measures to prevent macroeconomic stabilisation, the risk of instability is still big. It is justified and necessary to expand these measures with new, extended indicators, which would measure the states' macroeconomic situation in a more detailed manner and thus, limit the possibility of this balance to be affected. One of the suggested additional measurement methods is the macroeconomic stabilisation pentagon. This study will analyse and assess PIIGGS countries (as being potentially in danger of destabilisation) on the basis of the model of macroeconomic stabilisation pentagon and indicate the potential risk for the European Union's further integration.
    Efektem zdecentralizowanej polityki fiskalnej, prowadzonej do czasu wybuchu kryzysu z 2008 roku (ale również i po tym okresie) oraz braku skutecznego systemu monitorowania sytuacji finansowej państw członkowskich w krajach strefy euro, było wyeksponowanie i nasilenie trudności państw peryferyjnych (grupa PIIGGS): Portugalii, Włoch, Grecji, Hiszpanii, Irlandii i Wielkiej Brytanii. Pomimo zastosowania przez UE różnych metod i środków zapobiegających stabilizacji makroekonomicznej – ryzyko niestabilności wciąż jest duże. Zasadnym i koniecznym wręcz jest rozszerzenie tych środków o nowe, rozbudowane wskaźniki, mierzące w sposób bardziej szczegółowy sytuację makroekonomiczną krajów, a tym samym ograniczających pole naruszeń tej równowagi. Jedną z proponowanych, dodatkowych metod pomiaru jest metoda pięciokąta stabilizacji makroekonomicznej. W wyniku analizy w opracowaniu oceniono państwa z grupy PIIGGS (jako potencjalnie zagrożone destabilizacją), na podstawie modelu pięciokąta stabilizacji makroekonomicznej oraz wskazano potencjalne ryzyko dla dalszej integracji Unii Europejskiej.
    Źródło:
    Studia Ekonomiczne; 2016, 271; 138-150
    2083-8611
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Ekonomiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies