Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "animal language" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
Tytuł:
Looking for structure: Is the two-word stage of langugae development in apes and human children the same of different?
Autorzy:
Patkowski, Mark
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/780637.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
language development
animal language
cross-species comparison
semantic relations
word order
Opis:
Previously published corpora of two-word utterances by three chimpanzees and three human children were compared to determine whether, as has been claimed, apes possess the same basic syntactic and semantic capacities as 2-year old children. Some similarities were observed in the type of semantic relations expressed by the two groups; however, marked contrasts were also uncovered. With respect to the major syntactic mechanism displayed in two-word child language, namely word order, statistically significant differences were found in all three comparisons that were tested. These results indicate that chimpanzees do not exhibit the linguistic capacities of 2-year old children.
Źródło:
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching; 2014, 4, 3; 507-528
2083-5205
2084-1965
Pojawia się w:
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Review article: Charles Taylors critical philosophy of language
Autorzy:
Stalmaszczyk, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2051108.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Charles Taylor
The Language Animal
critical philosophy of language
designative theory
constitutive theory
Opis:
The article presents Charles Taylor’s critical philosophy of language and it reviews his recent book on the human linguistic capacity. Critical philosophy of language is understood here as a broad (philosophical, social and political) perspective on language characterized by multifaceted concern with the linguistic and cognitive mechanisms involved in language use. The paper discusses Taylor’s interest in language and philosophy of language, and focuses on his seminal distinction between the ‘designative-instrumental’ and ‘constitutive-expressive’ theories of language. In the former theory language is understood within the confines of Cartesian representational epistemology, whereas in the latter language constitutes meaning and shapes human experience (one of the features important for defining the critical approach to philosophy of language).
Źródło:
Linguistica Silesiana; 2019, 40; 409-417
0208-4228
Pojawia się w:
Linguistica Silesiana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
“Are we not Men?”: Reading the Human-Animal Interface in Science Fiction through John Berger’s “Why Look at Animals?”
Autorzy:
Smolnikov, Andrei
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1912438.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
science fiction
animal turn
language
ontology
Opis:
The so-called animal turn in literature has fostered the evolution of animal studies, a discipline aimed at interrogating the ontological, ethical, and metaphysical implications of animal depictions. Animal studies deals with representation and agency in literature, and its insights have fundamental implications for understanding the conception and progression of human-animal interactions. Considering questions raised by animal studies in the context of literary depictions of animals in science fiction, this article threads John Berger’s characterization of the present as a time of radical marginalization of animals in his essay “Why Look at Animals?” through two highly influential science fiction texts: H. G. Wells’s The Island of Doctor Moreau and Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. Applying Berger’s reasoning to these two novels raises issues of personhood, criteria for ontological demarcation, and the dynamics of power, providing an opportunity to clarify, modify, and refute a number of his finer claims. This process of refinement allows us to track conceptions of human-animal interactions through the literary landscape and explore their extrapolations into various speculative contexts, including the frontiers of science and post-apocalyptic worlds.
Źródło:
New Horizons in English Studies; 2020, 5; 157-171
2543-8980
Pojawia się w:
New Horizons in English Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
New Lexical and Phraseological Faunal Units in the Language Observatory of the University of Warsaw from a Cross-Linguistic Polish-English Perspective
Autorzy:
Szerszunowicz, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1879938.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-09-22
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
animal terms
contrastive analysis
cross-linguistic equivalents
figurative language
phraseology
Opis:
The aim of the present paper is to discuss the new Polish faunal lexical and phraseological units from a cross-linguistic perspective. The research corpus is compiled on the basis of Obserwatorium Językowe Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego (the Language Observatory of the University of Warsaw) – an online source containing the items which are in use and which have not been included in dictionaries so far. The English equivalents allocated for these units are analysed and divided intofour groups: quasi-absolute, partial, parallel and zero counterparts.
Źródło:
Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne; 2020, 19; 91-106
2084-3011
Pojawia się w:
Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
New Lexical and Phraseological Faunal Units in the Language Observatory of the University of Warsaw from a Cross-Linguistic Polish-English Perspective
Autorzy:
Szerszunowicz, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1890617.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-09-22
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
animal terms
contrastive analysis
cross-linguistic equivalents
figurative language
phraseology
Opis:
The aim of the present paper is to discuss the new Polish faunal lexical and phraseological units from a cross-linguistic perspective. The research corpus is compiled on the basis of Obserwatorium Językowe Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego (the Language Observatory of the University of Warsaw) – an online source containing the items which are in use and which have not been included in dictionaries so far. The English equivalents allocated for these units are analysed and divided into four groups: quasi-absolute, partial, parallel and zero counterparts.
Źródło:
Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne; 2021, 20; 91-106
2084-3011
Pojawia się w:
Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Relativism in the Language of Law (on the Example of Legal Texts Concerning the Constitutionally Unregulated Human-Animal Relationship)
Relatywizm w języku prawa (na przykładzie tekstów prawnych dotyczących konstytucyjnie nieuregulowanej relacji człowiek - zwierzę)
Autorzy:
Oronowicz-Kida, Ewa
Mika, Justyna
Myszka, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1928015.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
relativism
language of law
statute
law
act
constitution
human-animal relationship
relatywizm
język prawa
ustawa
konstytucja
relacja człowiek – zwierzę
Opis:
The article covers the issue of anthropocentrically conditioned relativism characterizing the attitude of humans toward animals. The relativity of good and evil in this respect was viewed through the prism of selected legal texts. Linguistic examples were indicated (various parts of speech, expressions, substitutions, collocations) attesting to cases of normative consent to the violation of animal welfare, resulting, as it may be assumed, from the subject approach to them and subordinating human welfare to them. The need to give the issue of animal protection a constitutional rank was also expressed.
W artykule omówione zostało zagadnienie uwarunkowanego antropocentrycznie relatywizmu charakteryzującego stosunek ludzi do zwierząt. Na względność dobra i zła w tym zakresie spojrzano przez pryzmat wybranych tekstów prawnych. Wskazano na językowe egzemplifikacje (różne części mowy, wyrażenia, substytucje, kolokacje) poświadczające przypadki normatywnego przyzwolenia na naruszanie dobrostanu zwierząt, wynikającego, jak można sądzić, z przedmiotowego podejścia do nich i podporządkowania postępowania względem nich dobru ludzi. Wyrażono także potrzebę nadania kwestii ochrony zwierząt rangi konstytucyjnej.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2021, 6 (64); 407-418
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Disputatio on the Distinction between the Human Person and Other Animals: the Human Person as Gardener
Autorzy:
Savino, Damien Marie
Wagner, Daniel C.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138115.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-09-26
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
human uniqueness
gardening
person
personalism
philosophical anthropology
philosophical biology
thomas Aquinas
Aristotle
human intelligence
animal intelligence
cognition
epistemology
metaphysics
philosophy of language
evolutionary biology
ecology
logic
ethics
disputatio
Opis:
While the catholic intellectual tradition upholds the uniqueness of humans, much contemporary scientific research has come to the opposing conclusion that humans are not significantly different from other animals. to engage in robust dialogue around the question of human uniqueness, we utilize Aquinas’s model of disputatio to focus on an attribute of human beings that is unexplored in the literature – namely, the human capacity to garden – and address five scientific and philosophical objections to our position that the capacity to garden makes humans distinct. engaging with various branches of science, we demonstrate that human capacities and modes of gardening are not only incrementally different, but also fundamentally different in kind, from those of nonhuman creatures. Philosophically, we utilize the power-object model of division and Aristotle’s categorization of knowledge to express the difference in kind between human beings and other animals. these responses allow us to set aside each major objection.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2022, 11, 3; 471-530
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies