Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Supreme Court" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 53
Tytuł:
Metody interpretacji ustaw w praktyce Sądu Najwyższego na Węgrzech
Autorzy:
Toth, Zoltan J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/687390.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
statutory law, Supreme Court
wykładnia prawa, Sąd Najwyższy
Opis:
The present paper deals with the methods of statutory interpretation, focusing, primarily, on the Hungarian practice thereof. It uses the term ’interpretation’ in the sense of Jerzy Wróblewski’s well-known category as an activity that one does if the meaning of a given text is vague or dubious and he/she wishes to reveal the appropriate meaning of the text in question. Firstly, the paper reviews the techniques by use of which judges (or anybody else) can decide what a given word, phrase, sentence or text means, or what it does not, establishing a classification that attempts to cover the pool of the possible methods of statutory interpretation. Secondly, the article analyses and introduces, in a legal sociological way, what kind of methods and in what proportion are applied by high courts in Hungary, and, mainly, by the Supreme Court of Hungary in the judicial practice.
Artykuł naukowy traktuje o wykładni prawa dla Sądu Najwyższego na Węgrzech. Autor dokonuje analizy oraz interpretacji  charakterystycznej dla Sądu Najwyższego na Węgrzech oraz poszczególnych procesów i zjawisk związanych z wykładnią prawa. Artykuł jest również filozoficznym rozważaniem nad tym, czym jest prawo i czym jest wykładnia prawa, w ujęciu realistycznym i pragmatycznym.
Źródło:
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M – Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis; 2016, 1, 1-2
2450-6354
Pojawia się w:
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M – Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The U.S. Supreme Court and the Cold War: Fear V. Security. The Times of Vinson Court and Warren Court
Autorzy:
Laidler, Pawel
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2028489.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
fear v. security
U.S. Supreme Court
cold war
Opis:
The main field of my study concerns the role of the Supreme Court in American legal and political system. My research frequently focuses on the case law, especially on some of the most important cases in the Court’s history, and on their influence on the whole of political, economic, and social relations of the country. I personally believe that American federal judges – among whom the most influential are the Justices of the Supreme Court – have gained more power than the Framers of the Constitution agreed to give them. Such situation occurred mostly because of the creation of the power of judicial review by the Supreme Court, which allowed the judiciary to determine the contitutionality of acts created by the other branches of government.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2007, 36; 159-173
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Israel – In Search of Constitutional Common Sense
Autorzy:
Sadowski, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40461704.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Israel
the principle of reasonableness
supreme court
high court of justice
Opis:
The Israeli radical judicial overhaul program, aiming to seriously weaken the judiciary, has led the country to the brink of chaos and violence, with hundreds of thousands of demonstrators in the streets, society tearing itself apart and numerous sectors of society, such as medical service or reservists of IDF, announcing a suspension of their service to a nation they fear will no longer be a democracy. Despite the strong social protest, Knesset – representing an extremely right-wing coalition – adopted on the July 24, 2023 the amendment to Basic Law: The Judiciary to bar the judiciary from striking down decisions of the government and its ministers on the grounds of such decisions being unreasonable. The measure known as the reasonableness clause (standard) is rooted in English and American case law and it is frequently used in Israel to control administrative activity. It allows the courts to strike down governmental and administrative decisions and their regulations seen as having not taken into account all the relevant considerations of a particular issue, or not given the correct weight to those considerations – even if they do not violate any particular law or administrative rulings. The current right-wing coalition, led by Benjamin Netanyahu, argues that the clause as it stands gives too much power to the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court sitting as a High Court of Justice, to interfere with the actions of the executive, and that the powers of judges, who are not elected by the public, remain out of control in this procedure. Opponents of the government’s amendment argue that this standard is crucial in helping to protect civil rights that are not fully defined in Israeli law. Eliminating the standard of reasonableness will be another step towards giving the government unlimited power. It violates not only the separation of powers principle and the rule of law but it also harms the right to good administration. Irrespective of the Supreme Court’s decision on the constitutionality of the government’s amendment, the struggle to maintain the democratic principles of the Israeli system will continue.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2023, 55, 4; 243-260
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Assesment of the International Court of Justice judgment to 2012 and the Supreme Court judgment in Poland to 2010
Autorzy:
Gruszczyński, Krzysztof Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1832521.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego i Indywidualnego Apeiron w Krakowie
Tematy:
Court of Justice
supreme Court
immunity
de iure imperii
de iure gestionis
Opis:
The article concernes the issue of foreign courts’ jurisdiction and their relations with the particular states’ legal systems in the context of sovereign state’s immunity and its temporary limited interpretation. several cases are analyzed, from midwar period, through the Cold War era, up to the end of the first decade od XXi century, including assesement of not only international Court of Justice and Polish supreme Court but also sereral examples of assesement of European and American courts.
Źródło:
Security Dimensions; 2015, 14(14); 54-66
2353-7000
Pojawia się w:
Security Dimensions
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
U.S. Supreme Court in the civil rights era: Deliberative Democracy and its educative institutional role, 1950s–1970s
Autorzy:
Figueroa, Carlos
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/652827.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
educative court
deliberative democracy
judicial review
U.S. Supreme Court
ethical responsibility
Opis:
This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s lesser-known educative role as an egalitarian institution within a broader deliberative democratic process. Scholars have argued that the Court’s long asserted power of judicial review, especially in the equal protection and civil rights context, has been an over-reach of the judicial branch’s constitutional authority and responsibilities. Normative and empirical critiques have been centered on the aims of judicial review, and the challenges it poses in American political life. A core issue surrounding these critiques is that Justices are appointed not elected, and thus undermine the principle of majority rule in the U.S. constitutional democratic order. Although these critiques are legitimate in terms of claims about unelected Supreme Court Justices’ seemingly discretionary powers over elected legislative bodies, and the uncertain policy implications of judicial pronouncements on the broader society, there is, nevertheless, a positive application of judicial review as a tool Justices use as part of their educative role overcoming the so-called “counter-majoritarian difficulty.” Through a close reading of oral arguments in Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) and San Antonio vs. Rodriguez (1973)-two landmark cases invoking the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the federal Constitution-the article shows how appointed Justices adjudicate individual cases on appeal and attempt to educate (through an argumentative, reason-based and question-centered process) citizenlitigants and their legal representatives about the importance of equality, fairness and ethical responsibility even prior to rendering final decisions on policy controversies that have broader national social, political and economic implications.
Źródło:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym; 2018, 21, 4; 59-88
1899-2226
2353-4869
Pojawia się w:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Organization of Courts in the Polish People’s Republic
Autorzy:
Resich, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/45426973.pdf
Data publikacji:
1964-12-31
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Polish People’s Republic
organization of courts
The Supreme Court
Źródło:
Droit Polonais Contemporain; 1964, 3; 9-16
0070-7325
Pojawia się w:
Droit Polonais Contemporain
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Correlation of Normative Resolutions with Normative Legal Acts
Autorzy:
Zhaksylykuly, Karatayev Turdaly
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2032286.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
normative resolutions
criminal law
Opis:
In the given article the issues concerning normative resolutions which are given by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan according to criminal cases are pointed out. The structure and mechanism of normative resolutions are discussed. Correlation of normative legal acts are investigated. Normative legal acts consist of legal norms, they regulate and manage social relations. It means that, as the normative legal acts play an important role on the judicial sphere, they create, change the norms and even can stop their activity. Here we may include constitutional laws, codes, laws, all charters of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan which have legal power. Normative resolutions are equal for all, according to definite cases it is used not for one person, but for several people. Also, normative resolutions are used in accordance with legal acts, and until the used norm loses its power it can have definite power.
Źródło:
Reality of Politics; 2013, 4; 126-137
2082-3959
Pojawia się w:
Reality of Politics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Marriage, Liberty and Constitution: a Corpusassisted Study of Value-Laden Words in Legal Argumentation
Autorzy:
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1026734.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-03-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
legal argumentation
judicial discourse
evaluative language
US Supreme Court
same-sex marriage
Opis:
This paper investigates the interplay between judicial argumentation and evaluative or emotive language identified in two US Supreme Court landmark cases on the right of same-sex couples to marry. The analysis of both majority and dissenting opinions leads to two main observations. First, marriage and liberty are indeed emotive words and they represent two major sites of contention between the concurring and dissenting judges. Second, there are important differences within the argumentative strategies employed by the judges. While (re)defining the concepts remains the major argumentative goal for both types of opinion, the majority opinions tacitly integrate the redefined concept of marriage into their argumentation. It is the dissenting opinions that explicitly raise the issue of (re)definition in order to defend and retain the original sense of marriage.
Źródło:
Research in Language; 2019, 17, 1; 71-91
1731-7533
Pojawia się w:
Research in Language
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Judgement of the Supreme Court, dated 17 February 2016 (Ref. no. WA 16/15)
Autorzy:
Kleczkowska, Agata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706774.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
blind bayonets
international criminal law
Penal Code
Polish Supreme Court
unlawful order
Opis:
In its Judgement of 17 February 2016, the Polish Supreme Court adjudicated the case of Polish soldiers accused of crimes committed in the village of Nangar Khel in Afghanistan in 2007. Ultimately, the Supreme Court found that Polish soldiers were guilty of, inter alia, breach of Article 318 of the Polish Penal Code, which stipulates that a soldier commits a crime even when executing an order if he is aware of this crime. However, the part of the judgement devoted to the problem of unlawful orders is very limited and almost completely lacks references to international law. The Supreme Court could have referred to a number of international legal acts, starting from the beginning of 20th century and up to the more recent regulations, including those in the Rome Statute. Moreover, the Supreme Court did not use international case law. As a result, the argumentation of the Supreme Court should be assessed as limited and unconvincing.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2016, 36; 267-276
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Constitutional conflicts in the European Union: Court packing in Poland versus the United States.
Autorzy:
Sweeney, Richard J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943183.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-11-14
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Polska
constitutional law
constitutional court
constitutional rights
Supreme Court Compliance
judiciary
court packing
European Union
United States
Opis:
Court packing greatly threatens democracy. This paper examines, compares and draws conclusions from two attempts: The PiS government is near to packing Polish courts; President Roosevelt tried but failed to pack the U.S. Supreme Court in 1937. In most democracies a head of government with a legislative majority and strong party control can pack courts, giving complete control. The United States escaped; Roosevelt lacked complete party control. Poland is unlucky; PiS is strongly controlled. Peaceful domestic protest is necessary, but Poland’s hope is from EU-level institutional pressure, supported by major democracies, to reverse packing and prevent further seizure of power.
Źródło:
Economics and Business Review; 2018, 4(18), 4; 3-29
2392-1641
Pojawia się w:
Economics and Business Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
United States Supreme Court Approach to First Amendment Freedom of Religion in Response to the COVID Pandemic
Autorzy:
Swenson, Delaine Russell
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1597406.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-08-21
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
US Constitution, Freedom of Religion, COVID 19, Free Exercise Clause, US Supreme Court
Opis:
The 2020-21 Covid 19 Pandemic has raised many legal challenges as governments world-wide have struggled to deal with the public health and safety challenges of Covid. At the center of many of these decisions is the need to balance public health protections against other rights that have been infringed by legislation related to Covid Pandemic restrictions. One of the most important rights that have been implicated by Covid restrictions in the United States has been in the area of restrictions on religious worship which implicates the right to freedom of religion as enshrined in the United States Constitution. During the time of the Pandemic the United States Supreme Court, as the final arbiter of the United States Constitution has had to work to balance the interests of the government in protecting public health and safety with the right to freedom of religion. The Supreme Court’s approach to these cases reflects the difficulties inherent in balancing two such important interests in difficult circumstances and also represents the reality of the shifting majority in the Court as a result of new Justices appointed under the administration of Donald Trump. The Court has transitioned from a majority that opposed restrictions on governmental action during COVID to a majority that is more willing to stop governmental action that is deemed to be in violation of the Free Exercise of Religion Clause of the First Amendment.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2021, 46, 3; 237-261
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 19 November 2019 – selected comments
Autorzy:
Baczyńska, Bogna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1596026.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
preliminary procedure
Court of Justice
principle of unity
Supreme Court
National Council of the Judiciary
Opis:
The changes introduced into the judiciary system within the last few years have actually led to the infringement of the principle of a tripartite division of power – Poland is inclining towards authoritarianism. The Constitutional Tribunal affected by formal changes and (partially) filled with persons who cannot guarantee independence – has ceased to perform their constitutional functions and ensure the constitutionality of laws long time ago. The “reforms” have already had impact on the judiciary authority, i.e. the courts. The above-described situation alerted the international opinion, thus, apart from the individual countries, many international organisations have also voiced their concerns. From among of the aforesaid organisations, the European Union (EU) is responsible for the key task. The changes in the structure of the Supreme Court and National Council of the Judiciary have become the subject of the preliminary procedure addressed to the Court of Justice of the European Union. In response thereto, the European Court of Justice located in Luxembourg stated that the cases concerning judges may not be tried by the court which is not independent or unbiased. The preliminary procedure is based on conciliation, which guarantees uniform application of Community law in all Member States. Therefore, it is always the national court that is responsible for the final resolution of the case. In the analysed case, it is the Supreme Court.
Źródło:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis; 2019, 28, 4; 23-43
2083-4373
2545-3181
Pojawia się w:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Judicial search for a legal definition of religion
Sądowe poszukiwania prawniczej definicji religii
Autorzy:
Kříž, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/23050633.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-12-20
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
religia
wolność religii
Sąd Najwyższy USA
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
sprzeciw sumienia
definicja prawna
Sąd Najwyższy Kanady
Trybunał Sprawiedliwości UE
religion
US Supreme Court
freedom of religion
European Court of Human Rights
conscientious objection
legal definition
Supreme Court of Canada
ECtHR
High Court of Australia
UK Supreme Court
Court of Justice of the EU
Opis:
A prerequisite for the proper application of the law is a certain definition of the terms used in the law. A variable definition of a concept undermines the requirement of legal certainty, and an overly narrow or broad definition of a concept (compared with the general idea of its content) may lead to doubts about the fairness of legal regulation. Although the legal system uses the term “religion” relatively frequently, it does not generally define it explicitly. In most cases, this does not cause problems because there is no reasonable doubt as to whether we are dealing with a religious element. In hard cases, however, there is no choice but to decide where to draw the line between religion and other types of beliefs. The alternative is to stop distinguishing between them, thus depriving the religious element of its special legal status. The social sciences distinguish four basic approaches to the definition of a religious phenomenon. The substantive definition seeks to capture the content that a particular belief must satisfy in order to be labelled religious. The essentialist approach emphasises the experience of the believer. The functionalist definition notes the function that religion serves in the life of the believer. The analogical approach does not seek to capture the essence of religion but rather notes its manifestations and what different religions have in common. This article offers examples of the application of these theoretical approaches in jurisprudential practice. It also highlights the fact that courts work flexibly with the concept of religion and often give it a different content depending on the context under consideration.
Przesłanką właściwej aplikacji prawa jest pewne zdefiniowanie używanych w nim pojęć. Zmienność takich definicji pozostaje w sprzeczności z wymogiem pewności prawa, a nazbyt wąskie lub nazbyt szerokie zdefiniowanie danego pojęcia (w zestawieniu z powszechnym postrzeganiem jego treści) może prowadzić do wątpliwości co do słuszności regulacji prawnej. Chociaż pojęcie religii używane jest w systemach prawnych relatywnie często, nie jest w nich ono zwykle definiowane expressis verbis. W większości przypadków nie powoduje to problemów, ponieważ nie ma racjonalnych wątpliwości co do tego, czy w danym przypadku mamy do czynienia z elementem religijnym. Jednak w trudniejszych sprawach istnieje konieczność podjęcia decyzji dotyczącej przeprowadzenia granicy pomiędzy religią i innymi typami przekonań. Alternatywą jest zaprzestanie dokonywania pomiędzy nimi rozróżnień, a więc pozbawienie specjalnego statusu tego, co religijne. W naukach społecznych wyróżnia się cztery zasadnicze podejścia do definiowania zjawiska religijnego. Definicje substancjalne starają się uchwycić, jakie treści mają być uwzględnione w danym zespole przekonań, aby mógł on zostać uznany za religijny. W podejściu esencjalistycznym podkreśla się znaczenie doświadczenia religijnego osób wierzących. Definicje funkcjonalne koncentrują się na funkcji, jaką religia pełni w życiu wyznawców. Natomiast podejście oparte na analogii nie dąży do uchwycenia istoty religii, lecz raczej skupia się na jej przejawach oraz na  cechach wspólnych różnych religii. Niniejszy artykuł omawia przykłady aplikacji tych teoretycznych ujęć w praktyce orzeczniczej. Autor dochodzi do wniosku, że sądy podchodzą do pojęcia religii w sposób elastyczny i nierzadko przypisują mu różną treść, w zależności od kontekstu analizowanej sprawy.
Źródło:
Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego; 2023, 26; 11-31
2081-8882
2544-3003
Pojawia się w:
Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Independent State Legislature Theory – the Underlying Ideas and the Threats
Autorzy:
Króliczek, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/45858991.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-06-15
Wydawca:
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
Supreme Court of the United States
constitutionality review
gerrymandering
independent state legislature theory
federalism
Opis:
This article discusses the independent state legislature theory, which has been the subject of interest of an ever-growing group of American constitutionalists in recent years. This theory deals primarily with state legislatures’ power – derived directly from the US Constitution – to regulate federal elections. According to its underlying premises, this fact results in the absence of any tools to control the law enacted in this area as to its compliance with a given state’s constitution. Neither the electoral administration nor the state courts can interfere with these laws. They would therefore be subject to federal courts’ review only. However, the Supreme Court, in applying the political questions doctrine, has excluded many election law matters – other than those concerning funding – from its jurisdiction. As a result, such an important part of state law – one concerning fundamental political rights – would remain without any supervision inherent in modern democracies.
Źródło:
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem; 2023, 15, 2; 294-309
2080-1084
2450-7938
Pojawia się w:
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Insolvency Forum Shopping – What Can Be Learned from the ECJ and US Supreme Court Case Law on International Company Law and Insolvency Procedures?
Autorzy:
MyszkeNowakowska, Mirosława
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706843.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Centre of Main Interest
company law
European Court of Justice
forum shopping
insolvency
US Supreme Court
Opis:
The recast of the European Insolvency Regulation, which has been applicable from 26 June 2017, implements a philosophy of Euro universalism, according to which insolvency proceedings opened in a Member State where the debtor has its centre of main interests (COMI) should have a universal scope and encompass all the debtor’s assets situated throughout the EU. The wording of the Recast Regulation is intended to comply with the ECJ case law concerning COMI, such as Interedil, Eurofood, Bank Handlowy or Mediasucre judgments. Nevertheless, it is now questioned whether the Recast Regulation strengthens or rather weakens the COMI/registered office rebuttable presumption and opens the gate for insolvency forum shopping. As far as international company law is concerned, the issue of transfer of seat as well as forum shopping has been widely discussed. So far the ECJ has issued a series of judgments in which it has explained the European freedom of establishment and the crossborder activities of companies in the internal market. Similarly, the US Supreme Court has issued several significant decisions, such as CTP Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America, Edgar v. MITE Corp., and International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, in which the limits of acceptable forum shopping are better delineated. Based on the aforementioned, it may be concluded that European harmonization measures facilitating crossborder mobility should additionally assist in achieving predictability and efficiency, as well as the economic viability and security of the operations under consideration. This contribution analyses and expounds on the lessons that can be learned from both the ECJ case law as well as US Supreme Court’s decisions on international company law, including an examination of their effect on insolvency forum shopping. There is no doubt that, if successful, harmonized legislation on these matters would be a great asset for the internal market.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2017, 37; 203-222
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 53

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies